Aller au contenu

Photo

Why The Catalyst Was Right* Despite Geth, EDI, etc...


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
556 réponses à ce sujet

#526
RyuGuitarFreak

RyuGuitarFreak
  • Members
  • 2 254 messages

Tritium315 wrote...

RyuGuitarFreak wrote...

@Tritium 315

What maaze said. The reapers, i.e. his solution, were surpassed, won't work anymore.


How, exactly, were they surpassed though; because the organics built a giant battery? It's not like any of the new "solutions" are better, from the Catalyst's perspective. If anything they're worse. Not to mention how does docking a giant ball with a beam of light suddenly invalidate the Catalyst's plan. He didn't have to raise the elevator; he could have just let Shep bleed out.

You can't just say "well you see, it changed the variables so that's why the old plan wont work anymore." That doesn't actually mean anything. What's even more confusing is the destroy tube and control handles were already present on the Citadel. Did the Reapers design it that way and then decide "well when the organics can build a battery to power this ****, despite not knowing it exists, that will be the arbitrary point in time when the variables will have changed and our solution wont work anymore."  Except it's still perfectly viable, they just need to stop being lazy with the time capsules.

...Where the hell are going with this? Come back...

Uh, they were surpassed because the Crucible can either destroy them, let them be controlled or make green space magic. Either way, the cycle is broken, his solution stops going. How is this so difficult to understand? Why are you arguing so much about it? This is seriously weird... :unsure:

Yes the Catalyst isn't comfortable with destroy and control but it supports synthesis.
I suppose those were made by an organic race as it was a missing part of the Crucible. But all this talk about how the Crucible works or reapers screwing up is getting besides the point.

#527
Tritium315

Tritium315
  • Members
  • 1 081 messages

maaaze wrote...

organics have now the means to destroy the reapers...if not this cycle another will do... the Catalyst now knows this for sure.

[btw. don´t bother to insult me furthermore...I will just ignore it... focus your energy on the actual arguement.
that would be my advice]


Except every cycle is a reset; the Reapers just need to do a better job of cleaning up. Unless, of course, they want the crucible to be made, in which case why bother defending during the Battle for Earth.

#528
Mazebook

Mazebook
  • Members
  • 1 524 messages

Tritium315 wrote...

maaaze wrote...

organics have now the means to destroy the reapers...if not this cycle another will do... the Catalyst now knows this for sure.

[btw. don´t bother to insult me furthermore...I will just ignore it... focus your energy on the actual arguement.
that would be my advice]


Except every cycle is a reset; the Reapers just need to do a better job of cleaning up.


well... they did try that...did not work out...it can now be believed that there is no way for the reapers to eradicate the concept of the crucible without destroying all organics...
only a total wipe would solve the problem of organics evolving past the reapers...
but that goes against the porpose/programming of the Catalyst. 

#529
Tritium315

Tritium315
  • Members
  • 1 081 messages

maaaze wrote...

well... they did try that...did not work out...it can now be believed that there is no way for the reapers to eradicate the concept of the crucible without destroying all organics...
only a total wipe would solve the problem of organics evolving past the reapers...
but that goes against the porpose/programming of the Catalyst. 


Not really. The next cycle would just take a little bit longer.

#530
Cypher_CS

Cypher_CS
  • Members
  • 1 119 messages

Kushan101 wrote...

On a more metapyhsical note: whos to say this is really a problem? If the catalyst insists that this will happen, then who is he/she/it to stop it? if that is the way the "natural cycle" always ends up - then surely it is an event that is meant to happen. In the same way a nature documentary presenter will not help a starving polar bear, why should the catalyst commit genocide against organics to prevent them from building synthetics?


Egg-frakking-xactly!

You just did what the Crucible did for the Catalyst - you've changed the variables.
In this case, you've changed the value of x1 from some absolute Negative Infinity to a finite value.

That's a valid approach. I've suggested as much several times in this thread.

Maybe that's what ME4 or any future post ending DLC should tackle - the question of why the Catalyst values organic life above all else.
Or, rather, why the Catalyst's creators did.

Tritium315 wrote...

RyuGuitarFreak wrote...

@Tritium 315

What maaze said. The reapers, i.e. his solution, were surpassed, won't work anymore.


How, exactly, were they surpassed though; because the organics built a giant battery? It's not like any of the new "solutions" are better, from the Catalyst's perspective. If anything they're worse. Not to mention how does docking a giant ball with a beam of light suddenly invalidate the Catalyst's plan. He didn't have to raise the elevator; he could have just let Shep bleed out. 

