Aller au contenu

Photo

Synthesis is what the Reapers want


1081 réponses à ce sujet

#351
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

RiouHotaru wrote...

Really?  I don't remotely see the similiarites between a man who was clinically insane with an outrageous racial hatred who abused political systems and the biases of a nation to spark a World War and a misguided AI created to solve a problem and found a solution, even it wasn't one pleasing to organic sensibilities.


You can defend Hitler's work with that same clever wording, lol. Let's not delude ourselves with fancy semantics.

#352
Mysterious Stranger 0.0

Mysterious Stranger 0.0
  • Members
  • 2 309 messages
Why don't people believe the epilogue? Your grasping at straws. Although synthesis may be a morally repugnant thing to do in real life, in mass effect everything comes out puppies and roses and synthesis ends up the "Disney ending". The writers did not write any implied downsides to synthesis, other than the reapers still existing.

#353
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

RiouHotaru wrote...


But they aren't made the same.  The organic-hybrids are not the same as the synthetic hybrids.  They're still two different people, they're just connected and have (according to the game's explanation) reached an understanding of each other.  Why you believe this has sinister implications is beyond me.


They are both hybrids. They are both remade into the image of the Reapers. Why can't they just co-exist as they are? As Rannoch proved they could?


...Did you miss the Catalyst's entire dialog?  I'll quote it:

"My creators gave them form, I give them function, they give me purpose."

He is not the creator of the Reapers, passively their controller (it's quite obvious he can't just shut them off), and "embodiment"?  No.  He was created before the Reapers, he can't be the embodiment of something before it existed.  And the Reapers themselves don't HAVE a directive individually, or a will.  They can communicate, yes, but they cannot act on their own accord (Well, possibly Leviathan, but that's speculation until any actual DLC hits the market).

The themes of Mass Effect and the events ofthe game, ironically, support that Synthesis IS a positive and beneficial outcome.  So yeah, those do speak for themselves.


And what does the Catalyst say next? That it turned it's creators into the first Reaper.
It's creators gave them form = Reapers are the synthetic representation of his creators.

#354
Khajiit Jzargo

Khajiit Jzargo
  • Members
  • 1 854 messages

KotorEffect3 wrote...

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

KotorEffect3 wrote...

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

@KotorEffect3

Congratulation, you got what you wanted, you got me mad and it showed in my writing, now your going to completely ignore what i wrote and act obtuse, I'm done with you.


You mean you lost your moral high ground you never had in the first place?  You mean I revealed the real you?  When the chips are down "civilized" people will tear each other apart.

Funny, Like I said before, you just complete to ignore what is written and keep insulting me, and I'm the one with no moral ground..Ha! I actually laughed.


I am not the one that has been throwing around insults in this thread.  Go back and read your little hissy fit.

O RLY?


"refusal is utterly stupid"
"Refusers are so stubborn"
"funny and hypocritical coming from a refuser"
"the amount of denial that refusers are in is pathetic"


Sure, no insults from you.

#355
Grimwick

Grimwick
  • Members
  • 2 250 messages

RiouHotaru wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

The fail is strong in this one.


Really?  I don't remotely see the similiarites between a man who was clinically insane with an outrageous racial hatred who abused political systems and the biases of a nation to spark a World War and a misguided AI created to solve a problem and found a solution, even it wasn't one pleasing to organic sensibilities.


Umm... do you know why Hitler did what he did?

He had problems: they were called the Jewish people and the supposed oppression of Aryans.

That 'misguided AI' you are talking about presented a genocidal solution... and now presents a 'final solution' all in the name of what he thinks is 'good'. I wonder where we have heard that before... oh wait, that's right. Hitler.

#356
Grimwick

Grimwick
  • Members
  • 2 250 messages

Mysterious Stranger 0.0 wrote...

Why don't people believe the epilogue? Your grasping at straws. Although synthesis may be a morally repugnant thing to do in real life, in mass effect everything comes out puppies and roses and synthesis ends up the "Disney ending". The writers did not write any implied downsides to synthesis, other than the reapers still existing.


Brainwashing.

#357
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

Optimystic_X wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

I asked if Legion said a specific thing. You did not provide it.


Of course I did. The Geth understood what Reapers were. They had several theories and the trip to the Collector Base allowed them to decide on which one was right (i.e. "billions of organic minds.")

Did you even play ME2? You must have, going by your avatar, but I'm honestly not sure.


They understand what the Reapers are.
They don't understand how the Reapers think.

#358
mcz2345

mcz2345
  • Members
  • 732 messages
YOU DON'T SAY !

That is the whole point of it <_<

Modifié par mcz2345, 05 juillet 2012 - 07:52 .


#359
Mysterious Stranger 0.0

Mysterious Stranger 0.0
  • Members
  • 2 309 messages

Grimwick wrote...

RiouHotaru wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

The fail is strong in this one.


Really?  I don't remotely see the similiarites between a man who was clinically insane with an outrageous racial hatred who abused political systems and the biases of a nation to spark a World War and a misguided AI created to solve a problem and found a solution, even it wasn't one pleasing to organic sensibilities.


Umm... do you know why Hitler did what he did?

He had problems: they were called the Jewish people and the supposed oppression of Aryans.

That 'misguided AI' you are talking about presented a genocidal solution... and now presents a 'final solution' all in the name of what he thinks is 'good'. I wonder where we have heard that before... oh wait, that's right. Hitler.


http://en.wikipedia....ki/Godwin's_law 

#360
Mysterious Stranger 0.0

Mysterious Stranger 0.0
  • Members
  • 2 309 messages

Grimwick wrote...

Mysterious Stranger 0.0 wrote...

Why don't people believe the epilogue? Your grasping at straws. Although synthesis may be a morally repugnant thing to do in real life, in mass effect everything comes out puppies and roses and synthesis ends up the "Disney ending". The writers did not write any implied downsides to synthesis, other than the reapers still existing.


Brainwashing.


There is 0 evidence of that? 

#361
Grimwick

Grimwick
  • Members
  • 2 250 messages

mcz2345 wrote...

That is the reason why I picked it


????????????????

'Oh sure, Harbinger. I'll just walk right into that beam of energy of yours, that's what you want, right?'

#362
KotorEffect3

KotorEffect3
  • Members
  • 9 416 messages

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

KotorEffect3 wrote...

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

KotorEffect3 wrote...

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

@KotorEffect3

Congratulation, you got what you wanted, you got me mad and it showed in my writing, now your going to completely ignore what i wrote and act obtuse, I'm done with you.


You mean you lost your moral high ground you never had in the first place?  You mean I revealed the real you?  When the chips are down "civilized" people will tear each other apart.

Funny, Like I said before, you just complete to ignore what is written and keep insulting me, and I'm the one with no moral ground..Ha! I actually laughed.


I am not the one that has been throwing around insults in this thread.  Go back and read your little hissy fit.

O RLY?


"refusal is utterly stupid"
"Refusers are so stubborn"
"funny and hypocritical coming from a refuser"
"the amount of denial that refusers are in is pathetic"


Sure, no insults from you.


Is there any specific individual I am talking about?  No.  I am talking about a stance.  Refusal is a stance not an individual.  Not my fault you took it personaly

#363
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

mcz2345 wrote...

That is the reason why I picked it


I lol'ed at the spectacular amount of appropriateness that your profile exudes.

#364
AngryFrozenWater

AngryFrozenWater
  • Members
  • 9 088 messages

The Angry One wrote...

Cutlass Jack wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

This is 100% fact, shown within the game when the head Reaper itself not only promotes synthesis as the best thing ever, but admits that it tried it before.

The only 100% fact is that the Catalyst didn't just keep that platform moving after lifting you and just toss your body into the Synthesis option.

I mean if the Reapers really wanted that, and its really a form of 'mind control' like people say, then your willing participation in the process is not necessary. And it wasn't like there weren't other bodies it could have used. Like TIM who clearly got there ahead of you.

And the most important point is it left the other two buttons turned on. That doesnt say 100% to me.

Just because someone tried something once, it doesn't mean they want it. Like my mom made me taste her meatloaf once, which I hated. But many years later I tried someone else's meatloaf and it wasn't so bad. That doesnt mean I had a secret Meatloaf agenda.

...or does it?Image IPB


Contrived as the reasons for spacebaby presenting the 3 options may be, whether it be because it's shackled (year right) or the Crucible is forcing it or whatever, they're there all the same.
This doesn't change the fact that synthesis is what it wants. It's not like it can physically shove you into the beam anyway.

I disagree. Not only is synthesis "ideal", it is also "inevitable"!

Child: It is the ideal solution. Now that we know it is possible, it's inevitable we will reach synthesis.

So, sooner or later it infects you anyway. Because, you know, it's "inevitable". :P

#365
Baronesa

Baronesa
  • Members
  • 1 934 messages

RiouHotaru wrote...

...Did you miss the Catalyst's entire dialog?  I'll quote it:

"My creators gave them form, I give them function, they give me purpose."

He is not the creator of the Reapers, passively their controller (it's quite obvious he can't just shut them off), and "embodiment"?  No.  He was created before the Reapers, he can't be the embodiment of something before it existed.  And the Reapers themselves don't HAVE a directive individually, or a will.  They can communicate, yes, but they cannot act on their own accord (Well, possibly Leviathan, but that's speculation until any actual DLC hits the market).

The themes of Mass Effect and the events ofthe game, ironically, support that Synthesis IS a positive and beneficial outcome.  So yeah, those do speak for themselves.


Quote the entire Catalyst dialogue, you are missing part of it that goes against your stance.

Second... "And the Reapers themselves don't HAVE a directive individually, or a will."

Do you realize that with that, you just reduced them into mere VI... they are no longer AI... they are also no logner a threat... they are a joke...

#366
KotorEffect3

KotorEffect3
  • Members
  • 9 416 messages

Grimwick wrote...

mcz2345 wrote...

That is the reason why I picked it


????????????????

'Oh sure, Harbinger. I'll just walk right into that beam of energy of yours, that's what you want, right?'


Nobody if forcing you into the beam.

#367
zambot

zambot
  • Members
  • 1 236 messages

Mysterious Stranger 0.0 wrote...

Grimwick wrote...

RiouHotaru wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

The fail is strong in this one.


Really?  I don't remotely see the similiarites between a man who was clinically insane with an outrageous racial hatred who abused political systems and the biases of a nation to spark a World War and a misguided AI created to solve a problem and found a solution, even it wasn't one pleasing to organic sensibilities.


Umm... do you know why Hitler did what he did?

He had problems: they were called the Jewish people and the supposed oppression of Aryans.

That 'misguided AI' you are talking about presented a genocidal solution... and now presents a 'final solution' all in the name of what he thinks is 'good'. I wonder where we have heard that before... oh wait, that's right. Hitler.


http://en.wikipedia....ki/Godwin's_law 


It's a little late.  OP already godwinned his/her own thread.

#368
Grimwick

Grimwick
  • Members
  • 2 250 messages

Mysterious Stranger 0.0 wrote...

Grimwick wrote...

Mysterious Stranger 0.0 wrote...

Why don't people believe the epilogue? Your grasping at straws. Although synthesis may be a morally repugnant thing to do in real life, in mass effect everything comes out puppies and roses and synthesis ends up the "Disney ending". The writers did not write any implied downsides to synthesis, other than the reapers still existing.


Brainwashing.


There is 0 evidence of that? 


*sigh*

Do I have to point out the evidence every single time?

The SC says it himself that he 'forcefully changes the perspective of organics'.

That's brainwashing. Not to mention the ridiculousness of the appearance of the society in the epilogues... take the husks for example...

#369
Cutlass Jack

Cutlass Jack
  • Members
  • 8 091 messages

The Angry One wrote...

Cutlass Jack wrote...

You mean like it physically lifted you up into the room with him to have that conversation? Like he couldn't ask the keeper down the hall to drag your sorry butt into the beam?


After which Shepard wakes up (and is already awake by the time the Catalyst approaches).


Your facts need some work.


Amount of Keepers on the bottom of the Citadel = 0. Again, this isn't the issue anyway.


You're absolutely correct. We shouldn't let real facts, like Shepard barely being able to walk, or the Keeper you pass by on the way to that room, get in the way of the issues as you see them.

#370
Khajiit Jzargo

Khajiit Jzargo
  • Members
  • 1 854 messages

KotorEffect3 wrote...

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

KotorEffect3 wrote...

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

KotorEffect3 wrote...

Khajiit Jzargo wrote...

@KotorEffect3

Congratulation, you got what you wanted, you got me mad and it showed in my writing, now your going to completely ignore what i wrote and act obtuse, I'm done with you.


You mean you lost your moral high ground you never had in the first place?  You mean I revealed the real you?  When the chips are down "civilized" people will tear each other apart.

Funny, Like I said before, you just complete to ignore what is written and keep insulting me, and I'm the one with no moral ground..Ha! I actually laughed.


I am not the one that has been throwing around insults in this thread.  Go back and read your little hissy fit.

O RLY?


"refusal is utterly stupid"
"Refusers are so stubborn"
"funny and hypocritical coming from a refuser"
"the amount of denial that refusers are in is pathetic"


Sure, no insults from you.


Is there any specific individual I am talking about?  No.  I am talking about a stance.  Refusal is a stance not an individual.  Not my fault you took it personaly

Accusing a group in total rather than a single individual actually makes things worse, it shows that you judge a whole group without even hearing what they have to say, which just continue to prove how ignorant you are.

#371
Grimwick

Grimwick
  • Members
  • 2 250 messages

KotorEffect3 wrote...

Grimwick wrote...

mcz2345 wrote...

That is the reason why I picked it


????????????????

'Oh sure, Harbinger. I'll just walk right into that beam of energy of yours, that's what you want, right?'


Nobody if forcing you into the beam.


Irrelevant. It is stupid to do something the reapers want in this case, it is stupid independent of whether you actually did it.

#372
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

KotorEffect3 wrote...

Is there any specific individual I am talking about?  No.  I am talking about a stance.  Refusal is a stance not an individual.  Not my fault you took it personaly


Ad hominem, via dictionary.com: attacking an opponent's character rather than answering his argument.

Nowhere does it state that there needs to be a specific individual, merely an opponent. Try again.

#373
PsyrenY

PsyrenY
  • Members
  • 5 238 messages

The Angry One wrote...

They understand what the Reapers are.
They don't understand how the Reapers think.


Do you have to understand fire to know that when it burns, it's only doing what it was created to do?

#374
RiouHotaru

RiouHotaru
  • Members
  • 4 059 messages
What I don't get is this:

Do people really think that because the Catalyst presents the options that those options are specifically what IT wants?

I mean, in ME1, Joker tells you can either save or kill Council, does that mean it's what Joker wants?

In ME2, TIM tells you about destroying the base, then gives you the option to keep the base. Does that mean it's what TIM wants? (Actually in this instance yes it is, you wouldn't have the option to keep the base, and some people actually trusted TIM by this point foolishly enough).

The question I have to ask is: Without the Catalyst, how would you have ANY idea which option lead to which choice. Trial and error? TAO's assertion is that the Catalyst is an antagonist, therefore he taints the ending choices with it's own directive. But in reality, the Catalyst is a plot device, designed as a mo0uth-piece to tell the players what options they have.

#375
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

Optimystic_X wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

They understand what the Reapers are.
They don't understand how the Reapers think.


Do you have to understand fire to know that when it burns, it's only doing what it was created to do?


Missing the point entirely.