Aller au contenu

Photo

Reject Shepards: Riddle me this.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
331 réponses à ce sujet

#76
F00lishG

F00lishG
  • Members
  • 283 messages

Sauruz wrote...

F00lishG wrote...

Sauruz wrote...

F00lishG wrote...

I genuinely want to know. Because I cannot see preferring genocide and ascension to destroying the enemy that you sworn to do since ME1.

It's clear why you can't understand people rejecting all three options if you don't see Destroy as genocide.


So...You point out why I created the topic. Because I wanted to understand...Why point this out?

Asking questions is a good thing.

Actually, I pointed out that you will never understand if you don't see how each of the Crucible's solutions is morally (but also practically) flawed. In particular, if you don't see how Destroy is genocide.


Ah. Ok. Destroy and Reject are cases of genocide. I get that. But it's like this:

kill an innocent child to save a million people. or don't and let a million people die.

It's a terrible paradox but not one person is worth a million. No matter how young. 

So, destroy the Reapers along with Edi and the Geth so that others may live, or allow everyone to die.

It's a terrible paradox but not one race and an amazing squadmates are worth a galaxy.

#77
Benny8484

Benny8484
  • Members
  • 452 messages
It was the only ending that truly upheld the views & morals of commander Shepard.  Even though it was added to spite fans for rejecting their endings it is by far the best. 

Synthesis gives the reapers what they have wanted all along - ascension

Control basically makes shepard out to be a hypocrit by accepting the Illusive
Man's solution (Which you opposed all throughout ME2/ME3)

Destroy leads to the destruction of all geth/EDI, but the reapers are destroyed.  Shepard lives? Buried in rubble with mortal wounds, unlikely.  (Acceptable ending)

I can now walk away from this franchise knowing that: I Commander Shepard did everything I could to
stop the reapers.  Inside & outside of the game.  I wrote Bioware a detailed letter offering suggestions, took part in the retake movement, submitted 3 surveys, took part in the on/off movement & all of it was ignored.  That said, I am glad Bioware added the rejection ending, because I reject Biowares (The catalysts) solutions & while my efforts were not successful I did everything I could as both a hero & a fan.

Modifié par Benny8484, 29 juin 2012 - 09:26 .


#78
zombieord

zombieord
  • Members
  • 231 messages

Baronesa wrote...

OK... Discuss this without metagaming.

First of all why would you even trust the Reaper's headhoncho?


Thank you! Somebody gets it. You can't cherry pick your ending after watching them all and having full information with which to base your choice.

#79
BobFettle

BobFettle
  • Members
  • 398 messages

miracleofsound wrote...

Catalyst: 'The cycle will not work anymore. I have failed. You can destroy me if you want'

Shep: 'NO **** you you're a murdering ****. Instead I will let you kill everyone in the galaxy to show you how much I think you suck'

Catalyst: 'LMFAO Ok then. snigger.'


LMFAO!!  This is classic!

#80
Jadebaby

Jadebaby
  • Members
  • 13 229 messages

DGMockingJay wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

DGMockingJay wrote...

Agreed OP

Shepard did agree to take Cerberus help in the start of ME2 right?? He did not say, cram it TIM.. I will rather watch humans get abducted rather than take help from u..!!!!


My Shepard told TIM to cram it, numerous times. However she always stuck around because they were working toward the same goal.


Same goals u say?? That maybe exactly my point. In Control ending we get what we want really... I mean, I came here, not just to kill Reapers.. Neutralizing them would have been enough for me... Its not like only killing Reapers would only solve the problem, or help me revenge the people I lost!!!

And watching Harbinger working his ass off during building the Relays would have been an incentive in its own!!! :police:


"Dead Reapers is how we win this."

Modifié par Jade8aby88, 29 juin 2012 - 09:31 .


#81
Jadebaby

Jadebaby
  • Members
  • 13 229 messages
If you don't meta-game Mass Effect 3. Refusal (at face value) is the best choice. Especially to hear Shepard's best speech ever... The decision after to cut to black then an automatic game over makes the choice more of a troll from Bioware.

#82
zombieord

zombieord
  • Members
  • 231 messages

Jade8aby88 wrote...

If you don't meta-game Mass Effect 3. Refusal (at face value) is the best choice. Especially to hear Shepard's best speech ever... The decision after to cut to black then an automatic game over makes the choice more of a troll from Bioware.


What game over? The stargazer proves the future cycle did win. The only troll from Bioware was the tweets that they chose RGB instead of a conventional victory.

#83
Baronesa

Baronesa
  • Members
  • 1 934 messages

zombieord wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

If you don't meta-game Mass Effect 3. Refusal (at face value) is the best choice. Especially to hear Shepard's best speech ever... The decision after to cut to black then an automatic game over makes the choice more of a troll from Bioware.


What game over? The stargazer proves the future cycle did win. The only troll from Bioware was the tweets that they chose RGB instead of a conventional victory.


Reject could have been improved showing the fleet and other forces killing  a few reapers but eventually being overwhelmed, and then a few retreating to hide (so Liara can expand and record the updated message)

#84
EnvyTB075

EnvyTB075
  • Members
  • 3 108 messages

LieutenantSarcasm wrote...

Because his logic is a load of lies, and he is explicitly the reapers combined AI. It's simply bowing to the reapers. To quote shepard: "I wont let fear compromise who I am."


Then pick destroy and kill em all.

Modifié par EnvyTB075, 29 juin 2012 - 09:45 .


#85
Xa1u5

Xa1u5
  • Members
  • 88 messages

Baronesa wrote...

OK... Discuss this without metagaming.

First of all why would you even trust the Reaper's headhoncho?

The catalyst offer 3 solutions to a problem that IS NOT REAL. Everything is based on a premise that cannot be proven. The Catalyst assume that synthetics will kill all organics. We have seen that is not true. Keyword here: ALL. The geth restored Rannoch and let plants and animals live in peace, they were even preparing for an eventual return of the creators (ME2 conversations, ME3 Rannoch missions).

Solutions:

Destroy: You eliminate all synthetics... this is accomplishing the goal... with no synthetics, there is no synthetics-organics conflict... so even by destroying the Reapers you accomplish the Catalyst objective, and commit genocide on an allied race and kill a close friend. Go you. Admittedly the best of the 3 RGB options... would be perfect if you could save EDI and the Geth with high EMS.

Control: You replace the Catalyst. You do exactly what you told TIM that was impossible, to try and control the reapers, and all your words towards TIM are now hollow... a wonderful hypocrite.There is no connection with your humanity, and you cease to be in hopes that the Catalyst is not lying to you. Nothing here assures you that you won't continue the cycle.

Synthesis: You complete the Catalyst work... this option is bowing down and do exactly what the Catalyst wants... your compromise is to achieve what the enemy wanted. You are also forcing everyone to become this new hybrid (What about the whole "it cannot be forced" lolwut?)

So presented with those 3 options, without knowing the outcomes of each, without any reason to trust the AI that controls the Reapers... what are you going to do? You reject the solutions that accomplish the Reaper's goals and stick to your guns... you fight till the end.

Basically, you paved the way for the next cycle to succeed, and not everything on this cycle is lost, if Asari Stargazer is an indication, other races may have survived to next cycle as well (hypothetical, but if Asari survived, nothing stops other races). Liara tell the next cycle that the Crucible does not work. By in game information you can clearly infer that the next cycle win without using the Crucible or choosing any of the 3 options.

Or you can go on twitter and read how they contradict the info Liara gives and state that next cycle will use the Crucible... making Reject pointless... This is the real insult here.

Just by in game information, reject gives a powerful message. You fought till the end, without compromising your core being, and maybe you lose everything, but you give hope and the means to succeed to the next cycle... without having to bow down to the options presented by the Reapers.


Thank you so much for this. You summed up what I too was feeling and expressing across the boards. Even if the Refuse ending turns the story into a tragedy, it's the path that makes most sense for me, it's imho the most coherent decision.

#86
daecath

daecath
  • Members
  • 1 277 messages

Baronesa wrote...

OK... Discuss this without metagaming.

First of all why would you even trust the Reaper's headhoncho?

The catalyst offer 3 solutions to a problem that IS NOT REAL. Everything is based on a premise that cannot be proven. The Catalyst assume that synthetics will kill all organics. We have seen that is not true. Keyword here: ALL. The geth restored Rannoch and let plants and animals live in peace, they were even preparing for an eventual return of the creators (ME2 conversations, ME3 Rannoch missions).

