Aller au contenu

Photo

There are no "good" choices, there are no "bad" choices. There is only the LINE.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
261 réponses à ce sujet

#126
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

Jade8aby88 wrote...

CronoDragoon wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

It is a good war time story ending to have morals take a sideline to survival. But in this case you're accepting the enemies options. Which you have no idea are coming.


They aren't the enemy's options. The Crucible changes the Catalyst, not the other way around.


But they are presented by the enemy.


He is merely a proxy. That is it.

#127
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages

MyChemicalBromance wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Destroy is the only ending I can stomach. Surviving is the sacrifice. The moral dilemma of bearing the brunt of what you've done.

Unless your Shepard was a sociopath I don't think many are going to wake up feeling like sunshine and daises.

I fail to see the major difference between Control and Destroy.

Either way you ignore the Catalyst's warnings, possibly setting up the galaxy for a future singularity. The only difference seems to be that the synthetics already exist in control, and thus "Destroy" may put off the singularity longer than control (of course, it depends on how long the Reapers hold out). And time isn't really relevant when compared to oblivion.

True, but you at least have the option to nagotiate synthesis instead of imposing it. Weare leting organics and synthetic choose instead of just forcing it.

#128
Geneaux486

Geneaux486
  • Members
  • 2 248 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

CronoDragoon wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

It is a good war time story ending to have morals take a sideline to survival. But in this case you're accepting the enemies options. Which you have no idea are coming.


They aren't the enemy's options. The Crucible changes the Catalyst, not the other way around.


But they are presented by the enemy.


He is merely a proxy. That is it.


Exactly.  He's basically surrendering, and telling you all of the Crucible's functions, even the one that kills it, as a gesture of good faith.

#129
CronoDragoon

CronoDragoon
  • Members
  • 10 413 messages

Jade8aby88 wrote...

CronoDragoon wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

It is a good war time story ending to have morals take a sideline to survival. But in this case you're accepting the enemies options. Which you have no idea are coming.


They aren't the enemy's options. The Crucible changes the Catalyst, not the other way around.


But they are presented by the enemy.


As in explained? Well...Bioware had to explain them somehow. Would your complaint be resolved if EDI explained them instead?

#130
Reptilian Rob

Reptilian Rob
  • Members
  • 5 964 messages

MyChemicalBromance wrote...

Reptilian Rob wrote...

MyChemicalBromance wrote...

Reptilian Rob wrote...

MyChemicalBromance wrote...

The problem with this statement is that you're assuming lives have value in the first place.

No, not life...The preservation of it. 

The preservation of the ability to induce and continue life at an individual level, or as it were the biological cycle in a natural form. That, is always valuable. 

Why?

That's the magic of life, and the qeustion that everyone wants answered. I would suggest joining a religion or becoming a cosmologist!

I fail to see the difference between cosmology and religion if you're attempting to divine ultimate meaning from cosmology.

When I asked "why?," I was asking you why life is inherently valuable. Why is anything valuable? That is not an answer waiting to be discovered, because humans invent the concept of value.

Some believe that value can be created (EDI's "Something greater"), but pure knowledge would have to exist for all time (since time is also a human construct). If it doesn't exist now, it doesn't exist.

I said either or, which ever suits you best. I don't know if you have strong convictions with god or not, or if you are a universal man. 

And like I said, that's the big question isn't it? But from the standpoint in the ME galaxy, it's valuable because it's what we fight for. It's purpose, it's drive and it's the love we feel towards each other. 

In our reality? Pick a theory, god, M theory, big chill, big crunch, big rip, ever expanding or intervention ETC. Life is what you make of it, not what others make of it. 

#131
xsdob

xsdob
  • Members
  • 8 575 messages
That was a great post, rather chilling but great. *claps*

Good job, man. Bravo.

#132
MyChemicalBromance

MyChemicalBromance
  • Members
  • 2 020 messages

dreman9999 wrote...

MyChemicalBromance wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Destroy is the only ending I can stomach. Surviving is the sacrifice. The moral dilemma of bearing the brunt of what you've done.

Unless your Shepard was a sociopath I don't think many are going to wake up feeling like sunshine and daises.

I fail to see the major difference between Control and Destroy.

Either way you ignore the Catalyst's warnings, possibly setting up the galaxy for a future singularity. The only difference seems to be that the synthetics already exist in control, and thus "Destroy" may put off the singularity longer than control (of course, it depends on how long the Reapers hold out). And time isn't really relevant when compared to oblivion.

True, but you at least have the option to nagotiate synthesis instead of imposing it. Weare leting organics and synthetic choose instead of just forcing it.

This justification doesn't make sense.

Did anyone "impose" life on them in the first place?

Does anyone "impose" death?

Death is unavoidable for organic life, thus any action that removes death is not imposition, but creation. That is why they are all "created" now.

#133
EnvyTB075

EnvyTB075
  • Members
  • 3 108 messages
Squash all life into Reaper form destroys individuality and destroys whatever beauty life had. Preservation is not the same as living.

