kathic wrote...
1) Indoc theory is dead thank god.
2) Any game they make would need to occur in the years between ME1 and ME2. There is not enough time to really have anything occur before ME1 because humanity is insanely new to the galaxy. The ending to ME3 even with Destroy would be make any game depressing.
Why? Set it when things are rebuilt with Reaper help or not. Synthesis is rather awkward though, so that would need to be canon or not. Ditto with genophage cured krogan and whether the geth and quarians are alive or not. Have them all alive and the game universe is pretty much what it was before 1.kathic wrote...
1) Indoc theory is dead thank god.
2) Any game they make would need to occur in the years between ME1 and ME2. There is not enough time to really have anything occur before ME1 because humanity is insanely new to the galaxy. The ending to ME3 even with Destroy would be make any game depressing.
it is not acceptable to choose at the begining the ending of the prevous game makeing any outcome canon?Firecell11 wrote...
ediskrad327 wrote...
or assuming the next game is Mass Effect 4 they could pull a Kotor 2
Kotor 2 is more than 6 years old. It was acceptable back then but not for today.
Xellith wrote...
Nerana wrote...
I thought Bioware wasn't going to do any other ME games that take place after ME3 anyway, so if that's true they don't need to make a canon ending at all. Maybe it's just a rumour though.
The dev team have said many things. Name me one thing they said that actually came true however...
blue water wrote...
Forget cannon, canon, where's this cannon?Karimloo wrote...
kaotician wrote...
Karimloo wrote...
That's a cannon, not canon, dummy.
It is canon.
Modifié par N-Seven, 29 juin 2012 - 11:32 .
Wrath of Bastila Shan wrote...
I've never read any of the Mass Effect books that are currently out, but don't any of them say what happens to Shepard/Harbinger/TIM//The Catalyst/Destroy or Control? Or do the the books have nothing to do with Shepard and Shepard is just Bioware's offshoot character?
books avoid to depct theses choices since they don't want to make a canon shepard that nobody would care aboutWrath of Bastila Shan wrote...
I've never read any of the Mass Effect books that are currently out, but don't any of them say what happens to Shepard/Harbinger/TIM//The Catalyst/Destroy or Control? Or do the the books have nothing to do with Shepard and Shepard is just Bioware's offshoot character?
Will they get too much backlash from people who made other choices?sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
They opened up the ME universe for a future. A canon ending is probably going to be high EMS destroy.
Firecell11 wrote...
If Bioware want to continue the Mass Effect universe then there has to be a canon ending for ME3.
Don't they have to follow the lore? Yeah we have that Stargazer scene set long time after the events of ME3 and people remeber the story. But this scene makes literally 0 sense with synthesis and control. I can't imagine a new game set after Mass Effect 3 if synthesis and control are real. How can you make sequals with this? I really don't know.
Personally I think (the Indoctrination Theory) or destroy ending are the only ways to go.
Perhaps even Refusal but it doesn't makes sense to me. Why does Liara's VI say the Crucible didn't work when it works just perfectly? Shepard didn't press a button now we're all dead? This ending shouldn't even be in the EC.
I pray to god they don't make another shooter that would be ridiculous.
Thoughts?
Alushadow wrote...
Firecell11 wrote...
If Bioware want to continue the Mass Effect universe then there has to be a canon ending for ME3.
Don't they have to follow the lore? Yeah we have that Stargazer scene set long time after the events of ME3 and people remeber the story. But this scene makes literally 0 sense with synthesis and control. I can't imagine a new game set after Mass Effect 3 if synthesis and control are real. How can you make sequals with this? I really don't know.
Personally I think (the Indoctrination Theory) or destroy ending are the only ways to go.
Perhaps even Refusal but it doesn't makes sense to me. Why does Liara's VI say the Crucible didn't work when it works just perfectly? Shepard didn't press a button now we're all dead? This ending shouldn't even be in the EC.
I pray to god they don't make another shooter that would be ridiculous.
Thoughts?
there is non we got screwed harder then a a wall hit by a wrecking ball
i stand by my sign at all times
ME3- it had ended before it even started
thats the game filled with stupid plot holes
with a rogue AI with weak character that was added 10 minutes before the game came out
so ... all the endings are super bad taking to account that mr star child could have activated the mass relay or the reapers at the start of ME1 pretty much a paradox on the whole trilogy
he was there but he didn't do anything to effect anyone or get the reapers in and he appears only in the last 10 minutes of the whole trilogy
that was what the writer's gave us WEAK PLOT and a bad end to a master piece
apparently that's how "Bioware Rolls"
there are thousand holes currently in the plot of ME
the ME3 that was poorly written as if a brain dmged child was the one to come up with the story
ME3 left holes in ME1 and ME2 rendering the whole game trilogy in ruins
and they attempted to "fix " the mega bad and weak plot
with some 1-2 minute "talking with pictures"
and "the question" that proves that that little kid wasnt even supposed to be there he just got in at the final 10 minutes of the making so they had to do EC to give him some conversation options
since he for billions of years been committing genocide on entire galactic civilizations
cuz REALLY trying to "get peace" is just too much work
so to murder everyone much faster and more efficient
Modifié par Firecell11, 29 juin 2012 - 11:40 .
ChrisDV wrote...
There IS a canon ending.
It's just as canon as Shepard's gender.
saracen16 wrote...
ChrisDV wrote...
There IS a canon ending.
It's just as canon as Shepard's gender.
/thread
Well what are you going to do with the other two? In control you have an omnipotent being protecting everyone making sure no bad things occur or else they get massively stomped or you go with synthesis in which literally nothing bad every happens again and everyone lives in peace and harmony in a utopia. The only endings with a story decent enough for a sequel are destroy and the reject ending and I doubt they would go with reject as the universe would simply be too alien for any newcomers to the genre ( however I think it would work great as a side game). So in the end destroy is the only ending where you can get a sequel.Reorte wrote...
Will they get too much backlash from people who made other choices?sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
They opened up the ME universe for a future. A canon ending is probably going to be high EMS destroy.
Karimloo wrote...
blue water wrote...
Forget cannon, canon, where's this cannon?Karimloo wrote...
kaotician wrote...
Karimloo wrote...
That's a cannon, not canon, dummy.
It is canon.
It is written, canon will only cannon whatever is canon. Therefore the cannon will canon for all of eternity for canon.
- Canon, Cannon.
RyMann88 wrote...
If they did continue the franchise post-trilogy, you'd be surprised what kind of shortcuts they'd most likely take.
For Control/Synthesis they'd come up with a rather simple/vague reason for why the Reapers left. Destroy is pretty obvious. The tricky part is what happened to Shepard. He'd obviously have to remain absent and then they can just add a dialog hook that checks the plot stake (Shepard is Catalyst/dead/etc). Then it's simple texture swaps based on if you chose Synthesis or not. Beyond that they would most likely make ME4 or any future ME title about 95% unrelated to ME3.
Retour en haut
