323 réponses à ce sujet

[JeffZero]

We don't have an answer on that one yet. Maybe Saturday!

[bFootball]

I wonder what Javik would make of an "allied" Reaper.

[Nerevar-as]

FitScotGaymer wrote...

Am I the only one who thinks that making a "good" Reaper is the stupidest lamest idea ever?

I´m half-expecting to discover all Reapers are OK guys and Sovey and Harbinger speeches were just Starbrat trolling us.

[JeffZero]

bFootball wrote...

I wonder what Javik would make of an "allied" Reaper.

"There is still time, Commander. Flush the Reaper back into Dark Space."

[known_hero]

I wonder what made Levi turn his back on his homies.

I'm intrigued.

Modifié par known_hero, 10 juillet 2012 - 06:29 .

[Dusen]

bFootball wrote...

I wonder what Javik would make of an "allied" Reaper.

"Throw him out the airlock." 
                                           -Javik

[Firecell11]

bFootball wrote...

I wonder what Javik would make of an "allied" Reaper.

Throw it out the airlock

Modifié par Firecell11, 10 juillet 2012 - 06:30 .

[RiouHotaru]

...It's funny that people are all "If it doesn't change anything, no sell."

LotSB didn't add anything to ME3 besides acknowledgement that you helped her become the Shadow Broker and that Feron is alive.

Arrival added a reason for Shepard to be arrested and kept you from losing Alliance War Assets, as well as some minor dialog changes to again, acknowledge what happened.

If Leviathan adds background information that's fine. Added Lore would make things interesting and possibly spark new debate. Not everything has to drastically alter the game.

[GreenSoda]

If this has no effect on the endings (and no +500 war assets doesn't count as "effect on the endings") than what's the point ? I'll probably skip it if that's the case.

[Vox Draco]

known_hero wrote...

I wonder what made Levi turn his back on his homies.

I'm intrigued.

Youn wonder what could make an eons old being of incredible power and intelligence turn its back on..the Starkiddie and his incredible logic and purpose?

Guess Leviathan was allowed by Bioware to choose to refuse and still go on with his life... 

[darkchief10]

bFootball wrote...

I wonder what Javik would make of an "allied" Reaper.

Javik: Commander i will return shortly...
Shepard:O...K...
IN SNOOTY FRENCH VOICE: 10 Minutes later...
Javik: Commander i have returned
Shepard: Hey leviathan just flew into the sun you wouldn't know anything about that would you?
Javik: I was away.
Shepard: Is that a thruster port in your hand?
Javik: I will be in my room.

[RiouHotaru]

GreenSoda wrote...

If this has no effect on the endings (and no +500 war assets doesn't count as "effect on the endings") than what's the point ? I'll probably skip it if that's the case.

Lore?  Insight into something we know next to nothing about?  Flavor text?

I swear it's like people don't like the setting!

[Mathias]

GreenSoda wrote...

If this has no effect on the endings (and no +500 war assets doesn't count as "effect on the endings") than what's the point ? I'll probably skip it if that's the case.

Same. Unless it adds around 3 hours of content like LotSB did, which I doubt this one will. But we'll see.

[GreenSoda]

RiouHotaru wrote...

...It's funny that people are all "If it doesn't change anything, no sell."

LotSB didn't add anything to ME3 besides acknowledgement that you helped her become the Shadow Broker and that Feron is alive.

Arrival added a reason for Shepard to be arrested and kept you from losing Alliance War Assets, as well as some minor dialog changes to again, acknowledge what happened.

If Leviathan adds background information that's fine. Added Lore would make things interesting and possibly spark new debate. Not everything has to drastically alter the game.

You're not quite right with that -while it's true that LotSB and Arrival didn't change anything in ME2 there was still the ME3 release looming in the distance, promising some form of payback. ME3 was the promise that the DLC will "matter".

The same obviously doesn't hold true for ME3 DLC.

[Atakuma]

Modifié par Atakuma, 10 juillet 2012 - 06:38 .

[Mathias]

RiouHotaru wrote...

GreenSoda wrote...

If this has no effect on the endings (and no +500 war assets doesn't count as "effect on the endings") than what's the point ? I'll probably skip it if that's the case.

Lore?  Insight into something we know next to nothing about?  Flavor text?

I swear it's like people don't like the setting!

That's something he could just youtube to learn more about the lore. What he's asking is, "Is this worth my money?" If it doesn't have an effect on the endings then it isn't, and i understand that.

[Zardoc]

RiouHotaru wrote...

GreenSoda wrote...

