37 réponses à ce sujet

[Erixxxx]

Landon7001 wrote...

reatake earth was not very good, nor were its graphics.....as for the ops topic-that was foreshadowing for starbrat

Graphically, there's not much you can do with a completely wasted city.

[Seboist]

Anti-killer wrote...

I had a bad feeling when the Crucible first came

+1

Same here, along with the Cerberus Sith Empire and the Alliance officials acting like five year old retards.

[rowan93]

Crucible made me weary, the dying reaper intrigued me, the mention of a master of the reapers excited me, the ending made me go :|

[Aramiss Ducati]

Bigdoser wrote...

Cthulhu42 wrote...

When I killed the Rannoch Reaper I thought "f*ck yeah!" The Renegade interrupt was glorious.

Yup that interrupt was awesome. Honestly I thought the crucible was going be a giant emp shockwave that targeted reapers. 

This is no time for rational story telling. 

[Reorte]

Erixxxx wrote...

Landon7001 wrote...

reatake earth was not very good, nor were its graphics.....as for the ops topic-that was foreshadowing for starbrat

Graphically, there's not much you can do with a completely wasted city.

Was it? I find it hard to tell from the real thing (I've never been keen on London :happy:)

Seriously though if it had had some landmarks in it, perhaps a fight along the Embankment, it could've looked good.

[Bantz]

www.youtube.com/watch

[Erixxxx]

Reorte wrote...

Erixxxx wrote...

Landon7001 wrote...

reatake earth was not very good, nor were its graphics.....as for the ops topic-that was foreshadowing for starbrat

Graphically, there's not much you can do with a completely wasted city.

Was it? I find it hard to tell from the real thing (I've never been keen on London :happy:)

Seriously though if it had had some landmarks in it, perhaps a fight along the Embankment, it could've looked good.

Problem with a wasted city is that most landmarks would have been wasted along with it. 

[LTKerr]

Erixxxx wrote...

Landon7001 wrote...

reatake earth was not very good, nor were its graphics.....as for the ops topic-that was foreshadowing for starbrat

Graphically, there's not much you can do with a completely wasted city.

Au contraire mon ami. Check Fallout series or Enslaved for example.

[LTKerr]

Upps wrong thread

Modifié par LTKerr, 24 juin 2012 - 09:47 .

[Erixxxx]

LTKerr wrote...

Erixxxx wrote...

Landon7001 wrote...

reatake earth was not very good, nor were its graphics.....as for the ops topic-that was foreshadowing for starbrat

Graphically, there's not much you can do with a completely wasted city.

Au contraire mon ami. Check Fallout series or Enslaved for example.

Never heard of Enslaved, and I never got around to play much Fallout (never made it out of the bunker-thing). What did they do with the wasted cities on those games?

[garrusfan1]

Reorte wrote...

Erixxxx wrote...

Landon7001 wrote...

reatake earth was not very good, nor were its graphics.....as for the ops topic-that was foreshadowing for starbrat

Graphically, there's not much you can do with a completely wasted city.

Was it? I find it hard to tell from the real thing (I've never been keen on London :happy:)

Seriously though if it had had some landmarks in it, perhaps a fight along the Embankment, it could've looked good.

It is kinda hard but like in fallout 3 they could show landmarks that were partially destroyed

[Erixxxx]

garrusfan1 wrote...

Reorte wrote...

Erixxxx wrote...

Landon7001 wrote...

reatake earth was not very good, nor were its graphics.....as for the ops topic-that was foreshadowing for starbrat

Graphically, there's not much you can do with a completely wasted city.

Was it? I find it hard to tell from the real thing (I've never been keen on London :happy:)

Seriously though if it had had some landmarks in it, perhaps a fight along the Embankment, it could've looked good.

It is kinda hard but like in fallout 3 they could show landmarks that were partially destroyed

Big Ben is there. Not sure how much else would be left after 200 years of extreme technological advancement.

[LTKerr]

Erixxxx wrote...

garrusfan1 wrote...
It is kinda hard but like in fallout 3 they could show landmarks that were partially destroyed

Big Ben is there. Not sure how much else would be left after 200 years of extreme technological advancement.

Many european cities have buildings or entire districts from XVIII-XIX centuries or older; actually my own building is 100 years old. Those same buildings (or most of them) and the new ones should be there in 200 years as well. As for Mass Effect, London lacks details, "life", the feeling that few months ago there're people living there. In that mission I didn't have the feeling I was walking through streets and destroyed buildings but stone walls rendered with poor textures. It was too empty. A destroyed city feels like a chaotic one, destroyed stuff everywhere, papers, cars, rubbish bins, benches, posters, bricks, destroyed stores, etc. Just like Fallout series as I said: