Armymedic75 wrote...
"Ah. I understand. You're one of those people, who think 'listens to' means 'do it exactly as we say'. Which we were told upfront wasn't gonna happen, seeing as at least some of the demands required a complete revision of the ending (i.e. no Catalyst).
And again, do you speak for every fan? Many on these forums seem to think otherwise, that their concerns were indeed adressed"
No that was not what I was saying. What im saying is that they needed to stay true to the established lore that was developed in the first two games. My own personal opinion is that the game could have ended when Anderson and Shep were bleeding out looking out over earth, and it would have made more sense than what we got. So in other words you are saying that Bioware has the right to give us a crappy ending as long as it fulfills their "artistic vision". Do I as a consumer not have a right to expect a decent product for my money? I dont care about the IT I dont care about reuniting wirh my LI what I do care about is an ending that actually fits with established lore.
Here we go. Now we get to what you want, and not vague statements about 'fan concerns'.
Personally, I thought the ending made a great deal of sense. You're facing an unbeatable force. Obviously, you need a superweapon. The superweapon will work through Video Game Physics (a sub-trope of Comic Book Physics) and destroy the enemy. For added value, you get to choose the conflict resolution: Boom, Godhood, or Transhumanism. Voila, the end.
Bit predictable, but what ending isn't?




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





