Pitznik wrote...
Why you say his life expectancy was retconned? Either his condition simply got worse, or his ME2 doctors were wrong. Life expectancy is just an educated guess, people don't have a timer inside showing 15 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hourse and 17 minutes do death.
I agree with many of your points, except for the possibility of the cure - it shouldn't be possible, for dramatic reasons, just like Javik shouldn't happen, just like refusal should always end with deafeat.
That is indeed true, life expectancies are indeed an educated guess. My father, for example, was given 2 years to live when he was diagnosed with terminal lung cancer, aespestosis, and emphasemea (all lung diseases), and my mother, well, she hasn't been given one yet but her condition is rapidly failing.
Unfortunately for a lot of people, and Thane's writer aespecially, My parents, and also my grandparents, several aunts, my friends next door, and every single person I've met in the Cancer wards of the Townsville General Hospital (and that's a lot) are my personal experience in this matter, and every single one of them, all at varying stages of their various diseases, most of which were to deal with the lungs, debunk Thane's disease as written in ME3.
Because simply put, a bacterial lung infection causing metastatic lung cancer does not become an alien version of Sickle Cell Aenemia. The blood can be USED to transport cancerous cells to the other organs, as it did in my father, my grandfather, and my grandmother, but it does not destroy the cells' protein markers that carry oxygen. The lungs cells were what were destroyed, not his blood.
There are a couple of essays written by a medical student and a medical researcher that detail exactly WHY Thane's death was medically inaccurate that BioWare have actually requested to read, and are reading now. If they can acknowledge the problems with it, why can't you guys?