As I said, I find it to be a tactical error, but not an act of treason -- due in large part to David Gaider saying the Tower wasn't breached because Loghain wanted it to be breached. It was breached because no safeguards were put in place.
David Gaider said that Loghain wanted either his men or Uldred in the Tower, because they were people he could trust. If he wanted his men or Uldred in the Tower, leaving the Tower susceptible to invasion just so he could have a justifiable reason for leaving the field would be asenine, because that wouldn't really make any sense considering Loghain would've charged to save Cailan had the battle been winnable using his strategy. That's
not the case. The Tower was breached not out of treason, but out of tactical errors.
David Gaider also said that if the battle was winnable, Loghain would've charged to save Cailan. Indeed, the toolset will show you the dialogue notes when you confront him about Cailan's death, telling you that he never wanted Cailan dead despite their disagreements.
I blame Bioware more for it then Loghain himself, because Bioware doesn't know **** about warfare. Indeed, my Dwarf Nobles and I did a double facepalm when hearing about the Tower's lower levels being "explored", more so when they heard Loghain was the general of Ferelden for
30 years and was just now bothering to learn about Ostagar.
And you should give a damn what DG says on the matter, because it's Word of God. You can't argue with it.
Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 08 juillet 2012 - 03:31 .