To people who call Synthesis a "violation"...
#201
Posté 30 juin 2012 - 11:49
#202
Posté 30 juin 2012 - 11:51
Synthetic Carrot: NO! NO! I'M TOO YOUNG TO DIE! STOP! YOU'RE HURTING ME!!savionen wrote...
On the positive side you can now talk to plants.
#203
Posté 30 juin 2012 - 11:51
Aris Ravenstar wrote...
Javik thinks benign EDI should be thrown out the airlock just for being Synthetic. Next thing you know he's standing there totally okay with his synthetic alterations. EDI said she finds the Reapers and their motives an abomination. Now she's singing praises to what is essentially the same thing.Hackulator wrote...
Rip504 wrote...
"You" do not wake up tomorrow.
Another person with the memories of who they once were wakes up. It changes you completely,meaning you are no longer the same person.
Everything we are told, and shown says this is wrong. You are now just headcanoning Synthesis to make it worse so you can justify hating it.
In a current poll, 75% of people say they would not consent to Synthesis. That's a lot of unhappy people. Yet EDI implies that there is universal peace, harmony and happiness.
The only way that's possible is if Synthesis changes their minds for them. They're all Stepford Wives now.
The poll shows people are afraid of change and growth, that doesn't mean they wouldn't be happy after it happened.
#204
Posté 30 juin 2012 - 11:52
Aris Ravenstar wrote...
Synthetic Carrot: NO! NO! I'M TOO YOUNG TO DIE! STOP! YOU'RE HURTING ME!!savionen wrote...
On the positive side you can now talk to plants.
Now you have to deal with massive guilt whenever you walk across a grass field.
#205
Posté 30 juin 2012 - 11:54
Forget plants, what if thought transfer works with animals? Butchers would have a high suicide rate.Ryzaki wrote...
Now you have to deal with massive guilt whenever you walk across a grass field. [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/uncertain.png[/smilie] "STOP STEPPING ON ME!"
#206
Posté 30 juin 2012 - 11:57
besides, if Shep was the exception to a rule they defined, so it can be the Synthetic-Organic conflict,
Synthesis is plausible but not for sentient beings!
#207
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 12:09
Yeah, I think I'd be ticked, if synthesis allowed me to be. >>
#208
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 12:15
Hackulator wrote...
The poll shows people are afraid of change and growth, that doesn't mean they wouldn't be happy after it happened.
People now are afraid of even minor changes that barely effect them. Something as big as Synthesis? Hell naw people wont accept that. I Understand why people reject, but I do not agree.
Aris Ravenstar wrote...
Forget plants, what if thought transfer works with animals? Butchers would have a high suicide rate.Ryzaki wrote...
Now you have to deal with massive guilt whenever you walk across a grass field. [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/uncertain.png[/smilie] "STOP STEPPING ON ME!"
Animals are alive now, do you feel bad when you eat meat?
Modifié par Welsh Inferno, 01 juillet 2012 - 12:18 .
#209
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 12:15
Space magic aside, Synthesis is severely lacking in exposition even with the Extended Cut that ultimately makes it the worst choice from a moral perspective.
#210
Guest_Fandango_*
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 12:22
Guest_Fandango_*
Synthesis was easily the most egregious choice for me. The prospect of grabbing a husk by the hand (they have no genitiles after all) and skipping through the streets of London singing 'we are the people' did less than nothing to paper over the cavernous cracks to lore and logic that particular choice required.
I mean, even leaving aside the violence synthesis does to several of the series' central themes, the bare faced ludicrousy of the choice is simply staggering right? Why does Casper even need Shep's permission to paint the galaxy green? How is it that everyones favourite deistic toddler can somehow (some might say magically) manipulate matter at the subatomic level and fundamentally change the very nature of sentient life but doesn't appear to have a simple off switch for the Reapers? What ancient pearls of wisdom did the genocidal little scrote impart with regards the evolution of future organic\\synthetic species?
Literally ridiculous. But hey, at least Garrus’ armour had neat little electronic-icky bits on it to show us that he was now part of Starbrats new emerald colored nightmare.
#211
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 12:23
BUT LOOK, IT'S SO BEAUTIFUL.
#212
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 12:25
What I'm saying is, it's a lot easier to kill them when you can't feel their terror and pain. With Synthesis you'd have no choice. It would make working in the meat farming industry even more hellish than it already sounds. Not making a moral argument, just an observation.Welsh Inferno wrote...
