Aller au contenu

Photo

Why is every high N7 person I've seen today....


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
106 réponses à ce sujet

#76
upinya slayin

upinya slayin
  • Members
  • 10 292 messages

Dilandau3000 wrote...

Because the vast majority of players don't read the forums?


exactly. if you don't read the forums or have soemone tell you it doens't work who has read the forums, how else would you know?

#77
Pekkan

Pekkan
  • Members
  • 410 messages

uncertainsky wrote...

ULM works just as its sposed to for me on any SMG


No, it does not work. It only "works" on the weapon screen and now apparently sometimes on power screen, but it does not work in game, as this July 8th vidoe done by someone shows that it is broken still. 

 

Modifié par Pekkan, 09 juillet 2012 - 06:22 .


#78
upinya slayin

upinya slayin
  • Members
  • 10 292 messages

Pekkan wrote...

uncertainsky wrote...

ULM works just as its sposed to for me on any SMG


No, it does not work. It only "works" on the weapon screen and now apparently sometimes on power screen, but it does not work in game, as this July 8th vidoe done by someone shows that it is broken still. 

 

i don't understand why people have such a hard time believing it?

#79
tMc Tallgeese

tMc Tallgeese
  • Members
  • 2 028 messages
 I've used the ULM on the Hurricane so it'll be black. Black weapons on my hot pink Krogan soldier is HOOOOOOOT!:devil:B):devil:

#80
JoxerNL

JoxerNL
  • Members
  • 176 messages

upinya slayin wrote...

i don't understand why people have such a hard time believing it?


Because most people are sheep, and the biggest part of the 'flock' believes that it is working, even though the evidence clearly shows it does not.

#81
msantos

msantos
  • Members
  • 308 messages

WarGriffin wrote...

Some guys like to impose challenges on themselves hell I seen a 5000 still using an avenger using the stablizer and scope as upgrades


Bingo !!!! 


Since we cannot play with character levels worse than level 1 and we cannot demote any weapons to a lower level, the next level in difficulty is to carry the lowest performing weapons in the arsenal to a match.  ;)

#82
CmnDwnWrkn

CmnDwnWrkn
  • Members
  • 4 336 messages

Star fury wrote...

Dilandau3000 wrote...

Because the vast majority of players don't read the forums?


Shane Ashkore wrote...

Tallgeese_VII wrote...

Because... everything says it works.
Only problem is it does not.


They only work if your recharge isnt 200% if it is then they do nothing and your better off with another mod.


You know, even reading forums doesn't help. Always meet people that say that ULM is working. Amusing.


It's really not that obvious, even if you read the forums.  I thought it was fixed for the first couple of weeks after the patch.

JoxerNL wrote...

upinya slayin wrote...

i don't understand why people have such a hard time believing it?


Because
most people are sheep, and the biggest part of the 'flock' believes
that it is working, even though the evidence clearly shows it does not.


BioWare even confirmed on here that it won't be fixed until the next official patch.

Modifié par CmnDwnWrkn, 09 juillet 2012 - 06:35 .


#83
Pekkan

Pekkan
  • Members
  • 410 messages
For me it was kinda obvious after the patch and DLC when I was using the Krysae and Hurricane I (weight 0.85) as side arm. The ULM not working made the ingame CD bonus something like +20% instead of +100%, and you could really feel that when you got that "stealth not properly breaking, full TC cooldown" bug with Krysae, or had the full TC CD for anyother reason, capturing objective etc.

But I guess with a class with already +200% CD bonus, having 0.2 weighting Shuriken X or 0.3 weighting Tempest X, the ULM not working might be harder to notice ingame.

Modifié par Pekkan, 09 juillet 2012 - 06:45 .


#84
malakim2099

malakim2099
  • Members
  • 559 messages
Because it's amusing.

#85
UKStory135

UKStory135
  • Members
  • 3 954 messages
In their defense, the patch said that it fixed the problem, and the forums were 90% "NERF TC AND THE KRYSAE! THEY ARE FOR NOOBZ IF YOU LIKE THEM THEY SUCK!!!!!" so important info like the ULM bug still not working might not have gotten across.

#86
upinya slayin

upinya slayin
  • Members
  • 10 292 messages

msantos wrote...

WarGriffin wrote...

Some guys like to impose challenges on themselves hell I seen a 5000 still using an avenger using the stablizer and scope as upgrades


Bingo !!!! 


Since we cannot play with character levels worse than level 1 and we cannot demote any weapons to a lower level, the next level in difficulty is to carry the lowest performing weapons in the arsenal to a match.  ;)









in that case why not just put no mods on it? i guess it is funny to use an ULM knowing it won't work. i have before

#87
Agueybana

Agueybana
  • Members
  • 1 278 messages

tMc Tallgeese wrote...

