skate4tacos96 wrote...
What would you guys do if BioWare said "Hey guys! Guess what?! We were just trolling with you the entire time! Now here's DLC with the endings and everything else you guys want! Have fun!" right before the last DLC came out?
Jade8aby88 wrote...
Dark energy plot was Drew's idea. It was scrapped when he left. I don't think they're allowed to use it. That's why it wasn't heard of again.
Where was dark energy foreshadowed in Arrival?
Modifié par Grubas, 07 septembre 2012 - 02:38 .
Yeah, and will also not undo whatever insane crazy shenanigans they pulled to make this happen. This is an exercise in trolling the entire fanbase, and even if it will eventually happen, it will be remembered with a mix of scorn and pain and belated satisfaction. Probably what twin/triplet/quadruplet/etc mothers think of their children's births.Grubas wrote...
So to speak despite that we got an ending, we would get a different ending once the Multiplayer campaign is over? That would actually fit their otherwise totaly blown up promises, but it will take time.
C9316 wrote...
But, if Bioware did this wouldn't that still make them @ssholes? For not only making most of this game's plot pointless, but for charging full price for an incomplete game?
Wasn't just me though...
Modifié par Jade8aby88, 08 septembre 2012 - 11:47 .
Noelemahc wrote...
Yeah, and will also not undo whatever insane crazy shenanigans they pulled to make this happen. This is an exercise in trolling the entire fanbase, and even if it will eventually happen, it will be remembered with a mix of scorn and pain and belated satisfaction. Probably what twin/triplet/quadruplet/etc mothers think of their children's births.Grubas wrote...
So to speak despite that we got an ending, we would get a different ending once the Multiplayer campaign is over? That would actually fit their otherwise totaly blown up promises, but it will take time.
Optimism is great, really, I really hope that your theory is how it really ends up being. Then they would certainly have pushed the envelope and done the most elaborate trolling attempt ever made, and certainly the most expensive one. If they do this properly, they might be vindicated by history-- they can still do it, actually, and pretend that was the plan all along... But I have this nagging suspicion that they won't and this is just a hopeful theory that won't come to pass.Jade8aby88 wrote...
Maybe, but hater's gonna hate. Some of the people who would look back on it negatively may be some of the people who like it as it is now. But I strongly believe that the overal reaction would be positive. If the whole concept of why it had to be set out this way is grasped.
Jade8aby88 wrote...
C9316 wrote...
But, if Bioware did this wouldn't that still make them @ssholes? For not only making most of this game's plot pointless, but for charging full price for an incomplete game?
It's still a complete game because we did get endings. Which would still be valid even after additional ones. It's not like they'd be releasing "the" ending, just "another" one. Sure, it might have a better outcome, but that's because it would be required to be able to not only gather fan feedback to implement into it, but also too let players actively participate in the Reaper war outside of Shepard's shoes, in the MP and operations.
edit: @ Debi-Tage, thank you!
Pascal219 wrote...
Jade8aby88 wrote...
C9316 wrote...
But, if Bioware did this wouldn't that still make them @ssholes? For not only making most of this game's plot pointless, but for charging full price for an incomplete game?
It's still a complete game because we did get endings. Which would still be valid even after additional ones. It's not like they'd be releasing "the" ending, just "another" one. Sure, it might have a better outcome, but that's because it would be required to be able to not only gather fan feedback to implement into it, but also too let players actively participate in the Reaper war outside of Shepard's shoes, in the MP and operations.
edit: @ Debi-Tage, thank you!
Would also make sense with Mike Gamble saying "If people knew what we have planned the reaction would be different.". Just a few days after release and all hell broke loose.
CrackFoxJunior wrote...
I don't even know how to feel about any of the endings or theories anymore. I think I have reached a point where I just try to repress every memory that has anything to do with the ending.
Ouch. It must have been pretty bad then.KENNY4753 wrote...
The game was really stupid. I'd rather replay the Mass Effect 3 endings lolskate4tacos96 wrote...
I never played the game, which is probably a good thing. The TV show was awesome though! It was definitely one of my favorites.
Wow. You have no idea how happy your post just made me. I wish everyone had your attitude.RainbowDazed wrote...
At this point I don't care any more. Whatever they release, I'll buy. I'm done being butt-hurt about the ending.
skate4tacos96 wrote...
Wow. You have no idea how happy your post just made me. I wish everyone had your attitude.RainbowDazed wrote...
At this point I don't care any more. Whatever they release, I'll buy. I'm done being butt-hurt about the ending.
Amen to that. Before any alterations to endings are made, that wonderful example of the Xen Syndrome should be re-made, preferrably from the ground up.Grubas wrote...
Funny to think about the endings, no matter what they change, when or if they change them. I still have to go through priority:earth to see them. I dont care if they are bad, i cant be assed to reach them anyway.
darthoptimus003 wrote...
hell id buy any DLC as long as it does something to the ending and as long as multiplayer DOES NOT effect it cause some people dont play mp but yeah id defentily pay for a win refusal
yes but it seems that mp will play a major roll in sp where it shouldnt but id still buy the dlc as long as mp doesnt play a roll in itJade8aby88 wrote...
darthoptimus003 wrote...
hell id buy any DLC as long as it does something to the ending and as long as multiplayer DOES NOT effect it cause some people dont play mp but yeah id defentily pay for a win refusal
The idea isn't so that you have to have played multiplayer to have access to additional endings. It's just about the people that do, are actively participating in the war, outside of Shepard's shoes. Assisting in new intel etc... So that everyone could receive them
darthoptimus003 wrote...
yes but it seems that mp will play a major roll in sp where it shouldnt but id still buy the dlc as long as mp doesnt play a roll in itJade8aby88 wrote...
darthoptimus003 wrote...
hell id buy any DLC as long as it does something to the ending and as long as multiplayer DOES NOT effect it cause some people dont play mp but yeah id defentily pay for a win refusal
The idea isn't so that you have to have played multiplayer to have access to additional endings. It's just about the people that do, are actively participating in the war, outside of Shepard's shoes. Assisting in new intel etc... So that everyone could receive them
Then there still will be people iffed by the game's ending. Fact of life. They vehemently refuse to change the two things that make the people most dissatisfied with the game: the lackluster samey final level (when it could've been epicky epic of epic proportions) and at the very least the use of the Crucible in the end. Your theory proposes how to fix the second problem, but the first is still gonna be there.Jade8aby88 wrote...
C'mon, that's just not gonna happen...
Retour en haut