Aller au contenu

Photo

We are not all heartless murderers! Discussion of Destroy


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
933 réponses à ce sujet

#326
Kaica

Kaica
  • Members
  • 86 messages

77boy84 wrote...

I think one of the few good things to come out the ME3 endings is the arguments about about which one is better. They're ALL terrible endings. You guys are literally arguing "Well, this pile of poop isn't as bad as THAT pile of poop!"

Who cares! They're all garbage!


I have to add that these were the only garbages we were given. Unfortunately :D

#327
Forbry

Forbry
  • Members
  • 446 messages

CesarSan wrote...

The destroy option implies that the cycle will eventually begin again.

Yes, it does and so few people who chose destroy seem to get that. Their choice took lives AND changed NOTHING!

#328
AxStapleton

AxStapleton
  • Members
  • 645 messages
[quote]Kaica wrote...


[/quote]I have a huge problem with people who choose destroy for selfish reasons, i respect people who choose it for the reason you do but i still think you guys commited wrongful genocide.

Which brings us back to the fact that there are no right or wrong answers on this one, only opinions. We can respect each others' opinions and have a good conversation, or we can't, and it all ends in "I'm right, you're wrong"-debate. I think you have brought up excellent reason to choose reject: it's the only fair-for-all option of them all. I'm a perfectionist, and your reason tickles me in a good way. I also see the flaw in your choice (everyone dies and no one is left to enjoy the result). Most of all I want to destroy the reapers, so I stay in my choice and Destroy.

No matter how much one believes his/her choice to be the right one, the best one, to some other it is not. It is something we can either argue to the end of the world or accept and let ourselves broaden our horizons. Okay, now I'm beginning to sound like a preacher, so I'll stop ;)

Anyway, thanks for everyone, I had lots of fun :) <3
[/quote]

Keep Preachin!:lol:

Modifié par AxStapleton, 01 juillet 2012 - 07:50 .


#329
Rhosyn

Rhosyn
  • Members
  • 37 messages
I keep hearing Khaijit parrot the same words...I don't think he has a real argument. Prove me wrong. Can you say that the ENTIRE GALAXY would be okay with you condemning them to death? You clearly don't understand the part where the Reapers can't be defeated wihout the Crucible. You're beat over the damn head with it numerous times. You would've willingly ignored every caveat to think you still had a chance of winning. The galaxy got behind Shepard with the idea of defeating the Reapers. Nowhere in that did they agree wholesale eradication was a choice. And if you think the galaxy is somehow above "genocide"....I give you Rachni, the Genophage, the Arrival DLC and the asari, turian, and salarian Councilors openly stating they would throw humanity under he bus

#330
NM_Che56

NM_Che56
  • Members
  • 6 739 messages
I can't even go into best buy now. It's like the merchandise KNOWS!

#331
Khajiit Jzargo

Khajiit Jzargo
  • Members
  • 1 854 messages

agu123 wrote...

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

I never said we had to save everyone, but im not destroying a whole species, we are an united galaxy we will fight not surrender to the catalyst logic and reasoning.


You surrendered to the Reapers the moment you said you wouldn't use the Crucible to stop the Catalyst and his talking abominations, just because you didn't want to get your hands dirty.

The galaxy doesn't care about your morals. Asari and Turian children watching their parents getting turned into Reaper ground troops on their respective planets don't care about your ideals. They never said anything about "dying to stop the Reapers", they were busy attempting to survive.

and the next cycles defeats the Reapers based on your information, so I died, I didn't commit Genocide, and the Reapers ended up being defeated.


Yay! Congratulations! Someone else did the job for you. Meanwhile, everybody in this cicle is dead.

Don't worry though, I'm sure the Asari, the Turians, the Quarians, the Krogan, the Salarians, Humans, the Vorcha, the Hanar and the Drell, the Elcor, the freaking Batarians, the Geth and every other species that is never seen but only mentioned, are being preserved by the Catalyst and his friends.

I hate Kai Leng but if you can't make the hard choices, step aside for those who can.

