I would even settle for them making the special rounds more random for the moment, instead of knowing they'll happen on round 3,6,and 10 every single time.
Modifié par TsaiMeLemoni, 19 août 2012 - 05:14 .
Modifié par TsaiMeLemoni, 19 août 2012 - 05:14 .
AresKeith wrote...
and it is possible for them to DLC a new mode but it will take a really long time, but new enemies should be easy, like the Collectors or Indoctrinated Mercs
TsaiMeLemoni wrote...
The thought of Scions in MP just made me shudder, but it would at least liven things up a bit.
TsaiMeLemoni wrote...
The thought of Scions in MP just made me shudder, but it would at least liven things up a bit.
I would even settle for them making the special rounds more random for the moment, instead of knowing they'll happen on round 3,6,and 10 every single time.
D24O wrote...
Praetorians
Modifié par TsaiMeLemoni, 19 août 2012 - 05:17 .
Modifié par Conniving_Eagle, 19 août 2012 - 05:17 .
Conniving_Eagle wrote...
TsaiMeLemoni wrote...
The thought of Scions in MP just made me shudder, but it would at least liven things up a bit.
I would even settle for them making the special rounds more random for the moment, instead of knowing they'll happen on round 3,6,and 10 every single time.
le thinks they should bring back geth hoppers
Modifié par Conniving_Eagle, 19 août 2012 - 05:20 .
Guest_BringBackNihlus_*
Conniving_Eagle wrote...
I loved Hoppers. They were so cute. Like Geth froggies! I thought fighting them was fun, it was always nice to subdue a hopper with Singularity/Lift.
No, it hinges on using the Crucible, and basically doing Destroy without any consequences. Using the Crucible will always result in a consequence, you can't just switch it from being non-discriminating to discriminating. Thus, a victory via refusal would have to be a conventional victory.Jade8aby88 wrote...
CDRSkyShepard wrote...
They way the entirety of ME3 is structured, I can't believe that a conventional victory is possible. Not unless they put stuff in like actually having all the ships fitted with Thanix cannons, and with that large mass accelerator weapon from ME2 that took out the Derelict Reaper. Without some extensive rewrite to the game, I wouldn't be able to buy conventional victory at the end. (Particularly since the fleets at Earth are basically fish in a barrel for the Reapers, they were never meant to be able to overpower the Reaper presence in that system, just buy the Crucible some time.) I certainly wouldn't be able to buy it any more than I buy Control or Synthesis.
Also, I don't believe in the Refusal ending anyway. Javik said, "Stand in the ashes of a trillion dead souls and ask the ghosts if honor matters. The silence is your answer." I think the Refusal ending as it stands is very much in line with this. You are forced to cross a line in order to end the war...this is the way it is in real life. I personally don't believe in putting RL depressiveness into games, but I see what they're trying to do with it.
Personally, I go with Destroy as the ultimate middle finger to the Catalyst and his crappy logic. He can die along with the Reapers. I also am of the belief that we can rebuild EDI and the geth, given time. It may not be the ideal solution, but they were all combatants ready to give their lives to stop the Reapers. I don't think a conventional victory should be possible without very heavy casualties, and that would be even more devastating than losing EDI and the geth. Just my 0.02 there.
There's a lot of good thought that has been put in here, though. I hope you can gain support for it!
States in OP that the theory doesn't support conventional victory...
Goes on to talk about conventional victory....

Guest_BringBackNihlus_*
Conniving_Eagle wrote...
AresKeith wrote...
what if Bioware makes a game mode that takes place during the Cerberus Coup
Modifié par Jade8aby88, 19 août 2012 - 09:00 .
CDRSkyShepard wrote...
No, it hinges on using the Crucible, and basically doing Destroy without any consequences. Using the Crucible will always result in a consequence, you can't just switch it from being non-discriminating to discriminating. Thus, a victory via refusal would have to be a conventional victory.Jade8aby88 wrote...
CDRSkyShepard wrote...
They way the entirety of ME3 is structured, I can't believe that a conventional victory is possible. Not unless they put stuff in like actually having all the ships fitted with Thanix cannons, and with that large mass accelerator weapon from ME2 that took out the Derelict Reaper. Without some extensive rewrite to the game, I wouldn't be able to buy conventional victory at the end. (Particularly since the fleets at Earth are basically fish in a barrel for the Reapers, they were never meant to be able to overpower the Reaper presence in that system, just buy the Crucible some time.) I certainly wouldn't be able to buy it any more than I buy Control or Synthesis.
Also, I don't believe in the Refusal ending anyway. Javik said, "Stand in the ashes of a trillion dead souls and ask the ghosts if honor matters. The silence is your answer." I think the Refusal ending as it stands is very much in line with this. You are forced to cross a line in order to end the war...this is the way it is in real life. I personally don't believe in putting RL depressiveness into games, but I see what they're trying to do with it.
Personally, I go with Destroy as the ultimate middle finger to the Catalyst and his crappy logic. He can die along with the Reapers. I also am of the belief that we can rebuild EDI and the geth, given time. It may not be the ideal solution, but they were all combatants ready to give their lives to stop the Reapers. I don't think a conventional victory should be possible without very heavy casualties, and that would be even more devastating than losing EDI and the geth. Just my 0.02 there.
There's a lot of good thought that has been put in here, though. I hope you can gain support for it!
States in OP that the theory doesn't support conventional victory...
Goes on to talk about conventional victory....
Conniving_Eagle wrote...
Bushido Effect wrote...
Someone linked me here from GameFAQs.
Damn theories.... Wrex should eat them! >:[
Conniving_Eagle wrote...
I loved Hoppers. They were so cute. Like Geth froggies! I thought fighting them was fun, it was always nice to subdue a hopper with Singularity/Lift. They said Hoppers would be too much strain on the engine or something.
KENNY4753 wrote...
Conniving_Eagle wrote...
I loved Hoppers. They were so cute. Like Geth froggies! I thought fighting them was fun, it was always nice to subdue a hopper with Singularity/Lift. They said Hoppers would be too much strain on the engine or something.
I hated those things. It's a pain in the a** when you have a sniper rifle
Conniving_Eagle wrote...
KENNY4753 wrote...
Conniving_Eagle wrote...
I loved Hoppers. They were so cute. Like Geth froggies! I thought fighting them was fun, it was always nice to subdue a hopper with Singularity/Lift. They said Hoppers would be too much strain on the engine or something.
I hated those things. It's a pain in the a** when you have a sniper rifle
That's why you bring Liara as an Infiltrator.
Conniving_Eagle wrote...
Praetorians would be quite interesting, actually.
I luv my Geth Hopperz, but the Quarians blew them up