42 réponses à ce sujet

[Elvira the Dark]

wait a second. in mass effect 2, you destroyed that one mass relay and it ended up destroying that entire solar system. so wouldn't the solar systems in mass effect 3 with mass relays also be wiped out from destroying the mass relays from the crucible?

[Elvira the Dark]

that's how i would rationalize it saying that it's a different kind of explosion than the one in the arrival. but still...

[DarkDragon777]

Yes.

[Kaiser Arian XVII]

"different kind of explosionS"

[Reptilian Rob]

Artistic integrity.

[Inquisitor Recon]

Dark energy.

[AcidGlow]

space magic

[CyberMiguel]

They say that relays weren't destroyed, but "disabled", which means tehy no longer work, but they didn't explode. At least that's what I understood.

[cparham7]

magnetite wrote...

I think they said the relays overloaded. Lot different than smashing an asteroid into a relay. Nothing was destroyed though. Planets are still in one piece.

this.

I personally take the difference to mean that the energy from the relay's was used for the crucible wave. It kinda makes sense if you think about it and not just blame space magic or artistic integrity for something that isn't spelled out for you.

Modifié par cparham7, 20 juin 2012 - 06:50 .

[f0rmaldehyde]

cparham7 wrote...

magnetite wrote...

I think they said the relays overloaded. Lot different than smashing an asteroid into a relay. Nothing was destroyed though. Planets are still in one piece.

this.

I personally take the difference to mean that the energy from the relay's was used for the crucible wave. It kinda makes sense if you think about it and not just blame space magic or artistic integrity for something that isn't spelled out for you.

Since you people CLEARLY dont know the difference...

[SSV Enterprise]

f0rmaldehyde wrote...

cparham7 wrote...

magnetite wrote...

I think they said the relays overloaded. Lot different than smashing an asteroid into a relay. Nothing was destroyed though. Planets are still in one piece.

this.

I personally take the difference to mean that the energy from the relay's was used for the crucible wave. It kinda makes sense if you think about it and not just blame space magic or artistic integrity for something that isn't spelled out for you.

Since you people CLEARLY dont know the difference...

Someone set that particular explosion to "blue", so what?

[CrystalCircuit]

Speculace magic from everyone

[f0rmaldehyde]

SSV Enterprise wrote...

f0rmaldehyde wrote...

cparham7 wrote...

magnetite wrote...

I think they said the relays overloaded. Lot different than smashing an asteroid into a relay. Nothing was destroyed though. Planets are still in one piece.

this.

I personally take the difference to mean that the energy from the relay's was used for the crucible wave. It kinda makes sense if you think about it and not just blame space magic or artistic integrity for something that isn't spelled out for you.

Since you people CLEARLY dont know the difference...

Someone set that particular explosion to "blue", so what?

My point exactly  

Seriously though what the hell!? on what planet was anyone going to identify one as an 'explosion' and one as an 'overload' when they both appear to...well...explode? *facepalm* if one was intended as an overload then you'd think they would animate it differently to blowing up :/ 

[Grubas]

cparham7 wrote...

magnetite wrote...

I think they said the relays overloaded. Lot different than smashing an asteroid into a relay. Nothing was destroyed though. Planets are still in one piece.

this.

I personally take the difference to mean that the energy from the relay's was used for the crucible wave. It kinda makes sense if you think about it and not just blame space magic or artistic integrity for something that isn't spelled out for you.

I just noticed that my entire narrative from hours and hours of playing the trilogy has gone to **** for no particular reason in a blink of an explosion.


.... without taking into acount anything i would have done differently. 
 

[HelpingFR]

(I though no spoiler allowed in the general discussion)

If you watch more carefully the relay's destruction in ME3, we can see the Energy of the mass relays is "transferred" with the "projection". So, there is no energy into the mass relays when they explode. Not like in ME2 where the relay is destroyed, freeing all the energy, making the destruction of the system.

[Fail_Inc]

Lots of speculation for everyone!

[Harorrd]

The Normal relay destruction destroys a system, The Me3 ending destruction is much more powerfull, it clearly burns the space clear of life at speeds much faster than light

[Elvira the Dark]

well, in the game the mass relays explosion or energy dispersment do not destroy the solar systems so i guess that's that. in other words, bioware says that the mass relays don't destroy the solar systems at the end of the game, so they don't.

[pmac_tk421]

The mass relay in 2 was destroyed and released all of its energy in a violent explosion. In 3, the mass relay was programmed to send out a signal that would wipe out all synthetics, the explosion in 3 was a side of effect of the energy they were forced to contain.

[xbeton0L]

writer's magic.

[Arkitekt]

Because plot.

[ScotGaymer]

Clearly you guys have never heard of such a thing as a Controlled Explosion.

It is entirely possible to detonate things in a controlled way so that they do not cause large scale collateral damage.

So it seems to me that it is possible to destroy the relays in a controlled way that the energy is not released in a system destroying way like it was in arrival.

It's real science people.

Modifié par FitScotGaymer, 20 juin 2012 - 04:48 .

[Squallypo]

everything is about explosions with significant changes