wantedman dan wrote...
saracen16 wrote...
AtlasMickey wrote...
that conflict between organics and synthetics is not inevitable.
And the geth who drove the Quarians into exile, the Zha'til, the Metacons, and Project Overlord suddenly mean nothing? Regardless of the outcomes of these situations, conflict DID happen.
Conflict is inevitable between ALL sapient creatures, ergo genocide is justified?
Conflict is a constant but so too are ways of avoiding it or determining to be better. We use imagination to find new ways to solve problems and the imagination is limitless except when it comes to certain video game endings.
Genocide is never justified.
The geth were concerned with self-preservation. They retreated from conflict. Project Overlord was an abomination of a project that involved one attempt at a type of synthesis or hybridization of human thought and tech. Yes, conflict happened, but it also was ended. Archer, who forced this upon his own brother actually even may have learned from the bad thing he did. This is the best outcome for conflict with the most reward.
Conflict isn't even necessarily always avoided or to be avoided. If a person states opinions and no one ever disagrees with that person just to avoid conflict, are they doing the right or the wrong thing? Conflict may be exactly what is needed in many cases. War not so much. And the kid equates conflict with war, meaning he sees conflict as war which is really stupid. Synthetics and organics may disagree because they want different things, but is it better for everyone to want the same thing?