How did I surrender? The galaxy agreed to fight the Reapers beforehand. To reject the Catalyst's offer is to continue to fight them. If you accept it, If i stop fighting them, then i surrendered,

We as a galaxy became united and gave it everything we had without commiting genocide, I'm pretty sure we would be proud.

#332
AxStapleton

AxStapleton
  • Members
  • 645 messages

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

agu123 wrote...

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

I never said we had to save everyone, but im not destroying a whole species, we are an united galaxy we will fight not surrender to the catalyst logic and reasoning.


You surrendered to the Reapers the moment you said you wouldn't use the Crucible to stop the Catalyst and his talking abominations, just because you didn't want to get your hands dirty.

The galaxy doesn't care about your morals. Asari and Turian children watching their parents getting turned into Reaper ground troops on their respective planets don't care about your ideals. They never said anything about "dying to stop the Reapers", they were busy attempting to survive.

and the next cycles defeats the Reapers based on your information, so I died, I didn't commit Genocide, and the Reapers ended up being defeated.


Yay! Congratulations! Someone else did the job for you. Meanwhile, everybody in this cicle is dead.

Don't worry though, I'm sure the Asari, the Turians, the Quarians, the Krogan, the Salarians, Humans, the Vorcha, the Hanar and the Drell, the Elcor, the freaking Batarians, the Geth and every other species that is never seen but only mentioned, are being preserved by the Catalyst and his friends.

I hate Kai Leng but if you can't make the hard choices, step aside for those who can.

How did I surrender? The galaxy agreed to fight the Reapers beforehand. To reject the Catalyst's offer is to continue to fight them. If you accept it, If i stop fighting them, then i surrendered,

We as a galaxy became united and gave it everything we had without commiting genocide, I'm pretty sure we would be proud.


Its been said by Bioware that the next cycle end up using the Crucible anyway.

#333
Tealjaker94

Tealjaker94
  • Members
  • 2 947 messages

wantedman dan wrote...

AxStapleton wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Yes. It does. I believe all the people I saved would agree.


There are countless warlords, dictators, and despots throughout the history of our miserable, yet brief, existence on Earth that are applauding your sentiment.

OK. And countless military generals and leaders of the free world. Douglas MacArthur got the Medal of Honor for leaving behind most of his men in the Philiipines. Because it was the right decision.


But he didn't leave them behind because they were human.

Do you know the definition of genocide?


And we didn't sacrifice the Geth because they were Geth. You just tripped up on your own logic.


You sacrificed them because of the cultural group of which they belonged, synthetics.

Try again, buttercup.

You are literally completely wrong. Last time I checked I'm not the one who made the crucible's destroy option target all synthetics. I'm sacrificing the geth because apparently tha's how the crucible works. I hold no ill will towards them and was not given a choice in the matter. You however are clearly busy yelling GENOCIDE while allowing everyone to die.

#334
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

Father_Jerusalem wrote...

I don't know why I'm going to bother with you, but I'll give it a shot.

Shepard's not killing the Geth because they're the Geth, either. They are an unfortuate side effect of what needs to be done to stop the Reapers. If the Starchild had said "Destroy will kill the Reapers." and Shepard had responded with "Hmm, can you throw the Geth in there as well? Then we'll have a deal." then maybe you would have a point.

Choosing Refusal is committing ethnocide on a mass scale because you are CHOOSING to let these civilizations be utterly destroyed rather than stopping the Reapers.

Tell me, again, how that is not letting fear rule you?


Shepard is destroying the Geth because they are synthetic. The circumstances of said "sacrifice" are irrelevant in this context. Logically: geth are synthetic; the Crucible indiscriminately destroys synthetics; ergo, by choosing destroy, Shepard willingly chooses to destroy the Geth because they are synthetic. Simple, clean.

The genocide may be an "unfortunate side effect," but it is still genocide.

You do realize that it is the Reapers committing these atrocities, correct? Justifying bad behavior with other bad behavior is fallacious.

#335
Tealjaker94

Tealjaker94
  • Members
  • 2 947 messages

Forbry wrote...

CesarSan wrote...

The destroy option implies that the cycle will eventually begin again.

Yes, it does and so few people who chose destroy seem to get that. Their choice took lives AND changed NOTHING!

How does the cycle begin again without Reapers?

#336
Father_Jerusalem

Father_Jerusalem
  • Members
  • 2 780 messages

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

agu123 wrote...

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

I never said we had to save everyone, but im not destroying a whole species, we are an united galaxy we will fight not surrender to the catalyst logic and reasoning.


You surrendered to the Reapers the moment you said you wouldn't use the Crucible to stop the Catalyst and his talking abominations, just because you didn't want to get your hands dirty.

The galaxy doesn't care about your morals. Asari and Turian children watching their parents getting turned into Reaper ground troops on their respective planets don't care about your ideals. They never said anything about "dying to stop the Reapers", they were busy attempting to survive.

and the next cycles defeats the Reapers based on your information, so I died, I didn't commit Genocide, and the Reapers ended up being defeated.


Yay! Congratulations! Someone else did the job for you. Meanwhile, everybody in this cicle is dead.

Don't worry though, I'm sure the Asari, the Turians, the Quarians, the Krogan, the Salarians, Humans, the Vorcha, the Hanar and the Drell, the Elcor, the freaking Batarians, the Geth and every other species that is never seen but only mentioned, are being preserved by the Catalyst and his friends.

I hate Kai Leng but if you can't make the hard choices, step aside for those who can.

How did I surrender? The galaxy agreed to fight the Reapers beforehand. To reject the Catalyst's offer is to continue to fight them. If you accept it, If i stop fighting them, then i surrendered,

We as a galaxy became united and gave it everything we had without commiting genocide, I'm pretty sure we would be proud.


Because you are literally handed victory on a silver platter. All you are required to do is make a choice. And you decide to continue fighting an unwinnable war in the name of your contemptable "morality". You would rather sacrifice ALL civilized life in the galaxy than win the war here and now.

That is surrendering to arrogance. That is surrendering to fear. That is surrendering to the Reapers.

#337
Rip504

Rip504
  • Members
  • 3 259 messages

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

I didn't commit genocide, I took my chances and failed, you on your own will commited genocide. I died free.

Yes you did. There are 3 different ways to stop the Reaper cycle. You chose to fight and die "free",rather then saving the entire galaxy and remaining "free". If we are taking the fact that the Catalyst states the Geth will die,then you have to accept the fact that the Catalyst told you,that you would fail otherwise. Hence you are willing  to sacrifice all life. You committed genocide on a level only capable by the Reapers. Great job. In destroy Shepard did not commit genocide,Shepard only set the events in motion. Which did end in the Genocide of the Geth. In refuse Shepard sets forth the events that will destroy all life. You chose not to stop the Reapers,when you had a chance to. Allowing the Reapers to harvest every civilization in our cycle,only to be defeated during the next cycle. So yes,one could hold Shepard acountable for the destruction of all life in our cycle.

#338
Vexille

Vexille
  • Members
  • 682 messages

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

agu123 wrote...

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

I never said we had to save everyone, but im not destroying a whole species, we are an united galaxy we will fight not surrender to the catalyst logic and reasoning.


You surrendered to the Reapers the moment you said you wouldn't use the Crucible to stop the Catalyst and his talking abominations, just because you didn't want to get your hands dirty.

The galaxy doesn't care about your morals. Asari and Turian children watching their parents getting turned into Reaper ground troops on their respective planets don't care about your ideals. They never said anything about "dying to stop the Reapers", they were busy attempting to survive.

and the next cycles defeats the Reapers based on your information, so I died, I didn't commit Genocide, and the Reapers ended up being defeated.


Yay! Congratulations! Someone else did the job for you. Meanwhile, everybody in this cicle is dead.

Don't worry though, I'm sure the Asari, the Turians, the Quarians, the Krogan, the Salarians, Humans, the Vorcha, the Hanar and the Drell, the Elcor, the freaking Batarians, the Geth and every other species that is never seen but only mentioned, are being preserved by the Catalyst and his friends.

