Stop. Just stop already. Broken record is broken.KingZayd wrote...
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
Rating ME3 below a 7, bad ending or not, is downright stupid. With that said, Metacritic user scores are useless. As much as I dislike some review sites, professional reviewers are way more reliable than the players.
No. It isn't. With the ending the way it is, ME3 is a 6 at best. The main appeal to the Mass Effect series was the story and the lore. Ending ruined all that.
to show bioware our appreciation of the EC can we fix the metacritic user score?....please?
#301
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 10:34
#302
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 10:37
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
Rating ME3 below a 7, bad ending or not, is downright stupid. With that said, Metacritic user scores are useless. As much as I dislike some review sites, professional reviewers are way more reliable than the players.
You have a right to an opinion, even when in error.
#303
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 10:37
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
Rating ME3 below a 7, bad ending or not, is downright stupid. With that said, Metacritic user scores are useless. As much as I dislike some review sites, professional reviewers are way more reliable than the players.
I echo that sentiment in full. If people think Me3 deserve a 1/10 or such score go play big rigs, that's a game truly deserving of the lowest score ever handed to a videogame. Mass Effect 3 isn't a horrible game by a long shot.
#304
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 10:39
If you think ME3 is a bad game, you've never played an actual bad game. Stop talking about stuff you know nothing about.Asharad Hett wrote...
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
Rating ME3 below a 7, bad ending or not, is downright stupid. With that said, Metacritic user scores are useless. As much as I dislike some review sites, professional reviewers are way more reliable than the players.
You have a right to an opinion, even when in error.
#305
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 10:40
Maias227 wrote...
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
Rating ME3 below a 7, bad ending or not, is downright stupid. With that said, Metacritic user scores are useless. As much as I dislike some review sites, professional reviewers are way more reliable than the players.
I echo that sentiment in full. If people think Me3 deserve a 1/10 or such score go play big rigs, that's a game truly deserving of the lowest score ever handed to a videogame. Mass Effect 3 isn't a horrible game by a long shot.
Rating it 10/10 or 9/10 has the same effect.
4/10 or 5/10 is a fairly fair score for Mass effect 3.
#306
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 11:39
#307
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 12:25
Persephone wrote...
Off the top of my head:
Lionhead Studios.
Jowood
Bethseda (Oblivion, buuuuuuuuuuurn!)
Sierra (GK3, MI4)
Need more?
The only one I'll really agree with is Lionhead studios.
Bethesda? It practically panders to its fanbase's everywant, constantly integrating popular mods into real gameplay on demand.
And because of Lionhead's failure at listening to its fans Fable 3 is all but dead in the water at this point. I think when last I looked its DLC sales barely scratched 200k downloads on Fable 3.
#308
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 09:44
ld1449 wrote...
Persephone wrote...
Off the top of my head:
Lionhead Studios.
Jowood
Bethseda (Oblivion, buuuuuuuuuuurn!)
Sierra (GK3, MI4)
Need more?
The only one I'll really agree with is Lionhead studios.
Bethesda? It practically panders to its fanbase's everywant, constantly integrating popular mods into real gameplay on demand.
And because of Lionhead's failure at listening to its fans Fable 3 is all but dead in the water at this point. I think when last I looked its DLC sales barely scratched 200k downloads on Fable 3.
Horse armor.
#309
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 09:44
Maias227 wrote...
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
Rating ME3 below a 7, bad ending or not, is downright stupid. With that said, Metacritic user scores are useless. As much as I dislike some review sites, professional reviewers are way more reliable than the players.
I echo that sentiment in full. If people think Me3 deserve a 1/10 or such score go play big rigs, that's a game truly deserving of the lowest score ever handed to a videogame. Mass Effect 3 isn't a horrible game by a long shot.
#310
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 09:46
gameplay until last 15 minutes 9
ending? 0
#311
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 09:48
The lies about multiplayer and the overall terrible customer relations would probably make it a solid 6 for me.
I don’t really care whether you think I should evaluate it as a standalone game or whatever, because it’s not. It’s Mass Effect 3.
#312
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 09:50
#313
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 11:33
Modifié par av196vad, 03 juillet 2012 - 11:42 .
#314
Posté 03 juillet 2012 - 11:45
they should make an extended cut for that movie and fix it just like they did mass effect 3
Modifié par UBER GEEKZILLA, 03 juillet 2012 - 11:46 .
#315
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 12:33
Ghost1017 wrote...
ld1449 wrote...
Persephone wrote...
Off the top of my head:
Lionhead Studios.
Jowood
Bethseda (Oblivion, buuuuuuuuuuurn!)
Sierra (GK3, MI4)
Need more?
The only one I'll really agree with is Lionhead studios.
