Aller au contenu

Photo

ending is written in stone, war asset points wont matter, whats the point with buying more dlc

Débuté par dsl08002 , juil. 15 2012 03:26

  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
234 réponses à ce sujet

#26
wantedman dan
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:15

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

Blueprotoss wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

AlanC9 wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

AlanC9 wrote...

 Just so I'm following this.... is the argument really that a DLC has to change a game's endings to make buying that DLC worthwhile? Or is it that your guys are still so sad about the endings that you don't want any more ME3?


Problem?


I just like to follow arguments. Is the issue here that you're sad about ME3's ending, or that DLCs in general have to change the ending of a game to be worth buying?


Mass Effect 3, pre-/post-EC, is an abomination and not worth my time to work towards. Where ever did you get that "in general" nonsense?

The nonsense seems to be coming from you since you're being closed-minded and unreasonable.


Yes, because you disagree with me I am "closed-minded and unreasonable." Would you like some coffee with that ad hominem?

Edit: I believe I would. You're on your own.

Modifié par wantedman dan, 15 juillet 2012 - 04:19 .

#27
DriftingMustang
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:21

DriftingMustang
  • Members
  • 93 messages

Tealjaker94 wrote...

I don't buy DLC to change a game's ending. I buy it to give me more content.


this

/thread

#28
AlanC9
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:28

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 825 messages
I guess "butthurt"was the word I was looking for.

Sorry, dan. I shouldn't have lumped you in with the OP. OF course, he's probably where you are too, but he sounded like he was making a general point.

#29
Blueprotoss
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:29

Blueprotoss
  • Members
  • 3 378 messages

wantedman dan wrote...

Yes, because you disagree with me I am "closed-minded and unreasonable." Would you like some coffee with that ad hominem?

 I can disagree with people without them being closed-minded and/or unreasonable while you're comments tell us a different story.

wantedman dan wrote... 

Edit: I believe I would. You're on your own.

I'm not insulting you at all while you should treat others on how you want to be treated. 

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 15 juillet 2012 - 04:30 .

#30
wantedman dan
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:31

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

AlanC9 wrote...

I guess "butthurt"was the word I was looking for.

Sorry, dan. I shouldn't have lumped you in with the OP. OF course, he's probably where you are too, but he sounded like he was making a general point.


I'll look over your change of heart on wording.

Modifié par wantedman dan, 15 juillet 2012 - 04:32 .

#31
wantedman dan
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:32

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

Blueprotoss wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

Yes, because you disagree with me I am "closed-minded and unreasonable." Would you like some coffee with that ad hominem?

 I can disagree with people without them being closed-minded and/or unreasonable while you're comments tell us a different story.

wantedman dan wrote... 

Edit: I believe I would. You're on your own.

I'm not insulting you at all while you should treat others on how you want to be treated. 


Please, elaborate.

#32
AresKeith
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:33

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

Blueprotoss wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

Yes, because you disagree with me I am "closed-minded and unreasonable." Would you like some coffee with that ad hominem?

 I can disagree with people without them being closed-minded and/or unreasonable while you're comments tell us a different story.

wantedman dan wrote... 

Edit: I believe I would. You're on your own.

I'm not insulting you at all while you should treat others on how you want to be treated. 


he's not being closed-minded and unreasonble, he''s stating his opinion and how he feels, when is that ever a problem?

#33
xsdob
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:36

xsdob
  • Members
  • 8 575 messages
What's the point of eating good tasting food? It's not like it matters, I could eat bland paste and still get the same protein and nutrients anyway. It's not like the flavor matters in the long run, it's all just going to be dissolved where I can't see it and end up a big pile a ****s no matter what I eat.

Sometimes it really is for the immediate experience and not the long term placement in the cosmic order of life.

#34
Blueprotoss
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:37

Blueprotoss
  • Members
  • 3 378 messages

wantedman dan wrote...

Please, elaborate.

This is enough to prove you wrong.

wantedman dan wrote...

Mass Effect 3, pre-/post-EC, is an abomination and not worth my time to work towards. Where ever did you get that "in general" nonsense?

 

#35
Blueprotoss
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:37

Blueprotoss
  • Members
  • 3 378 messages

AresKeith wrote...

he's not being closed-minded and unreasonble, he''s stating his opinion and how he feels, when is that ever a problem?

He has a right to an opinion while lashing out at other people for a difference of opinion is what makes him closed-minded and unreasonable.

xsdob wrote...

What's the point of eating good tasting food? It's not like it matters, I could eat bland paste and still get the same protein and nutrients anyway. It's not like the flavor matters in the long run, it's all just going to be dissolved where I can't see it and end up a big pile a ****s no matter what I eat.

Sometimes it really is for the immediate experience and not the long term placement in the cosmic order of life.

This! 

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 15 juillet 2012 - 04:38 .

#36
wantedman dan
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:37

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

Blueprotoss wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

Please, elaborate.

This is enough to prove you wrong.

wantedman dan wrote...

