The Catalyst doesn't exist! (New Hypothesis)
#51
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 09:21
#52
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 10:02
Modifié par Ieldra2, 14 juillet 2012 - 10:04 .
#53
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 10:07
sth128 wrote...
TL:DR version:
The Catalyst room we see at the end is a manifestation from Shepard's mind interfaced with Prothean technology they added to the Crucible. The Catalyst is the personification of Shepard's doubts and fears.
Interesting.
Also, I lol'd at your sig. Just sayin'
#54
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 10:15
It still does not explane everything and we are still stuck with the green space magic that is DNA changing synthesis.
Modifié par im commander shep, 14 juillet 2012 - 10:17 .
#55
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 10:17
#56
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 01:07
I hope you aren't administering any servers or web sites. Even people who took basic programming know that you don't just "make new ones" every time you want to change something.AlexMBrennan wrote...
Proof by analogy is not a valid form of proof. How about this:Right... And just because I built a car from scratch and understand all the necessary aerodynamics and combustion theories behind such a creation doesn't mean I can drive it.
I have created a number of scripts running on my server for various maintenance tasks. However, I cannot directly influence their behaviour - if I need to change what they're doing, the only way to do so is to kill them and make new ones. Now what do we do?
You take the existing script, you debug / improve / change it, then you upload it.
My god if General Ford took your approach, they'd have to reinvent the wheel every time they want a new model. You put forth a logical implausible scenario in your original post. Just admit it. If you don't agree with my hypothesis then submit concrete proof to the contrary.
Saying "no he only created everything, he has no control" is just stupid. Especially when the Catalyst specifically said "I CONTROL THE REAPERS".
Modifié par sth128, 14 juillet 2012 - 01:09 .
#57
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 01:10
Guest_Arcian_*
What's with you people and your perverted obsession with "IT WAS JUST A DREAM/HALLUCINATION?!?!?!"-plot devices?sth128 wrote...
So everyone hates the Catalyst. Nobody can explain why it didn't just activate the Citadel relay in the first game if it controls everything. Why does it look like the kid that's been haunting Shepard's dreams? Why why why?
The answer? The Catalyst does not actually exist.
Let's look at the Crucible: which civilization was the last to build and improve its design? The Protheans. Javik specifically said that their technology communicate through neural interface. The Beacons transmit thoughts and ideas directly into its users instead of telling them the message via words and sound. Therefore, I posit that the Protheans integrated this technology into the Crucible as part of its control interface.
What was the last thing we see before Shepard meets the Catalyst? Shepard collapses and a bright flash engulfs the screen. When this happens, Shepard's mind is directly linked to the Crucible control and everything we see is happening in Shepard's head. Immediately after the flash the Citadel arms open fully. The moment Shepard interfaced with the Crucible, the activation sequence had begun.
Each option we see is the symbolic representation of its consequence. In Destroy, Shepard uses a weapon to literally destroy a power conduit. In Control, Shepard takes hold of two control pillars. In Synthesis, Shepard embraces the Crucible beam and becomes one with everything.
So what is the Catalyst then, if it doesn't actually exist? The Catalyst is actually Shepard's doubts and fears. From the start of his journey, the child has been haunting Shepard, that humanity may not survive the war, that he might fail in his mission. We see this in Shepard's recurring nightmares.
The child is a way for Shepard's mind to make sense of the ordeal. He is essentially dreaming up the Catalyst to explain away why things are the way they are. Shepard doesn't question its logic because nobody thinks dreams are weird when they are dreaming. If Shepard has a low EMS, the Catalyst asks "why are you here", as if his doubts and fears know that Shepard hasn't done everything possible to bring the galaxy together.
"Wait, but how does this fit into the Control ending", you ask? "Doesn't Shepard replace the Catalyst"?
