wrong. he says that he still has the reaper code on the shuttle ride to the final mission. he hides it from you and lies to youRotgutso wrote...
KAM12780 wrote...
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT?!?!?!?!?!?!?? What about your pal Legion updating himself with Reaper Code?!?!??!!?Rotgutso wrote...
Sauruz wrote...
Is Chakwas trustworthy?
She could've given you bulletproof skin that makes you invincible but she never does. The only logical answer is that she must have wanted you to get hurt and put your life into danger.
Chakwas has been with me since the first game. She has proven herself over many many years. EDI is a highly corruptable and incompetent computer. Also, doesn't it bother people that she's built with reaper tech?
He only did that when the rannoch reaper died to make the geth better.
Is EDI Trustworthy?
#76
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 09:56
#77
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 09:56
Oh ok!! So because EDI was created with it built into her, and Legion allows it voluntarily, everything is ok? Your so smart! I don't why I argued with you this whole time. Oh, and by the way, sarcasm intended!Rotgutso wrote...
KAM12780 wrote...
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT?!?!?!?!?!?!?? What about your pal Legion updating himself with Reaper Code?!?!??!!?Rotgutso wrote...
Sauruz wrote...
Is Chakwas trustworthy?
She could've given you bulletproof skin that makes you invincible but she never does. The only logical answer is that she must have wanted you to get hurt and put your life into danger.
Chakwas has been with me since the first game. She has proven herself over many many years. EDI is a highly corruptable and incompetent computer. Also, doesn't it bother people that she's built with reaper tech?
He only did that when the rannoch reaper died to make the geth better.
#78
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 09:58
I'm starting to wonder whether OP has ever actually played the game.dreman9999 wrote...
Replay rennoch. He had it way before then. He had it from the geth dednought mission.
Gotta be a troll.
#79
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 09:58
So I have to kill him to here this? How does this prove your point?Cthulhu42 wrote...
Here you go, o unbeliever.dreman9999 wrote...
That never happen. And if you insist, I would need you to post a video.Cthulhu42 wrote...
"Tali'Zorah... does... this... unit.. have..."
Yeah, that's not asking directly at all.
#80
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 09:59
#81
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 09:59
Even if the IFF is only to get to the collector base, EDI is still using stupid reaper tech. What's keeping her from hiding me in reaper controled systems?
#82
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:00
ForThessia wrote...
wrong. he says that he still has the reaper code on the shuttle ride to the final mission. he hides it from you and lies to youRotgutso wrote...
KAM12780 wrote...
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT?!?!?!?!?!?!?? What about your pal Legion updating himself with Reaper Code?!?!??!!?Rotgutso wrote...
Sauruz wrote...
Is Chakwas trustworthy?
She could've given you bulletproof skin that makes you invincible but she never does. The only logical answer is that she must have wanted you to get hurt and put your life into danger.
Chakwas has been with me since the first game. She has proven herself over many many years. EDI is a highly corruptable and incompetent computer. Also, doesn't it bother people that she's built with reaper tech?
He only did that when the rannoch reaper died to make the geth better.
Fine, I'll accept that I got this part wrong.
#83
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:00
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
Because it is direct proof of what I was claiming and what you denied; namely, that Legion directly asks if it has a soul. Which, as you can see in the video, it clearly does ask.dreman9999 wrote...
So I have to kill him to here this? How does this prove your point?Cthulhu42 wrote...
Here you go, o unbeliever.dreman9999 wrote...
That never happen. And if you insist, I would need you to post a video.Cthulhu42 wrote...
"Tali'Zorah... does... this... unit.. have..."
Yeah, that's not asking directly at all.
Modifié par Cthulhu42, 09 juillet 2012 - 10:03 .
#84
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:01
Mr.House wrote...
EDI has never betrayed or lie to me. She has proven herself over and over again that she is loyal and a friend. The question is why should I not trust her?
Her loyalty is a calculated algorythm. It is easily manipulated and constantly re-evaluated, she can even change her own settings herself at a moments notice. She feels nothing, regardless of what she claims. How can anyone trust a creature like that? Experience in my workplace has taught me one lesson well: Never ever step into the reach of a machine.
#85
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:01
Rotgutso wrote...
dreman999, adaptive software doesn't make it alive, or even able to have emotions.
Even if the IFF is only to get to the collector base, EDI is still using stupid reaper tech. What's keeping her from hiding me in reaper controled systems?
You are hidden in Reaper controlled systems. You are detected when you use the scanners. Start reading peoples' posts before replying.
#86
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:03
#87
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:04
human brian power is adaptive programing. Are you saying that you are not alive?Rotgutso wrote...
dreman999, adaptive software doesn't make it alive, or even able to have emotions.
Even if the IFF is only to get to the collector base, EDI is still using stupid reaper tech. What's keeping her from hiding me in reaper controled systems?
She has emotion, she loves. That is clear.
And reapers are all join if one system as the catalyst. A reaper can just check the system just make sure thay are truely sensing a reaper. If nothing in the system says a reaper is there, they would know it's not. EDI would have to hack th catalyst to fully hide the rnormady form the reapers. She can't do that.
Modifié par dreman9999, 09 juillet 2012 - 10:06 .
#88
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:04
#89
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:04
Ztrobos wrote...
