ROFLSTOMP ALL THE HUSKS!Mash3d wrote...
Came here hoping for thread on curb stomping enemies.
Left disapointed.
Really Need To Have In-Game Kicks
#151
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 10:57
#152
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:03
#153
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:04
Modifié par Seifer006, 01 septembre 2013 - 03:08 .
#154
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:06
Modifié par Seifer006, 01 septembre 2013 - 03:08 .
#155
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:06
Seifer006 wrote...
cerberus1701 wrote...
Seifer006 wrote...
theillusiveman11 wrote...
ckriley wrote...
Descy_ wrote...
People would abuse it.
worthless comment if you cant back up reason
A six year-old's understanding of human psychology is all that's required as a reason.
one word isn't enough for a constructive response IMO
their has been well thought out answers from both sides
Meh.
No one owes you a dissertation.
#156
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:07
Modifié par Seifer006, 01 septembre 2013 - 03:08 .
#157
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:08
Modifié par Seifer006, 01 septembre 2013 - 03:08 .
#158
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:08
ckriley wrote...
Descy_ wrote...
People would abuse it.
#159
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:09
Seifer006 wrote...
cerberus1701 wrote...
Quote: So essentially you don't mind having to carry bad players over the possibility of being wrongfully kicked in a match?
Yup. I'd rather carry a guy with the heart of Rambo, but the combat skill of Chief Wiggum, than to see a decent player get booted because of one cyber-bully and two spineless jellyfish.
But that's just me.
right cause that always going to happen.
BS
Often enough to make the IGK a bad idea.
Don't like how they play, leave 'em on the ground.
Modifié par cerberus1701, 13 juillet 2012 - 11:09 .
#160
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:09
Modifié par Seifer006, 01 septembre 2013 - 03:08 .
#161
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:09
Modifié par Seifer006, 01 septembre 2013 - 03:08 .
#162
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:12
Seifer006 wrote...
cerberus1701 wrote...
Seifer006 wrote...
cerberus1701 wrote...
Seifer006 wrote...
theillusiveman11 wrote...
ckriley wrote...
Descy_ wrote...
People would abuse it.
worthless comment if you cant back up reason
A six year-old's understanding of human psychology is all that's required as a reason.
one word isn't enough for a constructive response IMO
their has been well thought out answers from both sides
Meh.
No one owes you a dissertation.
wasn't asking for one.
laughable
And you didn't get one, so what are you complaining about. if "x" thinks a one-word response is sufficient...whatever.
Clearly you just want something to fight about.
#163
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:15
Modifié par Seifer006, 01 septembre 2013 - 03:08 .
#164
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:17
Modifié par Seifer006, 01 septembre 2013 - 03:09 .
#165
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:19
#166
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:47
#167
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:51
Modifié par joker_jack, 13 juillet 2012 - 11:51 .
#168
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:52
Seifer006 wrote...
cerberus1701 wrote...
Seifer006 wrote...
cerberus1701 wrote...
Quote: So essentially you don't mind having to carry bad players over the possibility of being wrongfully kicked in a match?
Yup. I'd rather carry a guy with the heart of Rambo, but the combat skill of Chief Wiggum, than to see a decent player get booted because of one cyber-bully and two spineless jellyfish.
But that's just me.
right cause that always going to happen.
BS
Often enough to make the IGK a bad idea.
Don't like how they play, leave 'em on the ground.
I honestly think it won't be abused. Sure you'll find those but how often you think that'll happen? I don't think it will happen a lot since
1. It's not instant kick - it's a majority. I doubt the majority is just going to roll with the ONE GUY? If that guy is doing well in the game, doubt the other three players just going to kick him.
2. the whole "leave him on the ground" great how does that help when playing Gold Maps?? at least I have the chance of the bad player or whateve to leave and have someone come in who can actually contribute to the team.
3. Not sure how much MP you play, but on PC there's many who come in and just want creds, so they don't contribute. This isn't some One Time only matches. It happens a lot, there's many other reasons, but I 'm just giving one.
4. Bioware doesn't have to make it permanent? - who knows, might go well. If it gets abuse then Nerf it.
1. As has already been pointed out here, it only takes one guy, for whatever reason to start it. One will X, one other will either assume the kickee is doing something unseen and then join in or he just doesn't have the guts not to go with the flow. It's how human beings work.