No he doesn't. You cannot replace something that never existed. When Shepard chooses Control, his consciousness (still linked to Crucible) is embedded in a data burst and sent out across the galaxy to overwrite the core programming of every Reaper. Once taken Control, Shepard's mind literally exists in every Reaper. He becomes the "collective intelligence of the Reapers". This explains why you need to fire the Crucible in the Control choice. After all, if you are just taking over control from the Catalyst, you can just send out instructions the same way the Catalyst did, without the need of a giant blue bubble.
My hypothesis eliminates the inconsistency between previous games and this one since nothing is really controlling the Reapers and the Catalyst really is just the Citadel, and not a translucent kid living there. All insanities spouted by the Catalyst are just the inner conflicts of an unconscious mind exhausted from war and injury.
Furthermore, there is no secret room on the bottom of the Citadel tower with three retractable catwalks just waiting for someone to dock a Crucible. The collective efforts of the Cycles before us did not forget to include an activation switch and instead relied on its user shooting up the place. The hypothesis is not as extreme as to disclaim the existence of everything (ie. IT), but not as naive as to take everything at its face value.
It is, dare I say, the perfect solution...
#58
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 01:14
Arcian wrote...
What's with you people and your perverted obsession with "IT WAS JUST A DREAM/HALLUCINATION?!?!?!"-plot devices?
Sincere desire to help improve ME3?
Modifié par SpamBot2000, 14 juillet 2012 - 01:14 .
#59
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 01:17
It is nothing like IT. IT specifies that none of the events actually happened after Shepard is blasted by Harbinger. IT DENIES everything by positing that EVERYTHING IS FAKE. The husks are fake, Marauder Shields is fake, Anderson is fake, and the Crucible never dock. Everything is just a dream in which Shepard is battling indoctrination.SpamBot2000 wrote...
Hey, all due respect and all, but it seems pretty closely related to... IT basically. Only it doesn't go deep enough to root out the spacemagic. But kudos for fighting the good fight.
I'm saying IT'S ALL REAL. EVERYTHING HAPPENED. It's just the Catalyst dialogue and the Crucible activation sequence occurred in a Prothean tech-enabled virtual reality after Shepard passed out. THERE IS NO INDOCTRINATION in my hypothesis.
IT attempts to deny the ENDING CHOICES. My hypothesis attempts to reconcile what the Catalyst said and what Sovereign and Harbinger said. Additionally, my hypothesis attempts to reconcile the fact that the Crucible is activated by incredulous processes such as electrocution, track & field, and shooting up the place.
The only "similarity" there is between my scenario is the IT is that they both interpret the last 15 minutes or so of the game from concepts beyond just what we see and hear.
My hypothesis does not conflict with the EC content, while IT does.
Modifié par sth128, 14 juillet 2012 - 01:28 .
#60
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 01:19
What's with you people and your perverted obsession with "QUOTE EVERYTHING BUT NOT ACTUALLY REFER TO ANY OF IT!?!?"-forum posts?Arcian wrote...
What's with you people and your perverted obsession with "IT WAS JUST A DREAM/HALLUCINATION?!?!?!"-plot devices?sth128 wrote...
[entire article]
#61
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 01:21
This is not IT. There is no indoctrination in my hypothesis. An Asari is not a human with blue paint. To say as such would be ignorant. You are just me with different genes, so maybe we are "the same thing, just a twist".RenegonSQ wrote...
This is the same thing as the IT, just a twist IMO. But I am a believer of the IT, therefore I wouldn't count this out
#62
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 01:27
No. Shepard dies in my hypothesis just as he dies in the stock Bioware endings. In high EMS destroy, the neural interface disconnects and Shepard "wakes up". But that has more to do with the degree of injury sustained prior to the entire sequence, which my hypothesis does not alter.im commander shep wrote...
I have to say this theory does make a little sense and I like it. The only thing which does not make sense would be that dose this not imply shepard is potentially alive with all three main endings as he was never turned into husk or dissolved by the green synthesis beam.
It still does not explane everything and we are still stuck with the green space magic that is DNA changing synthesis.