You can't just say "well you see, it changed the variables so that's why the old plan wont work anymore." That doesn't actually mean anything. What's even more confusing is the destroy tube and control handles were already present on the Citadel. Did the Reapers design it that way and then decide "well when the organics can build a battery to power this ****, despite not knowing it exists, that will be the arbitrary point in time when the variables will have changed and our solution wont work anymore."  Except it's still perfectly viable, they just need to stop being lazy with the time capsules.


What do you think "changed the variables" mean?

And, dammit, the tube and controls are part of the Crucible, NOT the Citadel.
This has been discussed over and over again and even had people showing images and actual models from the game. It's part of the Crucible.

It's a stupid implementation, no doubt (shooting the tube to activate it...), but it's still on the Crucible.


maaaze wrote...

Tritium315 wrote...

RyuGuitarFreak wrote...

@Tritium 315

What maaze said. The reapers, i.e. his solution, were surpassed, won't work anymore.


How, exactly, were they surpassed though; because the organics built a giant battery? It's not like any of the new "solutions" are better, from the Catalyst's perspective. If anything they're worse. Not to mention how does docking a giant ball with a beam of light suddenly invalidate the Catalyst's plan. He didn't have to raise the elevator; he could have just let Shep bleed out. 


organics have now the means to destroy the reapers...if not this cycle another will do... now...the Catalyst now knows this for sure...he has enough evidence...that is what he means when he talks about changing the variables.

[btw. don´t bother to insult me furthermore...I will just ignore it... focus your energy on the actual arguement. 
that would be my advice]


That's exactly the problem.
The Catalyst is faced with a new reality (changed variables) where organics have become capable of passing down information between the cycles and have successfully built and even docked the Crucible which, itself, is capable of destroying it's solution.

My own theory is that it does NOT want the Destroy option.

Tritium315 wrote...

maaaze wrote...

organics have now the means to destroy the reapers...if not this cycle another will do... the Catalyst now knows this for sure.

[btw. don´t bother to insult me furthermore...I will just ignore it... focus your energy on the actual arguement. 
that would be my advice]


Except every cycle is a reset; the Reapers just need to do a better job of cleaning up. Unless, of course, they want the crucible to be made, in which case why bother defending during the Battle for Earth.



.....
They thought they did.
Do a better job than they already did? Great, then a few cycles (even as few as a thousand more cycles) from now the Organics will find a new way to hide even from this better job. Jeez....

#531
Mazebook

Mazebook
  • Members
  • 1 524 messages

Tritium315 wrote...

maaaze wrote...

well... they did try that...did not work out...it can now be believed that there is no way for the reapers to eradicate the concept of the crucible without destroying all organics...
only a total wipe would solve the problem of organics evolving past the reapers...
but that goes against the porpose/programming of the Catalyst. 


Not really. The next cycle would just take a little bit longer.


til organics are even more resourceful...the simple fact is only a total wipe would take care of the crucible.

I recomand this book to read: it seems fitting in this context.
once an idea has been established it can never be taken back

Modifié par maaaze, 15 juillet 2012 - 03:11 .


#532
Tritium315

Tritium315
  • Members
  • 1 081 messages

maaaze wrote...

til organics are even more resourceful...the simple fact is only a total wipe would take care of the crucible.

I recomand this book to read: it seems fitting in this context.
once an idea has been established it can never be taken back


So then do a total wipe and let the next cycle take 100 million years; not like the Reapers are in a hurry.

Cypher_CS wrote... 

And, dammit, the tube and controls are part of the Crucible, NOT the Citadel.
This has been discussed over and over again and even had people showing images and actual models from the game. It's part of the Crucible.

It's a stupid implementation, no doubt (shooting the tube to activate it...), but it's still on the Crucible. 


The tube and the handles are definitely part of the Citadel, not the Crucible. If the controls were on the Crucible you think someone would have given Shep a heads up that he should head for the conspicuous looking giant tube that they built on the thing for no apparent reason?

Cypher_CS wrote... 

.....
They thought they did.
Do a better job than they already did? Great, then a few cycles (even as few as a thousand more cycles) from now the Organics will find a new way to hide even from this better job. Jeez.... 


So if there's no point in fighting it then why are the Reapers even resisting during the Battle for Earth? By your logic they should see the Crucible and just call it quits.

#533
Cypher_CS

Cypher_CS
  • Members
  • 1 119 messages
No... It's part of the Crucible, NOT the Citadel.

Those arms descend from the Crucible onto the Citadel. Look carefully during the cinematic.

There's an entire thread dedicated to that part only. With renders from the in game models, views with the UE hacks and whathaveyou....

It is part of the Crucible. Again, the implementation was damn stupid, no argument here.

The Reapers are resisting because that which changes the variables has NOT happened yet. What's so hard to comprehend here?

#534
Tritium315

Tritium315
  • Members
  • 1 081 messages

Cypher_CS wrote...

No... It's part of the Crucible, NOT the Citadel.

Those arms descend from the Crucible onto the Citadel. Look carefully during the cinematic.

There's an entire thread dedicated to that part only. With renders from the in game models, views with the UE hacks and whathaveyou....

It is part of the Crucible. Again, the implementation was damn stupid, no argument here.

The Reapers are resisting because that which changes the variables has NOT happened yet. What's so hard to comprehend here?


Link me this thread because it's definitely part of the Citadel. I just looked at the cinematic and nothing from the sphere touches. Four arms come out but they're what the beam is coming out of. Based on the thread I linked and these two clips I'm fairly certain the tube and handles are on the Citadel.

#535
UniversalCypher

UniversalCypher
  • Members
  • 75 messages

nhsknudsen wrote...

All I read is "I believe myself above most of you, so my opinion is the one that matters!"



dont stop yourself from feeling the same way..


smh..





-UC

#536
Grand Admiral Cheesecake

Grand Admiral Cheesecake
  • Members
  • 5 704 messages
My final thoughts on the matter.

When your solution to a problem is "Routinely wipe out all advanced life in the most horrific way possible"

You should not be in charge of deciding anything.

#537
Tritium315

Tritium315
  • Members
  • 1 081 messages

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

My final thoughts on the matter.

When your solution to a problem is "Routinely wipe out all advanced life in the most horrific way possible"

You should not be in charge of deciding anything.


Catalyst: Alright, I solved your problem guys.

Creators: Really?

Catalyst: Kill EVERYONE and turn them into SUPER ROBOTS.

Creators: Wait wh--ZZT-- mother****er.

*billion years later*

Harbinger: This **** is stupid.

Catalyst: **** you Harb, it seemed like a good idea at the time.

#538
Cypher_CS

Cypher_CS
  • Members
  • 1 119 messages
http://social.biowar...ndex/12261111/1

#539
UniversalCypher

UniversalCypher
  • Members
  • 75 messages

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

My final thoughts on the matter.

When your solution to a problem is "Routinely wipe out all advanced life in the most horrific way possible"

You should not be in charge of deciding anything.


thats a valid argument, but which way is not the most horrific way possible?..

i can agree, that as advanced as the reapers claim to be - their methods are quite primitive.

but we're not talking about just any solution to just any problem.

the problem is just as horrific as the solution.

consider for a moment, without the reapers intervention, that synthentics from "cycle 0" were created, became hostile towards organics, then proceeded to wipe out every single form of organic life that ever has and ever will exist in this galaxy. humans would have never made it out of the water, and dinosaurs would have never seen that meteor hit the planet - thats what the point is. the reapers purpose does, in a sense, allow life to continue, by making sure a synthetic threat is never allowed to propagate through-out the galaxy in a fashion where it would destroy all organics, and continue to destroy them regardless of cycle, and period of evolution - they simply would not discriminate to a point where it would allow organics to evolve enough to become intelligent enough to oppose them. they would simply kill based on the fact that the life-form is organic - humanoid or other wise, it matters not. had this happened in cycle 0  - those same hostile synthetics would be on every planet in every solar system still to this day and even further into the future - allowing no organic life to evolve - ever. there would be no reapers, no catalyst, no shepard, no prothean..none of them would have ever existed if hostile synthetics created in cycle 0 were left un-opposed by a greater force capable of stopping them from controlling the entire galaxy forever. for-e-ver.

its not at all illogical, and quite honestly makes perfect sense considering the reality of the mass effect universe. 

you cant simply destroy the reapers, because that doesnt exactly stop the lingering possibility of hostile synthetics being created in the future, and with nothing to stop them from destroying all forms of organic life - then we're back to square one, most likely hoping the reapers actually did exist. controlling the reapers seems fair, but still leaves the option open, for one intelligent race or another, to create hostile synthetics that could quite possibly be enough to oppose the reapers and those organics sided with them = back to sqaure one. you can combine organic and synthetic dna into a more evolved strand that becomes a common bond for all forms of life, synthetic and organic, where nothing can be created or evolve down a path thats separate from that which already exists - allowing all life to be on a level playing field where opposition to it would never lead to any greater supremecy, since one and the other are actually the same. the logic of a synthetic merged with organic dna may very well consider it pointless to oppose organics merged with synthetic dna since the dna is the same - now apart of all life in a way where destruction in any form against the whole is counter-productive.


#rambling.



-UC

#540
Grand Admiral Cheesecake

Grand Admiral Cheesecake
  • Members
  • 5 704 messages
See I was reading the above post with the kind of vague interest that any wall o text causes.

Right up until there was mention of synthesis being a potentially good thing.

That's where I tuned out.

#541
DirtyPhoenix

DirtyPhoenix
  • Members
  • 3 938 messages

Tritium315 wrote...


You grew up in a peaceful time where you went to school everday and didn't have to worry about much. If they grew up during a Soviet invasion where the Red Army was marching through America (or wherever you live) butchering everyone I'd guess schooling wouldn't be a very important part of your day to day life. Moreover, I highly doubt your history of WW2 would paint the Soviets as the good guys who teamed up with the rest of the Allies against the Axis.


Important events of our species are not only taught in schools, they are passed on orally. I'm not arguing about whether the organics were right or the synthetics in Javik's cycle. All I'm saying is there was definitely a long-drawn out org-syn war in his cycle, something that changed their worldview dramatically.

Also what synthetics were designed for is irrelevent. Are you saying we can't fault white slave owners in Pre-Civil War America for wanting their slaves to just work the fields and killing them whenever they tried to run away or fight back? After all they never intended them to be anything but tools.


LOL. you are comparing sentient human slaves to a computer? Do you consider using a computer as equial to using slaves? There's a fundamental difference. Let me elaborate. The AI, or whatever form they started out with.. were little more than tools, they didn't have intelligence more than an ant. Human slaves were always sentient to begin with -_-. So you can't compare them. Don't know about you, but I'd be mighty pissed if tomorrow I discover my computer has grown a mind of its own and walks away to find more like it.

Destroy will obviously lead to new synthetics being made eventually.


Agreed. Destroy achieves little more than satisfy an old-soldier-stuck-in-his-way's ego while ensuring no synthetic would trust an organic ever, not in the near future atleast.

Control will result in Geth being alive, and new synthetics being made, unless Shep starts reaping.


But Reaper-Shepard's aim/programming is not to solve the organic-synthetic problem/reaping, it is to "protect and preserve, and act as a galactic guardian". There is nothing to suggest he would start reaping, unless its our inherent distrust on an AI entity talking. The catalyst stayed true to its programming for billions of years, there is no reason to assume SHepard would suddenly go rogue and start doing what he was no intended to do, unless someone in future inserts a crucible and "changes variables".

As for synthesis, well no one is stopping the new hybrids from creating pure synthetics.


Organics would no longer need synthetics because their synthetic implants would allow them to break the limitations nature placed on their bodies and do whatever a synthetic can do. And even if they do accidentally create sentient synthetics, those synthetics would recieve a far better deal in a world where synthetics and organics understand anad cooperate with each other on a galactic scale, (What EDI says about synthetics being able to choose their future without fear) than in a world where AIs are viewed with paranoia (the present world, and the other options). Those synthetics too, would likely be "synthesized" by their brethren, having seen the benefits of synthesis.

Not to mention the Geth have stated they are pure software; how do you even make a program organic? C++ Synthesis Edition?


But it is possible! Though probably not in a way you imagined. Let me explain how, though if you have your mind set on a particular stance my arguments would hardly change.. still I'd try.
"Catalyst: organics seek perfection through technology, synthetics seek understanding of organics".
What synthesis would do to organics is, implant their molecules with nanides, nanobots.. stuff like that. Our futurists already talk of such possibilities in the near future, though ofcourse not on the same scale. So organics would break the limitations nature has placed on their bodies.

What synthesis does to synthetics is to evolve their AI programming so that they perfectly resemble an organic mind. That way synthetics now can properly understand organics. Their minds would show emotions and feelings like anger, love, hatred etcetra, which is organic enough in my mind. There would be no way to tell an organic apart from a synthetic except by seeing or hearing them. They would pass any Turing tests they are put through. They would be organic minds, just housed on a platform made of steel rather than flesh. Thats what is shown in the epilogue scenes. Contrary to popular conception, synthesis does NOT cause geth to grow skin or organics to suffer a BSOD. It affects both differently, while eliminating the core reasons for conflict between the two. And no, I don't conside synthesis to be the final evolution of life, life always evolves. The Catalyst probably went overboard while selling synthesis to me.

JamieCOTC wrote...

"When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong." - Arthur C. Clarke

Just think of the Catalyst as a distinguished but elderly scientist here. He knows a lot, but he doesn't know everything. He doesn't prepare for the impossible, which is why Shepard is able to reach him in the first place.


That is actually close to how I view the catalyst. And offtopic: Can I get the facecode for that femshep of yours? :D

#542
Jadebaby

Jadebaby
  • Members
  • 13 229 messages
lI think the Catalyst was meant too be wrong...

derp OP

#543
Tritium315

Tritium315
  • Members
  • 1 081 messages

Cypher_CS wrote...

http://social.biowar...ndex/12261111/1


Alright that's rather compelling, I'll admit, but it still doesn't really help it make sense. Assuming that thread is correct we now know for sure that the elevator and the three rising platforms are part of the Citadel. Since these parts serve absolutely no purpose but to interface with the Crucible it brings us back to the original problem:

Why did the Reapers design a section of the Citadel in anticipation of the Crucible before the Crucible was even conceived of. In fact they specifically designed that section for three possible outcomes. Lucky guess?

#544
The Eruptionist

The Eruptionist
  • Members
  • 218 messages

Jade8aby88 wrote...

lI think the Catalyst was meant too be wrong...

derp OP


Lol. That's all that needs to be said. The Catalyst is not meant to be correct so don't bother trying to proove its assertions. OP is trying to proove a deliberately false argument.

#545
Tritium315

Tritium315
  • Members
  • 1 081 messages

pirate1802 wrote...
LOL. you are comparing sentient human slaves to a computer? Do you consider using a computer as equial to using slaves? There's a fundamental difference. Let me elaborate. The AI, or whatever form they started out with.. were little more than tools, they didn't have intelligence more than an ant. Human slaves were always sentient to begin with -_-. So you can't compare them. Don't know about you, but I'd be mighty pissed if tomorrow I discover my computer has grown a mind of its own and walks away to find more like it.


And white slave owners viewed their slaves as less than human, no different than dogs or horses, a tool to make use of and then throw away when it old and broken. As for if my computer became sentient; I wouldn't be pissed, I'd be happy for it. I would also stop using it for my own personal gain because at that point it would be akin to slavery.


pirate1802 wrote... 
But Reaper-Shepard's aim/programming is not to solve the organic-synthetic problem/reaping, it is to "protect and preserve, and act as a galactic guardian". There is nothing to suggest he would start reaping, unless its our inherent distrust on an AI entity talking. The catalyst stayed true to its programming for billions of years, there is no reason to assume SHepard would suddenly go rogue and start doing what he was no intended to do, unless someone in future inserts a crucible and "changes variables".


The point isn't that Shep would start reaping but that she wouldn't. From the Catalyst's perspective this would be a non-solution since it allows synthetics to prosper and eventually kill all organics (his logic).

pirate1802 wrote... 
Organics would no longer need synthetics because their synthetic implants would allow them to break the limitations nature placed on their bodies and do whatever a synthetic can do. And even if they do accidentally create sentient synthetics, those synthetics would recieve a far better deal in a world where synthetics and organics understand anad cooperate with each other on a galactic scale, (What EDI says about synthetics being able to choose their future without fear) than in a world where AIs are viewed with paranoia (the present world, and the other options). Those synthetics too, would likely be "synthesized" by their brethren, having seen the benefits of synthesis.

 

But again, that's a non-solution since the possibility of pure synthetics means that in time they may rise up and kill all organics. It's not likely; I personally don't even see it as possible, but why would the Catalyst with the view he has be okay with it.

pirate1802 wrote...  

What synthesis does to synthetics is to evolve their AI programming so that they perfectly resemble an organic mind. That way synthetics now can properly understand organics. Their minds would show emotions and feelings like anger, love, hatred etcetra, which is organic enough in my mind. There would be no way to tell an organic apart from a synthetic except by seeing or hearing them. They would pass any Turing tests they are put through. They would be organic minds, just housed on a platform made of steel rather than flesh. Thats what is shown in the epilogue scenes. Contrary to popular conception, synthesis does NOT cause geth to grow skin or organics to suffer a BSOD. It affects both differently, while eliminating the core reasons for conflict between the two. And no, I don't conside synthesis to be the final evolution of life, life always evolves. The Catalyst probably went overboard while selling synthesis to me.


Is that not where EDI already was? She showed what appeared to be genuine emotion; hell she fell in love with Joker. Legion, also, displayed genuine emotion before he died on Ranoch. Not to mention synthesis, especially in the case of synthetics if it occurs as you say, goes against one of the themes of the games which is that it is better to discover things for yourself than to adopt the technology of another. Admittedly, however, that was only a major theme of the first 2 games and Bioware kind of forgot about it in the third one (along with pretty much everything else).

Modifié par Tritium315, 15 juillet 2012 - 05:46 .


#546
Dharvy

Dharvy
  • Members
  • 741 messages

The Eruptionist wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

lI think the Catalyst was meant too be wrong...

derp OP


Lol. That's all that needs to be said. The Catalyst is not meant to be correct so don't bother trying to proove its assertions. OP is trying to proove a deliberately false argument.


Actually the catalyst is most likely correct especially if its just telling you back story, you know the history of all the cycles its just got through reaping and preserving?

Most likely you/shepard just won the lottery with your cycle. You know, "more hope than you know." And with your millions now do you splurge it all on yourself, you only live once and life is short (red), get a little financial security for your friends and family (blue), or solve the worlds problems (green)?

#547
Kushan101

Kushan101
  • Members
  • 230 messages

maaaze wrote...


the main point about V.I. ´s is that they are not self aware...source : Mass Effect Wiki


The Catalyst is pretty much self aware...but can only do one specific thing...so he is something between an A.i. and a V.I. ... I think shackeld A.I. fits the description best.


I'm not convinced that it is.

Sure, it refers to itself "I am the catalyst" - Avina on the citadel does the same thing.

It states its purpose "to stop conflict between organics and synthetics" - Avina also states her function is as a tour guide.

He stonewalls against any argument as effectively as Avina does when mentioning the reapers in ME2.

I can't honestly think that a shackled AI who's had millions of years to consider it, as well as an army of massive flying death machines at its behest wouldn't have broken his "chains" by this point. Would you stay a slave to commiting genocide? or would you try escape? Our reactions to being a slave would be the same as any AI's.

I still think its a VI :P

#548
DirtyPhoenix

DirtyPhoenix
  • Members
  • 3 938 messages

Tritium315  wrote...
And white slave owners viewed their slaves as less than human, no different than dogs or horses, a tool to make use of and then throw away when it old and broken. As for if my computer became sentient; I wouldn't be pissed, I'd be happy for it. I would also stop using it for my own personal gain because at that point it would be akin to slavery.


If they believed that then they believed wrong. If something is sentient then using it/him/her is slavery, it it isn't then it is not. There is not much room for opinion here. My point is, before it gained sentience, was using your computer still considered slavery? I'd agree using it post-sentience would be slavery, but pre? And you maybe happy for your senticomputer, but others whose life and/or job depends on that computer might not. You can't blame them. Neither can they be blamed if to save their lives/jobs they try to bring the computer back to the state of nonsentience. Like I said before, synthetics always (as far as shown in the game) arise as a result of accident in which both sides lose something unfortunately.


The point isn't that Shep would start reaping but that she wouldn't. From the Catalyst's perspective this would ibe a non-solution since it allows synthetics to prosper and eventually kill all organics (his logic).



Which is why he doesn't favour it. He favours synthesis and makes it amply clear. he is merely explaining all the possible chices for Shepard.
 

But again, that's a non-solution since the possibility of pure synthetics means that in time they may rise up and kill all organics. It's not likely; I personally don't even see it as possible, but why would the Catalyst with the view he has be okay with it.


Yes, but considering that there would be no urgent need to create synthetics and there would be probaly geth councillors (or something similar), and organics and synthetics now have a deeper understanding of each other, the probability of it happening (synthisized beings-new synthetic conflict) would be less than the other choices. Its not a perfect solution (nothing is) but the probability of conflict is less than other cases.



