Aller au contenu

Photo

Synthesis is what the Reapers want


1081 réponses à ce sujet

#51
MegaSovereign

MegaSovereign
  • Members
  • 10 794 messages

CrutchCricket wrote...

Mesina2 wrote...

Shepard isn't indoctrinated.

Indeed. He's now the indoctrinator, not the indoctrinatee

:devil:


I've always thought that Control was the most practical ending since the least amount of people die and the galaxy rebuilds faster...but...

I'm currently playing ME2 and seeing those colonists getting melted just makes me want to **** the Reapers up.

#52
CrutchCricket

CrutchCricket
  • Members
  • 7 726 messages

Baronesa wrote...
That was fun... But switchs confuse me ... I prefer very well defined Dommes and subs...  oh wait... wrong topic!

:o

#53
Heeden

Heeden
  • Members
  • 856 messages

The Angry One wrote...

Irrelevant. You CANNOT come to an understanding with the Reapers, and no organic would be stupid enough to try.


Synthesis allows it, I can't believe you rant so much about a subject you haven't even looked in to.

A galactic community of Reapers. We changed to a form they find tolerable.
That is NOT understanding.


Watch the Synthesis ending, note how organic life is still organic life and not interred in Reapers. We have a new capability, we can fully interact with technology, that does not make us Reapers.


Yes, they don't kill us because we are now them. They haven't changed at all.
A one-sided compromise is not a compromise.


Please look at what a Reaper actually is, they are a synthetic being created by interring numerous (up to the billions) organic minds within a single body. That does not happen in Synthesis.

#54
Pacifien

Pacifien
  • Members
  • 11 527 messages

The Angry One wrote...
Show me one synthetic race that has actively desired synthesis.
Look at the Geth, they find the idea of compromise with the Reapers repugnant. But suddenly synthetics fighting the Reapers are going to want to become one with them.

Not all of the Geth were like that. The Heretics joined the Reapers. (That's if you believe they joined willingly, which I do.) And then when pushed to the brink of extinction, the Geth joined the Reapers.

Which does make me think about what the Geth would have chosen if given the choice between Control, Synthesis, or Destroy. Legion already chose a form of Synthesis and then uploaded that to all the Geth. If given the choice between their own possible destruction or two methods of survival, one of which is to accept further Reaper code, they've already demonstrated a willingness to do whatever it takes to make sure they do not go extinct.

#55
Baronesa

Baronesa
  • Members
  • 1 934 messages

The Angry One wrote...

Heeden wrote...

Baronesa wrote...

Why is that change??

They accomplished their goal and changed EVERYONE... so tehre is no more reason to kill us... that is not changing! that is resting after accomplishing their goal!


The Reaper's goals were the Harvest, the change makes the Harvest no longer necessary so they change their goals. Note all the killing everybody that isn't happening? That is a change for the Reapers.


The harvesting was a means to an end. That was not their goal. Their goal was synthesis. Listen to the Catalyst.

Again you repeat that they're not killing everybody.
I'm sorry everyone, I must Godwin the thread because this person refuses to get it.

If Hitler made a magic machine that turned every human into his Aryan ideal, he would stop killing everyone.
Would this be because he came to an understanding? No! It's because he turned everyone into an Aryan! 



Or the compromise that the Architect wanted in DA?

If everyone would become a darkspawn then there would be no more blights... is that a worthy compromise? Something that you would even consider?

#56
Xellith

Xellith
  • Members
  • 3 606 messages

Heeden wrote...

Billyg3453 wrote...

Where's that? When every Reaper you've ever spoken with said we can't understand and our extincition is inevitable?


Yes they do, and then we create the Crucible which gives new options, at which point the Catalyst bows to our superior solutions and asks which one we'd like to pick.


Catalyst: "Hey Shepard.  You are the first organic ever to reach me.  Because of that - it means that my solution of harvesting organic and synthetics will no longer work anymore for some reason.  So I'ma let you pick one of three options"
Shepard: "Okay... I guess..."
Catalyst: "First you can destroy us. But you also wipe out every other synthetic and some technology.  Think of it as an EMP type dealio".
Catalyst: "You can control us too. You will die and your mind uploaded to a computer as the new catalyst. You wont be shepard anymore.  But a shepard AI based on you will rule."
Catalyst: "Or synthesis. This is where using some advanced technology that can distinguish between organics, synthetics, rocks, ships, metals and whatnot will turn organics and synthetics into something else.  You will all be cyborg type things"
Shepard: "Those all suck.  Cant you just fly into suns and leave us all alone?  Id rather not wipe out the synthetics we currently have."
Catalyst: "No you have to pick one of those options"
Shepard: "No I refuse. They all suck"
Catalyst: "SO BE IT. I WILL CONTINUE TO USE THIS SOLUTION I JUST SAID WILL NOT WORK ANYMORE.  BECAUSE IM SMART LIKE THAT."
/extinction

#57
Heeden

Heeden
  • Members
  • 856 messages

Ticonderoga117 wrote...
Yeah, we just become husk 2.0. Such a better step up. <_<


Husks have organic parts replaced by technology so their relationship to the originator species is mostly superficial, this is not the case - either stated or implied - with Synthesis.

