EA is doomed?
#1
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 04:49
http://www.gamesindu...mpaign=us-daily
Me thinks so,after the poor showing of TOR and then with this day 1 DLC with mass effect 3 (along with the BS ending) EA is in a world of hurt.
#2
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 04:54
Check this out, for example:
http://www.destructo...29894.phtml#ext
There is NO WAY EA will be able to handle f2p without being excessively douchey about it... and if they plan to move ALL of their games in that direction... than forget them.
Modifié par KingJason13, 21 juin 2012 - 04:55 .
#3
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 05:00
KingJason13 wrote...
Ea's problem is that their anti-consumer attitudes are angering many of their (soon to be "former") customers.
Check this out, for example:
http://www.destructo...29894.phtml#ext
There is NO WAY EA will be able to handle f2p without being excessively douchey about it... and if they plan to move ALL of their games in that direction... than forget them.
OMFG! I get free games and then only have to pay if I want something from the game!?!
*buys 100 EA games*
#4
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 05:02
#5
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 05:14
#6
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 05:15
You're clearly missing what free-to-play is all about. The "free" gets them onto your hard drive, the proverbial "foot in the door" so to speak, and then you have to PAY to have any chance of being successful at them( which is why they are often referred to as "pay-to-win" games). It becomes very easy to pay far in excess of the $60 you would have paid for a regular game outright.RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...
KingJason13 wrote...
Ea's problem is that their anti-consumer attitudes are angering many of their (soon to be "former") customers.
Check this out, for example:
http://www.destructo...29894.phtml#ext
There is NO WAY EA will be able to handle f2p without being excessively douchey about it... and if they plan to move ALL of their games in that direction... than forget them.
OMFG! I get free games and then only have to pay if I want something from the game!?!
*buys 100 EA games*
#7
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 05:16
#8
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 05:35
KingJason13 wrote...
You're clearly missing what free-to-play is all about. The "free" gets them onto your hard drive, the proverbial "foot in the door" so to speak, and then you have to PAY to have any chance of being successful at them( which is why they are often referred to as "pay-to-win" games). It becomes very easy to pay far in excess of the $60 you would have paid for a regular game outright.
Buying is a choice. Not buying is a choice.
Me? I get a free AAA game and I play it until I'm done with it. I really like it? I drop $20 on in game goodies. I really, really like it? I drop $40 on in game goodies. I hate the game? No money spent on it.
Tell me again how what EA is doing is bad?
#9
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 05:35
Grimez7 wrote...
@Rinphoce you can't buy a f2p game
#10
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 05:37
Azureskies wrote...
http://www.gamesindu...mpaign=us-daily
Me thinks so,after the poor showing of TOR and then with this day 1 DLC with mass effect 3 (along with the BS ending) EA is in a world of hurt.
ME3 was a drop in the bucket for EA which did not hamper them, TOR might of made a small dent in their costs. Still looking back over the past year+ they have had financial troubles and one of it comes from their less than appealing ways with customers. This is nothing new, they are not doomed, as long as they have massive control over Sports (which might start to wien), they can fund other other companies and make profits of them to pad it even more.
#11
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 06:59
In my OP i was offering my opinion as to why this trend is going to continue because of things like ME3s bad ending/day1DLC/poor fan response ect... That said,these graphs show that the downturn happening before ME3 was out.
#12
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 06:59
I don't see that happening. And if it doesn't then EA deserves to fail.
#13
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 07:28
It's like advertisements. I'd rather pay to watch something without advertisements than watch something free that's full of them. For me it's about quality time. I don't have all the time in the world to play games and watch movies anymore, and I certainly don't have time for advertisements for things I would never buy anyway and "batteries not included" video games.
Modifié par termokanden, 21 juin 2012 - 07:29 .
#14
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 07:52
Regardless of one's personal opinion about a company, it will not fail or succeed based on a single article or analysis, nor can one will a company into eventual success or failure.
#15
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 08:07
Ninja Stan wrote...
Companies generally have a broader view of things and plan their strategies accordingly. The individual consumer/gamer is extremely short-sighted, allowing each news article and discussion to inform their predictions about the company's future. If an article is negative, then an individual will tend to see the company's eventual failure as guaranteed. If an article is positive, the individual will tend to see the company's future success as assured.