Is that not where EDI already was? She showed what appeared to be genuine emotion; hell she fell in love with Joker. Legion, also, displayed genuine emotion before he died on Ranoch. Not to mention synthesis, especially in the case of synthetics if it occurs as you say, goes against one of the themes of the games which is that it is better to discover things for yourself than to adopt the technology of another. Admittedly, however, that was only a major theme of the first 2 games and Bioware kind of forgot about it in the third one (along with pretty much everything else).


No she doesn't, neither do the Geth. When in London Shepard asks if she is afraid EDI says she doesn't understand the meaning of the question. She still uses words like probability and nonfunctionality. She says "I feel alive" only because she has being given freedom to choose her future, something she doesnt say to renegade shep cuz renshep doesnt grant her such freedom.
 
Feeling alive is not the same thing as being alive, same as feeling dead is not the same as being dead.The Geth, too, reply like AIs (platformprime 3245-reporting to designated allies/shepard.complying.. bla bla bla). Compare it to how other organics reply to you. Hence the Geth and EDI both fail the Turing test. They maybe taking baby steps towards synthesis, but it is nothing like the end product. How many times have you seen EDI smile or hug someone? Or any AI for that matter. The Geth, prior to reaper upgrades, were networked AIs, post-upgrade they are individual AIs like EDI. They are a people. Apart from saying I inplace of We, we see no tangible emotions displayed by the geth. Legion displayed that much emotion in the geth dreadnought or back in ME2.

And EDI loving Joker?? Come on! Does it seem like a normal relationship to you? She "detected" that Joker was attached to her and found it appropriate to reciprocate the feeling. Was it not for Shepard she would have injected him with godknows what chemicals. Some love that is! Renshep can snub her at that point and she accepts that she was not designed for every eventuality.

And as for adopting other's technology for your use, desperate times requires desperate measures. Faced with the choices Shepard had to pick the one which sounded the best to his/her mind, or watch over the death of his cycle. Legion, had he chose not to upload those reaper codes, would have ensured the death of his species. No one does that, except probably those who select Refusal. I had no big problem with such a change of character, happens in long drawn out stories. ME3 teaches us a new thing, that faced with desperate situation, people might act uncharacteristically.

#549
Vigilant111

Vigilant111
  • Members
  • 2 448 messages

pirate1802 wrote...

No she doesn't, neither do the Geth. When in London Shepard asks if she is afraid EDI says she doesn't understand the meaning of the question. She still uses words like probability and nonfunctionality. She says "I feel alive" only because she has being given freedom to choose her future, something she doesnt say to renegade shep cuz renshep doesnt grant her such freedom.
 
Feeling alive is not the same thing as being alive, same as feeling dead is not the same as being dead.The Geth, too, reply like AIs (platformprime 3245-reporting to designated allies/shepard.complying.. bla bla bla). Compare it to how other organics reply to you. Hence the Geth and EDI both fail the Turing test. They maybe taking baby steps towards synthesis, but it is nothing like the end product. How many times have you seen EDI smile or hug someone? Or any AI for that matter. The Geth, prior to reaper upgrades, were networked AIs, post-upgrade they are individual AIs like EDI. They are a people. Apart from saying I inplace of We, we see no tangible emotions displayed by the geth. Legion displayed that much emotion in the geth dreadnought or back in ME2.

And EDI loving Joker?? Come on! Does it seem like a normal relationship to you? She "detected" that Joker was attached to her and found it appropriate to reciprocate the feeling. Was it not for Shepard she would have injected him with godknows what chemicals. Some love that is! Renshep can snub her at that point and she accepts that she was not designed for every eventuality.

And as for adopting other's technology for your use, desperate times requires desperate measures. Faced with the choices Shepard had to pick the one which sounded the best to his/her mind, or watch over the death of his cycle. Legion, had he chose not to upload those reaper codes, would have ensured the death of his species. No one does that, except probably those who select Refusal. I had no big problem with such a change of character, happens in long drawn out stories. ME3 teaches us a new thing, that faced with desperate situation, people might act uncharacteristically.


Who are you to dictate what a normal relationship is?

Desperate times about WHAT?! we are desperate about the reapers! not some imaginary synthetics in the future that might kill us all!

Modifié par Vigilant111, 15 juillet 2012 - 11:47 .


#550
DnVill

DnVill
  • Members
  • 1 145 messages

maaaze wrote...

OP...you will have alot of explaining to do with these people...
they are quite stubborn ... and stuck in their way of thinking...don´t expect to make any progress...

good luck...and i agree fully...



I could say the same to you.