Aller au contenu

Why do people keep insisting that conventional victory is possible?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
676 réponses à ce sujet

#201
LiarasShield

LiarasShield
  • Members
  • 6 924 messages

Dragoonlordz wrote...

BerzerkGene wrote...

Redbelle wrote...

The Mad Hanar wrote...

Come on, people are always saying that one of the main reasons the ending is bad is because there is no option for conventional victory. Meet me halfway here.


Sry but until BW release some figures on the size of each respective force and the killing potential of the different classes of ships all I have to offer is artistic integrity argumanet of BW's vision, to which ppl are cocking their heads to one side....... mouthing the word 'artistic vision'? Then demanding the chance to jump inside of Harby to throttle his Eezo core.

I was serious about fleet numbers, the rest was a joke.

But in seriousness, the answer may lie in the Codex where strategy has been recorded, stating along the lines of.......

'The Reapers impentrable outer skin is due largely to it's mass effect field increasing it's defence by raising it mass. This reduces the Reapers ease of movement and can allow ships to slip past and attack it's stern.'

Or something along those lines. Basically if the Reaper is seemingly invincible it's mass effect field is set to defence and the allies can move around it. If the Reaper is moving like the clappers then it's field is low and is a perfect time to shoot it, provided the gunners can hit a moving target.

A good idea. Another one is to use these:
The Thanix's core is a liquid alloy of iron, uranium, and tungsten
suspended in an electromagnetic field powered by element zero. The
molten metal, accelerated to a significant fraction of the speed of
light, solidifies into a projectile as it is fired, hitting targets with
enough force to pierce any known shield or armor. The gun can fire
reliably every five seconds.
The weapon's relatively small size allows it to be mounted on
most fighters or frigates. It is now widely used by the Alliance
military and is the primary weapon on the refurbished Normandy SR-2.



All they have to do is release a million of those drones from ME2. You lose all tactics. You get wiped out. The End.



You know those drones served the collectors right and their gone....

#202
Sabre120

Sabre120
  • Members
  • 279 messages
Reapers cannot be beaten conventionally, I'm fairly sure this is accurately depicted in all 3 games. The Protheans who were more advanced than any current species in the galaxy fought against them for centuries and were eventually annihilated.

#203
Dragoonlordz

Dragoonlordz
  • Members
  • 9 920 messages

nrcrane wrote...

You stated in a previous thread that the fans also asked for no reaper off switch as well.  So why was it ok to go with the off switch ending if your going off of what fans were asking for, but not the conventional ending?


They went with what they agreed with, you got that outcome. They built the story around that outcome and the results you seen. Feedback is one thing, you leave suggestions about what would like. They decide which they want to run with and they did already.

#204
shodiswe

shodiswe
  • Members
  • 4 999 messages
Because they want to defeat Reaper dreadnaught with assaultrifles because they think that would be cool.

#205
LiarasShield

LiarasShield
  • Members
  • 6 924 messages

Sabre120 wrote...

Reapers cannot be beaten conventionally, I'm fairly sure this is accurately depicted in all 3 games. The Protheans who were more advanced than any current species in the galaxy fought against them for centuries and were eventually annihilated.



And Javik has already explained because they were too much the same and couldn't adapt that is why they lost the war the real reason we lost the war is because we didn't take the reapers seriouslly until it was too late at least the alliance and the council did not and amazing as shepard and his or her squad is he or she is only one ship commander

Modifié par LiarasShield, 03 juillet 2012 - 04:48 .


#206
Redbelle

Redbelle
  • Members
  • 5 399 messages

BerzerkGene wrote...

A good idea. Another one is to use these:
The Thanix's core is a liquid alloy of iron, uranium, and tungsten
suspended in an electromagnetic field powered by element zero. The
molten metal, accelerated to a significant fraction of the speed of
light, solidifies into a projectile as it is fired, hitting targets with
enough force to pierce any known shield or armor. The gun can fire
reliably every five seconds.
The weapon's relatively small size allows it to be mounted on
most fighters or frigates. It is now widely used by the Alliance
military and is the primary weapon on the refurbished Normandy SR-2.



From what I saw those canons were widely used in the headon rush to meet the enemy. And why not...... In air to air engagements the intial rush to meet the opponent gives the best opportunity to kill them as you both close on each other, and the first one to shy away just gives the other the chance to shoot at them some more.......... unless their evading missles. I'm getting away from what I wanted to ask here.