Its also what Seele wanted, the hell am i agreeing with those *******, ever.

Modifié par EnvyTB075, 29 juin 2012 - 05:40 .


#134
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages
I am doing a whole new run through of the series this weekend.

**** is going to get CRAZY.

It will be glorious.

#135
Reptilian Rob

Reptilian Rob
  • Members
  • 5 964 messages

EnvyTB075 wrote...

Squash all life into Reaper form destroys individuality and destroys whatever beauty life had. Preservation is not the same as living.

Its also what Seele wanted, the hell am i agreeing with those *******, ever.

If you cease living, the preservation of who you were in that body is gone and only those around you will hold record. Life is the ability to choose, and the ability to make those hard choices. Life is about love, caring, friendship, crying, laughing, screaming, anger, and all those other emotions we feel. 

Without those, life doesn't mean a thing. It's just the prepetuation of biological function. Life is about so much more, life is about experience and knowledge. It's about crying on somone's shoulder or someone crying on yours, laughing with someone and talking about well...Life.

#136
Hey

Hey
  • Members
  • 4 080 messages
No good choices, right but...  one of the choices is ....wack/absurd/bad... but well narrated...

#137
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

Reptilian Rob wrote...

 Life is about love, caring, friendship, crying, laughing, screaming, anger, and all those other emotions we feel. 

Without those, life doesn't mean a thing. It's just the prepetuation of biological function. Life is about so much more, life is about experience and knowledge. It's about crying on somone's shoulder or someone crying on yours, laughing with someone and talking about well...Life.


Bro. Bro. You're going to make me cry.

THIS is what Mass Effect was about.

Being alive.

#138
Jadebaby

Jadebaby
  • Members
  • 13 229 messages
the 3 choices are not the galaxy winning on their terms, it is not Shepard winning on her/his terms, which breaks a massive theme established in the past two games.

I played ME1 because Shepard climbed out of that rubble.
I played ME2 because with enough work, you could ensure everyones survival, including your own.
I did not pay ME3 because I knew that no matter what I did, I could not win, just compromise.

#139
Reptilian Rob

Reptilian Rob
  • Members
  • 5 964 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

Reptilian Rob wrote...

 Life is about love, caring, friendship, crying, laughing, screaming, anger, and all those other emotions we feel. 

Without those, life doesn't mean a thing. It's just the prepetuation of biological function. Life is about so much more, life is about experience and knowledge. It's about crying on somone's shoulder or someone crying on yours, laughing with someone and talking about well...Life.


Bro. Bro. You're going to make me cry.

THIS is what Mass Effect was about.

Being alive.

It was about being alive the way you wanted, the way you felt was YOUR RIGHT!

As Shepard, are you willing to take that away from them with Synthesis...So that they can survive? Are you willing to cross that fine...Fine line?

(Damn dude, this is the deepest thread ever. Props and high fives to everyone here! <3)

Modifié par Reptilian Rob, 29 juin 2012 - 05:50 .


#140
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages
There are no winners in wars. Only victims.

A war lasts until a compromise is reached. And that usually means significant destruction of the opposing force.

#141
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

CronoDragoon wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

It is a good war time story ending to have morals take a sideline to survival. But in this case you're accepting the enemies options. Which you have no idea are coming.


They aren't the enemy's options. The Crucible changes the Catalyst, not the other way around.


But they are presented by the enemy.


He is merely a proxy. That is it.

Exactly, You first have to understand what the enemies goal are and they are not to let Shepard control them or destroy them. 

#142
CronoDragoon

CronoDragoon
  • Members
  • 10 413 messages

Reptilian Rob wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Reptilian Rob wrote...

 Life is about love, caring, friendship, crying, laughing, screaming, anger, and all those other emotions we feel. 

Without those, life doesn't mean a thing. It's just the prepetuation of biological function. Life is about so much more, life is about experience and knowledge. It's about crying on somone's shoulder or someone crying on yours, laughing with someone and talking about well...Life.


Bro. Bro. You're going to make me cry.

THIS is what Mass Effect was about.

Being alive.

It was about being alive the way you wanted, the way you felt was YOUR RIGHT!

As Shepard, are you willing to take that away from them with Synthesis...So that they can survive? Are you willing to cross that fine...Fine line?


I don't like Synthesis, but I don't see how it prevents any of those things...

#143
Reptilian Rob

Reptilian Rob
  • Members
  • 5 964 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

There are no winners in wars. Only victims.

A war lasts until a compromise is reached. And that usually means significant destruction of the opposing force.

Men like us have to cross a fine line at somepoint...We can only hope we die, after crossing it. Because when you live through something, the culmination of what you did and the destruction you wrought...When someone asks how you survied...You didn't. The man you are is dead, and only the line remains.

Modifié par Reptilian Rob, 29 juin 2012 - 05:53 .


#144
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages
Have you seen The Thin Red Line?

DEVASTATING.

#145
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages

CronoDragoon wrote...

Reptilian Rob wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Reptilian Rob wrote...

