Aller au contenu

Photo

Extended Cut is Finished, via Mike Gamble


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
316 réponses à ce sujet

#151
Baa Baa

Baa Baa
  • Members
  • 4 209 messages
Image IPB

#152
OH-UP-THIS!

OH-UP-THIS!
  • Members
  • 2 399 messages

Makrys wrote...

I'm not cuddling with anybody on here...




AWW!!Image IPB

Just a little hug?Image IPB

#153
TMA LIVE

TMA LIVE
  • Members
  • 7 015 messages

wantedman dan wrote...

TMA LIVE wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

TMA LIVE wrote...

To be serious, you'll probably get an ending where a nearby ship rescues them depending on your choices, or readiness.


WIth proceeding court martial for desertion for Alliance members, hopefully.


Not if Hackett gives the order in Extended scenes.


Then Hackett is an idiot for ordering the building something--and subsequently ordering the firing of--something of which he has no idea the proceeding consequences.

To guarantee that it doesn't kill everyone he has to say, "NAO RUN AWAE LAWL," seriously?

There is no "good" consequence from this.


You think it's stupid to not have your entire fleet stick around when a weapon of mass destruction goes off that could do some serious damage to the galaxy if it's energy is not focused by a missing piece they haven't gotten a chance to study, is a bad idea?

Sounds like you're going to be unhappy no matter if the reasons are logical.

#154
Devil Mingy

Devil Mingy
  • Members
  • 431 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

I agree with you fully on that.

Someone told me yesterday that Patrick Weekes had to fight to get the squad goodbyes. :sick:


That is what the unverified Penny Arcade post said. It depends on whether or not you actually believe it was him.

#155
MegaSovereign

MegaSovereign
  • Members
  • 10 794 messages
I had high hopes for the EC, but honestly the fact that they haven't shot down any of the conspiracy theories (like IT) makes me feel like they're going to try to leave the game incredibly vague/open-ended in an attempt to please both the pro-IT and anti-IT crowds.

I feel like we're not going to get the definitive, narratively cohesive ending we've wanted.

#156
Baa Baa

Baa Baa
  • Members
  • 4 209 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

I heard it from Michael Gamble.

We have eight hour meetings where I come from too.

But those are serious meetings. Like we have an issue meetings.


You'd think they would have had those when someone presented those abysmal ending options in the first place, but no.


I agree with you fully on that.

Someone told me yesterday that Patrick Weekes had to fight to get the squad goodbyes:sick:

Seriously!? That is... I can't find a word for it

#157
Jadebaby

Jadebaby
  • Members
  • 13 229 messages

Makrys wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

Makrys wrote...

xCaptainAmazing wrote...

Unless the team is currently working on something else, we could assume this is EC related. I don't know whether or not the same team does the multiplayer, but it doesn't seem like he'd be that relieved from some standard new fare.

No. What I'm thinking is that everyone's custom tailored aftermath could potentially hit a lot of bugs triggering the wrong scenes, etc. But to me, it seems more on that kind of scale for visible relief.


Different teams. 

ALL of the single player team has been working on the EC.


I was under the impression they pulled all staff in to get it done quicker, hence why Dragon Age 2 The Exalted March dlc was cancelled.

Just looked it up myself, dw. Someone got their facts mixed up...


and?


They cancelled the exalted march to work on Dragon Age 3. The official statement said 'another game' so one of my friends thought that meant Mass Effect 3Image IPB.. Silly people, and silly me for going on their word.

#158
TheClonesLegacy

TheClonesLegacy
  • Members
  • 19 014 messages
Are we sure he's talking about the EC?
he could be talking about the "Earth" DLC.
then again do different Devs take care of MP?

Modifié par TheClonesLegacy, 20 juin 2012 - 03:00 .


#159
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

I agree with you fully on that.

Someone told me yesterday that Patrick Weekes had to fight to get the squad goodbyes. :sick:


I wouldn't doubt it, honestly.

That was the only redeeming moment of Priority: Earth and even then it was a terrible sequence.

#160
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages
It was from Weekes.

He simply said he was "misquoted" on Twitter.

#161
OH-UP-THIS!

OH-UP-THIS!
  • Members
  • 2 399 messages

SimplyNeo wrote...

Billyg3453 wrote...



An hour ago (Done)
Image IPB


/definitive thread title resulting in speculative circumstantial evidence


Obviously, He was watching some NBA Finals...

.....



Talk about a serious, SNOREFEST!!Image IPB

#162
MegaSovereign

MegaSovereign
  • Members
  • 10 794 messages

TheClonesLegacy wrote...

btw are we sure he's talking about the EC?
he could be talking about the "Earth" DLC.


Multiplayer? 

That's done by a different team.

#163
TheClonesLegacy

TheClonesLegacy
  • Members
  • 19 014 messages

MegaSovereign wrote...

TheClonesLegacy wrote...

btw are we sure he's talking about the EC?
he could be talking about the "Earth" DLC.


Multiplayer? 

That's done by a different team.

alright,
Had a feeling.

#164
4stringwizard

4stringwizard
  • Members
  • 652 messages

MegaSovereign wrote...

