The Angry One wrote...
They've wasted time and money to please people who were already pleased.
There's a word for this.
BP20125810 wrote...
Not only is IT dead now, it is burned into ashes. The ashes were made into a milkshake, which were drunk by Eric Cartmen and pooped into the sewers.
And then the Normandy crew celebrates with the Ewoks.antares_sublight wrote...
RESOLUTION: The rendezvous point is the garden planet on which the Normandy crashed. Everyone is saved, game over, wins all around.
Goaliebot wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
They've wasted time and money to please people who were already pleased.
There's a word for this.
Unfortunately I don't think it was about pleasing, but rather about defending and protecting what they did in the original ending.
Hmm. Surprised they didn't have Ewoks fighting some Marauders and Brutes first.Sauruz wrote...
And then the Normandy crew celebrates with the Ewoks.antares_sublight wrote...
RESOLUTION: The rendezvous point is the garden planet on which the Normandy crashed. Everyone is saved, game over, wins all around.
Modifié par CrutchCricket, 22 juin 2012 - 09:18 .
antares_sublight wrote...
RESOLUTION: The rendezvous point is the garden planet on which the Normandy crashed. Everyone is saved, game over, wins all around.
The Angry One wrote...
The Grey Nayr wrote...
Except that the Reapers would be more likely to attack the crucible. But Hackett would probably sacrifice some troops to defend it while the rest of the fleets escaped. He did it with the Alliance fleets at Arcturus after all.
A handful of cruisers are not going to repel 50+ Sovereign class Reapers.And the Reaper's boss was willing to cooperate with Shepard, once he made his choice he probably ordered them not to touch the Crucible.
Illogical. If that were so then it would order them to stop while Shepard is making the choice.
According to the Catalyst, the current solution became defunct the moment Shepard arrived at that area.
The Angry One wrote...
Goaliebot wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
They've wasted time and money to please people who were already pleased.
There's a word for this.
Unfortunately I don't think it was about pleasing, but rather about defending and protecting what they did in the original ending.
Which is also a futile waste of time. The pro-enders will defend it either way. The rest of us will still see it for what it is.
Goaliebot wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
They've wasted time and money to please people who were already pleased.
There's a word for this.
Unfortunately I don't think it was about pleasing, but rather about defending and protecting what they did in the original ending.
The Angry One wrote...
The Grey Nayr wrote...
lillitheris wrote...
The Grey Nayr wrote...
I find it funny that people are bashing EC when we've seen only ONE betatest shot that actually answers a question we were all wondering about.
If you haven’t been paying attention (you haven’t), we’re bashing that screenshot that doesn’t answer the question in any manner resembling logical, sane, or even far-fetched but plausible.
How is that not logical? Hackett, Anderson, and Liara had all been wondering if the Crucible would kill them along with the Reapers for like half the game. I find the fact that they had an escape plan just in case to be very reasonable.
Because they also know that the Crucible is going to affect the GALAXY.
HOW are you going to run away from the GALAXY?
This is like planting a bomb in a building then trying to escape the blast by hiding in a room down the hall.
Moreover, stuff like rendezvous points and planned retreats is something you discuss at breifings BEFORE the battle.
Modifié par lillitheris, 22 juin 2012 - 09:23 .
Modifié par Chris Priestly, 22 juin 2012 - 09:23 .
The Grey Nayr wrote...
That's assuming there are even that many left in space. The battle in space looked pretty died down when making the choice compared to when it first started. Read the codex entries. A turian commander
with a single fleet of ships took down 12 Sovereign class Reapers
pretty easily when they first hit Palaven. Priority: Earth has every fleet in the freaking galaxy. We don't know how large Sword & Shield actually are.
Also it is not illogical. If you take too long making your choice, you get a critical mission failure. So the Catalyst's cooperation probably has limits. How many times have you and others called him a liar after all?
Yeah, what more closure could you want? if someone's gotta be stranded, might as well be the entire fleet, right?The Angry One wrote...
antares_sublight wrote...
RESOLUTION: The rendezvous point is the garden planet on which the Normandy crashed. Everyone is saved, game over, wins all around.
You know I can totally see BioWare making it so that the entire fleet crashes on the same damn planet.
Modifié par antares_sublight, 22 juin 2012 - 09:23 .
The Angry One wrote...
Goaliebot wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
They've wasted time and money to please people who were already pleased.
There's a word for this.
Unfortunately I don't think it was about pleasing, but rather about defending and protecting what they did in the original ending.
Which is also a futile waste of time. The pro-enders will defend it either way. The rest of us will still see it for what it is.
Chris Priestly wrote...
Angry One and others, you have seen a screenshot without the full context that goes on with that screenshot. There is more content around that shot not included.
While I understand you are guarded about what the EC will be, I do suggest until you play it or experience it in the full before you talk about how bad it is. If, having doe so, it still does not meet your expectations or it does (because they are negative and you believe we do not fix the issue) THEN complain about it.
Chris Priestly wrote...
Angry One and others, you have seen a screenshot without the full context that goes on with that screenshot. There is more content around that shot not included.
While I understand you are guarded about what the EC will be, I do suggest until you play it or experience it in the full before you talk about how bad it is. If, having doe so, it still does not meet your expectations or it does (because they are negative and you believe we do not fix the issue) THEN complain about it.
antares_sublight wrote...
RESOLUTION: The rendezvous point is the garden planet on which the Normandy crashed. Everyone is saved, game over, wins all around.
The line of dialog in the screenshot along with what we know happened is quite a bit of concrete material.Chris Priestly wrote...
Angry One and others, you have seen a screenshot without the full context that goes on with that screenshot. There is more content around that shot not included.
While I understand you are guarded about what the EC will be, I do suggest until you play it or experience it in the full before you talk about how bad it is. If, having doe so, it still does not meet your expectations or it does (because they are negative and you believe we do not fix the issue) THEN complain about it.
Modifié par antares_sublight, 22 juin 2012 - 09:29 .
The Grey Nayr wrote...
Yeah its real easy to believe snap judgments are true as gospel when you've seen 1 second of footage.
You saw a single second of one scene being betatested. Things could change, there could also be more that explains it!
Also one of the other screenshots showed a flow chart for EC. Take a look at it if you already haven't. It looks detailed.
Chris Priestly wrote...
Angry One and others, you have seen a screenshot without the full context that goes on with that screenshot. There is more content around that shot not included.
While I understand you are guarded about what the EC will be, I do suggest until you play it or experience it in the full before you talk about how bad it is. If, having doe so, it still does not meet your expectations or it does (because they are negative and you believe we do not fix the issue) THEN complain about it.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut