VOTE for "realistic" female Leather Armor!!!
#126
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 04:18
As a side note, I think the ladies here deserve a Conan-style set of armor for their manly companions so they can have something to oggle too.
#127
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 04:23
TheGreenLion wrote...
It's bad leather armor design, makes me want to yell, "I am Sparticus!!" so, I'd kindly like you to place blame where it is proper. And not on your male gaming compatriots who like the skimpy look and had nothing to do with this leather armor. I mean, we're guys...the sexier the better!
Except that the Spartans wore heavy bronze armor (breastplate, greaves and helmet). The reason they lasted at Thermopylae was because they used heavy armor, the persians didn't and they held a position where the persian cavalry couldn't flank them. That the Persian commanders had all the tactical savy of an inebriated invertebrate didn't help either.
Female warriors being exceedingly rare on the whole, if you're looking for female leather armor, the armor worn by female roman gladiators is about the only model you're going to find. That armor was designed to titilate more than protect, so I suppose the armor you have now is realistic.
#128
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 04:38
Those who say that it's fantasy, and so scantly clad female warriors are all right, can keep their halfnaked characters. As long as there is also a very revealing and sexy armour for MALES.
If that was the case, I'd be fine with the scantly clad female warriors. I'm not bothered by cheesy chainmail bikinis on pretty ladies; I only want them to be countered by big guys wearing only a fur skirt (à la Conan).
Anyway, I didn't find the clothes in DA O to be particularly offensive. They were all very tame, even the most revealing ones (except for Morrigan and the various desire demons, but it suited them).
Modifié par LunSei Sleidee, 17 décembre 2009 - 04:39 .
#129
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 05:00
That said, I do dislike DA:O's leather armour which reveals way too much of the female chest. I would stuff my female rogues in medium armour except the strength requirement is insane compared to the minimal bonuses gained from going light to medium armour.
#130
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 05:06
a) their armor rating is something like 0.01
#131
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 05:08
LunSei Sleidee wrote...
I have a solution.
Those who say that it's fantasy, and so scantly clad female warriors are all right, can keep their halfnaked characters. As long as there is also a very revealing and sexy armour for MALES.
... and so, like so many threads, this one arrives at its inevitable destination:
enchanted codpieces.
#132
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 05:10
SheffSteel wrote...
LunSei Sleidee wrote...
I have a solution.
Those who say that it's fantasy, and so scantly clad female warriors are all right, can keep their halfnaked characters. As long as there is also a very revealing and sexy armour for MALES.
... and so, like so many threads, this one arrives at its inevitable destination:
enchanted codpieces.
I wouldn't mind the, "Black Russian," from Blackadder.
Modifié par Lord Phoebus, 17 décembre 2009 - 05:10 .
#133
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 05:18
#134
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 05:47
#135
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 06:12
#136
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 06:50
Leather armor = Both men and women in skirts, but with women less protected with dalish leather too. Not very good protection, well hey, it's leather armor.
Medium armor = Armor covers both men and women from neck down, no exposure.
Heavy armor = Armor covers both men and women from neck down, no exposure.
Massive armor = Armor covers both men and women from neck down, no exposure. Female models are a bit weird however
Helmets = Helmets on women look weird.
Which of these would you like to change exactly?
#137
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 06:53
OneBadAssMother wrote...
What I don't get is why you people reckon something is wrong with the current armor models, for example, in my opinion.
Leather armor = Both men and women in skirts, but with women less protected with dalish leather too. Not very good protection, well hey, it's leather armor.
Medium armor = Armor covers both men and women from neck down, no exposure.
Heavy armor = Armor covers both men and women from neck down, no exposure.
Massive armor = Armor covers both men and women from neck down, no exposure. Female models are a bit weird however
Helmets = Helmets on women look weird.
Which of these would you like to change exactly?
Read the name of the topic, and the Maker shall enlighten you
#138
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 06:57
#139
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 07:06
Sarevok Anchev wrote...
OneBadAssMother wrote...
What I don't get is why you people reckon something is wrong with the current armor models, for example, in my opinion.
Leather armor = Both men and women in skirts, but with women less protected with dalish leather too. Not very good protection, well hey, it's leather armor.
Medium armor = Armor covers both men and women from neck down, no exposure.
Heavy armor = Armor covers both men and women from neck down, no exposure.
Massive armor = Armor covers both men and women from neck down, no exposure. Female models are a bit weird however
Helmets = Helmets on women look weird.
Which of these would you like to change exactly?