I hate Kai Leng but if you can't make the hard choices, step aside for those who can.

How did I surrender? The galaxy agreed to fight the Reapers beforehand. To reject the Catalyst's offer is to continue to fight them. If you accept it, If i stop fighting them, then i surrendered,

We as a galaxy became united and gave it everything we had without commiting genocide, I'm pretty sure we would be proud.


your telling me you think everybody in the galaxy would prefer to die rather then kill the geth?

I mean do you think these things through before typing them out? :P

#339
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

Tealjaker94 wrote...

You are literally completely wrong.


Ooh, good defense there.

Last time I checked I'm not the one who made the crucible's destroy option target all synthetics. I'm sacrificing the geth because apparently tha's how the crucible works. I hold no ill will towards them and was not given a choice in the matter. You however are clearly busy yelling GENOCIDE while allowing everyone to die.


Doesn't matter. You're willingly choosing to destroy them because they are Synthetic. That is genocide. When you're through with the fit you're throwing because you can't be challenged like an adult, get back with me.

#340
Miezul_Carpatin

Miezul_Carpatin
  • Members
  • 121 messages

AxStapleton wrote...

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

agu123 wrote...

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

I never said we had to save everyone, but im not destroying a whole species, we are an united galaxy we will fight not surrender to the catalyst logic and reasoning.


You surrendered to the Reapers the moment you said you wouldn't use the Crucible to stop the Catalyst and his talking abominations, just because you didn't want to get your hands dirty.

The galaxy doesn't care about your morals. Asari and Turian children watching their parents getting turned into Reaper ground troops on their respective planets don't care about your ideals. They never said anything about "dying to stop the Reapers", they were busy attempting to survive.

and the next cycles defeats the Reapers based on your information, so I died, I didn't commit Genocide, and the Reapers ended up being defeated.


Yay! Congratulations! Someone else did the job for you. Meanwhile, everybody in this cicle is dead.

Don't worry though, I'm sure the Asari, the Turians, the Quarians, the Krogan, the Salarians, Humans, the Vorcha, the Hanar and the Drell, the Elcor, the freaking Batarians, the Geth and every other species that is never seen but only mentioned, are being preserved by the Catalyst and his friends.

I hate Kai Leng but if you can't make the hard choices, step aside for those who can.

How did I surrender? The galaxy agreed to fight the Reapers beforehand. To reject the Catalyst's offer is to continue to fight them. If you accept it, If i stop fighting them, then i surrendered,

We as a galaxy became united and gave it everything we had without commiting genocide, I'm pretty sure we would be proud.


Its been said by Bioware that the next cycle end up using the Crucible anyway.


What?? Where? Please, tell me they didn't say that through f-ing twitter....

#341
Cant Planet

Cant Planet
  • Members
  • 395 messages

wantedman dan wrote...

AxStapleton wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Yes. It does. I believe all the people I saved would agree.


There are countless warlords, dictators, and despots throughout the history of our miserable, yet brief, existence on Earth that are applauding your sentiment.

OK. And countless military generals and leaders of the free world. Douglas MacArthur got the Medal of Honor for leaving behind most of his men in the Philiipines. Because it was the right decision.


But he didn't leave them behind because they were human.

Do you know the definition of genocide?


And we didn't sacrifice the Geth because they were Geth. You just tripped up on your own logic.


You sacrificed them because of the cultural group of which they belonged, synthetics.

Try again, buttercup.

No, I sacrificed them because that was the impact of choosing the only option that destroys the Reapers. Had it been "only Krogans will die" or "only humans will die", I would have made the same decision.

And it's the decision that is the key. Just as the decision not to act still makes Shepard culpable in Reject.

Don't you ever get tired of misinterpreting everyone else's motives and glorifying your own? I wouldn't mind so much if you weren't so persistently arrogant about it.

#342
Vexille

Vexille
  • Members
  • 682 messages

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Forbry wrote...

CesarSan wrote...

The destroy option implies that the cycle will eventually begin again.

