Why Isn't Sten freaked out by mages?
#1
Posté 19 juin 2012 - 03:55
In Da 2 the Arvaarad went bonkers when he you told him you were a mage why does Sten accept it so calmly?
#2
Guest_Faerunner_*
Posté 19 juin 2012 - 08:50
Guest_Faerunner_*
#3
Posté 19 juin 2012 - 08:59
The blight is easily as dangerous as a mage, but he's no more scared of it then he is of the Mage-Warden - he just acknowledges that it presents a threat.
#4
Posté 20 juin 2012 - 01:52
#5
Posté 20 juin 2012 - 03:29
#6
Posté 20 juin 2012 - 04:39
#7
Posté 20 juin 2012 - 05:43
#8
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 02:10
Arthur Cousland wrote...
The Qunari belief that a mage can corrupt someone by their breath alone was more of a DA2 thing. The Kossith in DA2 also have horns and don't believe in wearing shirts...
Yes, I think that some of the changes were good.
In seriousness, I think things that were more shaded in DAO were more black and white in DA2. Sten obviously was wary of mages and felt that their treatment was correct (their tongues cut out and kept in pens), and his reasoning was actually sound, though repugnant. There just was a depth to that dialog about mages that was missing in DA2, probably because they didn't deeply explore the themes.
I liked the more subtle approach.
#9
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 02:54
ejoslin wrote…
In seriousness, I think things that were more shaded in DAO were more black and white in DA2. Sten obviously was wary of mages and felt that their treatment was correct (their tongues cut out and kept in pens), and his reasoning was actually sound, though repugnant. There just was a depth to that dialog about mages that was missing in DA2, probably because they didn't deeply explore the themes.
I liked the more subtle approach.
I completely agree. I thought the mage/templar conflict in DA2 had a lot of potential, but the way that it was handled lacked subtlety, to the point where most of the mages and templars felt like caricatures instead of real people, and it was one of my major frustrations with the game. If there had been more moments in DA2 that showed the same depth of character as Sten's conversation with the Warden about mages, I would probably have enjoyed it more.
What I love about that conversation with Sten is that he's expressing an extreme and repugnant point of view, yet he also comes across as well-spoken and reasonable, listening carefully to the Warden and explaining his disagreement in an articulate and carefully considered way. It's that kind of multi-dimensionality that makes the characters in Origins so life-like and fascinating.
Modifié par jillabender, 21 juin 2012 - 02:55 .
#10
Guest_Nizaris1_*
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 03:32
Guest_Nizaris1_*
In DA2, there is something about "worthy to follow" thing..."Basavarad", something like that...if i understand the Ketojan at all
Modifié par Nizaris1, 21 juin 2012 - 03:33 .
#11
Posté 22 juin 2012 - 01:08
Nizaris1 wrote…
In DA2, there is something about "worthy to follow" thing..."Basavarad", something like that...if i understand the Ketojan at all
The word you're thinking of is "basalit-an" – that's what both Ketojan and the Arishok call Hawke, if I remember correctly.
Edit: My mistake – both "basvaraad" and "basalit-an" mean "worthy of following" in the Qunari tongue, but "basalit-an" always refers to a non-Qunari.
Modifié par jillabender, 22 juin 2012 - 01:15 .





Retour en haut







