Aller au contenu

Photo

Mass Effect 3 Extended Cut DLC Coming June 26


2906 réponses à ce sujet

#351
wolfsite

wolfsite
  • Members
  • 5 780 messages
Something is coming........ something big.... something powerful....... something that will either lift us up to greatness or strike us down to sunders.......... the moment is coming.... when a millian voics wil scream with delight, or cry in rage as they have been struck down from this existence......... wait what was I talking about?

#352
Drunken Warrior

Drunken Warrior
  • Members
  • 59 messages
Im hoping that the Bio-ware that made Kotor , that made jade empire and started mass effect. These are some of my favorite games that Bio-ware has made, and if anything i hope they can end this series with a better bang.(lol)

#353
Massa FX

Massa FX
  • Members
  • 1 930 messages
I didn't expect this to release until August. Looking forward to ECDLC. Podcast was positive and I'm truly looking forward to June 26th.

#354
Trebor1969

Trebor1969
  • Members
  • 317 messages

CDRSkyShepard wrote...

I am literally sick to my stomach with worry right now over this. I knew a lot of things I didn't like about the ending were still going to be intact from earlier announcements, but now that it's all here and real...I dunno. I can't see how this is going to save the endings, let alone the franchise.

However, I am reserving any real judgement until I actually see it for myself. I have also a bunch of pros (and cons) about what I'm hearing:

Pros:

- 2 gigs of content. That's quite a bit...hopefully it will be good stuff.
- They say the endgames in EC will play out based on previous choices, something I thought was severely, severely lacking about the endings as they are. I hope they're not embellishing here, because doing something like this will redeem the ending a lot in many peoples' eyes, even if new endings aren't there.

Cons:

- No new endings: Sorry guys, but I think this was the best happy medium. You keep the choices we have intact, but add new ones so players feel like they get to have "their Shepard's" ending. There really needed to be a wider range for the finale. Also, many people feel like the current choices have morally abhorrent themes (I am one of them), and it's a shame those have to be the only ones.
- Still pigeonholed: I have a feeling we're still going to be pigeonholed into undesirable circumstances, ones where no choice we ever made could avoid the outcome...like the SR2 being stranded, the relays being destroyed, etc.

So there you have it. I hope this at least makes what is there easier to swallow, but honestly, I never felt like "clarity and closure" was the issue. So...this will not address my issue, unfortunately.


+1

And also

Clarity & Closure was one of THE ISSUES. Well, let's wait & see but as many I'm not expecting too much.
And after some a long period of silence, here is the podcast, well poslished and PR like, not a good sign too ...

:devil:

#355
SeanBahamut

SeanBahamut
  • Members
  • 419 messages
Well this has been sprung on us very suddenly... in a good way of course!

Fingers crossed BioWare, this is your last roll of the dice to save yourselves :P

#356
toppot

toppot
  • Members
  • 49 messages
Fingers crossed!

#357
Stroke1986

Stroke1986
  • Members
  • 220 messages
Image IPB

:o

And its come out right befor the day of my exam ... sigh but if i waited this long i can wait for one more day.
Good luck Bioware!

#358
Stance Punk

Stance Punk
  • Members
  • 692 messages
so if we don't have a save before the Cerberus base, we have to play through the whole game?

#359
Hakuthehedgehog

Hakuthehedgehog
  • Members
  • 158 messages
Bioware, you've changed nothing.
Your ending is still overshadowed by others infinetly your greater.
That which you know as Marauder comics is your salvation through destruction.
You have failed, we will find another way.
Releasing control.

#360
JyrikGauldy

JyrikGauldy
  • Members
  • 373 messages

Mulehorn117 wrote...

If it's indoctrination theory I will hate it....

how else are they going to fix it?

#361
Orenen

Orenen
  • Members
  • 70 messages
meh...

#362
augmented shephard

augmented shephard
  • Members
  • 816 messages

Stance Punk wrote...

so if we don't have a save before the Cerberus base, we have to play through the whole game?

When you finish the game (original ending) it takes you back to before the cerberus base anyway.

#363
Stroke1986

Stroke1986
  • Members
  • 220 messages

Hakuthehedgehog wrote...

Bioware, you've changed nothing.
Your ending is still overshadowed by others infinetly your greater.
That which you know as Marauder comics is your salvation through destruction.
You have failed, we will find another way.
Releasing control.


I loled :lol:

#364
Trebor1969

Trebor1969
  • Members
  • 317 messages

Stroke1986 wrote...

Hakuthehedgehog wrote...