Yes, it does and so few people who chose destroy seem to get that. Their choice took lives AND changed NOTHING!

How does the cycle begin again without Reapers?


shhhh!!! get your common sense out of here!

#343
Khajiit Jzargo

Khajiit Jzargo
  • Members
  • 1 854 messages

Rhosyn wrote...

I keep hearing Khaijit parrot the same words...I don't think he has a real argument. Prove me wrong. Can you say that the ENTIRE GALAXY would be okay with you condemning them to death? You clearly don't understand the part where the Reapers can't be defeated wihout the Crucible. You're beat over the damn head with it numerous times. You would've willingly ignored every caveat to think you still had a chance of winning. The galaxy got behind Shepard with the idea of defeating the Reapers. Nowhere in that did they agree wholesale eradication was a choice. And if you think the galaxy is somehow above "genocide"....I give you Rachni, the Genophage, the Arrival DLC and the asari, turian, and salarian Councilors openly stating they would throw humanity under he bus

Insults, typical. Anyway my arguement is sound, As a galaxy we decided we will kill the reapers or die trying, not to sacrifice a whole species of around 1.5 billion, control them, or co-exist with them. When we build the Crucible we were hoping it would wipe out the Reapers, but when the Geth had to die the variables changed. If your sole purpose is to stop the reapers why not choose control or synthesis, your commiting genocide, and just because the salarian councilor wants to throw everyone under the bus doesn't mean that its right or that i will. Also, they ended up throwing their support, so that point is invalid.

#344
Khajiit Jzargo

Khajiit Jzargo
  • Members
  • 1 854 messages

Rip504 wrote...

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

I didn't commit genocide, I took my chances and failed, you on your own will commited genocide. I died free.

Yes you did. There are 3 different ways to stop the Reaper cycle. You chose to fight and die "free",rather then saving the entire galaxy and remaining "free". If we are taking the fact that the Catalyst states the Geth will die,then you have to accept the fact that the Catalyst told you,that you would fail otherwise. Hence you are willing  to sacrifice all life. You committed genocide on a level only capable by the Reapers. Great job. In destroy Shepard did not commit genocide,Shepard only set the events in motion. Which did end in the Genocide of the Geth. In refuse Shepard sets forth the events that will destroy all life. You chose not to stop the Reapers,when you had a chance to. Allowing the Reapers to harvest every civilization in our cycle,only to be defeated during the next cycle. So yes,one could hold Shepard acountable for the destruction of all life in our cycle.

You willingly decided to destroy the Geth, you commited Genocide.

#345
Tealjaker94

Tealjaker94
  • Members
  • 2 947 messages

wantedman dan wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

You are literally completely wrong.


Ooh, good defense there.

Last time I checked I'm not the one who made the crucible's destroy option target all synthetics. I'm sacrificing the geth because apparently tha's how the crucible works. I hold no ill will towards them and was not given a choice in the matter. You however are clearly busy yelling GENOCIDE while allowing everyone to die.


Doesn't matter. You're willingly choosing to destroy them because they are Synthetic. That is genocide. When you're through with the fit you're throwing because you can't be challenged like an adult, get back with me.

I didn't say it wasn't genocide. You said that MacArthur's sacrifice was different because he didn't do it because they were human. I'm not commiting genocide on the geth because they're synthetic but because the goddamn Crucible can't target only Reapers. 

#346
Khajiit Jzargo

Khajiit Jzargo
  • Members
  • 1 854 messages

Vexille wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Forbry wrote...

CesarSan wrote...

The destroy option implies that the cycle will eventually begin again.

Yes, it does and so few people who chose destroy seem to get that. Their choice took lives AND changed NOTHING!

How does the cycle begin again without Reapers?


shhhh!!! get your common sense out of here!

Control, Synthesis, and refusal all stop the cycle.

#347
Father_Jerusalem

Father_Jerusalem
  • Members
  • 2 780 messages

wantedman dan wrote...

Father_Jerusalem wrote...

I don't know why I'm going to bother with you, but I'll give it a shot.