I gave an example farther back of a guy using a Krysae...playing fine. Playing as he should, but the gun, by its nature steals kills. That could easily annoy people. It has annoyed me. The option should not exist for me, to in a pique, kick a guy who has just been playing the game as he should.
That you don't think it will be abused suggests to me that you're pretty young.
2. Better the devil you know. At worst, you have to put up with a crap player for 30 minutes (give or take) Since you have no idea at all that the guy that you booted will be replaced by a decent player you're really no worse off than if you just let the dude play out the game.
What will you say to this. "Kick him, too." Well, I, for one would become super annoyed with that kick prompt continuing to come up and distracting me, and if I knew it kept coming from you, I'd actually be most inclined to kick YOU and not Captain Deadweight..
3. I play a lot. And yes, there are people like that. And i'll carry them for a game, send them a message that if that's what they are there for to go to an FBWGG game and get them there. Most will leave on their own. about a quarter of the time i get messages back that are basically, "I wanna learn Gold by being in Gold."
I'd feel like ****cutting them loose, especially since I'm sure no room you're ever in would try to teach them. So I tell them. "Stay with one of us that knows, pay attention." And if I see them trying, we're good. If not, kick between games.
4. There's no "if" and I don't want to play a game that allows it. There's already enough elitist snobbery in online games. There's already enough of that in THIS game. I have no interest in seeing BW creating one more avenue for it.
Modifié par cerberus1701, 13 juillet 2012 - 11:57 .
#169
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:54
Seifer006 wrote...
Title Says It All, I'm sure many of you would agree
Denied.
-Hackett.
#170
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 04:30
Seifer006 wrote...
Someone With Mass wrote...
So I can get kicked during wave 11 by some butthurt kiddies? No thanks.
you that scared???? I doubt your going to be kick EVERY game.
wake up and realize its not going to happen. it's not going to happen
This.
#171
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 04:33
/signed
#172
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 09:05
I would be kicked from every single match.
It's also so very rude. Kicking someone during a match is like saying
Using reaper sound effects to replace swear words.
"Bleehhhh OFF. You Bleeeeehhh. Stop Bleeeehhhhh up the Bleeehhhh team. You Bleeeeehhhhhh!"
#173
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 09:22
Seifer006 wrote...
I honestly think it won't be abused. Sure you'll find those but how often you think that'll happen? I don't think it will happen a lot since
1. It's not instant kick - it's a majority. I doubt the majority is just going to roll with the ONE GUY? If that guy is doing well in the game, doubt the other three players just going to kick him.
2. the whole "leave him on the ground" great how does that help when playing Gold Maps?? at least I have the chance of the bad player or whateve to leave and have someone come in who can actually contribute to the team.
3. Not sure how much MP you play, but on PC there's many who come in and just want creds, so they don't contribute. This isn't some One Time only matches. It happens a lot, there's many other reasons, but I 'm just giving one.
4. Bioware doesn't have to make it permanent? - who knows, might go well. If it gets abuse then Nerf it.
I think it'd be heavily abused. You have an unusually high faith in human beings for someone who wants to be able to kick them while in a match.
For one, a lot of groups of two or three roll public to gain one more guy. Most people will support their friends over the random scrub. And it's not hard to convince the third guy to vote with you. Most people are quite easy to influence.
I've seen terrible players get great players kicked from lobbies despite rocking the two-three games before just because a single player that the others know hates them for being a "kill stealer" or whatever else they can think of. And perhaps if they are doing well people will suck up their ego's. Perhaps. But in what way should it be fair that people can be vote-kicked while in game based on their skill? If you're that opposed to bad players or carrying then you shouldn't be playing random to start with. They have just as much right to play as you do, no matter the skill level, so long as they are trying.
Really this is just an extension of the same philosophy of kicking people from lobbies for their equipment, class, N7 rank, yadda. Only the people who apparently can't judge properly on their own skewed systems of measurement want to doubly make sure they don't have to play with anybody who doesn't meet their standards by having the ability to remove them after their initial assement fails.
Nothing about this community has suggested to me that they are somehow above the petty, stupid things people do constantly. In fact, for the most part, the risk is higher here.
#174
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 02:36
Modifié par Seifer006, 01 septembre 2013 - 03:08 .





Retour en haut