 I've used the ULM on the Hurricane so it'll be black. Black weapons on my hot pink Krogan soldier is HOOOOOOOT!:devil:B):devil:


If you told me that in the lobby, I'd totally support your use of ULM.

#88
Guest_Ghostknife72_*

Guest_Ghostknife72_*
  • Guests

Agueybana wrote...

tMc Tallgeese wrote...

 I've used the ULM on the Hurricane so it'll be black. Black weapons on my hot pink Krogan soldier is HOOOOOOOT!:devil:B):devil:


If you told me that in the lobby, I'd totally support your use of ULM.



#89
Miriad

Miriad
  • Members
  • 424 messages
Dude, you need to let it go, I got what I wanted out of you:

1. You admit to having benefited from the glitch more than once. On BSN... Herp derp.
2. You still maintain how proud you are of your N7 score due to its showing of skill and "purity".
3. Then you attempt to be revisionist about what you clearly implied before: "collect your 75k and move on", don't report them.

Why on earth would anyone need at argue about this with this viewpoint. I'm not going to change your mind for sure, and you merely think I'm being "short sighted".

I mean... Seriously you come on here here boasting that your N7 score hasn't been tainted by money... Just exploits, and you want people to respect you? You are living in an alternate reality sir.

Seriously I'm done here, what a waste of time.

#90
djspectre

djspectre
  • Members
  • 1 237 messages
I dont use my maxed out GPSMG because it's an awful weapon. I use the Hurricane without ULM (I use the two ammo capacity boosting mods instead) for continuous firing (I can deplete a whole gun if I use Adrenaline Rush) to take down boss enemies.

#91
djspectre

djspectre
  • Members
  • 1 237 messages

upinya slayin wrote...

msantos wrote...

WarGriffin wrote...

Some guys like to impose challenges on themselves hell I seen a 5000 still using an avenger using the stablizer and scope as upgrades


Bingo !!!! 


Since we cannot play with character levels worse than level 1 and we cannot demote any weapons to a lower level, the next level in difficulty is to carry the lowest performing weapons in the arsenal to a match.  ;)









in that case why not just put no mods on it? i guess it is funny to use an ULM knowing it won't work. i have before


Nah, hardest is to play a match where you can only kill things using grenades or powers. No shooting at all. I did that once and even bronze was f-ing hard. 

#92
tMc Tallgeese

tMc Tallgeese
  • Members
  • 2 028 messages
Seriously, hasn't anyone used the mods to make the weapons black with red lights for hot pink Krogan action?!?

It's 100% proof positive that I'm a quint and craps dark matter.

#93
L.ast L.ife

L.ast L.ife
  • Members
  • 1 923 messages

UKStory135 wrote...

In their defense, the patch said that it fixed the problem, and the forums were 90% "NERF TC AND THE KRYSAE! THEY ARE FOR NOOBZ IF YOU LIKE THEM THEY SUCK!!!!!" so important info like the ULM bug still not working might not have gotten across.



#94
upinya slayin

upinya slayin
  • Members
  • 10 292 messages

djspectre wrote...

upinya slayin wrote...

msantos wrote...

WarGriffin wrote...

Some guys like to impose challenges on themselves hell I seen a 5000 still using an avenger using the stablizer and scope as upgrades


Bingo !!!! 


Since we cannot play with character levels worse than level 1 and we cannot demote any weapons to a lower level, the next level in difficulty is to carry the lowest performing weapons in the arsenal to a match.  ;)









in that case why not just put no mods on it? i guess it is funny to use an ULM knowing it won't work. i have before


Nah, hardest is to play a match where you can only kill things using grenades or powers. No shooting at all. I did that once and even bronze was f-ing hard. 


it was easy for me on gold??

http://social.biowar.../index/12937475

#95
Baerdface

Baerdface
  • Members
  • 550 messages
So "the ones I've seen today" = "every high N7 rank".

Very intelligent deduction

Modifié par Baerdface, 09 juillet 2012 - 08:51 .


#96
GGW KillerTiger

GGW KillerTiger
  • Members
  • 4 565 messages

Dilandau3000 wrote...

Because the vast majority of players don't read the forums?

^this^

I love that when I let them know I get called retarded and a dumb ass. they also tell me I'm a noob that doesn't know what I'm talking about .... Then vote to kick me :lol:

People on Xbox LIVE are so stupid. My favorite "insult" is when I'm called a dumb ass kid.

#97
Father Superior

Father Superior
  • Members
  • 377 messages

Miriad wrote...



Dude, you need to let it go, I got what I wanted
out of you:



1. You admit to having benefited from the glitch
more than once. On BSN... Herp derp. 

2. You still maintain how proud you are of your N7
score due to its showing of skill and "purity". 

3. Then you attempt to be revisionist about what
you clearly implied before: "collect your 75k and move on", don't
report them. 



