Aller au contenu

Photo

Would you have given Shepard permission for Synthesis? [POLL]


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
406 réponses à ce sujet

#301
s8383783

s8383783
  • Members
  • 37 messages

Mckay91 wrote...

Hmmm... Access to infinite knowledge spanning the entire course of Galactic History, borderline immortality and a free life. Or a violent death, most likely being turned into a Husk.

I can see why people are struggling with the choice.




Don't you realise?! People will lose their "individuality"! We'll all be the same green eyed-rash having beings! :crying:

#302
kar259

kar259
  • Members
  • 10 messages
It all depends on what you think synthesis means. I choose to believe that it is simply added synthetic components to organics in order to increase lifespan, cure disease, increase intelligence, etc. I think that everyone retains their independent thought, with no hive mind or any of that other stuff that turns people off to synthesis. Not to mention liberating the countless civilizations that came before and gaining access to their knowledge

#303
Wydi

Wydi
  • Members
  • 92 messages

kar259 wrote...

It all depends on what you think synthesis means. I choose to believe that it is simply added synthetic components to organics in order to increase lifespan, cure disease, increase intelligence, etc. I think that everyone retains their independent thought, with no hive mind or any of that other stuff that turns people off to synthesis. Not to mention liberating the countless civilizations that came before and gaining access to their knowledge

But how would this bring any kind of peace to the organics and the synthetics?
You know..if I woke up some day and looked like a second Terminator, I still wanted the reapers to "die", I still disliked one of my now-partly-Terminator-ish-neighbors and all that stuff.
In order for the Synthesis ending to make any sense, everyone's former identity has to be lost or altered in some way.

#304
Rex Fallout

Rex Fallout
  • Members
  • 205 messages

Jamie9 wrote...

Just because someone has done terribly immoral acts before does not mean they will not become a productive member of society.


People don't change.  You can delude yourself into thinking otherwise- but refusal to accept this will only end up hurting you in the end.  People don't change.  They are who they are, they may make poor decisions on occasion and then turn their lives around- but when they physically choose something like say, commit mass genocide, continue to ignore the well being of everyone around them to do Meth, (Personal experience with that one), etc.  They will not change.  They will not become a productive member of society.  And frankly, even if they could, I wouldn't forgive them enough to work with them.  

#305
themikefest

themikefest
  • Members
  • 21 613 messages
no, but he** f**king no

#306
Hackulator

Hackulator
  • Members
  • 1 606 messages
Is it really your belief that the only way to peace is brainwashing? Since nowhere in Synthesis does it say anything about brainwashing people or even changing their personalities, it just says that Synthesis leads to peace. Is Galactic-Wide brainwashing truly the only way you can conceive of peace?

#307
XxDarkTimexX

XxDarkTimexX
  • Members
  • 431 messages
no nothing is to perfect

#308
Wydi

Wydi
  • Members
  • 92 messages

Hackulator wrote...

Is it really your belief that the only way to peace is brainwashing? Since nowhere in Synthesis does it say anything about brainwashing people or even changing their personalities, it just says that Synthesis leads to peace. Is Galactic-Wide brainwashing truly the only way you can conceive of peace?

No, but it's the only way that has something to do with Synthesis and can do it this fast, and it totally fits in.
Simply making you partly synthetic isn't really a synthesis at all, it's just..augmentation.

#309
Hackulator

Hackulator
  • Members
  • 1 606 messages

Wydi wrote...

Hackulator wrote...

Is it really your belief that the only way to peace is brainwashing? Since nowhere in Synthesis does it say anything about brainwashing people or even changing their personalities, it just says that Synthesis leads to peace. Is Galactic-Wide brainwashing truly the only way you can conceive of peace?

No, but it's the only way that has something to do with Synthesis and can do it this fast, and it totally fits in.
Simply making you partly synthetic isn't really a synthesis at all, it's just..augmentation.


Actually, there already IS Galactic peace, the races have come together to fight the Reapers and now the Reapers are no longer fighting. Synthesis simply gives the Galaxy the tools to avoid falling back into war.

For example, Synthesis is supposed to basically give Organics the positive attributes of Synthetics. One obvious strength of Synthetics is the ability to autonomously control the functions of their own body. This could allow the Krogan to self regulate their birth rate, thus having families and growing as a society without giving birth to so many children that they have no choice but to go to war for more resources.

This is only one o fthe many ways synthesis can lead to a Utopian society without the need for any sort of brain washing. The possibilities are limited only by your imagination.

#310
s8383783

s8383783
  • Members
  • 37 messages

Wydi wrote...

kar259 wrote...