 Life is about love, caring, friendship, crying, laughing, screaming, anger, and all those other emotions we feel. 

Without those, life doesn't mean a thing. It's just the prepetuation of biological function. Life is about so much more, life is about experience and knowledge. It's about crying on somone's shoulder or someone crying on yours, laughing with someone and talking about well...Life.


Bro. Bro. You're going to make me cry.

THIS is what Mass Effect was about.

Being alive.

It was about being alive the way you wanted, the way you felt was YOUR RIGHT!

As Shepard, are you willing to take that away from them with Synthesis...So that they can survive? Are you willing to cross that fine...Fine line?


I don't like Synthesis, but I don't see how it prevents any of those things...

Of course there a reason, it's basicly mass indctrinations. The star child litterly tells you it changes how organics and synthetics think...The only dofference is the waht the reapers want to do is not sinister and the moral issue is that it's not force. Synthesis is basicly the same option to rewrite the heritic geth in Legions Mission only it includes everyone now.

#146
Reptilian Rob

Reptilian Rob
  • Members
  • 5 964 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

Have you seen The Thin Red Line?

DEVASTATING.

Yes, much better than Saving Private Ryan. 

#147
CronoDragoon

CronoDragoon
  • Members
  • 10 413 messages

Jade8aby88 wrote...

the 3 choices are not the galaxy winning on their terms, it is not Shepard winning on her/his terms, which breaks a massive theme established in the past two games.

I played ME1 because Shepard climbed out of that rubble.
I played ME2 because with enough work, you could ensure everyones survival, including your own.
I did not pay ME3 because I knew that no matter what I did, I could not win, just compromise.


I agree that ME3's ending does not satisfy when considering the series as a whole. I'm just trying to steer people away from this notion that Shepard surrendered to the Catalyst, or that he didn't win the war or save the galaxy. He didn't, he did and he did, but lots of people feel that the sacrifice, even in the EC, was too jarring.

#148
Geneaux486

Geneaux486
  • Members
  • 2 248 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

I am doing a whole new run through of the series this weekend.

**** is going to get CRAZY.

It will be glorious.


I did that not too long ago.  It feels weird going back through Mass Effect the first after so much time.  Depending on how long it's been since you last played it, I guess.

#149
MyChemicalBromance

MyChemicalBromance
  • Members
  • 2 020 messages

Reptilian Rob wrote...

MyChemicalBromance wrote...

Reptilian Rob wrote...

MyChemicalBromance wrote...

Reptilian Rob wrote...

MyChemicalBromance wrote...

The problem with this statement is that you're assuming lives have value in the first place.

No, not life...The preservation of it. 

The preservation of the ability to induce and continue life at an individual level, or as it were the biological cycle in a natural form. That, is always valuable. 

Why?

That's the magic of life, and the qeustion that everyone wants answered. I would suggest joining a religion or becoming a cosmologist!

I fail to see the difference between cosmology and religion if you're attempting to divine ultimate meaning from cosmology.

When I asked "why?," I was asking you why life is inherently valuable. Why is anything valuable? That is not an answer waiting to be discovered, because humans invent the concept of value.

Some believe that value can be created (EDI's "Something greater"), but pure knowledge would have to exist for all time (since time is also a human construct). If it doesn't exist now, it doesn't exist.

I said either or, which ever suits you best. I don't know if you have strong convictions with god or not, or if you are a universal man. 

And like I said, that's the big question isn't it? But from the standpoint in the ME galaxy, it's valuable because it's what we fight for. It's purpose, it's drive and it's the love we feel towards each other. 

In our reality? Pick a theory, god, M theory, big chill, big crunch, big rip, ever expanding or intervention ETC. Life is what you make of it, not what others make of it. 


My issue comes with the fact that one second you're arguing that morality doesn't exist, and the next you're making narrative arguments. A nihilist can't deny his cake and eat it too.

And there's no meaningful difference between Mass Effect and any other myth (such as freedom, human rights, religion, society etc) we tell ourselves. We create all of them to make ourselves feel better. We can't know everything (it's an assumption to even say there is an everything to know), so we do what we can with the limited information available to us. That comes down to recognising patterns; an action dependent on our time-dependent thought process. The only way a pattern could be absolute truth is if it encompassed the entirety of reality, not just an arbitarily defined "closed" system. But even that statement assumes reality has limits, an assumption that reeks of human limitations.

If you're going to make narrative arguments then fine, just realize that denying the existance of morality can lead to much bleaker conclusions, and the thoughts you'll end up with are worthless and painful. Then again, it's only depressing if you expected something more.

#150
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages

Reptilian Rob wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

There are no winners in wars. Only victims.

A war lasts until a compromise is reached. And that usually means significant destruction of the opposing force.

Men like us have to cross a fine line at somepoint...We can only hope we die, after crossing it. Because when you live through something, the culmination of what you did and the destruction you wrought...When someone asks how you survied...You didn't. The man you are is dead, and only the line remains.

That's my main Shepard in a nut shell.