Daverid wrote...
I think what makes me laugh is simply the way any Pro-ender defends the endings...
They can't just put point to point and say: What was great about it and have it make sense... No, they basically have to start with, "Well ALTHOUGH I know it's riddled with plot holes...."
Then talk about the very few good things in the ending.
Then the next general statement is... Well EC will come out and all those holes will be filled and it'll be dandy...
Problem is folks, we shouldnt have had to wait an extra 3+ months just for their to not be 20 plot holes in our ending. And if the ending was actually legitimately defendable, Pro-Enders wouldn't even have to bring up the "we know there's plot holes" ... They would just be able to outright explain without a quiver of doubt and make so much sense that even anti Enders might think ... Hmmm maybe they're right?
But nope. They can't even come close.
You're forgetting one (quite important) thing. There is a difference between being ok with an ending and constantly bashing it. You're basically saying I can only like something if I like all of it. That's nonsense.
I don't like the stupid side missions, the poor implementation of Multiplayer, the auto-dialogue, kai leng as the villain and several other things in ME3, yet in general I'm quite happy with the game. Same with the ending. In general I'm fine with it.
Also, what's with all that Pro-Ender talk? Why make a battle out of it? Just accept that different people have different taste and priorities and everything will be fine^^