HagarIshay wrote...
1. No, many also didn't like the exploration. And the Vehicles.
2. Well, maybe you don't skip. But many others do. Side quests don't make the story. They are all, well, side quests. And like I said, the exploration in ME made the game look like 35+ hours when you could have done it in 27- hours with side quests.
3. Comes out of nowhere. Like, lets say, the Collectors in ME2? We never heard of them in ME1. Something must move the plot. In ME3's case, it was the Crucible.
4. Your decision was acknowlaged. "choices don't matter" is not true. It may be not enough acknowlagemt in your opinion, and that is a valid complaint. Yet subjective. It's your opinon alone. Besides, there are also other choices that were fairly acknowlaged. So not really ALL choices were left aside.
5. I never played Dues Ex Machina. So what exactly is your point here? That the idea was taken from another game? Do you have any idea how many things in the media are copying other things? There is barely something today that is original.
7. Okay, so that is one bug. What are the rest exactly?
8. In my opinon, it's 8.5/10. Does that make the EC truly 4/10 or 8.5/10? No. That is left for personal opinion only.
10. No that doesn't anwer my question. The other two games had were relavant. They are not completley necessary to play, like every trilogy of book doesn't make reading the first or second book as completley necessary. But playing the first two games is important as it is to play ME1 if you want to play ME2. And I say that as someone who played ME2 prior to ME1.
11. And if there are people that didn't see the so called "insults"? Does that mean the game is still bad because of it? And you didn't answer my question. What exactly were the insults? Did BioWare ever call you stupid? Artistic integrity is nowhere near insult. If you felt offended because of that (also, what make artistic integrity offensive?), then it's you personally. Not BioWare. You shouldn't feel offenced on that more than any other artsit will tell you he's not going to change his work.
1. Those people were the really small minority. The wrong minority. Devs took their way to cut the game and release it ASAP.
2. And? You want to say that main storyline is the most important thing in ME series? Sorry, but main storylines are not that good even in first games and even not that enjoyable. ME is about characters, choices and lore. If you skip most of the missions to complete the game fast - you are not that interested in game. Is that the kind of player we want to be the core of playerbase? I say - No. Those people should go shooty in CoD.
3. It's ok to introduce new things in the middle of the series as long as they do not contradict the lore. It is bad to change the lore in the final part of the trilogy. Crucible is violating the lore. It is tolerable, but not appreciated at all.
4. I do not accept anything, but high quality. If I sell you heavily scorched car and you will complain, you want me to say: "Yeah, but hey, windows are not broken, not everything is bad"? That's exactly what you say.
5. *sigh* How old are you? Please google the
term (not the game) "Deus Ex Machina" and return.
7. Joker chair. Liara and Shep being posessed. Introduction bugs. Doors being unable to open (locks dissapear). Youtube it if you want.
8. Agree here.
10. ME is about choices. When previously choice-based game suddenly becomes streamlined... Well, that's wrong. Never understood people who would begin any book, film or game series from the middle or from the end, honestly.
11. Alright. You are not that bright. What? Don't like it? Well, it's your problem being offended, not mine.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