Solutions:

Destroy: You eliminate all synthetics... this is accomplishing the goal... with no synthetics, there is no synthetics-organics conflict... so even by destroying the Reapers you accomplish the Catalyst objective, and commit genocide on an allied race and kill a close friend. Go you. Admittedly the best of the 3 RGB options... would be perfect if you could save EDI and the Geth with high EMS.

Control: You replace the Catalyst. You do exactly what you told TIM that was impossible, to try and control the reapers, and all your words towards TIM are now hollow... a wonderful hypocrite.There is no connection with your humanity, and you cease to be in hopes that the Catalyst is not lying to you. Nothing here assures you that you won't continue the cycle.

Synthesis: You complete the Catalyst work... this option is bowing down and do exactly what the Catalyst wants... your compromise is to achieve what the enemy wanted. You are also forcing everyone to become this new hybrid (What about the whole "it cannot be forced" lolwut?)

So presented with those 3 options, without knowing the outcomes of each, without any reason to trust the AI that controls the Reapers... what are you going to do? You reject the solutions that accomplish the Reaper's goals and stick to your guns... you fight till the end.

Basically, you paved the way for the next cycle to succeed, and not everything on this cycle is lost, if Asari Stargazer is an indication, other races may have survived to next cycle as well (hypothetical, but if Asari survived, nothing stops other races). Liara tell the next cycle that the Crucible does not work. By in game information you can clearly infer that the next cycle win without using the Crucible or choosing any of the 3 options.

Or you can go on twitter and read how they contradict the info Liara gives and state that next cycle will use the Crucible... making Reject pointless... This is the real insult here.

Just by in game information, reject gives a powerful message. You fought till the end, without compromising your core being, and maybe you lose everything, but you give hope and the means to succeed to the next cycle... without having to bow down to the options presented by the Reapers.

Very well said. Basically, the entire ending boils down to our hero committing suicide because the leader of his enemy tells him to.

The most frustrating thing is that they could have done so much to fix it by taking one line out, instead of adding even more BS in. "The created will always rebel against their creators." Without this single line, the reapers become a solution to the chaos of organics. With synthetics, there is not one single instance that supports this premise and every instance that directly refutes it. Whereas if it is about the chaos of organics, now we do have evidence - the krogan rebellion, the quarian/geth conflict, the first contact war, the conflict between humans and batarians, every criminal you ever meet, etc. Just the removal of that one sentance, and then tweaking the ending options to support it, would go a long way to fixing the major problem that still exists with the ending.

Either that, or acknowleding that a conventional victory is possible, considering you killed 4 reapers with what basically amounts to a giant hand gun, a few missiles, a big worm, and a laser pointer. We've discovered their weakness, we know they can be killed conventionally. Or better yet, convince the starbrat that he's wrong. That's what Shepard does best, even better than fighting, is talking. So talk the catalyst into commanding the reapers to retreat back to dark space. If things look like they're getting out of hand, then come back. But let us try and solve our problems on our own terms. Either one of those (or both - a renegade and a paragon option) would have been satisfactory if they absolutely had to keep the ridiculous "synthetics are evil" premise.

#87
shadey

shadey
  • Members
  • 421 messages
so to the moral objectionists who would refuse because the other choices are "unethical"

then how about the literal thousands of machines/humans/asari/krogan/turian you've killed since mass effect 1 to this point as commander shepard.

#88
Tritium315

Tritium315
  • Members
  • 1 081 messages
I like how every reject thread got locked except the one that is heavily slanted in Bioware's favor.

#89
ahleung

ahleung
  • Members
  • 91 messages
Shepard has always been making similar decisions:
Refuse Sovereign and Saren
Refuse to believe entering Omega 4 Relay is suicidal
Refuse TIM (in ME3)

If you look back, they are all stubborn, selfish decisions simply based on belief and principles.
The chance of sacrificing lives is pretty high.
You thought that's heroic, just because you knew s/he would succeed.

But in fact that's no different than refusing Catalyst (without metagaming knowledge)

#90
Jamie9

Jamie9
  • Members
  • 4 172 messages

ahleung wrote...

Shepard has always been making similar decisions:
Refuse Sovereign and Saren
Refuse to believe entering Omega 4 Relay is suicidal
Refuse TIM (in ME3)

If you look back, they are all stubborn, selfish decisions simply based on belief and principles.
The chance of sacrificing lives is pretty high.
You thought that's heroic, just because you knew s/he would succeed.

