3 votes to 2 and I lose the landsmeet?
#1
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 07:13
And anyone know how much the comments during the conversation affects the votes? I pretty much took all the pursuade options. And with a cunning over 70 and all 4 coercions I doubt I failed any pursuade checks.
#2
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 07:15
#3
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 07:16
#4
Guest_Yenaquai_*
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 07:24
Guest_Yenaquai_*
And considering the fact that there IS a queen/king, I don't exactly believe that Ferelden is all about democratic choices... or representive democratic choices, for that matter.
Modifié par Yenaquai, 16 décembre 2009 - 07:24 .
#5
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 07:27
You may not even need Vaughn alive, but I didn't want to chance it.
Modifié par houdinimachine, 16 décembre 2009 - 07:27 .
#6
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 07:36
And I was hoping to become queen. But I guess you have to be human noble for that. Should have figured they wouldn't accept a dwarf queen lol. I wonder if there are any mods to change race/origin. hmmm.
I don't want to replay alienage, and i don't really care about the vote all that much, I was just curious.
I just can't believe Alistair dumped me. I never saw that coming. I guess it's good the game can still surprise you after 3 playthrus. Although I'm still at +100 love with Lelianna. She will help mend my broken heart. I was just hoping to get the Alistair/me ending. I could reload and have Anora take queen I suppose...
BTW anyone know all the endings? I'd like to get that achievement (may take a couple reloads to get it, however)
#7
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 07:39
#8
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 07:41
Or was it 5-1?
Either way: Number-1.
Modifié par Midnight Voyager, 16 décembre 2009 - 07:41 .
#9
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 07:42
#10
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 07:42
In many important votings it's not enough to get just more than half of people on your side. This concept is called qualified majority or "supermajority" ( http://en.wikipedia....i/Supermajority )Duck and Cover wrote...
I got 3 votes and Loghain got 2, yet I still lose landsmeet? I don't understand the voting at all.
During the Landsmeet you're not really battling Loghain on equal footing with whoever gets more votes ending as winner. You're instead trying to remove Loghain from his position (an impeachment of sorts) so the requirement of stronger support for this motion to pass can make sense.
#11
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 10:09
Ah yes the supermajority. A brilliant way to fool the populous they actually live in a democratic country. Funny though this whole landsmeet business. A country doesn't choose a king. Royalty is birthright, not chosen by a majority.tmp7704 wrote...
In many important votings it's not enough to get just more than half of people on your side. This concept is called qualified majority or "supermajority" ( http://en.wikipedia....i/Supermajority )Duck and Cover wrote...
I got 3 votes and Loghain got 2, yet I still lose landsmeet? I don't understand the voting at all.
During the Landsmeet you're not really battling Loghain on equal footing with whoever gets more votes ending as winner. You're instead trying to remove Loghain from his position (an impeachment of sorts) so the requirement of stronger support for this motion to pass can make sense.
Modifié par T-Kay, 16 décembre 2009 - 10:10 .
#12
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 10:21
T-Kay wrote...
Ah yes the supermajority. A brilliant way to fool the populous they actually live in a democratic country. Funny though this whole landsmeet business. A country doesn't choose a king. Royalty is birthright, not chosen by a majority.tmp7704 wrote...
In many important votings it's not enough to get just more than half of people on your side. This concept is called qualified majority or "supermajority" ( http://en.wikipedia....i/Supermajority )Duck and Cover wrote...
I got 3 votes and Loghain got 2, yet I still lose landsmeet? I don't understand the voting at all.
During the Landsmeet you're not really battling Loghain on equal footing with whoever gets more votes ending as winner. You're instead trying to remove Loghain from his position (an impeachment of sorts) so the requirement of stronger support for this motion to pass can make sense.
The "supermajority" was a tool of statecraft that Palpatine in Star Wars used to become Chancellor, then later Emperor.
#13
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 10:28
T-Kay wrote...
Funny though this whole landsmeet business. A country doesn't choose a king. Royalty is birthright, not chosen by a majority.
The Germans (Holy Roman Empire) and the Poles both elected their rulers in the Middle Ages.
#14
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 11:02
#15
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 11:12
#16
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 11:16
That being said unless I won Anora's favor, I could never avoid the brawl, even if I got all the other votes. The guide book says you get a vote through an assassination quest but i could never find that.
#17
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 11:36
#18
Posté 16 décembre 2009 - 11:39
#19
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 12:15
on a side note, i don't know what happens if you kill that jack a__ arl tho but i plan to on my city elf.
Modifié par Varyen, 17 décembre 2009 - 12:16 .
#20
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 12:24
A breakdown of how exactly the Landsmeet functions would be something better answered by Mary, if she cared to do so, though there are definitely a lot of factors in play as to how it can go down so it's pretty complex due to all the variations. It boggles my mind to think that there was even a period when the Landsmeet was MORE complex.
Modifié par David Gaider, 17 décembre 2009 - 12:28 .
#21
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 12:26
Modifié par AtreiyaN7, 17 décembre 2009 - 12:27 .
#22
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 12:43
He can also call for your arrest+execution even if Anora supports you, as long as the final vote goes in his favour (i.e. not enough nobles stand on your side)Obadiah wrote...
I think if Loghain has Anora's support he just calls for your arrest, and the vote only indicates who you have on your side in the fight that ensues.
#23
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 12:50
#24
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 12:51
I'm curious if it's possible to win at all if you choose the 'LOGHAIN ABANDONED GRAY WARDENS/KING CAILAN :E!!!' option first. It's a stupid choice, as you don't have any evidence- Anora and Eamon advise you against it- but I'm curious to see if you can win with it. Hm.
#25
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 12:54
The short and simplified explanation: You need five "points" to win the Landsmeet
Anora's support is worth 3
The Grand Cleric's denunciation is worth 2
Each named noble who supports you is worth 1
Persuasive arguments are worth 1
Failed arguments cost you 1
Arl Bryland always supports you, he is not counted toward your support. He's counter-balanced by Bann Ceorlic, who always sides with Loghain. This was done for the sake of scripting the melee battle, since named characters fight on the side of whomever they support.
It is entirely possible to win the Landsmeet without Anora, if you have the support of the named nobles and pick the right arguments. It's entirely possible to win the Landsmeet with only Anora and no other named nobles. And it's possible to have Anora and some named nobles, and lose due to your argument choices.





Retour en haut