Bethesda? It practically panders to its fanbase's everywant, constantly integrating popular mods into real gameplay on demand.
And because of Lionhead's failure at listening to its fans Fable 3 is all but dead in the water at this point. I think when last I looked its DLC sales barely scratched 200k downloads on Fable 3.
Horse armor.
Glad I'm not the only one who remembers that crap. Bioware only did EC because they are a studio that in past was well regarded. their last two non-MMO games at release got a lot of negative press, and AFAIK, TOR isn't doing well either.
#316
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 12:39
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
If you think ME3 is a bad game, you've never played an actual bad game. Stop talking about stuff you know nothing about.Asharad Hett wrote...
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
Rating ME3 below a 7, bad ending or not, is downright stupid. With that said, Metacritic user scores are useless. As much as I dislike some review sites, professional reviewers are way more reliable than the players.
You have a right to an opinion, even when in error.
Well done. What you said is one of the dumbest things said on this site. One hell of an accomplishment.
#317
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 12:42
It fixed it, barely, but it shouldn't have needed fixing. If they want to make up for this and redeem themselves they'll have to do it with another game.
#318
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 12:43
#319
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 12:55
Esquin wrote...
They can keep what they have because the fact of the matter is that they screwed up. They released a game with a terrible ending and were forced to fix it. You don't reward a kid for fixing something he broke while being an idiot.
It fixed it, barely, but it shouldn't have needed fixing. If they want to make up for this and redeem themselves they'll have to do it with another game.
Kinda my view too - prove you're worth my patronage with DA3 or something. Releasing DLC that says "the ending was just a dream" would also close the door completely, causing me to completely ignore Bioware for the rest of time.
#320
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 12:58
A few great moments in the game don't compensate, what was for me, a generally lack-lustre game.
#321
Posté 04 juillet 2012 - 01:06
That's actually the most logical way to aproach metacritic's system from a given individual's perspective.keeveek2 wrote...
I never look up for user's score on metacritic. Scores are too low or too high because of frustrated pimple-teenagers who either give 1/10 or 10/10 , it doesn't make any sense for me.
They have only one braincell, so they function in binary mode : either 1/10 or 10/10.
The chances of anyone reading your particular review when there are hundreds or thousand of others posted is very small; therefore, the specific number attached to your review only has meaning insofar as it affects the average score. The best way to "make your voice heard," in that regard, is to rate the game a 10 if you think it should be rated higher than the current average or a 0 if you think it should be rated below the current average.
Modifié par hippanda, 04 juillet 2012 - 01:07 .
#322
Posté 05 juillet 2012 - 11:55
hippanda wrote...
That's actually the most logical way to aproach metacritic's system from a given individual's perspective.keeveek2 wrote...
I never look up for user's score on metacritic. Scores are too low or too high because of frustrated pimple-teenagers who either give 1/10 or 10/10 , it doesn't make any sense for me.
They have only one braincell, so they function in binary mode : either 1/10 or 10/10.
The chances of anyone reading your particular review when there are hundreds or thousand of others posted is very small; therefore, the specific number attached to your review only has meaning insofar as it affects the average score. The best way to "make your voice heard," in that regard, is to rate the game a 10 if you think it should be rated higher than the current average or a 0 if you think it should be rated below the current average.
Amazon reviews do better: sort by rating. Look at the user's review percentages.
#323
Posté 05 juillet 2012 - 11:58
Well coming from you, that doesn't mean much. All you really do is pop into discussions out of nowhere just to tell people that they're stupid and/or wrong. Maybe you should try and tell me people WHY they're wrong for once.legion999 wrote...
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
If you think ME3 is a bad game, you've never played an actual bad game. Stop talking about stuff you know nothing about.Asharad Hett wrote...
Brovikk Rasputin wrote...
Rating ME3 below a 7, bad ending or not, is downright stupid. With that said, Metacritic user scores are useless. As much as I dislike some review sites, professional reviewers are way more reliable than the players.
You have a right to an opinion, even when in error.
Well done. What you said is one of the dumbest things said on this site. One hell of an accomplishment.
#324
Posté 06 juillet 2012 - 12:02
NO!!!
NOOOO!!!!!
They lie, do not finish their games and ask us to give more money for their mistakes! There is a reason why they are the worst American company!
Do not buy from them! And tell your friends why. This a company that is a cancer that the gaming industry needs to be rid of!
#325
Posté 06 juillet 2012 - 12:02
pants witch wrote...
NOPE.
At least, not until the mysterious week-long ban on The Angry One, the ban that no one in charge can seem to account for, is lifted.
Even then... mmm, NOPE.
I am guessing if TAO got banned for something it was deserved.





Retour en haut