My question...... is the Alliance Thanix canon a long range weapon? I ask as I can't remember seeing any Thanix's going off in the middle of the engagement.

#207
Dragoonlordz

Dragoonlordz
  • Members
  • 9 920 messages

LiarasShield wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

All they have to do is release a million of those drones from ME2. You lose all tactics. You get wiped out. The End.



You know those drones served the collectors right and their gone....


The collectors are not gone, you wiped out one base. Why would you assume that single base was entire collector arsenal and only location in entire universe they are present? Not only that why would you assume the Reapers would not have every single technology the collectors invented?

Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 03 juillet 2012 - 04:49 .


#208
Unlimited69x

Unlimited69x
  • Members
  • 129 messages
It's possible. The scenes in the end were just for maximum Hollywood explosions, not military tactics.

#209
Redbelle

Redbelle
  • Members
  • 5 399 messages

LiarasShield wrote...

You know those drones served the collectors right and their gone....


Were those drones called Oculas? Or something like that.

Anyway, the Oc's were part of the Collector arsenal, however I also saw them or something very similar in the intial fleet engagment over Earth. An Alliance fighter shot one down.

#210
Whatever42

Whatever42
  • Members
  • 3 143 messages

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The collectors are not gone, you wiped out one base. Why would you assume that single base was entire collector arsenal and only location in entire universe they are present? Not only that why would you assume the Reapers would not have every single technology the collectors invented?


The Collectors only attacked us with one ship. We saw their general die. I think its a good assumption.

#211
LiarasShield

LiarasShield
  • Members
  • 6 924 messages

Redbelle wrote...

LiarasShield wrote...

You know those drones served the collectors right and their gone....


Were those drones called Oculas? Or something like that.

Anyway, the Oc's were part of the Collector arsenal, however I also saw them or something very similar in the intial fleet engagment over Earth. An Alliance fighter shot one down.


Yes but I think they had the strong ones with the collectors those ones with the reapers seem very small or weak in comparison

#212
nrcrane

nrcrane
  • Members
  • 271 messages

Dragoonlordz wrote...

nrcrane wrote...

You stated in a previous thread that the fans also asked for no reaper off switch as well.  So why was it ok to go with the off switch ending if your going off of what fans were asking for, but not the conventional ending?


They went with what they agreed with, you got that outcome. They built the story around that outcome and the results you seen. Feedback is one thing, you leave suggestions about what would like. They decide which they want to run with and they did already.


So why bring up what the fans were asking for at all? You can't just point out that some fans were asking for no conventional ending and say they got what they asked for then just ignore the side that were asking for no reaper off switch.

#213
Dragoonlordz

Dragoonlordz
  • Members
  • 9 920 messages

Whatever666343431431654324 wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The collectors are not gone, you wiped out one base. Why would you assume that single base was entire collector arsenal and only location in entire universe they are present? Not only that why would you assume the Reapers would not have every single technology the collectors invented?


The Collectors only attacked us with one ship. We saw their general die. I think its a good assumption.


They only needed to send out one ship to do that job. Does not mean they do not have more. You saw one of their generals die, the only one you met. Does not mean there are not more of them.

#214
LiarasShield

LiarasShield
  • Members
  • 6 924 messages
Pretty sure they only had the collectors near the space from omega 4 relay otherwise we would've encountered them during the final battle

#215
BerzerkGene

BerzerkGene
  • Members
  • 520 messages

Zero132132 wrote...

moater boat wrote...

Zero132132 wrote...

I would have, if the Reapers were actually defeated in Shepard's lifetime. That would have been stupid as hell. If the game was a setup for a really long war, I might have bought it, but only if everyone did a complete 180 as soon as ME2 ended and started preparing every single ship in the galaxy for war against the Reapers. That's the only way it wouldn't stretch credibility, and in that case, what exactly are you giving Shepard to DO during the game? What's his role in the plot? Discovering other ancient weapons that are more powerful? Wouldn't have minded going back to the planet that the derelict reaper (and the moon Major Kyle was on) and finding some trace of the weapon they used to take down one Reaper, since it was strong enough to **** up the planet, but a victory within the span of one game wouldn't make any sense without some variant of 'space magic.'