Why on earth would anyone need at argue about this
with this viewpoint. I'm not going to change your mind for sure, and you merely
think I'm being "short sighted". 



I mean... Seriously you come on here here boasting
that your N7 score hasn't been tainted by money... Just exploits, and you want
people to respect you? You are living in an alternate reality sir. 



Seriously I'm done here, what a waste of time.




Well aren't you Mr. Tough-Guy, trying to make
yourself look smart without citing a single piece of evidence. I can't find the
exact thread I am looking for, but this should suffice:



Scylla Costa wrote...



To some of you, it may appear that we are not
doing anything against the cheaters. This is not true. However, we are being
careful to ensure that the individuals
flagged as cheaters are clearly
and repeatedly
 cheating.
 We do not want to act against honest people. 






I am not clearly and repeatedly cheating, I am
simply enjoying the benefits of being a victim of rocket-glitchers from time to
time. There was an additional post somewhere that said that Bioware was not
going to ban people who are matched into one game with them because they would
need to quit out and lose equipment. I do not remain in the game if the
rocket-glitcher does not stop after a warning or immediately leaves without any
response; I report them for cheating and am therefore following the guidelines and receiving the
occasional benefit.

I don't know why you keep bringing up my N7 score
and saying it doesn't matter when it clearly has some purpose. To put it in
simpler terms, if you are coach of a 4 man basketball team (don't ask how it
works, this is just an example) and you need to pick your final player, which
is more likely to be an asset to the team, a 7' monster of a man or a 5' shrimp,
both possessing the same knowledge of the game? The answer is 7' monster, in
case you didn't know because we are talking about likelihood. There is no way
of knowing for sure if the 7' monster will be better than the 5' shrimp, but
the odds are more in favor of the former.

Finally, unless you can give some solid evidence
that I said that glitchers shouldn't be banned, I suggest you stop making such
bold accusations. In the spirit of debate, I will provide evidence for my side:

Father Superior wrote...



Not everyone goes on these forums. Hell, I didn't
make an account until I hit at least 4 figures. The MP community is vast and expands far past this forum. It's for this reason that I laugh when I see threads bragging about how many
rocket-glitchers a particular member has reported because none of them seem to
realize that for the most part they aren't taking down
"bug-exploiters", they're taking away the progress, and essentially
the time spent playing, from someone who likely is not aware of the actions
Bioware and the "white knights" of the forums are taking to respond
to the problem.







That is not saying to not report them and to let
glitchers be ban-free, it says that people are immediately assuming that
someone is maliciously exploiting the glitch, well aware of its risks, without
even giving them the benefit of the doubt and considering the possibility that
someone doesn't know just how serious this bug is being taken by Bioware (I
didn't see any rallying cry by them to ban Hydra glitchers).

I argue this viewpoint because it is very clear
that you and a large portion of these forums are stuck in the tunnel-vision
mindset that "Anyone who utilizes an exploit is a thieving cheater
who is maliciously attacking your precious Bioware" when things are not
that black and white. Open your mind to other possibilities because you seem to
think that there is only one possible scenario, and that is why I called you
"short-sighted". If you won't ever budge on your idea, then not only
are you being stubborn, you are being pigheaded and an unworthy debate
opponent. The reason I have not changed my mind is because you have given me nothing convincing
enough to make me believe that your side is the only one that is correct.

I did not go around boasting my N7 ranking, I
simply used it as evidence that many people don't bother going on these forums
and some don't join until late into their ME3 MP career. And I was in no way
expecting respect for my N7 rank, I seek to earn it because I have formed a
solid argument while I have yet to see you present anything substantial for
your side that you clearly think is the only possible scenario. If anything,
you are demanding respect from me when it is clear that you don't have a foot
to stand on and that by joining the bigger group you have in some way validated
your claims.

If this debate was such a waste of time, why did
you bother engaging? And why engage when you don't intend to finish what you
started? I find it hard to take you seriously when you decide to run away after
being called out for providing insufficient evidence, if any at all. You have a
lot to learn.
Edit: Typo

Modifié par Father Superior, 09 juillet 2012 - 11:03 .


#98
Omnifarious Nef

Omnifarious Nef
  • Members
  • 3 893 messages
I do so because I enjoy having an SMG, of which is black in color.

Modifié par NeferiusX3, 09 juillet 2012 - 10:05 .


#99
JustinSaneV2

JustinSaneV2
  • Members
  • 741 messages
What's funny is trying to argue with that ULM is broken and they refuse to believe you 99% of the time.

#100
Guest_Ghostknife72_*

Guest_Ghostknife72_*
  • Guests

Baerdface wrote...

So "the ones I've seen today" = "every high N7 rank".

Very intelligent deduction


Doesn't that fall under the Post hoc ergo propter hoc logic fallacy?