257 réponses à ce sujet

[CINCTuchanka]

BSN: I H8 TEH ENDINGS.

*slight alterations to endings*

BSN: OMG I LURVE THEM.

Hey, no slight to you OP, I think you did a fine job. But really, it's not that much different than what we got when you choose Destroy.

And honestly, I think funneling everyone down the same ending path would have been a bit lame.

I think that there NEEDS to be sacrifice in the end, regardless of EMS. Otherwise Mass Effect becomes a game less about choice and more about collecting doo-dads around the galaxy and playing MP for the ultimate-win.

/my2cents

[Ryzaki]

I...think that's pretty much a lot of people's points that don't like the ending.

We would've loved them...without starbrat. (and relays automatically exploding and random WTF normandy crash).

He introduces so much ridculousness to the last 10 minutes its painful.

Modifié par Ryzaki, 05 juillet 2012 - 02:06 .

[Bigdoser]

Is there some way to mod this into my game? If I could get this into my game I might install mass effect 3 again and actually do a new game.

[SpamBot2000]

Bumped, since a lot of the PS peeps just got their EC and might enjoy the comparison.

[Xenite]

Better then what Bioware gave us, sent it to my wife who will enjoy it. She stops at the beam because she can't stand the catalyst kid garbage either.

[HeavenStar]

This is what should have happened. The last part is really a nice touch!

Thank you for sharing. You made my day!

[mopotter]

Very nice. I also have the 360 version, but I'd be greatly tempted to get the pc version for this.

[SpamBot2000]

After a long trawl through the murky depths of this forum, I like to relax with a nice cup of love, like this thread.

[Ithurael]

Sheepie Crusher wrote...

 When I uploaded the WIP version I was expecting to be bashed but the overwhelmingly positive response convinced me that the thi video is mostly complete so this version contains primarily more polish and minor changes and additions

FemShep version


ManShep version

My god - that was...perfect! Absolutly perfect!

[Sheepie Crusher]

SpamBot2000 wrote...

After a long trawl through the murky depths of this forum, I like to relax with a nice cup of love, like this thread.

Keep up like that and I'll have to give you credit for most of the views 

Modifié par Sheepie Crusher, 06 juillet 2012 - 01:29 .

[GreyLycanTrope]

Nice work, I would have so loved if this was actually in game. I especially liked the bit at the end with the Normandy going through the Relay. Journey coming full circle FTW

[Deltoran]

The Angry One wrote...

Bfler wrote...

Nice. Someone has to mod this into the game. Or better someone has to mod the child out of the game.

I would love anyone who did this forever.

QFT.  

[SpamBot2000]

Bumped, lest we forget.

[Baa Baa]

Wow this is great. Just removing the starchild makes it a good ending! Plus the addition of the last few minutes you incorporated gives me so much ME1 nostalgia! Great work!

Modifié par Baa Baa, 09 juillet 2012 - 07:26 .

[BlazingZephyr]

Amazing how it took only a removal of two scenes and an additional scene of "The Beginning" to improve upon the ending so much.

Even with the improvement, the existence of the crucible still bugs me a bit. It could have had so much potential, but Big Mac decided it would do exactly what it was said to do...

Modifié par BlazingZephyr, 10 juillet 2012 - 06:37 .

[Lionheart316]

HOLY ****!!! Now that was good. Only complain Miri died and it felt a bit off with the ending. Stick with cutscenes, I think its possible to end that way instead of having you move Shepard

[Voutsis1982]

My... god! It's like the OP read our minds!

Or our posts. That's not a put-down on the OP, just a statement that Bioware could have read those same posts. With their eyeballs.



It was so simple. Starchild is the worst received character in all of Mass Effect. So lose him. He's more hated than any Reaper, more despised than the Illusive Man, more loathed than Udina or the Council or Saren or Conrad Verner or the Asari that calls you dullstone or Jacob (although I'm not sure who this is. Is he on the dev team, and it's a big in-joke?).

In the Starchild they had an incredible expendable character who is hated by so many, whose presence doesn't make sense, who only exists for five minutes of the story and can be replaced by anything, including nothing.

So they decided to put more of him in. That's like increasing Jar Jar Bink's dialogue.

I've said this before but it's worth saying again. It's like Back to the Future 2. Old Biff from the future steals the time machine and goes back to 1955, making his younger self rich and powerful. Marty says "We've got to get back to the future and stop Biff from stealing the Delorean!" But Doc Brown stops him, because that won't work. The damage has been done in the past and they're now in an alternate timeline. Going forward would lead into a future where Biff runs everything. Instead, they have to go back to 1955 and fix the mess that was already made.

So it was in ME3. They needed to back and undo the damage that was already in the story, not add more material to it. Clarification just takes you deeper into a dark and disturbed future where Biff is rich and powerful and married to your mother.

Also, maybe it could be called the Abridged Cut? The Cut Cut? Wait - The Hack It Out Cut.

[otreblA_SNAKE_ITA]

I really liked it, nice job dude! This is how more or less should have been the ending!