First let me address the idea that a succesful war against the Reapers would have to take several decades. While the cycle ending wars normally take a long time, over a century for the Protheans I believe, the reason is because the Reapers are winning, and it takes a long to time scrub the galaxy clean. To say that this means that it would also take several decades to kill all the Reapers is a massive failure of logic. If a conventional victory did happen, and it became obvious to the Reapers that continuing the war would not work, there is no reason to think that they wouldn't retreat into dark space and begin to try and develop some other plan. Fighting to the death, while noble to organics, would be considered very illogical by machines.

Now let's talk about that 180 you claim is required for preparing for the Reapers. My question is what information do you have from ME2 that indicates that preperations are NOT being made? Sure Anderson doesn't flat out tell Shepard "By the way, we are building up a huge fleet because the Citadel battle really lit a fire under our butt." But Shepard is working for Cerberus and he has been dead for 2 years. He has no idea what state the galactic militaries are in. All that he knows is that there are some new weapons, shield, and armor developments that he can put in the Normandy, that alone is pretty strong evidence of the galaxy making a serious effort to increase military strength.

You ask what Shepard would do if the crucible wasn't being built. Just about anything the writers want to write and the players want to do. Things like curing the genophage and making peace between the quarians and the Geth would still be great additions to the story, but I think we can all agree that there was no shortage of mission opportunities in the game that didn't pan out, like all the fetch quests.


I say this because the rest of the council is denying that the Reapers exist in ME2. The Illusive Man also put as much into the new Normandy as he could. The improvements had to be discovered from VERY recent (and classified) technology. Updating the entirety of galactic civilization's fleets would take a long time, and more resources than they'd be willing to use if the threat weren't being taken seriously.

The other thing is that you're assuming that the Reapers aren't a large force, but they've done this cycle thing a ****LOAD of times (probably around 20k, as I stated above), and if each species harvested only makes one Capitol Reaper, they're adding more than one each cycle, so losing one or two in some cycles (it's pretty rare to discover remnants of Reapers; we know of only 2 so far) wouldn't really stop them from growing. Meanwhile, we have less than one hundred dreadnoughts (39 Turian, 20 Asari, 16 Salarian, 9 Human, 1 Volus, 85 total) and four are required for a single reaper capitol ship.

We don't know how many Frigates and Cruisers we have, and according to codex entries, Thanix cannons can be mounted on them, but we also don't know how many need to concentrate thanix cannon fire on one Dreadnought to take it down, so it's a lot of unknowns. Either way, the Reapers outnumber our dreadnoughts by a wide margin, and that's only the Capitol ships. Destroyers still handle a fair amount of firepower in the game (the cain was used on a Hades Cannon, not a Destroyer), so they can't be ignored, and since they're the ones that are going to be targetting civilian populations, they can't really be ignored while we try to clear out the Capitol ships.

If beating them was going to be a thing, it would have stretched credibility to think we could do it in a couple of months while no species has for nearly a billion years (at minimum). Since we devoted a lot of resources to the Crucible and most of the fleet wasn't doing well, I don't think we could realistically have won after making the 'Refuse' ending. The sort of victory people are talking about would probably have required that we truly give up hope for Earth.

"The Thanix's core is a liquid alloy of iron, uranium, and tungsten
suspended in an electromagnetic field powered by element zero. The
molten metal, accelerated to a significant fraction of the speed of
light, solidifies into a projectile as it is fired, hitting targets with
enough force to pierce any known shield or armor."
So 3 well placed shots. Dreadnought sized ones would probably only need 1-2. 1 whole fleet, say 100 ships or various classes, would shred destroyers and take decent losses if used effectively against sovereign classes. Against Harbinger by himself i would say major losses because of his beamspam.

Derelict reapers should probably be disposed of. I find it strange they would leave their tech lying around, even if it can indoctrinate.

I think beating the ones around earth should have definitely been possible. Then, remove the Crucible. Destroy the Catalyst, crippling the Reapers.
Use all the debris and whatever resources you had to build a giant ****ing Thanix cannon. Could we beat them all? That i'm not sure of, the ones around earth should have been possible though.

#216
moater boat

moater boat
  • Members
  • 1 213 messages

Zero132132 wrote...

moater boat wrote...

Zero132132 wrote...

I would have, if the Reapers were actually defeated in Shepard's lifetime. That would have been stupid as hell. If the game was a setup for a really long war, I might have bought it, but only if everyone did a complete 180 as soon as ME2 ended and started preparing every single ship in the galaxy for war against the Reapers. That's the only way it wouldn't stretch credibility, and in that case, what exactly are you giving Shepard to DO during the game? What's his role in the plot? Discovering other ancient weapons that are more powerful? Wouldn't have minded going back to the planet that the derelict reaper (and the moon Major Kyle was on) and finding some trace of the weapon they used to take down one Reaper, since it was strong enough to **** up the planet, but a victory within the span of one game wouldn't make any sense without some variant of 'space magic.'