But in fact that's no different than refusing Catalyst (without metagaming knowledge)


We can't defeat the Reapers conventionally. That's stated by several characters throughout ME3.

Choosing refuse, you are deliberately sacrificing the galaxy. But if those are your morals, so be it. :lol:

#91
Xa1u5

Xa1u5
  • Members
  • 88 messages

Tritium315 wrote...

I like how every reject thread got locked except the one that is heavily slanted in Bioware's favor.


Mmh, I think most of the locks were justified, the threads sometimes got quite out of hand. But there are still some good ones open:

Reject is the best ending - despite Bioware's attempt to spite it
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/12797214/14

My Apologies Bioware....Refusal Support Thread
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/12817724/5

Reject Ending [Support Thread]
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/12803473

Modifié par Xa1u5, 29 juin 2012 - 10:00 .


#92
ahleung

ahleung
  • Members
  • 91 messages

Jamie9 wrote...

ahleung wrote...

Shepard has always been making similar decisions:
Refuse Sovereign and Saren
Refuse to believe entering Omega 4 Relay is suicidal
Refuse TIM (in ME3)

If you look back, they are all stubborn, selfish decisions simply based on belief and principles.
The chance of sacrificing lives is pretty high.
You thought that's heroic, just because you knew s/he would succeed.

But in fact that's no different than refusing Catalyst (without metagaming knowledge)


We can't defeat the Reapers conventionally. That's stated by several characters throughout ME3.

Choosing refuse, you are deliberately sacrificing the galaxy. But if those are your morals, so be it. :lol:


It's Shepard's moral.

Sovereign already said we can't win in ME1. Shepard should join Sovereign then.

Modifié par ahleung, 29 juin 2012 - 10:00 .


#93
shadey

shadey
  • Members
  • 421 messages
people think control is evil just because TIM had the idea to do it.

control is the least intrusive of all the options, no race dies or gets anything forced on them

ok maybe eventually shepard could become more like an overlord after doing it for 50,000 years but then that is not a certain outcome and really for someone else to deal with.

Modifié par shadey, 29 juin 2012 - 10:01 .


#94
Joccaren

Joccaren
  • Members
  • 1 130 messages
It isn't so hard to see that the Crucible is the winning blow, its more what it represents, and how it destroys the story that people don't like.

For one it means going against what many Shepards have strived for in previous games. You either agree with the Reapers and Synthesise, you agree with the indoctrinated and Control, or you commit Genocide and Destroy - killing your friends and allies, EDI and the Geth.

I'm not going to go into the "Cold Calculus of War vs the soul of our species" debate on the destroy ending, that's been done enough, and by Mr Batier or W/E in ME1.

The choices it presents offer nothing for many Shepards.

In addition, a Deus Ex Machina [If taken in context of the whole series] or Magic Bullet [In context of purely ME3] is an extremely weak way to end a story. Do you respect people who hack games so that they can just press buttons and win? That's what the Crucible is. Press a button to win.
There is no challenge in it. There's no reason the Reapers ever stood a chance as soon as it existed. Nothing matters but it, and it can't fail. Its the easiest, cheapest and suckiest way out of a story ever. Its like if Gandalf came in through a magic portal, told the Reapers they shall not pass, then the Balrog grabbed all the Reapers and Gandalf and disappeared into a black hole. Oh, but it was set up earlier in the game, you went to Mars and found out that the Protheans designed an interdimentional portal that no-one has any idea what it does, and you spend the game building this. Its weak. It has nothing compelling about it. Its not interesting, its got no weight to it, and when you hear about things like it in stories, movies and games its a moment of "Oh, I've been here before". Find the magical artifact that will win you the game.
Yeah, it gives you an easy goal, but its an unsatisfying goal, like if 1 of the big dots in Pacman made you invulnerable forever, and could eat ghosts whenever you like. Does it let you win? Yeah. Is it fun, interesting or a good idea? Not really. Its a cheat, and cheats are never truly fulfilling.

#95
Rhiens VI

Rhiens VI
  • Members
  • 161 messages

wh00ley 06 wrote...

You're killing the Geth and EDI which is genocide too. A 'greater good' person would let a terrorist kill a person two others can live, but a moral person would tell the terrorist to eat **** and die.


And, to continue the analogy, your so called "moral" person lets all three die. Because he didn't want to get his hands dirty by making a difficult choice.

