spockjedi wrote...
HagarIshay wrote...
I don't think he meant to say we can't recodnize the bad writing. Also, I'm sure he didn't want to offend the writers themselves, especially in public so everyone will see.
And I'm sorry, I didn't try to straw man. Just wanted to answer something you pointed out.
By pretending the outrage was a result of the "lack of closure" and not of the bad wrting he already did that.
Ok, I believe you didn't try to straw man.
robertthebard wrote...
So, just what exactly was it you
planned to do if they had said "This is the game as written, sorry you
didn't like it, but we're not changing it."? Take your ball and go
home? I'm serious.
When did I said I would something to them?
I'm not demanding a new ending ("give a new ending otherwise you'll suffer"), I'm just saying IF they made a totally new ending, the fans would forgive them for the bad ending and continue supporting Mass Effect. That's what I said about "giving the chance to fix the ending".
robertthebard wrote...
Do you really believe that if they had decided
against EC there was anything you could do to them?
Since you're asking, fans already did something against Bioware because of the endings. Maybe the EC was a way to respond to this complaint. Who knows?
In answer to your first question, since you snipped your quote out of my reply:
What I replied toAfter reading this post, I went back through my email inbox, so I could find the letter I got from the BBB concerning what they can and can't do about game companies/publishers from when I filed against Atari concerning their DRM preventing paying customers from playing the game. Unfortunately, I seem to have finally trashed it, since it, in essence said "There's nothing we can do about it, have a nice day". So how did his lawsuit pan out? Is he hiding in embarrassment because he lost before he ever really got to court? While I'm not a pro-ender, the term was coined here for people that didn't mind the ending, and the courts are most likely to say "Well, it seems that while there is indeed some outrage, but, you can't sue somebody because you didn't like the end of a game. If we set a precedent that says you can, pretty soon we'll have to set one that says you can sue because you didn't like the ending of a movie, or a book". Only they'll use a lot more words to convey it. If they can't take action against Atari for a game being completely unplayable due to DRM, what action do you think they can take because somebody is unhappy about an ending? This despite the fact that we do have laws about a product being in a useable state when you buy it new.
I could actually play that game, but it did mess up licenses I had on my PC in completely unrelated areas, and my attorney advised me that I didn't have any recourse, other than uninstalling and reformatting my HD to get their crap off my machine. I just hope the guy's attorney was one of those "We don't get paid unless you win" ambulance chaser types, otherwise he spent a lot of money to lose.
Edit to fix link, I hope...
Modifié par robertthebard, 14 juillet 2012 - 08:20 .