First let me address the idea that a successful war against the Reapers would have to take several decades. While the cycle ending wars normally take a long time, over a century for the Protheans I believe, the reason is because the Reapers are winning, and it takes a long to time scrub the galaxy clean. To say that this means that it would also take several decades to kill all the Reapers is a massive failure of logic. If a conventional victory did happen, and it became obvious to the Reapers that continuing the war would not work, there is no reason to think that they wouldn't retreat into dark space and begin to try and develop some other plan. Fighting to the death, while noble to organics, would be considered very illogical by machines.

Now let's talk about that 180 you claim is required for preparing for the Reapers. My question is what information do you have from ME2 that indicates that preparations are NOT being made? Sure Anderson doesn't flat out tell Shepard "By the way, we are building up a huge fleet because the Citadel battle really lit a fire under our butt." But Shepard is working for Cerberus and he has been dead for 2 years. He has no idea what state the galactic militaries are in. All that he knows is that there are some new weapons, shield, and armor developments that he can put in the Normandy, that alone is pretty strong evidence of the galaxy making a serious effort to increase military strength.

You ask what Shepard would do if the crucible wasn't being built. Just about anything the writers want to write and the players want to do. Things like curing the genophage and making peace between the quarians and the Geth would still be great additions to the story, but I think we can all agree that there was no shortage of mission opportunities in the game that didn't pan out, like all the fetch quests.


I say this because the rest of the council is denying that the Reapers exist in ME2. The Illusive Man also put as much into the new Normandy as he could. The improvements had to be discovered from VERY recent (and classified) technology. Updating the entirety of galactic civilization's fleets would take a long time, and more resources than they'd be willing to use if the threat weren't being taken seriously.

The other thing is that you're assuming that the Reapers aren't a large force, but they've done this cycle thing a ****LOAD of times (probably around 20k, as I stated above), and if each species harvested only makes one Capitol Reaper, they're adding more than one each cycle, so losing one or two in some cycles (it's pretty rare to discover remnants of Reapers; we know of only 2 so far) wouldn't really stop them from growing. Meanwhile, we have less than one hundred dreadnoughts (39 Turian, 20 Asari, 16 Salarian, 9 Human, 1 Volus, 85 total) and four are required for a single reaper capitol ship.

We don't know how many Frigates and Cruisers we have, and according to codex entries, Thanix cannons can be mounted on them, but we also don't know how many need to concentrate thanix cannon fire on one Dreadnought to take it down, so it's a lot of unknowns. Either way, the Reapers outnumber our dreadnoughts by a wide margin, and that's only the Capitol ships. Destroyers still handle a fair amount of firepower in the game (the cain was used on a Hades Cannon, not a Destroyer), so they can't be ignored, and since they're the ones that are going to be targetting civilian populations, they can't really be ignored while we try to clear out the Capitol ships.

If beating them was going to be a thing, it would have stretched credibility to think we could do it in a couple of months while no species has for nearly a billion years (at minimum). Since we devoted a lot of resources to the Crucible and most of the fleet wasn't doing well, I don't think we could realistically have won after making the 'Refuse' ending. The sort of victory people are talking about would probably have required that we truly give up hope for Earth.


Anything the council says to Shepard in ME2 is completely inadmissible because they have no reason to tell him the truth.

You have absolutely no idea how long it would take to upgrade a ship with, for example, a thannix cannon. Spacecraft are not like navy ships that need a drydock and a shipyard for major overhauls, the can literally just park anywhere and get to work. This is supported by the fact that most alliance ships HAVE been upgraded with thannix cannons.

You're also assuming that the Reapers number in the tens of thousands even though there is absolutely no evidence to support this beyond speculation of the highest order. Just because they COULD have that many reapers doesn't mean they do have that many. Keep in mind that Reapers are probably not like Krogan, reproducing uncontrollably. Most likely they have some optimum number that, for whatever reason, they try to maintain. Keep in mind that Reapers spend most of their time hiding, and 20,000 capital ships with the accompanying destroyers is far more likely to be found than, say, 500 capital ships.

