236 réponses à ce sujet

[Aran Linvail]

Destroy is the only ending for me , before the EC and now after the EC , im full paragon but destroy is the only one that makes some sense.

[revo76]

jsl1016 wrote...

They all suck

Pretty much this, but until i see Shepard in next installement with Master Chief style return. Since Shepard is dead and no re-union anyway, i'll stick with renegade-control ending. 

I will hunt down people who is responsable of ME3's ending and vaporize them with Reaper lazer 

SHEPARD HURTS YOU.

Modifié par revo76, 26 juin 2012 - 08:22 .

[Goku16]

synthesis the rest are crap but control is cool.

[sicaalicious]

Shooting the catalyst
Was a pleasant surprise that was my form of rejection

[Grimez7]

 Don't like Reject at all, even if there is some sort of odd triumph in it.

Going to stick with Destroy, even if Synthesis and Control seemed rather palpable with the EC.

[Goku16]

destroy is the worst because the starchild stated that the peace won't last.

[Lambda_00]

Smatticus wrote...
2) Although I still don't buy the idea of all life suddenly having it's basic genetic code re-written by a beam of light in a series which takes its science relatively seriously, at least they do make some effort to explain it.

The question I still have is if that beam really is "light" or if it's actually a swarm of nanomachines (the question being how they could travel through space/atmospheres, potentially why the "light" exists)...Which might account for all of the explanations by the starchild.

[Smatticus]

Lambda_00 wrote...

Smatticus wrote...
2) Although I still don't buy the idea of all life suddenly having it's basic genetic code re-written by a beam of light in a series which takes its science relatively seriously, at least they do make some effort to explain it.

The question I still have is if that beam really is "light" or if it's actually a swarm of nanomachines (the question being how they could travel through space/atmospheres, potentially why the "light" exists)...Which might account for all of the explanations by the starchild.

Maybe, but that's pretty "outside the envelope" and speculative even by mass effect 3 ending standards.

[Nerevar-as]

Goku16 wrote...

destroy is the worst because the starchild stated that the peace won't last.

And you believe someone whose idea of peace is genocide everyone? Reapers are like fire? <_

[Sylvianus]

No, the worst is to believe to someone who is telling to you, that never again there will be wars. This is especially where you must use your brain.

[goose2989]

I'm surprised to say but I think control. My poor Tali is going to be lonely....

[Kannaksen_hanu]

Reject is the only one that does not cause too much facepalming.

Synthesis feels like racial breeding on top if its absurdity. Though I'd like to have lawn which I would not have to cut every now and then as we would share our consciousness (as plants are organic too).

[MysticH]

Synthesis. EDI and Ashley hugging was a great moment. (Giggidy.)

[sadako]

Reject. Damned if I trust any choices an AI gives me, real life or no.

[SLonergan]

Goku16 wrote...

destroy is the worst because the starchild stated that the peace won't last.

The after-credits sequence begs to differ.

A world without conflict can't exist. Even if the cycle was truly "ended", conflict would arise.

Destroy was the ending I picked. Pre-EC, I chose Synthesis...but this time it had an ominous collective consciousness feel to it.

I loved the Destroy ending. The death of the Geth and EDI was tough, but I thought the ending was great.

[Lambda_00]

Smatticus wrote...

Lambda_00 wrote...

Smatticus wrote...
2) Although I still don't buy the idea of all life suddenly having it's basic genetic code re-written by a beam of light in a series which takes its science relatively seriously, at least they do make some effort to explain it.

The question I still have is if that beam really is "light" or if it's actually a swarm of nanomachines (the question being how they could travel through space/atmospheres, potentially why the "light" exists)...Which might account for all of the explanations by the starchild.

Maybe, but that's pretty "outside the envelope" and speculative even by mass effect 3 ending standards.

The nanomachines wouldn't be too speculative, I mean, it's what was used to make the husks in the first place (via the Dragon's Teeth devices)
Also under Reaper Capabilities in the Codex (ME3) (Secondary): "Reaper power sources seem to violate known physical laws."

[joker_jack]

Synthesis. EDI's performance is what did this for me.

[Smatticus]

Lambda_00 wrote...

Smatticus wrote...

Lambda_00 wrote...

Smatticus wrote...
2) Although I still don't buy the idea of all life suddenly having it's basic genetic code re-written by a beam of light in a series which takes its science relatively seriously, at least they do make some effort to explain it.

The question I still have is if that beam really is "light" or if it's actually a swarm of nanomachines (the question being how they could travel through space/atmospheres, potentially why the "light" exists)...Which might account for all of the explanations by the starchild.

Maybe, but that's pretty "outside the envelope" and speculative even by mass effect 3 ending standards.

The nanomachines wouldn't be too speculative, I mean, it's what was used to make the husks in the first place (via the Dragon's Teeth devices)
Also under Reaper Capabilities in the Codex (ME3) (Secondary): "Reaper power sources seem to violate known physical laws."

Oh god yeah I forgot about the husks. Haven't played it for a few weeks and after a while skimmed over the codex entries. Fair point then, not sure I entirely agree with it and I stick by what I said about the Synthesis ending, but fair point nonetheless.

[BooBoo_swe]

I prefer my ending, Stop play right after Illusive man's base and let thair artistic creativity unseen since it's better let BW keep thair dillusions of grandure and we will remain happy having a Alliance soldier til our very end.

[Mandolin]

For me synthesis and destroy are tied as the "best" - I use the word loosely.
Control is horrible for me personally - Shepard, the shining symbol of humanity has his humanity taken away. History teaches that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. GodShep would become a despot in time - it may take eons but it would happen.
Refuse makes the whole me series a waste of everyones time.

[Shaleist]

Goku16 wrote...

destroy is the worst because the starchild stated that the peace won't last.

So what?

[dragondragon]

I think I prefer destroy. It´s the only choice to let the world you know live on. Synthesis is creating some kind of new race, but that´s not what I want. Control is turning Shepard into a god, no one should have these powers. The reject option is actually cool too, go down like the protheans and let the next cycle kick som reaper a**..

Modifié par dragondragon, 26 juin 2012 - 09:04 .

[kyles3]

I liked Control best before, I like it even more now. It's not perfect, but to me it's far more ethical than the alternatives.

[Mandolin]

With destroy at least you have wiped the slate clean - civilization is free to develop in whatever way it chooses without the shadow of impending reaper apocalypse hanging over it. It may end up destroying itself but it would happen as a result of its own decisions, not the whims of starbrat.

[Serp86]

Destroy , especially after listening to Starchild explanations ( that actually are pretty neat ) it became even clearer that it is the right thing to do. He's just an AI gone Insane after he was tasked with something he clearly wasn't capeable of understanding and def. not able to solve.

Do EDI and the Geth get destroyed ? Well yes but they can be rebuild just like the Relays could.
Using the Reapers to your advantage in both synthesis and control seems like keeping the colector base in ME2 . Just plain wrong even IF if it give us a temporary advantage.

Modifié par Serp86, 26 juin 2012 - 09:08 .