I don't think Shepard is ever turned into a husk in any ending... As for my view on the mechanics behind Synthesis, I addressed it above in a previous posting. I won't go into my view on the ethics behind Synthesis here. Suffice to say I am not a fan.
If you would like to point out ambiguities that's not addressed in my hypothesis, I can take a crack at incorporating them into the explanations.
#63
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 01:41
Yes and no. Like I said before, everything the Catalyst said is just a regurgitated version of what Shepard has learned, suspected, seen, and heard. He learned from ME2 that Reapers harvest us to make new ones. He learned from Vigil that Reapers control the Citadel. Javik has repeatedly told Shepard that machines are not to be trusted. And despite Shepard's best efforts, the Quarian - Geth relations are tenuous at best. Tali said so herself, that there's too much bad blood for them to accept each other as equals right away.Ieldra2 wrote...
It must come from somewhere, it can't come all from within Shepard's mind.
I said the Catalyst is a manifestation of Shepard's fears and doubts. When someone is clouded by fears and doubts, they tend to convince themselves that some things "must be". People invent ideas and reasons in their heads to reassure themselves that not going forward is okay.
Shepard is under a lot of stress. After the events on Thessia, Shepard's will certainly have been swayed, if just a little. He more or less conjured up the explanations given by the Catalyst as a way to say to himself "the Reapers have a reason, I have not just sacrificed everything to stop something with no purpose".
#64
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 02:43
Personnally, I would love to see this get stickied so it stays around at the top and continues to grow and gain steam. IT started similiar and gained huge audience. If this gained huge audience - who knows, maybe Bioware would "adopt" it in a sense since, like I thought was clear from beginning and you have clarified for others, it does not conflict with the EC!
#65
Posté 17 juillet 2012 - 04:47
My hypothesis was really just designed to explain away the odd Crucible activation mechanisms. I mean, what if Shepard had been a Volus? You think he could have reached those Control pillars?

LOL...
#66
Posté 23 juillet 2012 - 01:15
Ah well, good times. Now back to scanning the boards for the newest IT/anti-IT wars, why <fill in the blank> is the best and everyone else can go screw...and oh yeah - absolutely zippo from Bioware on anything as they let the BSNers rage, flame out, and eventually "accept" the unfulfilled potential they have forced on all of us...
#67
Posté 23 juillet 2012 - 01:40
sth128 wrote...
TL:DR version:
The Catalyst room we see at the end is a manifestation from Shepard's mind interfaced with Prothean technology they added to the Crucible. The Catalyst is the personification of Shepard's doubts and fears.
Go ahead and find evidence to support your assertion.
#68
Posté 23 juillet 2012 - 02:34
For some reason, the decision chamber is a non-literal evironment...Arcian wrote...
What's with you people and your perverted obsession with "IT WAS JUST A DREAM/HALLUCINATION?!?!?!"-plot devices?
These are attempts to explain why everything's metaphorical and dreamlike...
Modifié par Bill Casey, 23 juillet 2012 - 02:36 .
#69
Posté 23 juillet 2012 - 03:11
Why would Shepard's mind mixed with Prothean tech create a fake character which proceeds to instead of just neutrally explain the options, call itself the leader of the Reapers and then have strong preference in the actions it offers? In the Catalyst's mind Synthesis> Control > Destroy > Reject.
And what about the elevator? We as a player clearly see it pull Shepard up. Then clearly see Shepard wake up (the Catalyst tells him to) Shepard is clearly unconscious and then woken up. How does that add up? Unconscious Shepard dreamed he was unconscious and raised by an elevator without noticing?
#70
Posté 23 juillet 2012 - 04:21
The fact is, Shepard passed out, then a bright light fills the screen. We see and hear a lot of things that do not make sense either way. My hypothesis provides a possible explanation for those things.
Why would Shepard's mind create a fake character? Why would the Catalyst take the form of a child?
Why didn't Hackett continue calling for Shepard on the comm after he passed out? If we as players are seeing what's really happening, shouldn't Hackett continue to talk to Shepard until he gets a response?
