o Ventus wrote...
xsdob wrote...
Artifical gravity is also space magic, the only sci-fi thing to ever cover it in a logical and non-magic way was 2001 a space oddesy, as far as my knowledge goes.
Nice self contradiction there.
Tealjaker94 wrote...
Mass effect fields. They're a pretty vital part of the universe. Hence the title of all 3 games.xsdob wrote...
Artifical gravity is also space magic, the only sci-fi thing to ever cover it in a logical and non-magic way was 2001 a space oddesy, as far as my knowledge goes.
o Ventus wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet Saren is the prime example of Synthesis.
No.
He.
Isn't.
xsdob wrote...
o Ventus wrote...
xsdob wrote...
Artifical gravity is also space magic, the only sci-fi thing to ever cover it in a logical and non-magic way was 2001 a space oddesy, as far as my knowledge goes.
Nice self contradiction there.
They had them walking on the stations walls, this is how it would need to be so the rotational force could keep them in place, everything would need to be built so that the sides are the floor.
Every other sci-fi that I've seen does not do this or have this design, how do they stay planted.
Blueprotoss wrote...
There's a lot space magic in ME and a prime example is a biotic.AresKeith wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet I'm not the one complaining here or being childish.AresKeith wrote...
@Blueprotoss if you think its time to move on then gtfo
your the one comparing Mass Effect sci-fi to real life and telling people in a thread for talking about ME3 to move on, do you know how stupid that makes you look?
Again he doesn't use space magic to achieve it.Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet Saren is the prime example of Synthesis.Tealjaker94 wrote...
Saren was implanted. He never changed his genetic structure.Blueprotoss wrote...
Talk to Saren.Tealjaker94 wrote...
I'm talking about synthesis.
Modifié par Tealjaker94, 09 juillet 2012 - 02:45 .
Ticonderoga117 wrote...
o Ventus wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet Saren is the prime example of Synthesis.
No.
He.
Isn't.
Well he is for the idea. Not in the execution we saw though.
Modifié par o Ventus, 09 juillet 2012 - 02:48 .
You clearlly didn't play ME1.o Ventus wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet Saren is the prime example of Synthesis.
No.
He.
Isn't.
Modifié par Blueprotoss, 09 juillet 2012 - 02:47 .
Blueprotoss wrote...
You clearlly didn't play ME1.
I guess TIM wasn't the example for Control or Anderson for Destroy then.o Ventus wrote...
Ticonderoga117 wrote...
o Ventus wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet Saren is the prime example of Synthesis.
No.
He.
Isn't.
Well he is for the idea. Not in the execution we saw though.
Still, no he wasn't. Saren favored subjugation. He thought organics should serve the Reapers as tools and slaves. He never condoned rewriting synthetics and organics to make peace between the 2 parties.
2Shepards wrote...
And no, Saren has nothing to do with synthesis.
I see that you aren't interested in logic.o Ventus wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
You clearlly didn't play ME1.
Right back at you. If you can find me a quote from Saren condoning an idea similar ot Synthesis, I will concede my point.
daaaav wrote...
I'm not a particle physicist so I can't say I really thought a whole lot about how eezo works. The point is that we know what it does in Mass Effect and that the characters know what it can do. It powers the relays and is somehow involved in Biotics. It's like the "spice" of Dune, except Dune gets really pseudo scientific and fuzzy with what folks can do with spice.
What didn't occur in Mass Effect was that when faced with a problem, a character didn't just say "No worries, I'll tie some eezo to this baboon here and that blah blah etc etc".
Blueprotoss wrote...
I guess TIM wasn't the example for Control or Anderson for Destroy then.
Blueprotoss wrote...
I see that you aren't interested in logic.
o Ventus wrote...
... Mass Effect does this as well.
Yep and he had to die twice based on his Synthesis.NoUserNameHere wrote...
2Shepards wrote...
And no, Saren has nothing to do with synthesis.
Well, he is a Reaper toady advocating a blurring of the lines between organic and machine. A vision of the future, he was.
2Shepards wrote...
And no, Saren has nothing to do with synthesis.
Tealjaker94 wrote...
@blueprotoss do you actually believe any of the arguments you're making?
o Ventus wrote...
Still, no he wasn't. Saren favored subjugation. He thought organics should serve the Reapers as tools and slaves in the hopes the Reapers will find them useful and spare them death. He never condoned rewriting synthetics and organics to make peace between the 2 parties.
It seems ignorance is blissful for some people based on how its easier to say plot hole instead of using common sense.Tealjaker94 wrote...
@blueprotoss do you actually believe any of the arguments you're making?
Actually biotics and several of the other things mentioned are explained pretty well, synthesis defies all laws of science and principals of evolutions. Biotics work by giving people enhanced with EEZO the ability to fEluril wrote...
legion999 wrote...
The first six have been explained.
And Prometheus isn't exactly known for great writing.
What do you mean by "explained"? A few lines in a codex or a few lines of dialogue were more than enough to explain how it works in the universe. I'm perfectly happy with that. What I am getting at is that people focus on things being "explained" in the universe as if it needs to have to be diagrammed exactly how it would work. That's not science fiction, that's a scientific colloquium.
And Ridley Scott should be praised for having the balls to use visuals to tell as much of his story as he can in Prometheus. And care to debate me on whether Prometheus is better than Alien 3 or Alien Resurrection?
k with gravity. FTL works by EEZO making the mass of a ship irrelevant and allowing it much faster speeds. The others are there you just have to look.
Yet you're insulting people, which tells me you don't know the definition of the word "troll".AresKeith wrote...
Tealjaker94 wrote...
@blueprotoss do you actually believe any of the arguments you're making?
he's just a troll who doesn't back up his arguements
Retour en haut