190 réponses à ce sujet

[Blueprotoss]

XqctaX wrote...

Beeing forced into multiplayer to get a better ending to a SINGLEplayer game
is nothing short of an insult to the gamers considering it was promoted pre release
that multiplayer part of the game did NOT affect the singleplayer part.

The irony here is that nobody was foorced to get a perfect ending in ME3 by playing MP especially when you could have played ME: Infiltrator or used the ME3 Datapad app to make up the difference.  

XqctaX wrote... 

Mass effect WAS a singleplayer storydriven game and should have stayed that way.

Yet it still is a storydriven Single player RPG just like ME1 and ME2.

XqctaX wrote... 

the resources used for MP should have been used to make ME3 into the game
it was suppose to have been. a hole extra team could have helped polish the game.

so many things was rushed to get it finished in time the developing team should be embarrased
over the quality of the product... 

(Qoute and insert your own "rushed" part of the game)

It seems like you didn't pay attention that a separate Bioware studio worked on the MP.  It also seems you haven't noticed that a lot of Single player games have gotten the MP treatment like Resident Evil, Dead Space, God of War, Dead Rising, Assassin's Creed, Ghost Recon, Splinter Cell, and Front Mission are some examples of SP games having some MP.

XqctaX wrote... 

and dont even get me started on the fact that the multiplayer part of the game is
reduced to a FREE TO PLAY concept using microtransitions,
in what can at best be described as a lotterysystem and at worst...

 You don't need to use real world money to buy those crates, which is why its useless to complain.

XqctaX wrote... 

i cant write the worst. i'd get banned for doing so.
but lets just say its like batheo or evony and other games like that
were those that pay extra get an advantige that in this case stretches all the way into the
singleplayer portion..

You're being petty and ignorant whiel I would be surprised if nothing is done to you.

[kyles3]

Rubios wrote...

While the multiplayer is not terrible (atleast no CoD-like terrible) it makes no sense on a story driven RPG.

Wasted resources to make EA happy, but the worst part is the people actually paying for MP things.

Actually it kind of does make sense. Hackett tells you after N7 missions that he's sending in teams to hold the position. That's the multiplayer guys and gals. Also the weekend challenges are all pretty feasible events that could be happening "off-screen" during the course of the single-player story.

Oh, and anyone who loves the MP also loves the people who actually pay for MP things. They're the reason we keep getting free DLC.

[AresKeith]

kyles3 wrote...

Rubios wrote...

While the multiplayer is not terrible (atleast no CoD-like terrible) it makes no sense on a story driven RPG.

Wasted resources to make EA happy, but the worst part is the people actually paying for MP things.

Actually it kind of does make sense. Hackett tells you after N7 missions that he's sending in teams to hold the position. That's the multiplayer guys and gals. Also the weekend challenges are all pretty feasible events that could be happening "off-screen" during the course of the single-player story.

Oh, and anyone who loves the MP also loves the people who actually pay for MP things. They're the reason we keep getting free DLC.

the free DLCs are good but they won't keep people, the only way Bioware can keep the MP fresh now is to input new game modes

[mauro2222]

Blueprotoss wrote...

mauro2222 wrote...

He said "better used for enhancing single player"... and I agree. They could have used the money for the development of MP in SP, after all, it seems that money was the problem with the game being rushed.

There would be no reason for another Bioware studio to work on the SP especially when they wanted to do a MP for ME3 since their MP only ME got canceled, which it was similar to Star Wars: Battlefront.  Btw ME3 wasn't rushed at all especially when production and developement for ME3 started when ME2 was being produced and developed.

Who said anything about another studio. Use that money for the studio working in SP. And it was rushed, even the writers say so, it doesn't matter when it began production, it was released before being finished that's why is a rushed game. They run out of money for a lot of things.

Modifié par mauro2222, 04 juillet 2012 - 11:34 .

[mauro2222]

Blueprotoss wrote...

XqctaX wrote...

Beeing forced into multiplayer to get a better ending to a SINGLEplayer game
is nothing short of an insult to the gamers considering it was promoted pre release
that multiplayer part of the game did NOT affect the singleplayer part.

The irony here is that nobody was foorced to get a perfect ending in ME3 by playing MP especially when you could have played ME: Infiltrator or used the ME3 Datapad app to make up the difference.  

You got to be kidding me...

You need an android or a stupid I-phone...

[Blueprotoss]

 

mauro2222 wrote...

Who said anything about another studio. Use that money for the studio working in SP. And it was rushed, even the writers say so, it doesn't matter when it began production, it was released before being finished that's why is a rushed game. They run out of money for a lot of things.

You still missed the point as there were no resources taken away from the SP to do the MP and that ME3 was developed/produced at the same time as ME2.  It seems like you just want to make excuses for nippicks. 

mauro2222 wrote...

You got to be kidding me...

You need an android or a stupid I-phone...

The perfect endings are optional just like playing the MP, playing ME: Infiltrator, or using the ME3 Datapad app.

You can play ME: Infiltrator on any tablet while they're still optional.

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 05 juillet 2012 - 12:59 .

[voteDC]

Well to be fair there was one resource taken away from the single player by multiplayer and that is space on the physical media the game was sold on.

How much space does the multiplayer portion of the game take up on both discs of the Xbox 360 version for example. Could the single player team have used that extra space to improve their section.

[kyles3]

voteDC wrote...

Well to be fair there was one resource taken away from the single player by multiplayer and that is space on the physical media the game was sold on.

How much space does the multiplayer portion of the game take up on both discs of the Xbox 360 version for example. Could the single player team have used that extra space to improve their section.

The multiplayer maps appear in the single-player as N7 missions, and the character models (Asari, Drell, etc.) come straight out of the single-player. The two modes share a lot of resources. And besides, considering how rushed the endings were, what reason is there to believe they would've had time to add anything else? EA loves their deadlines.

[Forsythia]

It's fun, but it's not like a game like Team Fortress 2 or Unreal Tournament '99/2004, which I can play for hours straight.

I'll play a few hours, only to get bored with it real soon and put it away for a month. And the unlock system stinks. It's way too random.

[Hvlukas]

Modifié par Hvlukas, 09 juillet 2012 - 06:34 .

[Tenshi]

CO-OP only? no PvP? sir, anyone stuck in this mp obviously never played anything else.

[BadExamp1e]

Rubios wrote...

While the multiplayer is not terrible (atleast no CoD-like terrible) it makes no sense on a story driven RPG.

Wasted resources to make EA happy, but the worst part is the people actually paying for MP things.

And MP is making EA a ton of cash.

[AresKeith]

BadExamp1e wrote...

Rubios wrote...

While the multiplayer is not terrible (atleast no CoD-like terrible) it makes no sense on a story driven RPG.

Wasted resources to make EA happy, but the worst part is the people actually paying for MP things.

And MP is making EA a ton of cash.

then there's people saying "but it help gives you free DLCs" that isn't the point, the MP is wasted potential of what it could have been

[Izhalezan]

It was fun for only so long, until you realized that once again, you were soloing the round because the other 3 people are incapped together with far too enemies to even considering running in to revive.

[jakal66]

I really enjoy the MP but i did buy it for the sp, but the surpeise i got with the mp was great because i was expecting worse, Gears of war, pfft what a pos game...it's mp might be fun but that testosterone looking piece of crap was never appealing for me.

[XqctaX]

Blueprotoss wrote...

XqctaX wrote...

Beeing forced into multiplayer to get a better ending to a SINGLEplayer game
is nothing short of an insult to the gamers considering it was promoted pre release
that multiplayer part of the game did NOT affect the singleplayer part.

 The irony here is that nobody was foorced to get a perfect ending in ME3 by playing MP especially when you could have played ME: Infiltrator or used the ME3 Datapad app to make up the difference.

   

I dont see how saying that there was more ways OUTSIDE the singleplayer campaign to get the "best ending"
when my point was that is WAS not possible to get the "best ending" with singleplayer alone.
possebillity of paying for a seperate applikation/game is not an excuse, rather added salt to injury.

Blueprotoss wrote... 

XqctaX wrote... 

Mass effect WAS a singleplayer storydriven game and should have stayed that way.

Yet it still is a storydriven Single player RPG just like ME1 and ME2.

XqctaX wrote... 

the resources used for MP should have been used to make ME3 into the game
it was suppose to have been. a hole extra team could have helped polish the game.

so many things was rushed to get it finished in time the developing team should be embarrased
over the quality of the product... 

(Qoute and insert your own "rushed" part of the game)

It seems like you didn't pay attention that a separate Bioware studio worked on the MP.  It also seems you haven't noticed that a lot of Single player games have gotten the MP treatment like Resident Evil, Dead Space, God of War, Dead Rising, Assassin's Creed, Ghost Recon, Splinter Cell, and Front Mission are some examples of SP games having some MP.

 
yes a seperate team worked on MP. that second team could have been a part of the first team thus adding resources to that, twice the people working on a project will most likely speed up the process.

dont think paying attention meens what you think it meens but kidding aside what you said was compleatly beside the point I made , and pls dont tell me its the right way to go with this game becouse other games have done it. use arguments that can stand on there own merits. rather than saying others agree.

Blueprotoss wrote... 

XqctaX wrote... 

and dont even get me started on the fact that the multiplayer part of the game is
reduced to a FREE TO PLAY concept using microtransitions,
in what can at best be described as a lotterysystem and at worst...

 You don't need to use real world money to buy those crates, which is why its useless to complain.