Aris Ravenstar wrote...
Forget plants, what if thought transfer works with animals? Butchers would have a high suicide rate.Ryzaki wrote...
Now you have to deal with massive guilt whenever you walk across a grass field. [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/uncertain.png[/smilie] "STOP STEPPING ON ME!"
Animals are alive now, do you feel bad when you eat meat?
Modifié par Aris Ravenstar, 01 juillet 2012 - 12:26 .
#213
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 12:33
Aris Ravenstar wrote...
What I'm saying is, it's a lot easier to kill them when you can't feel their terror and pain. With Synthesis you'd have no choice. It would make working in the meat farming industry even more hellish than it already sounds. Not making a moral argument, just an observation.
Yeah I know that was what you were saying. But do we know how intelligent they become? Nope. Can you actually feel their terror? Sounds like pure speculation really but I understand what you mean. It's pretty horrid killing an animal already but the ones that do it for a living? I really doubt it would change much.
Oh and from the above about grass(may of been a joke?) Grass is technically alive now, it is a plant and plants are alive. In Synthesis I expect them to be no less or more alive, just more efficient at growing and all that.
#214
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 12:39
#215
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 12:39
#216
Guest_Fandango_*
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 12:42
Guest_Fandango_*
Hackulator wrote...
Where does this assumption that everyone is suddenly permalinked in some sort of mental phone call with synthesis come from? Just because something gains synthetic qualities does not mean it is on a network with everything else with synthetic qualities. I have a second computer that ISN'T on the internet....SHOCKING
The assumtions are due to a complete lack of clarity - which is kind of the point of people's objections.
#217
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 01:02
Aris Ravenstar wrote...
Forget plants, what if thought transfer works with animals? Butchers would have a high suicide rate.Ryzaki wrote...
Now you have to deal with massive guilt whenever you walk across a grass field. [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/uncertain.png[/smilie] "STOP STEPPING ON ME!"
...why would half synthetics even need to eat? If they have the strengths of both and the weaknesses of neither?
...Also brings the question why they'd need to breed but they're doing that anyway so *shrugs*
That's pretty much summons Synthesis up for me. A giant WTF shrug.
#218
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 01:07
#219
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 01:10
Hackulator wrote...
Honestly, if you woke up tomorrow and someone had given you superpowers while you slept without telling you, would you really be mad?
Yes.
/thread
#220
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 02:55
Hackulator wrote...
Where does this assumption that everyone is suddenly permalinked in some sort of mental phone call with synthesis come from? Just because something gains synthetic qualities does not mean it is on a network with everything else with synthetic qualities. I have a second computer that ISN'T on the internet....SHOCKING
Ironically, from Pro-Synth people.
Seriously, I am in debates with Pro-Synth all over the place and even they can't all agree on what the perfect utopian world of synthesised beings is.. One of them says It means X, I say well I actually find X to be abohrrent and another pro synth will come in and say - The ending does not say X happens, strawman, strawman.
It is really very funny actually.
#221
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 02:57
#222
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 03:01
cavs25 wrote...
So now when you put something in the microwave you are violating him...
I bet that makes perfect sense in your head.
I however am struggling to find the connection.. any connection, to the topic.
#223
Posté 01 juillet 2012 - 03:08
Aylyese wrote...
Hackulator wrote...
Where does this assumption that everyone is suddenly permalinked in some sort of mental phone call with synthesis come from? Just because something gains synthetic qualities does not mean it is on a network with everything else with synthetic qualities. I have a second computer that ISN'T on the internet....SHOCKING
Ironically, from Pro-Synth people.
Seriously, I am in debates with Pro-Synth all over the place and even they can't all agree on what the perfect utopian world of synthesised beings is.. One of them says It means X, I say well I actually find X to be abohrrent and another pro synth will come in and say - The ending does not say X happens, strawman, strawman.
It is really very funny actually.
I'm not anti-synthesis. Synthesis is space magic. Anything can happen after choosing synthesis. The fact that some people compare it to rape and molestation is distrurbing. That's their head canon for what happens after syntheis. My head canon is more like this:
Modifié par zambot, 01 juillet 2012 - 03:09 .





Retour en haut