If this has no effect on the endings (and no +500 war assets doesn't count as "effect on the endings") than what's the point ? I'll probably skip it if that's the case.

Lore?  Insight into something we know next to nothing about?  Flavor text?

I swear it's like people don't like the setting!

We liked the setting. Then BioWare came and ruined it.

[Sarevok Synder]

RiouHotaru wrote...

...It's funny that people are all "If it doesn't change anything, no sell."

LotSB didn't add anything to ME3 besides acknowledgement that you helped her become the Shadow Broker and that Feron is alive.

Arrival added a reason for Shepard to be arrested and kept you from losing Alliance War Assets, as well as some minor dialog changes to again, acknowledge what happened.

If Leviathan adds background information that's fine. Added Lore would make things interesting and possibly spark new debate. Not everything has to drastically alter the game.

You don't think a rogue Reaper should be a big deal in at least the conversation when confronting Starbrat? It only proves the damn thing is fallable after all.......

Modifié par Sarevok Synder, 10 juillet 2012 - 06:38 .

[Mathias]

Atakuma wrote...

GreenSoda wrote...

If this has no effect on the endings (and no +500 war assets doesn't count as "effect on the endings") than what's the point ? I'll probably skip it if that's the case.

 
I don't understand this complaint. What was the point of any previous DLC? None of those affected the ending or anything at all really.

That game didn't end like a trainwreck and leave a lot of people pissed off though. 

[Tealjaker94]

I don't regret buying LotSB even though it had no real effect on ME3. I enjoyed the plot line and added background. I don't see how this DLC is any different.

[Dusen]

RiouHotaru wrote...

GreenSoda wrote...

If this has no effect on the endings (and no +500 war assets doesn't count as "effect on the endings") than what's the point ? I'll probably skip it if that's the case.

Lore?  Insight into something we know next to nothing about?  Flavor text?

I swear it's like people don't like the setting!

I think the problem is that people actually liked the lore and setting from ME1 and ME2. IMO, ME3 drastically altered that by ruining the reapers as villians, and ignoring older points of lore that could have added to the storyline. . . that or they outright retconned them.
 
IMO, I enjoyed not knowing anything about the reapers other than they wanted to harvest us to produce more of themselves. I didn't care where they came from, who made them, or that they secretly were care-bears out to save life as we know it by slaughtering life everywhere they went.

[RiouHotaru]

Sarevok Synder wrote...

RiouHotaru wrote...

...It's funny that people are all "If it doesn't change anything, no sell."

LotSB didn't add anything to ME3 besides acknowledgement that you helped her become the Shadow Broker and that Feron is alive.

Arrival added a reason for Shepard to be arrested and kept you from losing Alliance War Assets, as well as some minor dialog changes to again, acknowledge what happened.

If Leviathan adds background information that's fine. Added Lore would make things interesting and possibly spark new debate. Not everything has to drastically alter the game.

You don't think a rogue Reaper should be a big deal in at least the conversation when confronting Starbrat. It only proves it's fallable after all.......

People thought and swore up and down that Javik had to be a big deal.

Except he wasn't.  He was interesting flavor text and depth-adding to the setting and lore, but hardly a game-changer.

Leviathan will likely be the same thing.  It won't drastically alter the game.  It'll add something interesting, but your game won't be "less" without him/it.

Also, the TLK files actually DID make allowances for confronting the Catalyst about Leviathan.  But there's no guarantee it'll change things.

[bFootball]

Maybe Leviathan indoctrinates Shepard, thereby breathing new life into the IT.

[Atakuma]

Sarevok Synder wrote...

RiouHotaru wrote...

...It's funny that people are all "If it doesn't change anything, no sell."

LotSB didn't add anything to ME3 besides acknowledgement that you helped her become the Shadow Broker and that Feron is alive.

Arrival added a reason for Shepard to be arrested and kept you from losing Alliance War Assets, as well as some minor dialog changes to again, acknowledge what happened.

If Leviathan adds background information that's fine. Added Lore would make things interesting and possibly spark new debate. Not everything has to drastically alter the game.

You don't think a rogue Reaper should be a big deal in at least the conversation when confronting Starbrat? It only proves the damn thing is fallable after all.......

It was never implied to be infallible in the first place.

[Dusen]

Sarevok Synder wrote...
You don't think a rogue Reaper should be a big deal in at least the conversation when confronting Starbrat? It only proves the damn thing is fallable after all.......

The whole Geth-Quarian arc proved the thing fallable, but that was never brought up in conversation with Casper, so I don't see the leviathan adding anything new to that conversation.