 
I still fall behind if i Dont Use Money, which makes my point valid but your argument against it not so much
and the lotterysystem is just another way to try and get people to waist more real money. 
rather than beeing able to pay to get what they want, thus making it possible to pay a crapload of money and get nothing for it that you need/want.

Blueprotoss wrote...  

XqctaX wrote... 

i cant write the worst. i'd get banned for doing so.
but lets just say its like batheo or evony and other games like that
were those that pay extra get an advantige that in this case stretches all the way into the
singleplayer portion..

You're being petty and ignorant whiel I would be surprised if nothing is done to you.

accually I made a joke that also shows my opinion, and that doesnt validate calling me petty and ignorant.
that is nothing more than name calling by someone without real arguments.

[hawkens982]

mauro2222 wrote...

Is boring...

[Blueprotoss]

XqctaX wrote...

I dont see how saying that there was more ways OUTSIDE the singleplayer campaign to get the "best ending"
when my point was that is WAS not possible to get the "best ending" with singleplayer alone.
possebillity of paying for a seperate applikation/game is not an excuse, rather added salt to injury.

Yet Me: Infiltrator and the ME3 Datapad app are still outside the SP.  You also forget that the "perfect" or "best" endings are just optional not mandatory, which thats not adding salt to an injury..

XqctaX wrote... 

Mass effect WAS a singleplayer storydriven game and should have stayed that way.

Yet it still is a storydriven Single player RPG just like ME1 and ME2.

XqctaX wrote... 

yes a seperate team worked on MP. that second team could have been a part of the first team thus adding resources to that, twice the people working on a project will most likely speed up the process.

dont think paying attention meens what you think it meens but kidding aside what you said was compleatly beside the point I made , and pls dont tell me its the right way to go with this game becouse other games have done it. use arguments that can stand on there own merits. rather than saying others agree.

Yet you act as if extra SP would have done any good especaily when that other time worked on that ME canceled project that was like Star Wars: Batllefront.

Its better not to make assumptions especially when wouldn't know the outcomes.

XqctaX wrote... 

I still fall behind if i Dont Use Money, which makes my point valid but your argument against it not so much
and the lotterysystem is just another way to try and get people to waist more real money. 
rather than beeing able to pay to get what they want, thus making it possible to pay a crapload of money and get nothing for it that you need/want.

Yet there's no reason for you to complain especially when real world money for crate prurchases are optional and we're talking about a Co-Op mode not a standard MP.

XqctaX wrote... 

accually I made a joke that also shows my opinion, and that doesnt validate calling me petty and ignorant.
that is nothing more than name calling by someone without real arguments.

Either way you were still petty and ignorant while  real arguements aren't personal nippicks.

[Blueprotoss]

AresKeith wrote...

BadExamp1e wrote...

Rubios wrote...

While the multiplayer is not terrible (atleast no CoD-like terrible) it makes no sense on a story driven RPG.

Wasted resources to make EA happy, but the worst part is the people actually paying for MP things.

And MP is making EA a ton of cash.

then there's people saying "but it help gives you free DLCs" that isn't the point, the MP is wasted potential of what it could have been

I love the irony here based on how there's a separate Bioware studio handling the SP and the MP.

[AresKeith]

Blueprotoss wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

BadExamp1e wrote...

Rubios wrote...

While the multiplayer is not terrible (atleast no CoD-like terrible) it makes no sense on a story driven RPG.

Wasted resources to make EA happy, but the worst part is the people actually paying for MP things.

And MP is making EA a ton of cash.

then there's people saying "but it help gives you free DLCs" that isn't the point, the MP is wasted potential of what it could have been

I love the irony here based on how there's a separate Bioware studio handling the SP and the MP.

what does that have to do with wasted potential, stop repeating the same comment over and over

[Blueprotoss]

AresKeith wrote...

what does that have to do with wasted potential, stop repeating the same comment over and over

You're making assumptions on an outcome that can't be answered based on how two separate Bioware studios worked on the SP and MP.

[AresKeith]

Blueprotoss wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

what does that have to do with wasted potential, stop repeating the same comment over and over

You're making assumptions on an outcome that can't be answered based on how two separate Bioware studios worked on the SP and MP.

and that comes from me saying the MP is wasted potential and could have been better how?

[mauro2222]

Blueprotoss wrote...

 

mauro2222 wrote...

Who said anything about another studio. Use that money for the studio working in SP. And it was rushed, even the writers say so, it doesn't matter when it began production, it was released before being finished that's why is a rushed game. They run out of money for a lot of things.

You still missed the point as there were no resources taken away from the SP to do the MP and that ME3 was developed/produced at the same time as ME2.  It seems like you just want to make excuses for nippicks. 

No darling, you're missing the point, nobody said "they took resources". We were saying that they could have diverted that money into SP. And you still miss the point of rushed. It was a rushed launch of an incomplete game, how hard is to understand that?

Modifié par mauro2222, 05 juillet 2012 - 07:36 .