30 réponses à ce sujet

[DangerSandler]

 ... But they didn't. 

[Godlysnack]

agreed.. you'd think in a game for player choice they would of had at least 1 ending with a certain EMS or something to give you a LI reunion.. but nope you must speculate that there is one in the future..

[AlexandraK]

They wanted to be 'epic', lol.
EMS let's say 5000 or 6000 for reunion. One scene, really BW, was it that hard to make? 

Modifié par AlexandraK, 26 juin 2012 - 02:41 .

[BalooTheBear]

It would have been better. But it's implied and well head cannon can do the rest. It's a shame.

[taggen86]

Nope but it would have been far more cheezy

[Naltair]

Not a deal breaker for me, I am happy to see the Galaxy will recover and thrive.

[mugwuffin1986]

It's fairly simple to figure out... having one where they reunite would completely remove the choice. Implying a reunion leaves enough open to make the others acceptable.

[zambot]

Disagree. But you can't please everyone I guess.

[d-boy15]

it's not include but implied.

in destroy your LI didn't put your name on wall, I think that enough because after that
normandy flew off and shepard breath scene show up.

[Nageth]

Eh, would have been fine with blue babies but a reunion just feels meh with how most of the endings work (although your LI talking to you through a reaper or talking to robo-skeleton shep would be kind of fun).

[Samuel_Valkyrie]

I started playing the EC from the TIM Cerberus Base, and took Tali, my LI with me.

Just before the Reaper Beam hit me, she and my other squaddie (Garrus), got shot. Que a very lovely scene with Tali and my Shep, about how she doesn't want to leave me alone, and how Shep needs her to go to Rannoch.

So, yeah, I had a little bit of my LI thing in the EC. Still, I find the ending I wrote better than this one. But kudos for doing the effort and having the Star Child delve deeper into its motivations.

[Vlk3]

The LI reunion is implied in the ending... There is hope and you can imagine all the rest. And that will always be better than any cutscene

I'm happy for those of you, who have that chance. My Shepard won't get that reunion even though she chooses destroy.

Modifié par Vlk3, 26 juin 2012 - 02:46 .

[DangerSandler]

d-boy15 wrote...

it's not include but implied.

in destroy your LI didn't put your name on wall, I think that enough because after that
normandy flew off and shepard breath scene show up.

Yeah, pretty sure I never saw Jack in the entire ending besides the flashback which doesnt even count. 

[Xamufam]

nop, the problem was the crusible still made no sense

[jsl1016]

Vlk3 wrote...

The LI reunion is implied in the ending... There is hope and you can imagine all the rest. And that will always be better than any cutscene

I'm happy for those of you, who have that chance. My Shepard won't get that reunion even though she chooses destroy.

Imagine is the key word. Or head canon. Either one tells me IT is not proven or disproven. Not of the new endings proves or disproves it.

So the arguing can continue.

This is all a joke. I didn't think they could fix things with this DLC (for me anyway) and they haven't (again, for me anyway).

[Nageth]

You can also believe that you were indoctrinated since the beacon on Eden Prime. Thats the neat thing about imagination.

[Kick In The Door]

zambot wrote...

Disagree. But you can't please everyone I guess.

It doesn't matter what Bioware does, some of these folks will NEVER be happy. Bioware could give each and every one of them exactly what they wanted down to w/e size underwear they want their shepard to wear and they would still cry. 

[Earthborn_Shepard]

By the way, am I the only one to think that using "Vigil" as credits music would have improved the ending by a thousand percent?
Maybe in a new, more epic remix...

[Soulstice88]

I would've liked it for sure. It's more implied now then it was before, but would've loved the EC if it was shown.  At least it's implied that Shepard is still on the Citadel this time, since it shows it's intact.

Modifié par Soulstice88, 26 juin 2012 - 02:53 .

[Menethra]

d-boy15 wrote...

it's not include but implied.

in destroy your LI didn't put your name on wall, I think that enough because after that
normandy flew off and shepard breath scene show up.

That still doesn't answer what happened to shepard it was simply the same scene we saw before that gave us the same questions we had before, what happened to shepard in the destroy?

As i said in another thread it's either down to lazyness / neglect or because they want to make money off it via DLC.

[Carlthestrange]

Eeeh, I feel its enough.

[lokiarchetype]

taggen86 wrote...

Nope but it would have been far more cheezy

If it wasn't included because it was too cheesy, why'd they include the far cheesier stargazer scene?

[LazyTechGuy]

I can see why they did it. What did everyone say? It's "their" story and not the writers'? Well okay, there you go. BioWare gave you all the implication you needed to complete the rest of Shepard's life in your own head. Have at it.

[panamakira]

Maybe~ but I don't think it's necessary when it was so heavily implied that they will see each other again. It's sort of like repeating Mass Effect 2 without the Reapers. Shepard already died and came back to life once, BW showing that again I didn't feel it was necessary when we know they will see each other again. That is good enough for me~ Major improvement overall.

[bloodshed17]

Even just a slide would have been nice. At least an option. Oh well.