It all depends on what you think synthesis means. I choose to believe that it is simply added synthetic components to organics in order to increase lifespan, cure disease, increase intelligence, etc. I think that everyone retains their independent thought, with no hive mind or any of that other stuff that turns people off to synthesis. Not to mention liberating the countless civilizations that came before and gaining access to their knowledge

But how would this bring any kind of peace to the organics and the synthetics?
You know..if I woke up some day and looked like a second Terminator, I still wanted the reapers to "die", I still disliked one of my now-partly-Terminator-ish-neighbors and all that stuff.
In order for the Synthesis ending to make any sense, everyone's former identity has to be lost or altered in some way.


Increased knowledege and understanding would definitely bring peace. I'm sure the initial shock of it all was a bit much, but I doubt everyone is in 'reapers must die' mode.  If you go by what the Catalyst said the Reapers were just instruments to carry out the plan, I'd use the whole "do you get mad at the gun or the shooter' thing but it feels a tad cliche :P. Plus they are even sharing knowledge and helping rebuilding. 

And I don't believe anyones identity has to be altered, they are gaining knowledge and with that a new understanding. 

#311
s8383783

s8383783
  • Members
  • 37 messages

Rex Fallout wrote...

Jamie9 wrote...

Just because someone has done terribly immoral acts before does not mean they will not become a productive member of society.


People don't change.  You can delude yourself into thinking otherwise- but refusal to accept this will only end up hurting you in the end.  People don't change.  They are who they are, they may make poor decisions on occasion and then turn their lives around- but when they physically choose something like say, commit mass genocide, continue to ignore the well being of everyone around them to do Meth, (Personal experience with that one), etc.  They will not change.  They will not become a productive member of society.  And frankly, even if they could, I wouldn't forgive them enough to work with them.  


Someone sounds a tad bitter. :?

#312
TaradosGon

TaradosGon
  • Members
  • 299 messages
Say your country's government came out tomorrow and revealed that for the past week, without your permission, they put a new compound in your drinking water that will cure AIDS, prevent and cure cancer with a 100% success rate, restore you to a healthy BMI, increase energy, extend lifespan by 50%, repair brain damage, increases brain function and drastically improves memory, and helps ward off the effects of aging, yet the only side effect is that the top of your tongue will turn black. And now that the compound is in your body, it's permanent.

Sure, A LOT of people are going to be initially upset since they didn't consent to this and they are going to be paranoid about the government and fearful of any effects it might have. But as time passes and people are "miraculously" healing from diseases, living longer, becoming smarter, maintaining health, having fewer miscarriages and with newborns having unprecedented survival rates and being perfectly healthy, all at the cost of a harmless discoloration of the tongue, exactly how long are people going to be mad, when there are only benefits (aside from your tongue), and really huge benefits?

Now say that you find out that the whole reason that this compound was released into your water supply is because your country was at war and the enemy country requested that you release this compound as part of the peace conditions. The alternatives were that your country was going to continue to fight and suffer millions of casualties and ultimately lose, or your country's military leaders saw the possibility for victory by sacrificing millions of citizens from an allied nation that had been faithfully fighting along side your nation's armed forces as cannon fodder, so that you could exploit a weakness in the enemy's defenses..

I mean, you would really rather fight to the death or sacrifice your faithful ally for victory rather than tolerate the continued existence of your former enemy who is offering very generous peace terms from which you benefit? Yes, someone decided your fate for you, but you would really prefer that you and everyone you know die, or to sacrifice millions of allies just to make the enemy pay? They are reaching out to you at the peace table when wiping you off the map would be just as easy for them.

If I found out my nation's leader rejected the peace terms or sacrificed millions of allies rather than agreeing, I'd be pretty angry. I wouldn't be saying ,"curse you, Shepard for not dooming us to extinction or sacrificing our allies. What gives you the right to improve our standard of living through altering biological pathways without our consent, you monster!"

Synthesize away, Shep.

Modifié par TaradosGon, 30 juin 2012 - 01:32 .


#313
BP20125810

BP20125810
  • Members
  • 508 messages
It's a video game. Synthesis is the coolest ending. I picked it. I liked it. Nobody got "raped" And nobody has sent me letters complaining. It's cool if you don't like synthesis. Just stop hating on it.

#314
Hackulator

Hackulator
  • Members
  • 1 606 messages

BP20125810 wrote...

It's a video game. Synthesis is the coolest ending. I picked it. I liked it. Nobody got "raped" And nobody has sent me letters complaining. It's cool if you don't like synthesis. Just stop hating on it.