Guess what, your hands are dirty anyway. You killed everyone, congratulations.

"Refuse" option is surrender through inaction. The most shameful way for Shepard to loose.

#96
Jamie9

Jamie9
  • Members
  • 4 172 messages

ahleung wrote...

It's Shepard's moral.

Sovereign already said we can't win in ME1. Shepard should join Sovereign then.


It was stop Sovereign or everyone everywhere dies. I think I'll stop Sovereign.

It was stop the Collectors or the human race will be wiped out. I think I'll stop the Collectors.

It was stop the Reapers or everyone everywhere dies. I think I'll stop the Reapers. Not refuse based on some high-based moral judgement. I'm not willing to sacrifice everybody - trillions of people - based on some moral ideal.

None of the choices are truly moral. Not even Refuse.

#97
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 816 messages
Catalyst wants Synthesis over reaping.

Catalyst will compromise and accept control.... but you will have absolute power and will start it over like it did, mediating between organics and synthetics for millenia, then will eventually go mad and make your reaper. Nothing changes. You probably just argued with TIM that no one person should have that much power.

Destroy is what the Crucible was designed to do. The other two are modifications. But you if you chose the Geth over the Quarians, or made peace the Geth will die, and there's EDI; if you did not make peace and chose the Quarians, you have EDI. EDI would rather be nonfunctional than be rewritten.

Synthesis rewrites everything.

Your mission is to stop the reapers. You knew at the beginning of this war that you might have to sacrifice 10 billion to save 50 billion. One death is a tragedy. The deaths of a million is a statistic. The mind cannot grasp it.

So by choosing Destroy you save 50 billion. By rejecting you condemn all 60 billion. You have a choice to make. Both are bad. One is worse. But not making a choice is still making a choice. If there is no other way you make the choice to save the 50 billion -- it is the lesser of the evils. You not only save 50 billion remaining in this cycle (or more), but you save more that would be reaped in the next cycle(s).

So sometimes the end can justify the means, but only if there is something to justify the end. Saving the 50 billion justifies the end -- dead reapers.

Shepard stands there alone on the reject ending realizing the gravity of the choice just made, and hears the screams of everyone in the entire galaxy as they die. (they left the suicide scene out)

Modifié par sH0tgUn jUliA, 29 juin 2012 - 10:10 .


#98
daecath

daecath
  • Members
  • 1 277 messages

Jamie9 wrote...
We can't defeat the Reapers conventionally. That's stated by several characters throughout ME3.

Right, because they're so uber-powerful. Well except for the one we took out with a Cain hand cannon. And the one that we destroyed with a couple missiles off a truck. And the one that got eaten by the giant worm. And the one that we used the laser pointer thing to target its weakness. Oh right, and they have this glaring (literally) weakness where you just hit them in their laster lens.

Wait, why is a conventional victory not possible?

#99
zombieord

zombieord
  • Members
  • 231 messages

Rhiens VI wrote...

wh00ley 06 wrote...

You're killing the Geth and EDI which is genocide too. A 'greater good' person would let a terrorist kill a person two others can live, but a moral person would tell the terrorist to eat **** and die.


And, to continue the analogy, your so called "moral" person lets all three die. Because he didn't want to get his hands dirty by making a difficult choice.

Guess what, your hands are dirty anyway. You killed everyone, congratulations.

"Refuse" option is surrender through inaction. The most shameful way for Shepard to loose.





Shepard isn't the one doing the reaping... By cooperating with the Catalyst you are complicit in the Reapers actions and further their agenda. Why else do you think the Catalyst invites you up? He needs you to advance the Reaper agenda. He could leave you to die at the console, but instead, he beams you up to manipulate you into doing what he wants. Yes, even Destroy advances the Reaper agenda.

#100
flanny

flanny
  • Members
  • 1 164 messages
i chose the reject ending because i expected a decent ending, one where your choices and EMS determine if you you go out giving the reapers a bloody nose are even winning the battle for earth conventionally, i expected that Shepard would try to disable the catalyst or make the fleet aware of the catalyst and that it's destruction would make the reapers vulnerable... I was not expecting bioware to give me the finger

Though I'd still choose it as it's the only ending that comes close to making sense, I mean after fighting the reapers for three games the idea of Shepard turning around and saying 'okay O'wise and powerful reaper overlord, i accept your choices at face value and will now choose the one the that sucks the least'