Regardless of one's personal opinion about a company, it will not fail or succeed based on a single article or analysis, nor can one will a company into eventual success or failure.
I understand that,yet at the same time couldnt you say that in a years time to trend that far down that there will even be time to recover? If there is what do you think it will take to achive it?
That said there are a lot of people not happy over what has been going on with EA,I believe it is finally showing.
I would love to see EA do well,but they have to act like they WANT to do well. They might first start off by listening to more of what the players of the games want or would like to see,and less of "people will pay for it just because of the IP".(not talking about just ME either) Something I have not personally seen from them in quite a while.
Modifié par Azureskies, 21 juin 2012 - 08:17 .
#16
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 08:58
Modifié par TheBlackBaron, 21 juin 2012 - 08:59 .
#17
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 09:01
#18
Guest_Tigerblood and MilkShakes_*
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 09:18
Guest_Tigerblood and MilkShakes_*
.....
.....
.....
....
.....
....
ok,so now youve had the time to read and do some research.you see they had ups and downs just like any other company.and theyre still around.along with the franchises they still own and run.Theyll be here for awhile maybe some games will only have one good one and some dlc or the whole franchise will be great or suck.at the end of the day theyre making money and milking what they can without causing to much lose.plus the sport games are getting really good (least NHL/FIFA)
#19
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 09:27
Guest_Arcian_*
Activision I can understand, but how in hell is Ubisoft worse than EA? The only really negative thing they have going for them is their perverse obsession with intrusive DRM.TheBlackBaron wrote...
If that's what EA thinks is the future, fine. I'll suck what fun I can out of their games and move on when I can't progress any further without giving them money. But Peter Moore is an idiot if he thinks the thing that built the industry - the $60 upfront AAA game - is going away or is going to become scarce. Even arguably worse companies like Activision and Ubisoft seem to be getting along just fine without trying to insert micortransactions into everything.
#20
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 09:29
Ninja Stan wrote...
Companies generally have a broader view of things and plan their strategies accordingly. The individual consumer/gamer is extremely short-sighted, allowing each news article and discussion to inform their predictions about the company's future. If an article is negative, then an individual will tend to see the company's eventual failure as guaranteed. If an article is positive, the individual will tend to see the company's future success as assured.
Regardless of one's personal opinion about a company, it will not fail or succeed based on a single article or analysis, nor can one will a company into eventual success or failure.
Short-sightedness is an apt description of EA and their money schemes over the last couple years. They certainly aren't building bridges with their once loyal customers. It's all about the next money scheme and how to make a quick buck by fleecing those who buy their current products.
#21
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 09:30
bobobo878 wrote...
Duh, of course they are.
Oh god, I had no idea! Now I have to burn my Star Wars dvds in order to escape my future of eternal Hellfire! D:
#22
Guest_Ninja Stan_*
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 09:30
Guest_Ninja Stan_*
Modifié par Ninja Stan, 22 juin 2012 - 06:41 .
#23
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 09:41
We are not fans, we are customers. The moment you blur that very fine line you go in a direction like Dragon Age 2 and Mass Effect 3 were the customers really do not like it but yeah we are fans are we are going to take it anyway? Well that is being proven incorrect.
Star Wars The Old Republic is another example the majority want something other than features focused on a 'Hardcore Minority' yet Bioware keeps on bringing things on like Guild Summits and refuses to listen to the majority of the population. I think it's very clear why EA laid off and fired so many Bioware employees as of late because they lost sight of who they are marketing to.
They've added a dungeon finder coming in the next patch but that still doesn't help since it's not cross servers and help with elite quests.
#24
Guest_Tigerblood and MilkShakes_*
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 09:46
Guest_Tigerblood and MilkShakes_*
saMOOrai182 wrote...
bobobo878 wrote...
Duh, of course they are.
Oh god, I had no idea! Now I have to burn my Star Wars dvds in order to escape my future of eternal Hellfire! D:
my whole 360 and small NES Collection is going to have to burn too
i might cry,itll be the first time since the moon bleed 8k years ago
#25
Posté 21 juin 2012 - 09:56
I hate their business model passionately so it would all be schadenfreudelicious except the livelihoods of some talented people are on the line, and I do feel for them.
Modifié par Addai67, 21 juin 2012 - 09:56 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut







