139 réponses à ce sujet

[Omega One]

Here is the link:

www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2012/06/26/mass-effect-3s-extended-cut-too-little-far-too-late/

In my opinion, I felt like this then notice this article and felt glad that someone else have the same feelings I have on this.

Modifié par Omega One, 26 juin 2012 - 04:15 .

[Pangaron]

Forbes delivers, again

[JeosDinas]

Please. That article's title should read "Mass Effect 3's Extended Cut: More than People Deserve."

[selphiegirl]

I am loving Forbes.

[Torrible]

Forbes' interest in this is far too much for far too long.

Modifié par Torrible, 26 juin 2012 - 04:23 .

[Candidate 88766]

Great article.

I don't think it was as little as they made out - I think the explanations actually did go a long way - but I imagine a lot of people will still be disappointed.

I really agree with two of the points the author made:

Firstly, I agree that control is now the most compelling. Shepard transcends his form to become a guardian, watching over the galaxy.

Secondly, I agree that the IT is now finally dead. I never agreed with it from the start, and I'm glad that we can finally have an end to the constant stream of threads about it. It was an interesting theory, but the idea that bioware withheld the 'real' ending of the trilogy was ridiculous from the start.

[Menalaos1971]

I only disagree with the end of the article. Bioware has blow it for me too many times to trust them. They won't be getting anymore of my money, even if they come out with Garrus - Space Batman.

[Kanon777]

Torrible wrote...

Forbes' interest in this is far too much for far too long.

[pseudonymic]

brilliant.

[panzerwzh]

Forbes nails it !

[samb]

Menalaos1971 wrote...

I only disagree with the end of the article. Bioware has blow it for me too many times to trust them. They won't be getting anymore of my money, even if they come out with Garrus - Space Batman.

Space batman featuring Garrus?  Yes I would get that. 

[iggy4566]

Kanon777 wrote...

Torrible wrote...

Forbes' interest in this is far too much for far too long.

Cry us a river.

[JayPlays]

Nice

[BoomDynamite]

JeosDinas wrote...

Please. That article's title should read "Mass Effect 3's Extended Cut: More than People Deserve."

This.

[darkiddd]

I love forbes

[Cyneburh]

JeosDinas wrote...

Please. That article's title should read "Mass Effect 3's Extended Cut: More than People Deserve."

Because no one deserves to get what they paid for, right?

Good article.  

[Ieldra]

Hmph. Mr. Tassi is just disappointed that IT wasn't implemented. Thank god it wasn't. Reading this article before having seen the EC, I expect it to be rather satisfying.

[Iacov]

i never liked forbes, but now i do

[Chashan]

Ieldra2 wrote...

Hmph. Mr. Tassi is just disappointed that IT wasn't implemented. Thank god it wasn't. Reading this article before having seen the EC, I expect it to be rather satisfying.

There still is that very interesting shift in tone of the thing in the reject ending...

Speaking for myself, the EC...it worked. Did not believe it before watching it.

Now to wait for ME4...

[majormajormmajor]

Perhaps the pro-enders would prefer some lighter reading

Something from IGN, perchance

Modifié par majormajormmajor, 26 juin 2012 - 04:33 .

[Robhuzz]

JeosDinas wrote...

Please. That article's title should read "Mass Effect 3's Extended Cut: More than People Deserve."

Why is that exactly? When you pay for a product would you not want exactly what you paid good money for? Wouldn't you be disappointed or angry when you only got half of what you paid for? I know I would...

Modifié par Robhuzz, 26 juin 2012 - 04:35 .

[Striker93175]

so basically what i get out of this is forget it, watch it on youtube - and spend your time playing dawngaurd instead. thanks forbes

[xsdob]

Article was good even if I dont agree.

[lettuceman44]

JeosDinas wrote...

Please. That article's title should read "Mass Effect 3's Extended Cut: More than People Deserve."

Definently. People should be happy they got anything.

[Jon The Wizard]

Right again, Forbes.