What, the entire galaxy is at stake but Hackett gives up after not getting a response twice?
"Shepard? Shepard! Oh well I guess he's not there, let's just keep shooting at the Reapers and pretend everything will work".
#71
Posté 23 juillet 2012 - 04:29
im commander shep wrote...
I have to say this theory does make a little sense and I like it. The only thing which does not make sense would be that dose this not imply shepard is potentially alive with all three main endings as he was never turned into husk or dissolved by the green synthesis beam.
It still does not explane everything and we are still stuck with the green space magic that is DNA changing synthesis.
Perhaps his mind is destroyed in both the Control/Synthesis ending.
#72
Posté 23 juillet 2012 - 04:38
That's what I hypothesized. In Control and Upload, the link was never severed and all of Shepard's consciousness and memories are directly uploaded to the AI / nanites.MegaSovereign wrote...
Perhaps his mind is destroyed in both the Control/Synthesis ending.
In Destroy, the link is severed after the Crucible fired. If you have a high EMS, Shepard is "downloaded" back into his body and he wakes up (next to Anderson and TIM's body).
#73
Posté 23 juillet 2012 - 05:04
The selfdoubts boy calls himself the leader of the Reapers because that's what he (and they) symbolize to Shepard: hopelessness and the futility of trying to act; Shepard probably remembered Harbinger repeatedly saying stuff like, “These attacks are pointless.” So of course Shepard's self-doubts-symbolized-as-a-boy wouldn't present the options neutrally, but instead pessimistically (i.e. "maybe bio and machine life aren't good enough to survive; what would this mean for each of the possible choices?").
Also, it's very possible for Shepard to dream/imagine that he's waking up. I've occasionally dreamed that I was waking up and turning off the (beeping in reality) alarm clock in the mornings before actually waking up and turning off the alarm clock. Anyways, the elevator itself could be symbolic of a "loading" routine carried out by the Prothean interface, like a temporary uploading of Shepard's consciousness. Shepard, while he's not able to do anything with the interface, would see himself as unconscious on the elevator. And once the interface and his mind are ready, he thinks he wakes up, because that's what makes sense –
when we're unconscious/asleep, we can't act or trigger Crucibles; when we wake up, we can act and make decisions that have real impact. Shepard could simply be filling in the gaps of the Prothean interface with his own unconscious.
Modifié par lietk12, 23 juillet 2012 - 05:19 .
#74
Posté 23 juillet 2012 - 05:23
There's no evidence. If there was actual evidence then it'd be a working theory. And what about the elevator? Sure we see him wake up, but we also see the Catalyst appearing as a child from Shepard's nightmares. We also hear Shepard's voice, both male and female. We also see images of Anderson shooting the power tube, TIM grabbing the control pillars, and flashes of aftermath of the Crucible detonation.
The fact is, Shepard passed out, then a bright light fills the screen. We see and hear a lot of things that do not make sense either way. My hypothesis provides a possible explanation for those things.
Exactly. The fact we see the elevator + the Catalyst BEFORE Shepard wakes up proves they exist.
You can't deny this fact by saying "there are other plot-holes." The player experiences and is shown things Shepard is unaware of. Then Shepard is literally woken up by the Catalyst.
This is not Shepard's mind.
#75
Posté 23 juillet 2012 - 05:33
No he isn't...MetioricTest wrote...
Then Shepard is literally woken up by the Catalyst.
The Catalyst says Wake up, but Shepard is already on his hands and knees looking around...
Also, we don't see the Catalyst before Shepard does...MetioricTest wrote...
Exactly. The fact we see the elevator + the Catalyst BEFORE Shepard wakes up proves they exist.
You
can't deny this fact by saying "there are other plot-holes." The player
experiences and is shown things Shepard is unaware of.
We see Shepard look up, then we see the Catalyst...
Modifié par Bill Casey, 23 juillet 2012 - 05:45 .





Retour en haut






