229 réponses à ce sujet

[CuseGirl]

Elite Midget wrote...

christrek1982 wrote...
thats a tad harsh give it a chance.

You meran like everyone gave ME3 a chance when it came out than found out it didn't meet any of the promisess or expectations?

Well....yea, sorta. I mean, don't go all "I'm sure it's gonna be AWESOME" but for me personally, I'm reserving a visceral reaction until I play thru the London mission with an ems over 5000.

[TeffexPope]

Talthanar wrote...

This could be before the assault on Earth or the base. The pictures don't give a timeframe of when the scene happens just that it does. #crushhopesanddreams

A hashtag. Really?

A. Hashtag.

[shepard1038]

Elite Midget wrote...

christrek1982 wrote...


thats a tad harsh give it a chance.

You meran like everyone gave ME3 a chance when it came out than found out it didn't meet any of the promisess or expectations?

Please don't make me laugh. Months before Me3 came out fans were putting Me3 as a bad game and then when it came out. Most of the people were satisfied and loving Me3 until the endings then the talk of Me3 shifted to the endings. And as you can see people are doing the same to the EC. Saying that the EC is going to bebad and it hasn't released.

Modifié par shepard1038, 23 juin 2012 - 02:40 .

[Sashimi_taco]

So are they going to retcon the fact that the relays are destroyed? I don't understand. If they do that, then what was the point of the new game plus ending where there are 2 humans on a planet with no space flight.

I'm glad they are trying to fix this, but I really have no idea how they would do that since they messed it up so badly and are saying they wont change facts just explain it. How do you explain stuff like that?

[ScaredPeach]

Remember, the fleets didn't know how the Crucible fires, so this is what the fleets want to avoid when activating the Crucible:  


Activate it and stay away; I understand them taking a step back or two.

Modifié par ScaredPeach, 23 juin 2012 - 02:44 .

[Mr.House]

ScaredPeach wrote...

Remember, the fleets didn't know how the Crucible fires, so this is what the fleets want to avoid when activating the Crucible:

Activate it and stay away; I understand them taking a step back or two.

So let your weapon be unprotected so the Reapers can destory it?

[ScaredPeach]

Well the reapers didn't, so i don't see a problem. I have no idea what tatics they use to defend it, but it was defended nonetheless and they still could fall back

Modifié par ScaredPeach, 23 juin 2012 - 02:45 .

[Humakt83]

Aris Ravenstar wrote...

sporeian wrote...

Aris Ravenstar wrote...

Calling it now, the first image is the squadmates and Joker putting Shepard's name on the wall.

or Shepard and squadmates putting anderson's name on the wall..... hopefully

I wouldn't hold my breath scene.

Fixed

[zovoes]

ScaredPeach wrote...

Remember, the fleets didn't know how the Crucible fires, so this is what the fleets want to avoid when activating the Crucible:  


Activate it and stay away; I understand them taking a step back or two.

it is going to hit evrywhere if it works though. it has to hit all the reapers so the is nowhere they could run to so why run at all.

[OdanUrr]

Mr.House wrote...

ScaredPeach wrote...

Remember, the fleets didn't know how the Crucible fires, so this is what the fleets want to avoid when activating the Crucible:

Activate it and stay away; I understand them taking a step back or two.

So let your weapon be unprotected so the Reapers can destory it?

The Reapers could've destroyed the Citadel at any time during the game, particularly once they learnt it was a key component to make the Crucible work. If they didn't destroy it then, there's no reason why they'd want to destroy it now.

[Mr.House]

OdanUrr wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

ScaredPeach wrote...

Remember, the fleets didn't know how the Crucible fires, so this is what the fleets want to avoid when activating the Crucible:

Activate it and stay away; I understand them taking a step back or two.

So let your weapon be unprotected so the Reapers can destory it?

The Reapers could've destroyed the Citadel at any time during the game, particularly once they learnt it was a key component to make the Crucible work. If they didn't destroy it then, there's no reason why they'd want to destroy it now.