Shepard's not killing the Geth because they're the Geth, either. They are an unfortuate side effect of what needs to be done to stop the Reapers. If the Starchild had said "Destroy will kill the Reapers." and Shepard had responded with "Hmm, can you throw the Geth in there as well? Then we'll have a deal." then maybe you would have a point.

Choosing Refusal is committing ethnocide on a mass scale because you are CHOOSING to let these civilizations be utterly destroyed rather than stopping the Reapers.

Tell me, again, how that is not letting fear rule you?


Shepard is destroying the Geth because they are synthetic. The circumstances of said "sacrifice" are irrelevant in this context. Logically: geth are synthetic; the Crucible indiscriminately destroys synthetics; ergo, by choosing destroy, Shepard willingly chooses to destroy the Geth because they are synthetic. Simple, clean.

The genocide may be an "unfortunate side effect," but it is still genocide.

You do realize that it is the Reapers committing these atrocities, correct? Justifying bad behavior with other bad behavior is fallacious.


He is sacrificng the Geth because the mission is to destroy the Reapers - the Crucible's indiscimination is not something that Shepard was planning for. He is choosing to finish the mission of destroying the Reapers. By choosing refusal, he is actively choosing to allow every civilized being in the galaxy die a terrible death.

The Reapers may be the gun that shoots trillions of beings in the face, but Shepard is the finger that pulled the trigger by refusing to end the war. He. Is. Responsible. It is HIS inaction that killed trillions of lives. Lives that would be alive had he simply chose to sacrifice the few for the many, either by allowing the Geth to die, or by sacrificing his own life for Control or Synthesis. 

Calling the deaths of the Geth genocide and abhorrent, yet actively defending Shepard being responsible for the genocide of every other civilized race in the galaxy is fallacious.

#348
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

Cant Planet wrote...

No, I sacrificed them because that was the impact of choosing the only option that destroys the Reapers. Had it been "only Krogans will die" or "only humans will die", I would have made the same decision.


And it still would have been genocide. When you willingly destroy a group because it is a group--culturally, nationally, racially, etc.--you are willingly committing such.

Does it have a positive impact? Maybe. That, however, is irrelevant.

And it's the decision that is the key. Just as the decision not to act still makes Shepard culpable in Reject.

Don't you ever get tired of misinterpreting everyone else's motives and glorifying your own? I wouldn't mind so much if you weren't so persistently arrogant about it.


It would be nice if you would sufficiently understand the very concepts that you're arguing before arguing them.

#349
AxStapleton

AxStapleton
  • Members
  • 645 messages

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

Vexille wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Forbry wrote...

CesarSan wrote...

The destroy option implies that the cycle will eventually begin again.

Yes, it does and so few people who chose destroy seem to get that. Their choice took lives AND changed NOTHING!

How does the cycle begin again without Reapers?


shhhh!!! get your common sense out of here!

Control, Synthesis, and refusal all stop the cycle.


Using the very same thing that you revile.

#350
Vexille

Vexille
  • Members
  • 682 messages

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

Rip504 wrote...

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

I didn't commit genocide, I took my chances and failed, you on your own will commited genocide. I died free.

Yes you did. There are 3 different ways to stop the Reaper cycle. You chose to fight and die "free",rather then saving the entire galaxy and remaining "free". If we are taking the fact that the Catalyst states the Geth will die,then you have to accept the fact that the Catalyst told you,that you would fail otherwise. Hence you are willing  to sacrifice all life. You committed genocide on a level only capable by the Reapers. Great job. In destroy Shepard did not commit genocide,Shepard only set the events in motion. Which did end in the Genocide of the Geth. In refuse Shepard sets forth the events that will destroy all life. You chose not to stop the Reapers,when you had a chance to. Allowing the Reapers to harvest every civilization in our cycle,only to be defeated during the next cycle. So yes,one could hold Shepard acountable for the destruction of all life in our cycle.

You willingly decided to destroy the Geth, you commited Genocide.


thats very arguable, you were not purposely trying to destroy the geth, they were merely collateral damage