android654 wrote...
When I say evil, I mean that he's calculating and cold. Everything I've read about his time at the KGB and as President shows that the guy is cold blooded. The way journalists write about his handling of terrorists in the Moscow Theater Hostage Crisis and other things come more as an influence of him and guys like him creating the FSB and the SVR. But the SVR are jokes, especially when you see how they handled their time in the U.S. It was like a B version of "Get Smart." It's a lot different from American handlings of things. We tend to be a little bit neater, with those types of things, and we leave less of a mess.
Then there's the issue of having a spook as a president. What is he really going to tell you if he spent most of his life in a career where everything was "need to know?" If there's anything of consequence going on, no one would know about it until he wanted them to. Interpret that how you will, but the guy does not blink, for anything.
Well he's received a lot of awards from the state by being a goodwill ambassador for the country. I've also seen his remarks about democracy being bad. Still love to see him slap a guy with a fish, or flip someone around a dozen different ways be their tie. The guy's a legend.
I suppose that's true. Especially now, "badasses" find their niche and do what comes natural I suppose. In other periods of time they seem to shine a bit more and were held in a different light.
Ahh true enough in that case. As to spook or not. Never trust anyone that speaks for someone powerful. As one, they will always lie or use half truths. Or two. They will tell the whole truth and generally arn't worth trusting, as would you place trust in a clumsy person to pull you from a ledge? ah well.
Hmm might be, and I didn't think of his good will work. Normally I look at things from an Eastern perspective I'll openly admit, but "goodwill ambassadors" I see as little play things and popular figures of western invention...but a friendly face to the world would be a Chinese thing to do, and in keeping with the views and history of the people. If you want to lower ones guards or make a favorable image, or one of weakness, who is better, a strong man, or a clown?
Hmm also true, though I find in the west at the least, that "place" grows smaller and more to the sides, in favor of the Merchant and lawmakers. Hmm I find they still shine as much. A light always shines, but to paraphrase a saying in various martial scripts.
"The brightest light is found in the Warrior, few men are such and truely great. In times of peace the room grows larger (that is populations) and while the light is always as bright and in same number, what it reaches grows dimmer."
Basically just the ratio of "badasses" to the normal citizenry is at a 100 to 1 ratio, even modern military studiest seem to support this, plus even trained soldiers have shown not to be equal, even in the age of firearms with those few. When major wars or risky ventures happen, those genetic markers or mindsets, are largely the ones that survive and thrive, while the average citizenry, from 4000bc, till 2012 ad, always will die in the largest numbers. So in more older or violent times those men shine more as...well lack of a better word, the darkness shrinks.
Its like, say a thousand voices say no to such and such a manner, the heavily outnumber the 100 that say yes. That 100 is good for 500 but not a thousand...if however the numbers drop to 400...
The fact is however when wars arn't being waged, or times of hardship, exploration, or risk, and the numbers are in favor of the more numerous sorts, then the balance shifts, and such men are useless. Its been seen countless times in history. When a trying time arises, great men always are found. When times of stagnation or peace are around, poor men are always found. In an odd manner, Peace can in some matters be far more destructive to the human condition than war. While at the same time War can be damaging to life in general.
Modifié par Confess-A-Bear, 01 juillet 2012 - 02:07 .