Um they are trying to destory the cruible and can if you take to long. You are confusing the Citadel with the cruible.

[OdanUrr]

Mr.House wrote...

OdanUrr wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

ScaredPeach wrote...

Remember, the fleets didn't know how the Crucible fires, so this is what the fleets want to avoid when activating the Crucible:

Activate it and stay away; I understand them taking a step back or two.

So let your weapon be unprotected so the Reapers can destory it?

The Reapers could've destroyed the Citadel at any time during the game, particularly once they learnt it was a key component to make the Crucible work. If they didn't destroy it then, there's no reason why they'd want to destroy it now.

Um they are trying to destory the cruible and can if you take to long. You are confusing the Citadel with the cruible.

Once the Crucible's docked with the Citadel, I'd say destruction of one would result in the destruction of the other as well.

[FBI-Azzurri]

LazyTechGuy wrote...

wright1978 wrote...

Damn, read OP post. Sounds like they are going for a BS reason for Normandy fleeing. Given there was no logical one i can hardly say i'm surprised.

OdanUrr in the IT thread figured it out.



"All Fleets: The Crucible is armed. Disengage and head to the rendezvous point."

Yep. That pretty much explains that dialogue in the picture and why the Normandy fled through the Mass Relay, but how will they explain why Harbinger left Shepard alive? Will they even try to explain it at all? My guess is no.

[Mr.House]

OdanUrr wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

OdanUrr wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

ScaredPeach wrote...

Remember, the fleets didn't know how the Crucible fires, so this is what the fleets want to avoid when activating the Crucible:

Activate it and stay away; I understand them taking a step back or two.

So let your weapon be unprotected so the Reapers can destory it?

The Reapers could've destroyed the Citadel at any time during the game, particularly once they learnt it was a key component to make the Crucible work. If they didn't destroy it then, there's no reason why they'd want to destroy it now.

Um they are trying to destory the cruible and can if you take to long. You are confusing the Citadel with the cruible.

Once the Crucible's docked with the Citadel, I'd say destruction of one would result in the destruction of the other as well.

That's speculation. We know Reapers are trying to destroy teh cruible, we know they can destory the cruible. Leaving the cruible unprotected is very very stupid, if Hackett does that, then the character is ruined even more.

[Zardoc]

OdanUrr wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

ScaredPeach wrote...

Remember, the fleets didn't know how the Crucible fires, so this is what the fleets want to avoid when activating the Crucible:

Activate it and stay away; I understand them taking a step back or two.

So let your weapon be unprotected so the Reapers can destory it?

The Reapers could've destroyed the Citadel at any time during the game, particularly once they learnt it was a key component to make the Crucible work. If they didn't destroy it then, there's no reason why they'd want to destroy it now.

They can still destroy the Crucible. They do, in fact. Also, the Reapers may not be the smartest people around, but not even they are retarded enough to not attack the thing that is about to destroy them.

It's also pretty much impossible for the fleet to disengage in the time between the activation and firing of the Crucible, seeing how that's like 5 to 10 seconds max. And trying to disengage from a fight like the one they're in at that time would be suicide aswell.

Modifié par Zardoc, 23 juin 2012 - 02:55 .

[Priss Blackburne]

anyone notice what looks kinda like the kodiak transport in the screen with the citadel getting ready to fire? Juts below the arm of the left. Hard to really tell if it is or just some part of the citadel or debris.

[Mr.House]

Priss Blackburne wrote...

anyone notice what looks kinda like the kodiak transport in the screen with the citadel getting ready to fire? Juts below the arm of the left. Hard to really tell if it is or just some part of the citadel or debris.

It's sadly debris.

[Funkdrspot]

zovoes wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

So Shepard somehow survives in Destroy.....and is either.floating in space alone, never to be seen again.....or.....he's superman and can fall to Earth on an exploding super structure, the size of the asteroid that killed the Dinosaurs

it's 44 km long, the asteroid that you are taking about was about 10km long....... there are five arms to the citadel, just think about that for a sec. just to put that into terms we can get the bigest nuke ever made was a 50 megaton bomb, the astirod that killed the dinos was almost 100 tetratons of boom.

