Fauxnormal wrote...
Please learn what oblivious means.
Nope, not at all. But you're clearly trying to start an arguement. Also, your defensiveness amuses me.
take case A: a person is open-minded, when presented with a situation that is unfamiliar with them, they accept what happens. However, during acceptance, they also do not see the longer term ramifications of the situation.
I told you already, open-mind and oblivious are not mutually exclusive, also telling me to go 'learn what oblivious means' just makes your argument look weaker.
You're offering no refusal of my opinion about destroy, say we'll never agree, then rise to my dismissive comment - takes two to tango.

anyhoo; my argument still stands:
Subject9x wrote...
geth/edi were killed by authorial fiat in an attempt to make the other 2 choices somehow palatable.
you claim theres nothing wrong with other two, but never provide any specific examples. I based my statement on looking at the writing of the game.