I mean, at this point its not just a discussion about the ending of a video game, its a debate on comparative morality.

#315
justafan

justafan
  • Members
  • 2 407 messages
No. I would not accept a Reaper approved synthesis.

Were it upgrades designed and made by humans, then I would strongly consider it, since we as a species have earned it ourselves. Actually if any living species besides the Reapers offered it I would strongly consider it.

However, I would never consent to upgrades from such monsters as the reapers, though I admit it is mostly a matter of principle.

#316
Hackulator

Hackulator
  • Members
  • 1 606 messages

justafan wrote...

No. I would not accept a Reaper approved synthesis.

Were it upgrades designed and made by humans, then I would strongly consider it, since we as a species have earned it ourselves. Actually if any living species besides the Reapers offered it I would strongly consider it.

However, I would never consent to upgrades from such monsters as the reapers, though I admit it is mostly a matter of principle.


Actually, Synthesis is the result of the Crucible, not the Reapers. Therefore, it is the combined idea of every cycle that has come before.

#317
justafan

justafan
  • Members
  • 2 407 messages

Hackulator wrote...

justafan wrote...

No. I would not accept a Reaper approved synthesis.

Were it upgrades designed and made by humans, then I would strongly consider it, since we as a species have earned it ourselves. Actually if any living species besides the Reapers offered it I would strongly consider it.

However, I would never consent to upgrades from such monsters as the reapers, though I admit it is mostly a matter of principle.


Actually, Synthesis is the result of the Crucible, not the Reapers. Therefore, it is the combined idea of every cycle that has come before.


The catalyst mentions trying synthesis out himself, though it didn't work.  I took that as meaning that research went into the Crucible's version, hence it contains reaper tech.  Not to mention I would prefer it to be the work of a living species, one that I know, preferrably my own.  It is safer that way.

#318
3DandBeyond

3DandBeyond
  • Members
  • 7 579 messages

s8383783 wrote...


Increased knowledege and understanding would definitely bring peace. I'm sure the initial shock of it all was a bit much, but I doubt everyone is in 'reapers must die' mode.  If you go by what the Catalyst said the Reapers were just instruments to carry out the plan, I'd use the whole "do you get mad at the gun or the shooter' thing but it feels a tad cliche :P. Plus they are even sharing knowledge and helping rebuilding. 

And I don't believe anyones identity has to be altered, they are gaining knowledge and with that a new understanding. 


The difference is the gun doesn't carry people goo inside it.  If that gun had your daughter's goo in it, I think you'd pretty much hate it. And many people do blame guns because they are easier to kill with from a distance impersonally rather than say a knife which means you must get down and dirty.

The reapers were not mere tools, no matter what the kid says.  But he contradicts himself in that he is them and they are him.

The reapers killed billions or turned them into goo, so any reaper that comes to your front door might have your family inside it, or maybe the people of the town where you were born.  Liara was despondent about Thessia-do you really think she could forget that?

Consider this...Jeffrey Dahmer willfully ate parts of some of his victims.  Of course people hated him, and with good reason.  His apartment never did anything, he did.  The families of victims petitioned successfully to have his apartment demolished.  The Sharon Tate house also was demolished.  Todd, your cousin died in Bob the reaper over there.  Hi, Todd.

Synthesis is non-evolution and advancement before people are ready.  It is also forced upon them without their consent.  The only implied consent given was to destroy the reapers because that was the goal all along.  In fact, there were people that didn't like implants even and Synthesis goes further.

Also, when you do not learn something for yourself, you may know it, but it isn't the same as learing it for yourself.  That is what evolution is-growth of the mind and the character and the spirit, even.  The well-rounded person.

And supposedly, advancement with tech (which the kid still says is new DNA) is supposedly perfection.  In whose warped mind?  I know I will never be perfect, don't care to be.  Because perfection is unreal and superficial.  I am human, I will die, but before then I will live and I will learn and maybe become better or do better and enjoy overcoming my mistakes.  If only one person feels as I do-that the would not want to be Synthesized and if only one person feels as I do, that a galaxy with one reaper alive in it is one reaper too many, then Synthesis is wrong.

No one that watched Palaven or Earth or Thessia dying or that was on the Collector base or on Horizon or Eden Prime with Husks on dragon's teeth or that had seen someone indoctrinated on Virmire or that had had to kill 300k Batarians to delay the reapers, would want one reaper left alive in the galaxy.

#319
3DandBeyond

3DandBeyond
  • Members
  • 7 579 messages

justafan wrote...