Lord with this again.

The reason an asteroid is dangerous isn't just its size, it's the SPEED it's carrying. The Arms to the citadel are basically traveling at virtually nothing for speed. It's like comparing a rocket to a turtle.

And you can't even begin to figure the kinetic energy of an object until you know the speed so your end point is also moot.

Modifié par Funkdrspot, 23 juin 2012 - 03:14 .

[FBI-Azzurri]

umadcommander wrote...

ok the guy holding something, that something will be shepards name plate to put on the wall

What if they all say something about Shepard (Love Interest says their own unique dialogue) and your love interest is (Kaiden is just a placeholder LI in this pic) the one who puts Shepard's nameplate on the wall while shedding tears? Then, it cuts to the secret scene at the end if your EMS is high enough and you picked Red where Shepard takes a breath and the scene continues where Shepard rises from the rubble and heoric music starts to play as the game cuts to the credits. Stargazer seen is removed and this song is added as the ending credits song: www.youtube.com/watch?

Modifié par FBI-Azzurri, 23 juin 2012 - 03:11 .

[Funkdrspot]

FBI-Azzurri wrote...

LazyTechGuy wrote...

wright1978 wrote...

Damn, read OP post. Sounds like they are going for a BS reason for Normandy fleeing. Given there was no logical one i can hardly say i'm surprised.

OdanUrr in the IT thread figured it out.



"All Fleets: The Crucible is armed. Disengage and head to the rendezvous point."

Yep. That pretty much explains that dialogue in the picture and why the Normandy fled through the Mass Relay, but how will they explain why Harbinger left Shepard alive? Will they even try to explain it at all? My guess is no.

I'd imagine it goes something like this:

- The citadel IS the catalyst
- The catalyst controls the reapers
- Blowing up the crucible while it's connected to the catalyst would likely blow up both
- The catalyst isn't suicidal

[Mcfly616]

zovoes wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

So Shepard somehow survives in Destroy.....and is either.floating in space alone, never to be seen again.....or.....he's superman and can fall to Earth on an exploding super structure, the size of the asteroid that killed the Dinosaurs

it's 44 km long, the asteroid that you are taking about was about 10km long....... there are five arms to the citadel, just think about that for a sec. just to put that into terms we can get the bigest nuke ever made was a 50 megaton bomb, the astirod that killed the dinos was almost 100 tetratons of boom.

Then that just makes my point even more relevant...haha, seriously can't wait to see the "clarification" for that

[jules_vern18]

christrek1982 wrote...

MattFini wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...

Could it be possible that this image is for the Control or Synthesis endings? Considering EDI is there?


Or maybe we'll have this same scene in Destroy, and she'll be absent....

Yeah, that's what I'm hoping for ... that this is one scenario where Shepard might be dead.

Which I'm PERFECTLY FINE with.  As long as there are other options where Shepard lives.  Then I'd certainly replay the game a few times to see how all of my choices shook out.

But if Shepard can't survive in any scenario, then the EC was a huge waste of time.  

I hate to admit it but If the force kill shepard then ME is also dead to me if shepard can live and be with crew LI in the end then I'm back with the program and will be happy to buy any future DLC

Even if you have to commit genocide to attain it?

[Asharad Hett]

KainrycKarr wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

pro5 wrote...

So, EDI *does* in fact survive the ending... Interesting.

No she does not.

I dedicated a playthrough to getting her to walk out.

When I picked Control she walked out.

When I reloaded and picked Destroy she didn't.

She walked out when I picked destroy...

  I too dedicated a play through to make her walk out.  I killed damn near everyone else. She still didn't.  Can you post a video of your destroy ending?  And tell us what you did to make it happen?

[Mcfly616]

vivaladricas wrote...

Wonder what software they use out of curiosity. Custom stuff perhaps?

Yeah I went extra nerd there LOL

Also if Shep survies that means he crashed LANDED back on London

No....just, no