Godak wrote...
In order to save Bruce, Alfred feels he must abandon the Batman.
Something I do not understand at all, esp since Alfred fears for his life.
The way I see it, it's just poorly attempted drama for the sake of it.
If the ending were going to be different, I could agree with that. At the same time, I feel like the trilogy always had to end with Bruce's Batman dying (whether or not that meant Bruce's death). It would have been extraordinarily disappointing if, by some magical plot device, Bruce was able to heal his body and continue being the Batman indefinitely.
Goes back to how we understand Batman and Bruce. For me, Bruce is the mask and Batman is the real person. Batman can't stop being batman. But I am not criticizing Nolan's series in that regard, it was consistent.
The existence of the character of Batman who can maintain a secret identity in the largest city on the planet requires the suspension of disbelief. Nolan handled it better than most (There's no "ALFRED DID IT!" for one thing).
Perhaps you misunderstood me. That's precisely what I am saying. Believing that Batman cannot be exposed requires our suspension of disbelief. But when you can make a random dude expose him as kid easily well it's no longer consistent and we can no longer pretend to believe that no one can find out.
This is just his origin story (if that). We see some of his trials and tribulations, and it is heavily (HEAVILY) implied that he will become the new Batman. However, donning the cowl comes with its own trials. Batman was not a complete character in Batman Begins. Blake won't be complete until his he grows during his tenure as the caped crusader.
I disagree, I think Batman was a complete character by Begins more or less and TDK and TDKR did not add much to his character, views and motivations. For Blake, well other than he is an orphan and just a nice guy, there is not that much to his origin.
Sadism is not necessarily dramatic. And Bane seems to keep a far more level-headed approach than Talia.
Bane said he is doing all this because despair can't exist without hope. He just wants false hope before destroying Gotham. I'd say that pretty sadistic and not level headed, compared to Ras.
Keep in mind that Ozymandias speechified Nite Owl and Rorschach. They were unable to physically stop him - and, even if they could, he had already implemented his plan of action. He had won, so he went head first to the dramatic talking points. Heck, I think Ozymandias would have been proud of Bane.
How? Bane had a 5 month time bomb that he had no reason to delay. His goal is to destory Gotham, why wait 5 months and pull off a sham pointless revolution?
Is it anything that they couldn't have given to Bane to make him more complex? Is it not Bane's entire purpose to be a villain who is capable of standing toe-to-toe with Batman on both a physical and intellectual level? Making Talia the mastermind undermines Bane's intellectual abilities, making him a really strong mook.
Talia does not have to be the mastermind. She can be the co-conspirator or simply the one who will detonate the bomb should Bane's plan fail.
As for what she would add, she would show an emotional side of Bane. Bane in the comics had a teddy bear best friend. Baby Talia could have been that teddy bear.
Furthermore, if Bane was rejected by Ras to be his heir because of Talia and his beliefs which led to Ras seeking Bruce as a potential heir, it would have added more to the rivalry between the two.
I would argue that Blake and Selina need to remain in order to bring Bruce back.
[snip]
Good point.
Still, that's way too many characters to do right. I feel Blake is more necessary than Selina, who could have been removed. I understand that she brings a new love interest to Bruce, but I would have preferred the ending to be less happy and more ambiguous. I would have preferred if we don't know whether Bruce can live without Batman or not. But that said, I am a fan of the bittersweet.
But I feel like you want Nolan to be telling a different story. For the story he did tell, both Blake and Kyle were of the utmost importance. In a different tale, yes, they might very well be useless wall-flowers who are ancillary to the main story.
To a certain extent yes, I do. But even for the story he wanted to tell, it was not as well done as it could have been and I think we agree. We seem to agree that there is at least one character too many. You think it's Talia, I think it's Selina (that's cause I think Talia is more interesting and more crucial to the plot / story). Also Blake because I fond him poorly executed albeit not pointless.
I always saw Batman as defined by his antagonistss and not his allies (needless to say, I hate Robin barring Jason Todd and the rest).
Oh well, maybe in a decade or so a re-invention of Batman can be done.
Still, all in all, I like the movie (but I think it's my least favorite of the trilogy) and I loved the serie and found it much better than the old movies (except Phantasm).