Read the name of the topic, and the Maker shall enlighten you
But everyone else seems to be going on about MORE then leather armors lol
Meh, *shrug*
#140
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 07:39
#141
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 07:40
TheGreenLion wrote...
@ Tirronan: Ya ever read the Sword of Truth books? I happen to be a fan of em and Legend of the Seeker totally botched nearly everything they possibly could have. Not to say it's a bad show but they could have at least read the books they were making a TV series about. Since this is the wrong place for it, I won't rage on about the many things I noticed that were out of place.
As a side note, I think the ladies here deserve a Conan-style set of armor for their manly companions so they can have something to oggle too.
Re: Seeker TV
That was disappointing. I couldn't even finish the 1st season. The Mord'sith were nice looking, tho'.
Re: Conan
Do you mean the 'Conan the Barbarian' movie? As a dude, I wouldn't mind my PC looking like Arnold's take on REH's protagonist, so I'd vote for that, too.
http://www.scheerstu...onan/Conan9.gif - one of my favourite depictions of Conan. It's not as cool as the movie version, but, I think, it captures the feel of the original character better.
#142
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 07:54
Denna? *automatic drooling sequence activated.*
There's a few different versions of Conan, most recent I can think of is the game they made (fun, but short.) and his armor I think was more true to his comic book appearance. I liked that armor, the "armor" (maybe fur undies would be better) that Arnold wore would be farther focused towards the ladies...but he still kicked ass in his undies.
#143
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 08:14
#144
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 08:20
The males in light armor don't have their neck and upper chest exposed. All light armors on females leave that unprotected. The males in Dalish armor don't have their midriff exposed. The medium, heavy and massive armors are fine in my opinion. It's only the light leathers that are the problem, which is why I can't take my rogue seriously.OneBadAssMother wrote...
Sarevok Anchev wrote...
OneBadAssMother wrote...
What I don't get is why you people reckon something is wrong with the current armor models, for example, in my opinion.
Leather armor = Both men and women in skirts, but with women less protected with dalish leather too. Not very good protection, well hey, it's leather armor.
Medium armor = Armor covers both men and women from neck down, no exposure.
Heavy armor = Armor covers both men and women from neck down, no exposure.
Massive armor = Armor covers both men and women from neck down, no exposure. Female models are a bit weird however
Helmets = Helmets on women look weird.
Which of these would you like to change exactly?
Read the name of the topic, and the Maker shall enlighten you
But everyone else seems to be going on about MORE then leather armors lol
Meh, *shrug*
The cloth robes can be revealing because they aren't meant for protection (they give 0 armor). They're meant to be non-restricting. I think the chasind robes look silly (anyone else think the breasts look too high up on those), but there are other robe designs that are fine.
Modifié par sarahbau, 17 décembre 2009 - 08:22 .
#145
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 08:27
I doubt modders would take the time to skin leather armor though unfortunately. =/
So you might just have to go one step up.
Modifié par OneBadAssMother, 17 décembre 2009 - 08:28 .
#146
Posté 17 décembre 2009 - 08:32
"virgina boob."
#147
Posté 11 avril 2010 - 09:49
edit: Tight form fitting leather is hot, less isn't always more on females. The twig arms on the female leather armor bugs the hell out of me, so I only use medium and up on them.
Modifié par KS22, 11 avril 2010 - 09:51 .
#148
Posté 11 avril 2010 - 10:02
http://img.vidaextra.../nightsong1.jpg
#149
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 09:21
But I do have to agree. I mean, seeing Lelianna with her weird Dalish midriff thingy really isn't that bad, but you do have to wonder...why don't the Darkspawn just stick her right there? Seems like an easy enough way to kill a rogue to me. Then again, rogues are meant to avoid hits...but still...
And I know you're going to say this is fantasy game, blah blah blah, there are mages and fireballs and demons and whatever else. But there's magical reality, and physical reality: In a fantasy universe, you allow some impossible things to happen: Magic, dragons, monsters, etc. However, fantasy also has to conform to physical reality: That is, it must obey simple universal laws like: Time moves from the past, to the present, to the future. Or: If a thing goes up, it will eventually come down. Or this one: If a woman is wearing next to no clothing, with her top non-existent and her midriff out and open to the air, she will NOT have a higher armor rating than someone in heavy plate. Also, may God have mercy on her soul, because she'll probably either get stabbed through the gut and not survive because she wasn't wearing anything there, or she'll get mobbed and raped by a bunch of slavering men.
Anyways. So, basically, I agree with Sarevok.
#150
Posté 17 avril 2011 - 10:28





Retour en haut