[2Shepards]

Very very good job! Huzzah's all around!

[elitehunter34]

Voutsis1982 wrote...

My... god! It's like the OP read our minds!

Or our posts. That's not a put-down on the OP, just a statement that Bioware could have read those same posts. With their eyeballs.

It was so simple. Starchild is the worst received character in all of Mass Effect. So lose him. He's more hated thanany Reaper, more despised than the Illusive Man, more loathed than Udina or the Council or Saren or Conrad Verner or the Asari that calls you dullstone or Jacob (although I'm not sure who this is. Is he on the dev team, and it's a big in-joke?).

In the Starchild they had an incredible expendable character who is hated by so many, whose presence doesn't make sense, who only exists for five minutes of the story and can be replaced by anything, including nothing.

So they decided to put more of him in. That's like increasing Jar Jar Bink's dialogue.

I've said this before but it's worth saying again. It's like Back to the Future 2. Old Biff from the future steals the time machine and goes back to 1955, making his younger self rich and powerful. Marty says "We've got to get back to the future and stop Biff from stealing the Delorean!" But Doc Brown stops him, because that won't work. The damage has been done in the past and they're now in an alternate timeline. Going forward would lead into a future where Biff runs everything. Instead, they have to go back to 1955 and fix the mess that was already made.

So it was in ME3. They needed to back and undo the damage that was already in the story, not add more material to it. Clarification just takes you deeper into a dark and disturbed future where Biff is rich and powerful and married to your mother.

Also, maybe it could be called the Abridged Cut? The Cut Cut? Wait - The Hack It Out Cut.

Bolded your most important point.  I agree with you 100% percent.  I don't know why Bioware didn't realize this.  I sincerely hope that not all of Bioware's writers wanted the star child, let alone more of it.

[CondeDrako]

elitehunter34 wrote...

Voutsis1982 wrote...

My... god! It's like the OP read our minds!

Or our posts. That's not a put-down on the OP, just a statement that Bioware could have read those same posts. With their eyeballs.

It was so simple. Starchild is the worst received character in all of Mass Effect. So lose him. He's more hated thanany Reaper, more despised than the Illusive Man, more loathed than Udina or the Council or Saren or Conrad Verner or the Asari that calls you dullstone or Jacob (although I'm not sure who this is. Is he on the dev team, and it's a big in-joke?).

In the Starchild they had an incredible expendable character who is hated by so many, whose presence doesn't make sense, who only exists for five minutes of the story and can be replaced by anything, including nothing.

So they decided to put more of him in. That's like increasing Jar Jar Bink's dialogue.

I've said this before but it's worth saying again. It's like Back to the Future 2. Old Biff from the future steals the time machine and goes back to 1955, making his younger self rich and powerful. Marty says "We've got to get back to the future and stop Biff from stealing the Delorean!" But Doc Brown stops him, because that won't work. The damage has been done in the past and they're now in an alternate timeline. Going forward would lead into a future where Biff runs everything. Instead, they have to go back to 1955 and fix the mess that was already made.

So it was in ME3. They needed to back and undo the damage that was already in the story, not add more material to it. Clarification just takes you deeper into a dark and disturbed future where Biff is rich and powerful and married to your mother.

Also, maybe it could be called the Abridged Cut? The Cut Cut? Wait - The Hack It Out Cut.

Bolded your most important point.  I agree with you 100% percent.  I don't know why Bioware didn't realize this.  I sincerely hope that not all of Bioware's writers wanted the star child, let alone more of it.

Indeed.

In fact, you really win by replacing the starchild by nothing.

These endings are much better than the original ones.

Modifié par CondeDrako, 10 juillet 2012 - 01:53 .

[Kel Riever]

What the F*CK is wrong with BioWare that they can't even do this ending?

God, if the ending had been exactly what the OP put up, this game would not be reduced to the pile of trash that it has, and that includes after the DLC.

When a fan uses basic technology and YouTube to come up with an ending that beats the living snot out of whatever pretentions, egomaniac, pseudo intellectual crap that started the moment the little boy of lights opens his mouth, you know the original writers of the ending did about as bad a job as they possibly ever could.

Well done, OP. You smacked the craptastic thing that was called the ending of ME3 right upside the face and left raw, bleeding palmprint across its face. I'll have to see if I can't get a CD of the game burned properly with your ending, and overwrite the abomination that is on it currently.

Modifié par Kel Riever, 10 juillet 2012 - 02:38 .

[Thore2k10]

there... that was not too difficulty i think?

[Kel Riever]

Bump. Because non-sucktastic endings are not that hard. Just as the OP shows.

[Baa Baa]

BlazingZephyr wrote...

Amazing how it took only a removal of two scenes and an additional scene of "The Beginning" to improve upon the ending so much.

Even with the improvement, the existence of the crucible still bugs me a bit. It could have had so much potential, but Big Mac decided it would do exactly what it was said to do...

I agree, that was perfect, got me all nostalgic