1-You committed a greater genocide if you choose to refuse
rather than just killing all the Geth if you choose destroy.
The Galaxy agreed to fight the Reapers or die trying; if we
refuse the catalyst options we are continuing to fight them. If the Japanese
wouldn’t have surrendered in WW2, and they would have been wiped out, would
their world leaders be accused for Genocide? No, it would just be that Japan
lost the war. Same thing if you choose refusal, yes we loss, but Shepard can’t
be accused for Genocide, when you choose destroy your willingly shooting a tube
knowing it will around 1.5 billion geth, whether you accept your decision or
try to justify by saying it’s just war or being ignorant calling the Geth
toasters it’s up to you, but it’s still Genocide.
2-Sacrifices must be made to win the war, whether it’s
controlling the reapers, synthesis, or destroying the Geth.
True, sacrifices
must be made, but some things are something’s are some despicably wrong that
shouldn’t be done. During the whole events of ME3, you are in a constant argument
with TIM saying controlling the Reapers are wrong, you saw all the innocent
people who died by Cerberus because they wanted to control the Reapers, and
unless you meta-game it seems fishy that the Catalyst would just let you
control him, so why choose Control if it contradicts and betrays everything you
fought for in ME3. Synthesis is again a betrayal for everyone who fought to
defeat the Reapers, all the people who died, all the families separated, no one
agreed to co-exist with the Reapers, we agreed to destroy them, synthesis is
wrong. Now there will always be casualties in war, but no one agreed to be sold
in order to win the war, furthermore committing genocide just for the fact to
ensure victory in the war because you’re afraid of extinction compromises the
agreement the galaxy agreed to, win this war together.
3- If you choose refusal, the next cycle uses the Crucible
anyway, so what’s the point?
You don’t know that unless you Metagame, there is still no
conformation if they use it or not, it just shows Liara passing down the plans
and you don’t know what they choose, whether more options arrived, and the circumstances
on how their war was.
4-People who choose refusal are cowards and are too afraid
to make tough decisions.
We’re not cowards, were sticking truth to what the Mass
Effect series has been about, overcoming challenges against all odds in our
terms. And I have still to comprehend how refusing the catalyst and continuing
to fight is cowardly. If you make a choice because you’re afraid of what might
happen if you don’t is cowardly like many people do.
5-Why pour all the resources and waste all the efforts
people have put into by not using the crucible.
As a YouTuber, MrBtongue said, the story of the Crucible is
flawed and stupid, but when our cycle built it was to defeat the Reapers but
not at the cost of Genocide, or to control or co-exist with the Reapers, as an
united Galaxy by the end of ME3, I think we would rather all die than sell
someone out now, or betray everything we fought for.
Those are my explanations, if you find anything wrong with them, please tell me what it is. If your going to act ignorant or give some stupid obtuse explanation, or repeat the same thing which I just argued by just repeating the question, please don't say anything at all. Thank you.
PS-Sorry for formatting, copy and pasted from Microsoft Word.
Modifié par Khajiit Jzargo, 03 juillet 2012 - 10:29 .
Retour en haut