One more thing. The game wouldn't actually need to end with the destruction or retreat of all Reapers, just a sufficient enough victory to show that the war CAN be won, much like how the entire empire wasn't destoyed at the end of Return of the Jedi.

#217
o Ventus

o Ventus
  • Members
  • 17 275 messages

Dragoonlordz wrote...

Whatever666343431431654324 wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The collectors are not gone, you wiped out one base. Why would you assume that single base was entire collector arsenal and only location in entire universe they are present? Not only that why would you assume the Reapers would not have every single technology the collectors invented?


The Collectors only attacked us with one ship. We saw their general die. I think its a good assumption.


They only needed to send out one ship to do that job. Does not mean they do not have more. You saw one of their generals die, the only one you met. Does not mean there are not more of them.


They had 3 ships. Shepard destroyed one, James destroyed another. The third is sent to fight at Palaven (See secondary codex) and I would guess is destroyed as well.

#218
nrcrane

nrcrane
  • Members
  • 271 messages
Nevermind, just read the above post about the 1 ship left at palaven.

Modifié par nrcrane, 03 juillet 2012 - 04:55 .


#219
Dragoonlordz

Dragoonlordz
  • Members
  • 9 920 messages

nrcrane wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

nrcrane wrote...

You stated in a previous thread that the fans also asked for no reaper off switch as well.  So why was it ok to go with the off switch ending if your going off of what fans were asking for, but not the conventional ending?


They went with what they agreed with, you got that outcome. They built the story around that outcome and the results you seen. Feedback is one thing, you leave suggestions about what would like. They decide which they want to run with and they did already.


So why bring up what the fans were asking for at all? You can't just point out that some fans were asking for no conventional ending and say they got what they asked for then just ignore the side that were asking for no reaper off switch.


Shows that the discussion was already had back then and it is merely being repeated here. They already decided the outcome. People debated should there be conventional win back then, some people said not some people said yes, just like some people here now. It was already listened too back then and a choice was made. They have also since said EC was the definitive ending, the final one which reinforces that choice. There is nothing wrong with debating about it but my suggestion is don't get your hopes up that discussion will bring about new ending DLC. Personally I find it silly to argue about in first place because you can pull as many theories as like but none of them can be proved because none of them happened and very likely never will.

Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 03 juillet 2012 - 04:58 .


#220
Whatever42

Whatever42
  • Members
  • 3 143 messages
Nevermind mine as well!

Modifié par Whatever666343431431654324, 03 juillet 2012 - 04:58 .


#221
Redbelle

Redbelle
  • Members
  • 5 399 messages

Dragoonlordz wrote...

Whatever666343431431654324 wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The collectors are not gone, you wiped out one base. Why would you assume that single base was entire collector arsenal and only location in entire universe they are present? Not only that why would you assume the Reapers would not have every single technology the collectors invented?


The Collectors only attacked us with one ship. We saw their general die. I think its a good assumption.


They only needed to send out one ship to do that job. Does not mean they do not have more. You saw one of their generals die, the only one you met. Does not mean there are not more of them.


It's possible that their are more collectors out there being that they are repurposed Protheans, and if one race got repurposed why not another......... but everything I read into the collectors suggests that the base was the central launching point that they then all retreated to. The base only seemed to have one berth for a ship so mulitple ships are unlikely unless they hot berth.

Also, the secretive nature of the collectors and the fact that no-one could get through the Omeaga 4 realy made that location the best place to hide and not get in the advanced species way until they were needed. It's all circumstatial evidence in the context of 'there are no more collectors' given that there is no strong evidence to suggest otherwise.

Now you mention it though, maybe BW could come up with a strong enough reason to include the collectors in MP.

#222
PeterDax

PeterDax
  • Members
  • 1 messages


thread closed.

#223
v TricKy v

v TricKy v
  • Members
  • 1 017 messages
I bet there would be way less complaining if Bioware would have made it the other way around and made a conventional victory possible.

#224
Zero132132

Zero132132
  • Members
  • 7 916 messages

BerzerkGene wrote...

Zero132132 wrote...
You're right, they even miss Shepard on the ground, so their aim isn't fantastic. But we still don't actually ever hear about HOW effective the thanix cannon is. Since it still requires four dreadnoughts to bring down a Reaper, considering how many there are (they usually enter without resistance, and since the oldest one we know of is nearly a billion years old, even assuming one per cycle (which I reject, since they're still trying to harvest humanity after building a fair chunk of the human reaper), that's a bit under 20k capitol ships overall. Some have probably been destroyed in the past, but since they usually eliminate the heart of galactic civilization first, shut down the relay network, and take worlds one by one, I honestly don't think there are going to be less than 10k of the capitol ships, and probably many more destroyers.


