If bringing upon the extinction of all natural organic life in the Milky Way Galaxy isn't evil, then what is?
So why is bioware trying to make this ending be the best outcome, and making it look morally right?
If some man invented mechanical body parts that were superior then organic ones, is it right for him to gas people, and do surgery on them against their will, to remove certain inferior organic parts to be replaced by mechanical ones? No it is not. But bioware is saying that something like this is good.
It doesn't matter if this man has good intentions, and that what he invented can be used for good, but you know what they say, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. It doesn't matter if this man thinks what he is doing is right, if he is forcing it upon people instead of giving people a choice...then it's evil.....period.
So it is wrong for the bioware writers to think that just because the galaxy is synthesized because of shepards good intentions, somehow makes it morally right and not evil.
What do you think?
Edit: Also remember guys, the dude who really wants your shepard to do Synthesis is an EVIL AI. So that right there isn't a good sign.
Modifié par me308f1cd5c, 10 juillet 2012 - 06:25 .





Retour en haut