The catalyst mentions trying synthesis out himself, though it didn't work.  I took that as meaning that research went into the Crucible's version, hence it contains reaper tech.  Not to mention I would prefer it to be the work of a living species, one that I know, preferrably my own.  It is safer that way.


He said it didn't work because it couldn't be forced.  So, apparently Shepard is the one who is able to forcibly invade the bodies of unknowing people and alter them though they may be unwilling.  And now it's ok.

#320
justafan

justafan
  • Members
  • 2 407 messages

3DandBeyond wrote...

justafan wrote...


The catalyst mentions trying synthesis out himself, though it didn't work.  I took that as meaning that research went into the Crucible's version, hence it contains reaper tech.  Not to mention I would prefer it to be the work of a living species, one that I know, preferrably my own.  It is safer that way.


He said it didn't work because it couldn't be forced.  So, apparently Shepard is the one who is able to forcibly invade the bodies of unknowing people and alter them though they may be unwilling.  And now it's ok.


Well, Shepard did come back from the dead to lead his 12 followers to save the world from the ultimate evil.  So Space Jesus can do what he wants.  I still don't think it is OK though.

#321
memorysquid

memorysquid
  • Members
  • 681 messages

Wydi wrote...

kar259 wrote...

It all depends on what you think synthesis means. I choose to believe that it is simply added synthetic components to organics in order to increase lifespan, cure disease, increase intelligence, etc. I think that everyone retains their independent thought, with no hive mind or any of that other stuff that turns people off to synthesis. Not to mention liberating the countless civilizations that came before and gaining access to their knowledge

But how would this bring any kind of peace to the organics and the synthetics?
You know..if I woke up some day and looked like a second Terminator, I still wanted the reapers to "die", I still disliked one of my now-partly-Terminator-ish-neighbors and all that stuff.
In order for the Synthesis ending to make any sense, everyone's former identity has to be lost or altered in some way.


Untrue.  Most people are bigots due to ignorance and lack of compassion.  Synthesis obviates both.  Did nobody listen to EDI's narration?

#322
memorysquid

memorysquid
  • Members
  • 681 messages

justafan wrote...

3DandBeyond wrote...

justafan wrote...


The catalyst mentions trying synthesis out himself, though it didn't work.  I took that as meaning that research went into the Crucible's version, hence it contains reaper tech.  Not to mention I would prefer it to be the work of a living species, one that I know, preferrably my own.  It is safer that way.


He said it didn't work because it couldn't be forced.  So, apparently Shepard is the one who is able to forcibly invade the bodies of unknowing people and alter them though they may be unwilling.  And now it's ok.


Well, Shepard did come back from the dead to lead his 12 followers to save the world from the ultimate evil.  So Space Jesus can do what he wants.  I still don't think it is OK though.


It's like someone reading the Bible and saying, wow this whole resurrection deal makes no sense!  How dare he commit me to some afterlife I might not want!  My autonomy!!!!  I demand a new ending!

#323
3DandBeyond

3DandBeyond
  • Members
  • 7 579 messages

justafan wrote...

3DandBeyond wrote...

justafan wrote...


The catalyst mentions trying synthesis out himself, though it didn't work.  I took that as meaning that research went into the Crucible's version, hence it contains reaper tech.  Not to mention I would prefer it to be the work of a living species, one that I know, preferrably my own.  It is safer that way.


He said it didn't work because it couldn't be forced.  So, apparently Shepard is the one who is able to forcibly invade the bodies of unknowing people and alter them though they may be unwilling.  And now it's ok.


Well, Shepard did come back from the dead to lead his 12 followers to save the world from the ultimate evil.  So Space Jesus can do what he wants.  I still don't think it is OK though.

Yeah space jesus.  The writers never met a cliche they didn't like.

Nor do I.  The only choice that even has any implied consent for me is
destroy because it's what everyone wanted to do all along.  I don't like
it.  In fact I feel the game is a complete no win.  I prefer at least
one choice that lets me enjoy the ending.  I don't enjoy any of these
and I don't play what isn't fun.  Play and fun go hand in hand. 

#324
TheGreatDayne

TheGreatDayne
  • Members
  • 1 220 messages
From what little I remember, Synthesis gives us the collective knowledge of all the advanced species from before...

Yes, I want to know what they knew! Don't know how that would help me, personally, but I like knowing things, even useless things.

#325
Peregrin25

Peregrin25
  • Members
  • 660 messages
I would have to say no. If someone made that choice without the decision of the entire civilized galaxy, I would use my supremely evolved self to hunt that bastard down and destroy him, and would be like Synthesize this b*tch! BAM!

lol