I had high hopes for the EC, but honestly the fact that they haven't shot down any of the conspiracy theories (like IT) makes me feel like they're going to try to leave the game incredibly vague/open-ended in an attempt to please both the pro-IT and anti-IT crowds.

I feel like we're not going to get the definitive, narratively cohesive ending we've wanted.

Bioware is hurting itself by being this vague.  All we know about the EC so far is "clarity and closure."  That's it.  They've given nothing else to keep fans interested. 

#165
Makrys

Makrys
  • Members
  • 2 543 messages
The Penny Arcade post featuring Weekes was debunked a LONG time ago. People seriously need to stop citing references from it as fact. It was fake. Confirmed by Bioware and Weekes numerous times. And the content described to have happened in the post, is virtually impossible anyways. The ending was not written by just two people. Seriously guys.

#166
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

TMA LIVE wrote...

You think it's stupid to not have your entire fleet stick around when a weapon of mass destruction goes off that could do some serious damage to the galaxy if it's energy is not focused by a missing piece they haven't gotten a chance to study, is a bad idea?

Sounds like you're going to be unhappy no matter if the reasons are logical.


So you're saying constructing a weapon of mass destruction that could go off and do some serious damage to the galaxy if its energy is not focused by a missing piece they haven't gotten a chance to study isn't a bad idea? Furtherore, you're saying it isn't a bad idea to fire said weapon without knowing what in the ever-living-Hell it would do?

Finally, you're saying that a weapon of mass destruction that could go off and do some serious damage to the galaxy if its energy is not focused by a missing piece they haven't gotten a chance to study is safe enough to fire in such proximity to Earth?

"F*ck it, let's try out that new H-bomb in the middle of goddamn San Fran."

Please. There is no logic in your argument.

Modifié par wantedman dan, 20 juin 2012 - 03:04 .


#167
Makrys

Makrys
  • Members
  • 2 543 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

It was from Weekes.

He simply said he was "misquoted" on Twitter.


No, I think you are mistaken. He clearly said that post was false. It claimed he was bad mouthing the creative director for crying out loud. None of it is possible anyways.

#168
sparkyo42

sparkyo42
  • Members
  • 434 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

I heard it from Michael Gamble.

We have eight hour meetings where I come from too.

But those are serious meetings. Like we have an issue meetings.


You'd think they would have had those when someone presented those abysmal ending options in the first place, but no.


I agree with you fully on that.

Someone told me yesterday that Patrick Weekes had to fight to get the squad goodbyes. :sick:


If that's true then it shows how completely disconnected some of the team were from the base. I mean I'm verging on the not giving a damn side but that's just insane

No matter where you fall on pro or anti side the idea that the ending wouldn't even have had those is just pathetic, were they trying to damage the IP at that stage?

#169
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages
Something went wrong. And Mac Walters and Casey Hudson are at the helm.

When something like this fails, it is either the script, or the director. This has happened time and time again. It will happen again in the future.

#170
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

Something went wrong. And Mac Walters and Casey Hudson are at the helm.


BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

#171
sparkyo42

sparkyo42
  • Members
  • 434 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

Something went wrong. And Mac Walters and Casey Hudson are at the helm.

When something like this fails, it is either the script, or the director. This has happened time and time again. It will happen again in the future.


Are you suggesting they're Reapers?:D

#172
Sublyminal

Sublyminal
  • Members
  • 916 messages
Sadly, I can't even bring myself to be excited over this announcement. Bioware has turned me into a cynical ******.

#173
TMA LIVE

TMA LIVE
  • Members
  • 7 015 messages

wantedman dan wrote...

TMA LIVE wrote...

You think it's stupid to not have your entire fleet stick around when a weapon of mass destruction goes off that could do some serious damage to the galaxy if it's energy is not focused by a missing piece they haven't gotten a chance to study, is a bad idea?

Sounds like you're going to be unhappy no matter if the reasons are logical.


So you're saying constructing a weapon of mass destruction that could go off and do some serious damage to the galaxy if its energy is not focused by a missing piece they haven't gotten a chance to study isn't a bad idea? Furtherore, you're saying it isn't a bad idea to fire said weapon without knowing what in the ever-living-Hell it would do?

Finally, you're saying that a weapon of mass destruction that could go off and do some serious damage to the galaxy if its energy is not focused by a missing piece they haven't gotten a chance to study is safe enough to fire in such proximity to Earth?

"F*ck it, let's try out that new H-bomb in the middle of goddamn San Fran."

Please. There is no logic in your argument.


Uh, Hackett telling the fleet to get away before bomb goes off has no logic? I think it does. Because it sounds better then bomb going off with fleet right next to it. Especially if fleet is the only other chance you got against the Reapers, as Hackett says if it doesn't work.

Modifié par TMA LIVE, 20 juin 2012 - 03:07 .


#174
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

wantedman dan wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Something went wrong. And Mac Walters and Casey Hudson are at the helm.


BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Even if they didn't write this together, they executed it POORLY.

#175
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

sparkyo42 wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Something went wrong. And Mac Walters and Casey Hudson are at the helm.

When something like this fails, it is either the script, or the director. This has happened time and time again. It will happen again in the future.


Are you suggesting they're Reapers?:D


The cycle has repeated itself more times than you can fathom.