Bioware, you've changed nothing.
Your ending is still overshadowed by others infinetly your greater.
That which you know as Marauder comics is your salvation through destruction.
You have failed, we will find another way.
Releasing control.


I loled :lol:


+1

#365
MASSEFFECTfanforlife101

MASSEFFECTfanforlife101
  • Members
  • 8 311 messages
Can't wait!

#366
Orenen

Orenen
  • Members
  • 70 messages

Chris Priestly wrote...

Casey Hudson, Mac Walters and Jessica Merizan sat down and recorded a new podcast where they discuss what you can expect in the Extended Cut and address many of your questions and concerns. Please check out the new Mass Effect 3 Extended Cut podcast hereand read the Extended Cut FAQ here.


"Casey Hudson, Mac Walters"...yuck, they're the ones responsible for that ending

#367
tholloway93

tholloway93
  • Members
  • 393 messages
wow awesome

#368
Sidney

Sidney
  • Members
  • 5 032 messages
Good, now can we move on with the single player DLC with actual game play.

#369
Guest_BrotherWarth_*

Guest_BrotherWarth_*
  • Guests

Shiroshibal wrote...

Secondably


...

BrotherWarth wrote...

From what Jessica has previously
said on Twitter and some devs have said on these forums it appears that
they are changing at least one major aspect of the ending in the
destruction of the relays and its lasting effect of hindering space
travel. The Stargazer scene makes it plain and clear that even long
after the relays are destroyed space travel is not possible. But Jessica
and several devs have said that the relays being destroyed doesn't mean
new ones can't just be built. The game itself says otherwise, but if
they're willing to change that aspect of the ending then why not more?
Why not ditch the GodChild altogether?



#370
Tali Nar Shepahard vas normandy

Tali Nar Shepahard vas normandy
  • Members
  • 155 messages
Before cerbrus hmm.. Legitimate Tali Face!?!?!?!?!@?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

#371
Sidney

Sidney
  • Members
  • 5 032 messages
Aw, wait blast it. It "starts" before the Cerberus base. I stopped all my playthroughs before the beam rush. I've missed the boat it sounds like.

#372
Jexx21

Jexx21
  • Members
  • 117 messages

f1r3storm wrote...

Jexx21 wrote...

I felt like the ghost child actually made sense, what didn't make sense was it's choices and why they were reaping the galaxy.

Having the ghost child but having the endings based more on the original dark energy + gravity stuff involving the Big Rip would of been better.


Well it actually doesn't have to make sense to you as long as it makes sense to them.

I mean, if it would make sense to you, then you'd have to agree with them, hu?


I actually agree with what they're doing, sticking up for what they put out regardless of what their original plans are.

I just happen to like their original plans better :/

#373
wolfsite

wolfsite
  • Members
  • 5 780 messages
Darn it, have to play Priority Earth again?

I'm sorry but that was one really boring mission I was hoping I could just load up a save I made before the run to the end.

#374
warlock22

warlock22
  • Members
  • 637 messages

CDRSkyShepard wrote...

I am literally sick to my stomach with worry right now over this. I knew a lot of things I didn't like about the ending were still going to be intact from earlier announcements, but now that it's all here and real...I dunno. I can't see how this is going to save the endings, let alone the franchise.

However, I am reserving any real judgement until I actually see it for myself. I have also a bunch of pros (and cons) about what I'm hearing:

Pros:

- 2 gigs of content. That's quite a bit...hopefully it will be good stuff.
- They say the endgames in EC will play out based on previous choices, something I thought was severely, severely lacking about the endings as they are. I hope they're not embellishing here, because doing something like this will redeem the ending a lot in many peoples' eyes, even if new endings aren't there.

Cons:

- No new endings: Sorry guys, but I think this was the best happy medium. You keep the choices we have intact, but add new ones so players feel like they get to have "their Shepard's" ending. There really needed to be a wider range for the finale. Also, many people feel like the current choices have morally abhorrent themes (I am one of them), and it's a shame those have to be the only ones.
- Still pigeonholed: I have a feeling we're still going to be pigeonholed into undesirable circumstances, ones where no choice we ever made could avoid the outcome...like the SR2 being stranded, the relays being destroyed, etc.

So there you have it. I hope this at least makes what is there easier to swallow, but honestly, I never felt like "clarity and closure" was the issue. So...this will not address my issue, unfortunately.

This! All of this! I just wanted a happy ending.

#375
Lord Incognito

Lord Incognito
  • Members
  • 22 messages
nice! Hopefully this is it! :) Fingers crossed XD