Mass Effect 3, pre-/post-EC, is an abomination and not worth my time to work towards. Where ever did you get that "in general" nonsense?

 


No, it isn't.

#37
Samtheman63
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:38

Samtheman63
  • Members
  • 2 916 messages

DriftingMustang wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

I don't buy DLC to change a game's ending. I buy it to give me more content.


this

/thread


#38
Blueprotoss
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:40

Blueprotoss
  • Members
  • 3 378 messages

wantedman dan wrote...

No, it isn't.

You're better off by moving on or staying on topic based on your general attitude and treatment of others.

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 15 juillet 2012 - 04:40 .

#39
wantedman dan
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:41

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

Blueprotoss wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

No, it isn't.

You're better off by moving on or staying on topic based on your general attitude and treatment of others.


According to whom? I've already stated my piece on this topic.

What have you done?

#40
The Spamming Troll
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:45

The Spamming Troll
  • Members
  • 6 252 messages

AlanC9 wrote...

wantedman dan wrote...

AlanC9 wrote...

 Just so I'm following this.... is the argument really that a DLC has to change a game's endings to make buying that DLC worthwhile? Or is it that your guys are still so sad about the endings that you don't want any more ME3?


Problem?


I just like to follow arguments. Is the issue here that you're sad about ME3's ending, or that DLCs in general have to change the ending of a game to be worth buying?

Edit: feel free to substitute P.O.d, butthurt, or whatever else ywould be more accurate than "sad" above.


either answer is bad. but honestly, id say its atleast becasue of both.

youve only listed 2 of many reasons why someone wouldnt want to buy DLC for ME3.

#41
Memnon
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:45

Memnon
  • Members
  • 1 405 messages

RavenEyry wrote...

Few more gameplay hours was all we got from ME2 DLC.


While this is true, there was always ME3 on the horizon, along with the potential of anything we did with the DLC to have an effect on the ending of the trilogy. This was the driving factor for me, anyways - now, with the endings as they are, I personally don't see a reason to play anything that takes place before the final events

Modifié par Stornskar, 15 juillet 2012 - 04:45 .

#42
Guest_Sion1138_*
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:52

Guest_Sion1138_*
  • Guests
I can see what you guys are thinking, but seriously, gaining more knowledge and assets to help against the Reapers resulting in absolutely nothing, kinda doesn't make sense.

#43
frostajulie
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:53

frostajulie
  • Members
  • 2 083 messages
since the ending delivered emotional satisfaction dlc for the sp campaign will give me more story and add to a game distinctly lacking in build up quests and story. I cannot wait until we get some mission dlc.

#44
Hexley UK
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:54

Hexley UK
  • Members
  • 2 325 messages
I agree with you OP, BiowEAre won't be seeing any more of my cash to extend a game that already crapped all over the ME universe.

#45
zsom
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:55

zsom
  • Members
  • 333 messages
Not a single Bioware DLC has changed the ending of the games. Not the DAO, DA2, ME1/ME2 (yes, not even Arrival) DLC and neither the one we got for ME3 and yet there were several well worth buying. Expecting a DLC which by definition should be something optional and not essential to the main story is wrong.

#46
jakenou
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:56

jakenou
  • Members
  • 3 867 messages
The best thing they can do is give us a new crew mate imo.

#47
Blueprotoss
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:58

Blueprotoss
  • Members
  • 3 378 messages

wantedman dan wrote...

According to whom? I've already stated my piece on this topic.

 If thats the case then you haven't moved on

wantedman dan wrote... 

What have you done?

Pot calling the kettle black.

#48
Guest_Sion1138_*
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:58

Guest_Sion1138_*
  • Guests

zsom wrote...

Not a single Bioware DLC has changed the ending of the games. Not the DAO, DA2, ME1/ME2 (yes, not even Arrival) DLC and neither the one we got for ME3 and yet there were several well worth buying. Expecting a DLC which by definition should be something optional and not essential to the main story is wrong.


There's one small but very important difference between all these titles and ME3.

Modifié par Sion1138, 15 juillet 2012 - 04:59 .

#49
wantedman dan
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:59

wantedman dan
  • Members
  • 3 605 messages

zsom wrote...

Not a single Bioware DLC has changed the ending of the games. Not the DAO, DA2, ME1/ME2 (yes, not even Arrival) DLC and neither the one we got for ME3 and yet there were several well worth buying. Expecting a DLC which by definition should be something optional and not essential to the main story is wrong.


Which of those has the same circumstances as ME3?

#50
MassEffect762
Posté 15 juillet 2012 - 04:59

MassEffect762
  • Members
  • 2 193 messages
eh, whatever they do I hope they do it right.

@zsom

I feel Javik should have been in the vanilla game and not DLC, he's pretty much essential(imo) to the story.

Modifié par MassEffect762, 15 juillet 2012 - 05:01 .

Retourner dans Story, Campaign, and Characters


  1. The BioWare Forum
  2. → Mass Effect
  3. → Mass Effect 3
  4. → Story, Campaign, and Characters