Well, I'm not sure about Harbinger, he was not the Reaper i loved to fight anymore. Although dropping out of the sky to annihlate everyone is in-character
Yeah, like i've said, basically retconned Thanix Cannons cause their presence means its possible to take out a Reaper relatively easy. Well, compared to other methods.
As for the Capitol ships, we don;t know if a species is always made into one, the Protheans, for example, were not. I doubt that was a one time thing. But i agree theres a few thousand at least. Not sure about destroyers. You only see a few, like 7 different ones. They're prettymuch always alone too. Maybe they only go after the easy targets? How many are taken out seems to be something to ponder. There was that derelict reaper, it was apparently destroyed by one enormous gun. That looked sovereign class. We could probably assume as many are destroyed are made each cycle, especially for technologically better civs, like Protheans.
The thing is if they had that many, the Catalyst is the boss, why would he possibly risk himself if he has thousands more reapers to call upon? Nothing stopping a bunch of errant bombs hitting the Citadel. A total shield wall of them would seem pragmatic. Then again, his logic makes my head hurt with how wrong it is...so i dunno.


They didn't retcon Thanix cannons. They took down the Collector Ship fairly easily, but you can beat that ship without it (if you don't upgrade, you still take them down). Meanwhile, Sovereign withstood concentrated fire of a huge fleet for several minutes without blinking, and that fleet included the Normandy. We don't actually KNOW how well they work against the big Reapers, or how prevalent they are. We know that it took 15k Platinum to build one for the Normandy, but it's a unitless quantity. No telling what it actually means. Even so, platinum is exceptionally rare. I just think that the Thanix cannon thing is too fuzzy to be able to state that it could turn the tide.

We don't actually KNOW that the Protheans weren't. EDI speculates that that's the case, but how exactly do you mess up grinding a species into goo and combining that with some tech?

The derelict Reaper was sovereign class, but that one hit was MASSIVELY powerful. It actually scarred the face of Klendagon, creating something called the 'Great Rift Valley' just from a glancing blow. Since the only other Reaper corpse we know of is the Leviathan of Dis, I don't think the notion that their population basically holds even is correct.

BerzerkGene wrote... 

Zero132132 wrote...
The notion of a conventional victory is still objectively wrong, since the game shows us the outcome if we choose not to use the Crucible.

Not really, it cuts to black, theres no going down in a blaze of glory, you have no goddamn idea what happens. A bit like the treatment of Me2 romanceable scenes. If we had been shown WHY we lose, tons more reapers jump in, suddenly all reaper forces get much more aggressive, something. Then i would say alright, because i would know WHY. Right now i have no damn clue other than "because Bioware says so." Which is a terrible reason. Avoiding logic at all costs led to the Dark ages Not really relvavent .


I'll have to disagree here. The only reason we can know ANYTHING in the series is "because Bioware says so." For the sake of argument, I'll ignore this principle and state that no Reapers have ever been destroyed. Why should I believe that there's a derelict Reaper just because Bioware says so? Why should I think that Sovereign was defeated just because we're shown it being defeated? Why should I believe that the Turians have a strong military, or that Garrus isn't a human in a mask?

I think people would have been more pissed at 'reject' if it showed the fleet getting wrecked and everyone Shepard cares about dying horribly. I think Bioware tried to make it tasteful so that people wouldn't feel like it was a slap in the face. Turns out that fans WANT to see the fleet lose. Don't think anyone would have expected that.

#225
Redbelle

Redbelle
  • Members
  • 5 399 messages

o Ventus wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

Whatever666343431431654324 wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The collectors are not gone, you wiped out one base. Why would you assume that single base was entire collector arsenal and only location in entire universe they are present? Not only that why would you assume the Reapers would not have every single technology the collectors invented?


The Collectors only attacked us with one ship. We saw their general die. I think its a good assumption.


They only needed to send out one ship to do that job. Does not mean they do not have more. You saw one of their generals die, the only one you met. Does not mean there are not more of them.


They had 3 ships. Shepard destroyed one, James destroyed another. The third is sent to fight at Palaven (See secondary codex) and I would guess is destroyed as well.


3 ships? Could you point me towad those codex entries? I didn't know they had 3.