Helios969 wrote...
The whole concept of synthesis as the means to promoting galactic unity and fostering a lasting peace is a fallacy unless it rewrites organic/synthetic thought processes to think and believe identically and are linked collectively in the same fashion the Geth were...
Synthesis presumes the only reason for conflict is the inability of organics/synthetics to understand one another. But conflict arises due to limits of resources also. Once a population exceeds the needed resources to sustain itself conflict will arise. Which part of this new utopian society will be sacrificed so the majority can continue to exist? A schism will develop between those who support sacrificing some for the benefit of the galactic whole and those who desire an alternative to genocide. As soon as this starts to occur, galactic war will be inevitable.
As EDI, put it, Synthesis allows for the first steps to be taken towards ending conflict between organics and synthetics.
Conflict for resources is not limited to organics and synthetics. It can happen in just about any form of life. Synthesis did not propose to end all sources of conflict, only to eliminate specific attitudes that the Catalyst identified as the most common source of conflict and extinction. That is the inability of organics to match synthetics and the inabiltiy of synthetics to understand organics.
I don't believe an utopian society is created from day to night. it seems that way because Shepard can take actions that promote peace and cooperation amongst the different races.
(I should probrably load a Renegade Shepard and choose Synthesis to see what happens)
Also, the possibility exists that, with acess to the knowledge of the Reapers, many of social ills could be reduced or outright eliminated.
Modifié par MisterJB, 27 juin 2012 - 01:07 .