630 réponses à ce sujet

[istle]

Taboo-XX wrote...
Miss Taylor, who voices Jack is there.
Take that as you will.

Don't say that... Now that I know it's very probable that I'm going to be disappointed expecting too much

[TMA LIVE]

So where's the link to the one coming up right now?

[v0rt3x22]

They haven't put it on the site yet. I don't know why.
If I'm not mistaken - its about to start.

Check the site in OP - they will eventually post a live coverage.

[DiegoRaphael]

http://www.newsarama...ent-future.html

[v0rt3x22]

I've updated the link in OP

[Phydeaux314]

Ooo, sweet, they're going to talk about the design choices of the EC.

[Chaotic-Fusion]

Well, this should be interesting.

[Phydeaux314]

Ooo, some expanded stuff for the epilogue.

[Brovikk Rasputin]

So the slides are actually set 10 years after the ending of the game? Damn.

[Xellith]

Ok well this completely AND FINALLY shoots down the dream indoc theory. (I think.. was kinda shot down before but people wouldnt let that particular theory perish)

[Brovikk Rasputin]

Yay, the IT is pretty much dead now.

[M Hedonist]

Wait - which part of the endings shows centuries into the future of Mass Effect? Do they mean the Stargazer cutscene? But that was already there before.

[Phydeaux314]

Yeah, this is the death knell for IT.

/salute

[Fapmaster5000]

Boom, headshot.

[Brovikk Rasputin]

Sauruz wrote...

Wait - which part of the endings shows centuries into the future of Mass Effect? Do they mean the Stargazer cutscene? But that was already there before.

The slides right before the "people we lost" stuff. I think he means the images of London and stuff like that. 

[M Hedonist]

Also, IT is never gonna die, people.

[FellishBeast]

Is this not the main panel?

[Phydeaux314]

Brovikk Rasputin wrote...

Sauruz wrote...

Wait - which part of the endings shows centuries into the future of Mass Effect? Do they mean the Stargazer cutscene? But that was already there before.

The slides right before the "people we lost" stuff. I think he means the images of London and stuff like that. 

Yeah, the London conduit going to the citadel is set 10-15 years after the end.

[v0rt3x22]

-.- "open communication" - I haven't seen any on BSN as of late...

[noobcannon]

 "5:16 Now on to the next MP DLC"

/facepalm

Modifié par noobcannon, 15 juillet 2012 - 12:17 .

[Phydeaux314]

Nah, it's been happening. Not in the story discussion in public, but over at the HTL boards they've been talking with us, and they've answered people via twitter and PM.

[Firecell11]

more mp? Really?....

[Fapmaster5000]

Hey, check it! They finally acknowledged that there was backlash at the ending, and not clarification requests!

... and then followed it up with more Multiplayer DLC. Really?

[M Hedonist]

Brovikk Rasputin wrote...

Sauruz wrote...

Wait - which part of the endings shows centuries into the future of Mass Effect? Do they mean the Stargazer cutscene? But that was already there before.

The slides right before the "people we lost" stuff. I think he means the images of London and stuff like that.

Ah. Interesting.
Although all of these slides really could be set at any time in the future of Mass Effect. Some kind of text or narration that tells us what's going really would've been handy to portray that but oh well.

[Xellith]

LOL what communication? We outright asked them at PAX for what they thought of the indoc theory. We got stonewalled with a "we dont want to tell you what to think" statement".