Mr.House wrote...
EDI has never betrayed or lie to me. She has proven herself over and over again that she is loyal and a friend. The question is why should I not trust her?
Her loyalty is a calculated algorythm. It is easily manipulated and constantly re-evaluated, she can even change her own settings herself at a moments notice. She feels nothing, regardless of what she claims. How can anyone trust a creature like that? Experience in my workplace has taught me one lesson well: Never ever step into the reach of a machine.
Well said. Her loyalty rests on a quantum bit that she can change at any time.
#90
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:05
Who are you, Sarah Conner?! Just kidding! But no seriously, what workplace do you work in?Ztrobos wrote...
Mr.House wrote...
EDI has never betrayed or lie to me. She has proven herself over and over again that she is loyal and a friend. The question is why should I not trust her?
Her loyalty is a calculated algorythm. It is easily manipulated and constantly re-evaluated, she can even change her own settings herself at a moments notice. She feels nothing, regardless of what she claims. How can anyone trust a creature like that? Experience in my workplace has taught me one lesson well: Never ever step into the reach of a machine.
Modifié par KAM12780, 09 juillet 2012 - 10:05 .
#91
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:06
KAM12780 wrote...
If your just trolling us all right now, congratulations, you succeeded. If not... Your anidi... interesting person!
Reported. Stop heaping abuse.
#92
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:06
Because she does't have to and is. The fact she is help on her own choice prove she is emotionaly ingaged with the people on her crew. She is not a machine programed just to do what she is programed to do, she writes her own programing.Ztrobos wrote...
Mr.House wrote...
EDI has never betrayed or lie to me. She has proven herself over and over again that she is loyal and a friend. The question is why should I not trust her?
Her loyalty is a calculated algorythm. It is easily manipulated and constantly re-evaluated, she can even change her own settings herself at a moments notice. She feels nothing, regardless of what she claims. How can anyone trust a creature like that? Experience in my workplace has taught me one lesson well: Never ever step into the reach of a machine.
If that was the reason not to turst her, no one would be trusted ever.
Modifié par dreman9999, 09 juillet 2012 - 10:07 .
#93
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:07
you reported them for what?<_<Rotgutso wrote...
KAM12780 wrote...
If your just trolling us all right now, congratulations, you succeeded. If not... Your anidi... interesting person!
Reported. Stop heaping abuse.
#94
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:08
ForThessia wrote...
you reported them for what?<_<Rotgutso wrote...
KAM12780 wrote...
If your just trolling us all right now, congratulations, you succeeded. If not... Your anidi... interesting person!
Reported. Stop heaping abuse.
Calling me an idiot. I'm bringing up valid concerns.
#95
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:09
When did he/her write that?Rotgutso wrote...
ForThessia wrote...
you reported them for what?<_<Rotgutso wrote...
KAM12780 wrote...
If your just trolling us all right now, congratulations, you succeeded. If not... Your anidi... interesting person!
Reported. Stop heaping abuse.
Calling me an idiot. I'm bringing up valid concerns.
#96
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:10
This thread is in need of a hero. The last thread I've seen that was as nonsensical as this was Seival's infamous test jump theory thread.
Modifié par Sauruz, 09 juillet 2012 - 10:11 .
#97
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:10
Unlimited69x wrote...
Rotgutso wrote...
dreman999, adaptive software doesn't make it alive, or even able to have emotions.
Even if the IFF is only to get to the collector base, EDI is still using stupid reaper tech. What's keeping her from hiding me in reaper controled systems?
You are hidden in Reaper controlled systems. You are detected when you use the scanners. Start reading peoples' posts before replying.
Point is, she can't even mask a simple scan? With reaper tech and all, she should be keeping me hidden for a much longer time. I'm sick of hearing honks after just two scans.
Modifié par Rotgutso, 09 juillet 2012 - 10:10 .
#98
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:12
These are reapers...You can't hide from them with your signals a full blast. She doen't have a way to hide you in those conditions.Rotgutso wrote...
Unlimited69x wrote...
Rotgutso wrote...
dreman999, adaptive software doesn't make it alive, or even able to have emotions.
Even if the IFF is only to get to the collector base, EDI is still using stupid reaper tech. What's keeping her from hiding me in reaper controled systems?
You are hidden in Reaper controlled systems. You are detected when you use the scanners. Start reading peoples' posts before replying.
Point is, she can't even mask a simple scan? With reaper tech and all, she should be keeping me hidden for a much longer time. I'm sick of hearing honks after just two scans.
#99
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:13
I never wrote such a thing! I was obviously going to call you an idiom. Don't jump to conclusions. Thank you everyone, for supporting me! And also, don't jump down my throat saying you brought up valid concerns. Everybody, including myself, here has proved your concern to be completely ridiculous.Rotgutso wrote...
ForThessia wrote...
you reported them for what?<_<Rotgutso wrote...
KAM12780 wrote...
If your just trolling us all right now, congratulations, you succeeded. If not... Your anidi... interesting person!
Reported. Stop heaping abuse.
Calling me an idiot. I'm bringing up valid concerns.
Modifié par KAM12780, 09 juillet 2012 - 10:15 .
#100
Posté 09 juillet 2012 - 10:14





Retour en haut






