McD1330 wrote...
chriseggroll wrote...
Hackulator wrote...
Ok so, it seems so far people are voting no, because they feel that Synthesis changes them intrinsically in some way, which it does. However, while making you more intelligent and more competent might change you, its true, why is that a bad thing.
Or, to put it in way that makes you take another look at things, would it be morally wrong to find a treatment or cure for a person who was mentally handicapped? Doing so would inherently change who they are, wouldn't it?
He doesn't know what it will do, but supposedly being fused with synthetic life in some way. What makes you you, and how this would affect your personality etc are I think very good reasons for not wanting to go through with this. At the very least, every person should be able to make that choice, and making that choice for every living thing in the entire galaxy I think, is evil. As to your situation with the handicapped person, well that would be their parent/guardian's decision and would only affect them, not really similar to the scale of this decision.
So what did you choose instead?
For lack of a better option, I chose destroy. Control seems like a choice no Shepard would make to me, because we just had a long discussion with TIM about the inability to control them, how we are not ready to have that kind of control etc and we ended up killing him over it. Would Shepard really be that much of a hypocrite?
The whole point of all 3 games really has been "stop the reapers," first it was preventing their return, and then when that wasn't possible, destroying them. with the reapers dead, conflict with synthetics might happen again, but nothing could be as bad as the reaper invasion is/was, and with this invasion down in the history books, it seems likely all races would be working to prevent that from happening.