#58
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

Heeden wrote...

Synthesis allows it, I can't believe you rant so much about a subject you haven't even looked in to.


Synthesis is domination of the Reaper ideal. Not understanding.

Watch the Synthesis ending, note how organic life is still organic life and not interred in Reapers. We have a new capability, we can fully interact with technology, that does not make us Reapers.


There is no organic life.  There are only hybrids. Approved by the Reapers. LOOK at them for heaven's sake, don't tell me they aren't changed.

Please look at what a Reaper actually is, they are a synthetic being created by interring numerous (up to the billions) organic minds within a single body. That does not happen in Synthesis.


They are hybrids, regardless of the method. Also, look at husks. Reapers have been doing this for billions of years in a smaller scale.

#59
MegaSovereign

MegaSovereign
  • Members
  • 10 794 messages

The Angry One wrote...

Optimystic_X wrote...

A third explanation: recall that our cycle can have synthetics work on the crucible too. We aren't the first cycle to have a synthetic race fight the Reapers. (100% fact - Starkid says this himself.) But if machines see Synthesis as logical/desirable, they would have been glad to build that function into the Crucible, possibly even without the organics they were working with realizing they did so.


Show me one synthetic race that has actively desired synthesis.
Look at the Geth, they find the idea of compromise with the Reapers repugnant. But suddenly synthetics fighting the Reapers are going to want to become one with them.


Gotta disagree there TAO.

I remember clearly that the Geth went to the Reapers for help during the Geth/Quarian war. They prefer submission over extinction.

Also synthetic life is actively seeking perfection through understanding. And since the Geth don't have the same morals as organics, I doubt they would care if synthesis was forced on them.

#60
WYLDMAXX

WYLDMAXX
  • Members
  • 377 messages

Heeden wrote...

It may seem strange to you, but some people really do think trying to understand our enemies is a better path to peace than simply wiping them out.


Its a nice to know people still want this to be true. 

#61
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

CrutchCricket wrote...

You let billions die. I support your right and even your reasons to do so. But don't kid yourself. You are directly responsible for the completion of the cycle when you could've done something about it.


Directly, no. Indirectly, yes.

If I must become the enemy to stop the enemy, I have no justification in stopping him in the first place. This is why synthesis--above all--is the most abhorrent ending. I literally become my enemy.

Modifié par wantedman dan, 05 juillet 2012 - 05:12 .


#62
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

Pacifien wrote...

Not all of the Geth were like that. The Heretics joined the Reapers. (That's if you believe they joined willingly, which I do.) And then when pushed to the brink of extinction, the Geth joined the Reapers.

Which does make me think about what the Geth would have chosen if given the choice between Control, Synthesis, or Destroy. Legion already chose a form of Synthesis and then uploaded that to all the Geth. If given the choice between their own possible destruction or two methods of survival, one of which is to accept further Reaper code, they've already demonstrated a willingness to do whatever it takes to make sure they do not go extinct.


The heretics were misguided, and in any case they fell for the Reaper's promises of new technology.
They weren't thinking of becoming one with the Reapers, and using the Reaper code isn't a form of synthesis either, it's a synthetic upgrade, nothing more.

#63
Heeden

Heeden
  • Members
  • 856 messages

The Angry One wrote...

I recommend you read between the lines, and realise that synthesis remakes all life in the Reaper's image. A life form they can tolerate.


Reading between the lines is not the same as making up a load of rubbish. The Harvest remakes life in the Reaper's image, if thay was the Catalyst's aim he could have achieved ages ago by allowing the Harvest to continue until all life - not just advanced species - have been interred.

#64
Caenis

Caenis
  • Members
  • 166 messages
 

The Angry One wrote...

This is 100% fact, shown within the game when the head Reaper itself not only promotes synthesis as the best thing ever, but admits that it tried it before.

No this isn't about the morality or lack thereof of synthesis, there are enough topics about that.
Here I ask.... if we are to believe that the Crucible was designed by some unknown organic race and improved upon in the following eons... why does it have an option for synthesis?

Not only is it what the Reapers want. But think about this. Really think about this. The people who designed/added to the Crucible wouldn't be thinking "We need to merge with synthetics for greater understanding/final evolution of life/blah blah blah!". They'd be thinking "Oh my god those giant metal cuttlefish are going to kill us, we need to build something to stop them."
I really have to wonder what kind of mentality would see giant metal killbots and think "You know what would be a good idea? Merging our bodies with them!".

 
It's really NOT that deep.

Modifié par Caenis, 05 juillet 2012 - 05:10 .


#65
General User

General User
  • Members
  • 3 315 messages

Heeden wrote...

Watch the Synthesis ending, note how organic life is still organic life and not interred in Reapers. We have a new capability, we can fully interact with technology, that does not make us Reapers.

After Synthesis, organic life is most certainly NOT still organic life; it is "synthesised" life (hence the word "Synthesis").  Organic lifeforms like us have been changed into a form the Reapers find acceptable, and thus they no longer seek to "harvest" us.

Modifié par General User, 05 juillet 2012 - 05:11 .


#66
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

MegaSovereign wrote...

Gotta disagree there TAO.

I remember clearly that the Geth went to the Reapers for help during the Geth/Quarian war. They prefer submission over extinction.

Also synthetic life is actively seeking perfection through understanding. And since the Geth don't have the same morals as organics, I doubt they would care if synthesis was forced on them.


The only reason they did that is because the destruction of their construct literally made them dumber for all the programs they lost.
This is BioWare outright saying the only way you cooperate the Reapers is if you're dumb. It's quite funny if you think about it.

Modifié par The Angry One, 05 juillet 2012 - 05:13 .


#67
Billyg3453

Billyg3453
  • Members
  • 429 messages

Heeden wrote...

Ticonderoga117 wrote...
Yeah, we just become husk 2.0. Such a better step up. <_<


Husks have organic parts replaced by technology so their relationship to the originator species is mostly superficial, this is not the case - either stated or implied - with Synthesis.

Actually it is. It is stated that synthesis will create a new framework that combines synthetics and organics into a new synthetic-organic DNA.

You can't defend the science or logic of synthesis. It is impossible. If you like the idea of it, thats a different debate.

#68
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

Reading between the lines is not the same as making up a load of rubbish.


Aka what doesn't convene you.

The Harvest remakes life in the Reaper's image, if thay was the Catalyst's aim he could have achieved ages ago by allowing the Harvest to continue until all life - not just advanced species - have been interred.


It won't affect all life everywhere in the galaxy, and harvesting less advanced species gains the Reapers little.
This way is the most efficient for the Reapers, all life becomes like them. Forever.

#69
savionen

savionen
  • Members
  • 1 317 messages

WYLDMAXX wrote...

Heeden wrote...

It may seem strange to you, but some people really do think trying to understand our enemies is a better path to peace than simply wiping them out.


Its a nice to know people still want this to be true. 


That's all well and good when they're not trying to exterminate you, consider you insects and have killed trillions upon trillions.

This isn't two countries trying to understand eachother. This is cells of bacteria and humans trying to negotiate and understand eachother.

#70
Ticonderoga117

Ticonderoga117
  • Members
  • 6 751 messages

Heeden wrote...
Husks have organic parts replaced by technology so their relationship to the originator species is mostly superficial, this is not the case - either stated or implied - with Synthesis.


And the green glowey stuff isn't technology? What is it then, bio-luminescent paint?
Husks = forcibly add tech to an organic being creating something different.
Husks 2.0 = forcibly add tech to an organic being creating something different, however, this version doesn't destroy the original personality it seems.

#71
Welsh Inferno

Welsh Inferno
  • Members
  • 3 295 messages
I love that some people have almost the complete polar opposite view to what BioWare intended with the endings. Its funny. Would of helped if they wrote the entire thing better though..

#72
CrutchCricket

CrutchCricket
  • Members
  • 7 726 messages

wantedman dan wrote...
Directly, no. Indirectly, yes.

If I must become the enemy to stop the enemy, I have no justification in stopping him in the first place.

You could've directly ended it by shooting the thing, grabbing the things, or throwing yourself down the beamy thing. You directly refused. As a result everybody dies.

I'm not arguing which one is morally right (I don't even care). I'm saying they all have **** attached to them. No option is good. You will be atrocious regardless. So just pick your poison.

#73
Heeden

Heeden
  • Members
  • 856 messages

The Angry One wrote...

The harvesting was a means to an end. That was not their goal. Their goal was synthesis. Listen to the Catalyst.


Their goal was peaceful coexistence between synthetics and organics, synthesis is the best way of achieving this goal.

The goal is not inherently evil, the solution is not inherently evil.

Nothing suggests it turns everyone in to Reapers, if that was the Catalyst's goal he could have achieved it after the first Harvest by continuing until all the non-advanced races were interred as well.

Your Godwin invocation is flat-out stupid.

#74
wantedman dan

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

Welsh Inferno wrote...

I love that some people have almost the complete polar opposite view to what BioWare intended with the endings. Its funny. Would of helped if they wrote the entire thing better though..


Good intentions pave the road to Hell.

#75
Caenis

Caenis
  • Members
  • 166 messages
Seriously, people are making this whole 'choose your ending' thing into a big philosophical and moral debate, when it's NOT even that deep. It's JUST a game, it's a fictional world, there's no more logic to it than there is logic to unicorns have wings and can fly and biotics have magic just like mages *scratches head* wow!...People are getting all fired up over something that's not real and completely hypothetical. At the end of the day, that's all it is. Take a deep breath.